全 5 件のコメント

[–]Dressedw1ngsThe Mighty M3 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, while I wish it would become more mainstream to shit on the Tiger, the KwK36 is pretty much accepted as a decent gun here.

The intention isn't to rewrite history.

[–]nate077 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'e already fallen to the hypnotic sway of godless communism.

[–]hurricane_97 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Implying that being anti-Wehrmarcht is a bad thing?

[–]TankArchivesBolshevist Jew Conspiracy Liason 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The worst parts of the Tiger had nothing to do with the 75 mm Sherman or 76 mm T-34.

[–]ThunderSteeleWorld War 2: Electric Boogaloo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

deny the strength of Tiger agianst Sherman 75mm

The 75mm M3 could use the M61 APC shell that didn't really have a problem with the Tiger's flat 100mm of armor. The British and Soviets used this round more than American Sherman crews did because of our armor doctrine.

and T34 pre 85mm.

The T34/57 and /76 could still take on a Tiger I's flat plate armor. Both had sufficient penetration.

The best chance a Tiger I had was an engagement at range - though the short 88 mounted to the Tiger I wasn't much more accurate than the competition, and the real weaknesses came from it's mechanical unreliability and weird design quirks. (Most of the big cats had gunner's sights that were non-traversable, meaning that keeping up with moving targets was limited to the current F.O.V. and turret traverse.)

The Tiger I wasn't a good design and wasn't reliable in combat conditions and didn't have the same production ability as the T-34 and Sherman. So what we've got is a massive, unreliable box-tank that takes too many resources to produce compared to it's combat performance outside of long-range fights.

Also being an anti-Wehrmacht group isn't a bad thing. Nazis were fucking assholes.

ChristianMunich, is that you?