全 8 件のコメント

[–]futurefightthrowaway 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

We are way above these ideological purity questions. Now is a question of reasons vs feelings, truth vs deception, tolerance vs intolerance etc.

[–]ARTIFICIAL_SAPIENCEI voted! 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think this is one of the dumbest questions I've ever seen. So seriously dumb that I can't even make a snarky comment about sandwiches vs purebread. Or water or air, because even a crappy analogy that doesn't work is more thought than this deserves.

The truth is not always in between, but "purity" is the domain of imbeciles looking to feel good about how little thought they put into something.

[–]Nevone2[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I ask this because of Bernie- I fear that he might cause his fans to widen the gap even more come 2018. I fear that he might cause his followers to try and enforce a certain level of purity that needs to be reached to get their vote- something that would cause much more harm than good.

[–]ARTIFICIAL_SAPIENCEI voted! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do you care to elaborate? I've seen enough accusations of not being pure enough leveled at Sanders that the idea he's now a major source of such a thing takes me aback.

[–]futurefightthrowaway -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think pure white people should still run things. That is just what the white Jesus wanted.

[–]DisapprovingLlamaThe NRA supports Syrian refuges right to buy assault rifles 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ideological purity can suck a dick.

Compromise isn't a bad word, it's how shit gets done.

[–]Nevone2[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I agree, but tell that to the people in the thread on the front page about Bernie coming onto the Late Show. They are still devoted to him- and I fear that purity, above minor compromise, is their goal.