上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (47子コメント)

This thread will remain open but will be heavily policed by the moderation team. Please actually try and use this as a place for civil discussion and not just screaming and swearing looks at SRS and just behave in general. Report any comments that are not civil (in the sense of if they attack another user or are agressive) DO NOT REPORT JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT AGREE WITH SOMEONE'S OPINION. enjoy

EDIT: To all the people saying "er mah gudd how could you endorse a neo nazi"... read the sidebar:

  • " Once a day we shine a spotlight on the small, the big, the new and the old. Our mission is to spotlight unique reddit communities, every damn day."

Nowhere there does it say we endorse ANY of the communities we feature, we just put them under the spotlight for YOU GUYS to make YOUR OWN opinions.

[–]moistowelettes 400ポイント401ポイント  (282子コメント)

I think this sub is running out of subs

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 31ポイント32ポイント  (100子コメント)

you try finding new subreddits that have 500+ subscribers and that haven't been featured before in /r/SubredditOfTheDay whilst also having enough substance in them to make an interesting read and then making sure that you have a post for every day of every month in the year... its hard man

[–]XENOVICE 211ポイント212ポイント  (8子コメント)

Because what you do here is so important. That's how you rationalize promoting this? Jesus.

[–]SaturdayKid 260ポイント261ポイント  (11子コメント)

There's absolutely no excuse for this.

[–]magicsebi 39ポイント40ポイント  (4子コメント)

Just post /r/catgifs three times in a row instead of promoting far right fuckos... Bam, solved!

[–]Fastball14 27ポイント28ポイント  (4子コメント)

SHUT IT DOWN

[–]ErrolFuckingFlynn 23ポイント24ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that the bare minimum of opposition is all it takes for you to start shrieking canned phrases is probably a good sign that your death cult ideology is completely intellectually bankrupt.

[–]JWAxeMan 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

The end of your juvenile club will be the minute internet anonymity goes away. When we see that 90% of your users are in high school or below.

[–]Dominator27 167ポイント168ポイント  (27子コメント)

Why don't you at least not promote nazis. It can't be that hard to do a quick scan of that sub and conclude these people are racist nazis and then move on to another eligible subreddit.

Also Why should racist bigots get a award because your too lazy to find non racist sexist subreddits?

[–]Njallstormborn 40ポイント41ポイント  (1子コメント)

You legitimize these people by featuring them here.

[–]TrumpHasASmallPenis 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

On purpose. Apparently there's a neo-nazi alt-righter on the mod team.

[–]qTimes2 36ポイント37ポイント  (21子コメント)

I don't believe /r/ainbow, /r/Islam or /r/Mexico have been featured before. Knowing the controversy some of those subjects generate on reddit I'm sure you'd be able to come up with plenty of interesting questions.

Feel free to PM me if you need even more suggestions.

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 6ポイント7ポイント  (18子コメント)

I will look into featuring all three of those, thank you

[–]umatik 6ポイント7ポイント  (17子コメント)

I'm sure your alt right Co mod will love that discussion...

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 1ポイント2ポイント  (16子コメント)

We have featured many subreddits that I personally dislike. Why must you project your own fear of differing opinions onto me?

[–]umatik 8ポイント9ポイント  (14子コメント)

Who says I fear differing opinions?

I'm a non white antifascist that shakes hands and discusses with old school neo nazis who have called me vermin that don't try to sugar coat your position like you new cowards do.

Sick strawman failure. This is why even outright neonazis laugh at your new breed and don't respect you for failing to try to rationalise your thoughts with the unsavoury outcome of it.

My post had nothing to do with you fearing those subs. I just said I bet you'll love the discussion.

Stop projecting.

[–]Zorkamork 16ポイント17ポイント  (15子コメント)

I'm sorry that it's apparently too hard to find a sub that isn't literally proud white nationalists to feature. This sounds like a very hard job no one is making you do, guess you had no choice but to feature nazis!

[–]-Lautrec- 361ポイント362ポイント  (28子コメント)

But as we all know; Reddit is extremely liberally biased. Ultimately we will be banned if for no other reason than we’ve become too popular.

Reddit is so liberally biased that every second /r/all submission comes from the-donald

[–]Carl_B 144ポイント145ポイント  (4子コメント)

Don't let facts get in the way of a persecution complex!

[–]nenyim 35ポイント36ポイント  (1子コメント)

The alt-right warned us. Persecution complex, the PC culture where you can't call a racist a racist, feels before reals, the safe spaces or keyboard warriors like the_donald.

The more time pass the more they resemble the strawmen they love to hate.

[–]20person 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

The more time pass the more they resemble the strawmen they love to hate.

They've just been projecting the whole time.

[–]Lord_Kek 87ポイント88ポイント  (10子コメント)

It would be every post but they had to nerf r/all.

[–]stubing 37ポイント38ポイント  (9子コメント)

It wasn't so much as a nerf, but more of the Admins removing that sticky voting trick.

[–]Lord_Kek 4ポイント5ポイント  (8子コメント)

It wasn't so much that they modified reddit's algorithm so they could stop a certain sub's posts getting to the front page. It's that they modified reddit's algorithm to stop a certain sub's posts from getting to the front page.

[–]quantumhovercraft 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

It wasn't so much that they modified reddit's algorithm so they could stop a certain sub's posts getting to the front page. It's that they modified reddit's algorithm to stop a certain sub's posts covering the entire front page.

[–]oscillator- 26ポイント27ポイント  (2子コメント)

Its the conservative mantra now. Even though they just won the election nobody hears or cares about them still. They are going to keep throwing political tantrums just like the GOP. I am fairly convinced conservatives as a whole and the GOP have no policy other than if the DEMs or a liberal thought of it it is bad. In theory they should stand for small government and low spending but neither of those is true either. Its a party for the rich that manipulate the idiots inside of it to think they are working for them. Then they'll cry this is why we voted trump! Admitting they have no inner functioning other than knee jerk cry baby reactions.

[–]Mr_Barry_Shitpeas 42ポイント43ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yes, so biased against them that manipulating votes never got them banned.

[–]In_Liberty 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would have been almost every post if Reddit hasn't adjusted their algorithm to suppress t_d.

[–]CantSayISaidSo 386ポイント387ポイント  (70子コメント)

I'd like to put a huge target on my back and let all you fascist fucks know that myself and my two very white, very Anglo-descended brothers have all procreated with women of color.

Death to your vision of America. I'm proud to be doing my part.

[–]atheistness 72ポイント73ポイント  (0子コメント)

You sir are a true patriot. Have an upvote.

[–]TheManInsideMe 89ポイント90ポイント  (3子コメント)

This post is awesome and you're awesome. I've been waiting to get my 'race traitor' card for a while.

How's your inbox doing?

[–]CantSayISaidSo 65ポイント66ポイント  (2子コメント)

Oh, man, there are currently so many fascists in my inbox, one would think I was sponsoring a book burning.

The good news is it makes it easy to identify and block all the neo-Nazis so I don't have to see their drivel on my Reddit feed.

[–]StealthDrone 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

any chance you can screen shot a few. I'm Brown Canadian, so I never received fascist mail. 😭😢

[–]umatik 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The best kind of nation is miscegenation!

[–]itsnotlupus 200ポイント201ポイント  (57子コメント)

I see this sub is exploring the fine line between being morally neutral and being morally bankrupt.

Will they find the line? Stay tuned.

[–]Dominator27 212ポイント213ポイント  (39子コメント)

What the Fuck! The Alt right gets featured it's like r/theredpill all over again. First Furry porn then a bunch of KKK endorsers who believe nonsense like the "white genocide" conspiracy. A bunch of neo-nazis (with pepes) don't deserve this reward!

Edit: I've created a protest Subreddit! To protest clear mod bias and giving a voice to some of the most digusting people on reddit /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]RuthBuzzisback 593ポイント594ポイント  (390子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me..?

[–]YopperApe 252ポイント253ポイント  (185子コメント)

Wow.

Just wow.

I can't even...

[–]Agastopia 248ポイント249ポイント  (183子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

I see you're new to the alt right.

to demonize all Jew's just seems too similar to me to blacks demonizing all whites for the success of many.

Are whites actively undermining blacks? No? Then it's not comparable.

Listen, I'm sure good jews exist. I mean there's the color of crime guy and Paul Gottfried. Outside of that though? Zip. Nada. Zilch.

encourage you to look for exceptions. I tried for a long time to find "good jew" exceptions but consistently they would start jewing somehow and come out in favour of everything we're against. Like the "conservative" jews who ends up being in favour of muslim immigration. Or "libertarian" jews who end up being in favour of importing mestizos. Or "free speech" jews who end up being in favour of political correctness. It never fails, they always jew you in the end.

I can agree there is theoretically a capacity for certain jews to contribute in a positive manner. However it is like finding a unicorn pretty much. And the chance he's gonna jew you and undermine your entire movement is magnitudes higher. Hence for our own preservation we can't really risk anything.

[–]YopperApe 80ポイント81ポイント  (116子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

Yes we are. That's one of the defining features of the alt-right, that we're racist. Where did you get the idea that it was otherwise?

[–]Agastopia 171ポイント172ポイント  (52子コメント)

At least you admit it

[–]YopperApe 31ポイント32ポイント  (51子コメント)

Now that that's out of the way, what was your point?

[–]survivalsong 57ポイント58ポイント  (1子コメント)

I love this attitude that if you just front up about being racist people will be stumped somehow. Like if you own it you'll take all the power out of it. We already know that alt-right is built on unreconstructed old-school racism.

[–]RushofBlood52 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, that was basically it.

[–]TotesMessenger 52ポイント53ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]EnobyRavenWay 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi my name is Ebony Dark'ness Dementia Raven Way and I have long ebony black hair (that's how I got my name) with purple streaks and red tips that reaches my mid-back and icy blue eyes like limpid tears and a lot of people tell me I look like Amy Lee (AN: if u don't know who she is get da hell out of here!). I'm not related to Gerard Way but I wish I was because he's a major fucking hottie. I'm a vampire but my teeth are straight and white. I have pale white skin. I'm also a witch, and I go to a magic school called Hogwarts in England where I'm in the seventh year (I'm seventeen). I'm a goth (in case you couldn't tell) and I wear mostly black. I love Hot Topic and I buy all my clothes from there. For example today I was wearing a black corset with matching lace around it and a black leather miniskirt, pink fishnets and black combat boots. I was wearing black lipstick, white foundation, black eyeliner and red eye shadow. I was walking outside Hogwarts. It was snowing and raining so there was no sun, which I was very happy about. A lot of preps stared at me. I put up my middle finger at them.

[–]Mulche_ 50ポイント51ポイント  (17子コメント)

Remember guys, "that's racist" isn't a counter-argument.

[–]_The_Burn_ 37ポイント38ポイント  (13子コメント)

Although racism is a cardinal sin to most, within the Alt Right, it is irrelevant. There is a dichotomy between the standards of morality.

[–]Sansa_Culotte_ 30ポイント31ポイント  (0子コメント)

Correct, it's a statement of fact.

[–]niton 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

We as a society say some things are reprehensible enough to expunge. Murder and theft for example. Civilized society decided that while these do provide significant benefit to the people performing them, it isn't proper considering those hurt by these same actions. Similarly, we as a society decided that discrimination and bigotry based on race was reprehensible and unjust. So yes, by being racist you're going against the norms of any modern, civilized society. It is a counter-argument and a very effective one.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 12ポイント13ポイント  (28子コメント)

...well what is your counter? And remember: not every member speaks for the group. Why don't you target Israeli subs or groups for being the most "racist" country on the planet. They do ethnic DNA test for entry and have a machine gun mounted border wall, and take in no "refugees." Pointing out the hypocrisy and subversion of the Jewish tribe is a core principle in the Alt Right.

[–]flint97 49ポイント50ポイント  (12子コメント)

Counter to what? The claim that this guy has only met stereotypical jews? We are not clairvoyant. And why should random jews who quite possibly do not even live in Israel be forced to answer for the racism there?

[–]TheManInsideMe 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

My exact reaction.

Followed by,

'Wait for real?'

Then,

'Am I on r/hatesubreddits-- nope'

Then,

'Maybe there's a reason-- no he said race realism in the first line'

And finally,

uncontrollable vomiting

[–]theaccountismine 139ポイント140ポイント  (33子コメント)

the SPLC literally has a profile on the alt right. it is a self professed white supremacist group.

if anyone else is sick of this shit, imzy is public and needs a bigger userbase. Nazis need not apply.

[–]BullishOnTheBear 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Uh they also think a cartoon frog meme is a white nationalist symbol. So yea.

[–]xfLyFPS 27ポイント28ポイント  (27子コメント)

SPLC also thinks fucking Infowars is a nazi site. They're a joke.

[–]Karmaisforsuckers 130ポイント131ポイント  (6子コメント)

So the SPLC is right again

[–]xfLyFPS 21ポイント22ポイント  (5子コメント)

I don't see any swastikas and calls to gas the kikes and lynch the niggers on Infowars. That's the Daily Stormer.

[–]TrumpHasASmallPenis 41ポイント42ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a site run by white supremacists that promotes the same things. The rhetoric is just less inflammatory.

[–]theaccountismine 80ポイント81ポイント  (8子コメント)

Stunningly, a guy who constantly shouts about (((globalists))) is loved by anti semites. Who would've thought?

[–]FuckTrumpWithAGlock 18ポイント19ポイント  (9子コメント)

That site that denies that the holocaust happened is a Nazi site? NO WAAAAAAAAAAAY.

[–]Heyitskristin918 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean Infowars does hate Jewish people

[–]Dominator27 314ポイント315ポイント  (9子コメント)

Hey anyone who happens to read this. Altright got featured because the writer is a bias mod who used his power to promote his garbage beliefs. He posts in mutiple pro-Trump subreddits and rants about SJWs and his comments here clearly prove he agrees with them. I thought Trumpers would be againist bias mods considering how much they complained about r/politics! SAD! This guy let his personal bias chose who to nominate for the award SROTD. Oh and his avatar is a nazi anime girl [the girl is pulled straight from the post] damning proof right there that this mod is with the altright (altright loves memes and anime) but cleary altright is not nazis of course not, just "racist realists" or "people who take pride in being white". We need to stand up to this mod's corruption of this subreddit and how he rigged the system to get nazis featured on this subreddit because he is one. We will start a movement and start a new Subreddit!!! /r/goodsubredditoftheday!

Hey mods don't remove this unless you want to be a facist! Because that's how free speech works!/s

[–]Kropotqueer 63ポイント64ポイント  (3子コメント)

by the way, this is the largest alt right sub on the net.

just in case anyone was wondering whether they were actually nazis.

[–]akjax 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Literally the only thing worth reading on this entire page.

Good idea. It would be a nice companion to /r/UpliftingNews. In fact, that would be a great sub to feature!

[–]sverzino 64ポイント65ポイント  (9子コメント)

I like how alt-righters think they're so much smarter than everyone else but they placed their faith into a failed businessman who has never held firmly onto an opinion in his life.

[–]Phunk131 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

"He's draining the swamp."

Cabinet full of career politicians and corporate lobbyists.

[–]thekangzwewuz 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Strange definition of "failed businessman" when the guy in question is worth billions.

But I agree, Trump is not a good choice for president. I think even he might agree with that. The point was that everyone else was much worse.

And most people who voted for Trump aren't "alt-right."

[–]Monk_on_Fire 51ポイント52ポイント  (2子コメント)

Man, fuck this shit. That subreddit ought to be banned and here you are promoting it.

[–]Captain_Arrrg 54ポイント55ポイント  (25子コメント)

Bunch of white people trying to make themselves feel better about being worthless by associating themselves with achievements they had absolutely nothing to do with, based solely on thier melanin content. Makes total sense me.

[–]ProudWhiteMann 9ポイント10ポイント  (22子コメント)

Not really it's mostly about combating white guilt making sure we don't become minorities in our own lands and recognizing racial differences.

[–]FuriousTarts 28ポイント29ポイント  (5子コメント)

Maybe being a minority wouldn't be so bad if you didn't treat minorities like shit.

[–]ProudWhiteMann 7ポイント8ポイント  (4子コメント)

Tell me one non white country were minorities are treated better than in the West also tell me about a country with more troublesome minorities than Western ones.

[–]Meatssacre 83ポイント84ポイント  (2子コメント)

What the actual fuck?

[–]Dominator27 47ポイント48ポイント  (0子コメント)

The moderator is a member of the/supports /r/altright so he featured it

[–]Shitgenstein 38ポイント39ポイント  (14子コメント)

I'm curious for any alt-right users here, I have a question. I will not try to argue against your answer. I will respect your right to have the views which you have.

How do things like "Human Bio-Diversity" and "race realism" differ from concepts like polygenism and scientific racism which are widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

[–]CertifiedRabbi 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's pretty obvious that human biodiversity and race realism are just politically correct euphemisms for scientific racism. The only reason that we use those terms is to put people at ease because modern sensibilities have been so skewed towards automatically and violently rejecting White bigotry. But the idea that scientific racism has been thoroughly debunked is a talking point that anti-racist liberals like to spout in order to discredit our ideas. And just because certain aspects of 19th century and early 20th century scientific racism were nonsense, that doesn't mean that everything that they espoused was nonsense or that more recent scientific racism is just a rehash of discredited ideas.

Reality also isn't a popularity contest. I could be the only person in the entire world that believes that not all racial groups are equally intelligent and civilized, but that wouldn't mean that I'm wrong. Yes, we know that the scientific and academic community completely despises us, but that isn't because our ideas are BS. Our views simply aren't politically correct.

Eugenics is a perfect example of a completely valid scientific idea falling out of fashion simply because it offends modern liberal sensibilities. Not only is it possible to improve the human gene pool through genetic screening, embryo selection, cloning, genetic engineering, selective breeding, polygamy, artificial insemination, et cetera, but it's absolutely vital to the long-term health of our species and our environment.

It's widely known in environmentalist circles that human overpopulation is the root cause of most environmental issues. Everything from climate change to overfishing is mostly caused by too many people living on this planet. So, if the human population needs to be dramatically reduced in order to fix this problem (which most scientists and environmentalists are hesitant to publicly acknowledge because they don't want to be accused of being evil Nazis), then eugenics is obviously the most logical solution to this problem, because if you have to dramatically reduce the human population then obviously it just makes sense to select for the best and the brightest.

Who wouldn't want to live in an environmentally sustainable society that had a guaranteed income, an army of AI robots (but not so smart that they pose a threat to us) to take care of the dirty work, and a beautiful and healthy citizenry comprised of Mensa members? We'll soon have the scientific know-how to make that neo-Nazi utopia a reality, but what we lack is the political will to implement it (thanks to the progressive Left). The Alt-Right exists to solve this problem.

Dysgenics is also a massive problem that's being completely ignored because the solutions lead you down a path towards the Fourth Reich.

Eugenics has to be one of the most important and powerful ideas in all of human history, but it's being suppressed simply because it reeks of Nazism. So, while the progressive Left just loves to claim that the conservative religious Right is getting in the way of scientific and human progress, when it comes to eugenics it's the liberal Left that's preventing our species from making the next major leap forward.

You can tell that the scientific community is completely terrified of new developments in genetic research bolstering our racist weltanschauung. Once we get a better idea of which genes are responsible for human behavior, we'll finally be able to solidly prove that some racial groups are inherently superior to other racial groups. You can also tell that the scientific community is extremely nervous about discovering that the genes that are responsible for intelligence won't be evenly distributed throughout the various "population groups" (the politically correct term for race). Acknowledging that racial and class differences have a genetic basis will completely undermine the central pillar of modern progressive ideology.

Scientists like James Watson and Hans Eysenck weren't quacks. They were treated like heretics for daring to dissent from modern progressive orthodoxy.

If you want to learn more about modern scientific racism, then you should check out people like Stephen Hsu [1][2][3]. He's allowed to get away with espousing racist, Nazi-ish ideas because he isn't White, and because he's very careful to moderate his views by paying lip service to progressive egalitarian ideology.

[–]AFlyingMexican5 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

Okay but let's say that you're right and that scientists have stopped studying "race realism" and what not. How can you guys probe you're correct, are any of you folks scientists?

[–]bitchy_witcher 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

The data still exists. Most scientists refuse to draw conclusions from it, but you don't need an advanced degree to grasp the implications of a government-funded double-blind study that reveals black people are twice as likely to speed.

And there are still some scientists whose loyalty to scientific truth is stronger than their need for funding. A famous example is James Watson, Nobel prize winner and co-discoverer of the DNA double helix structure, who said:

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address. His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”. He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”. He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.

[–]bitchy_witcher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's better to say that "scientific racism" is a dysphemism for human biodiversity and race realism.

[–]RedPillDessert 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even with monogenism, a lot can happen in 100,000 years in terms of evolution, especially if you subscribe to the Punctuated Equilibrium theory in evolution.

As for the term "race realism", I think that's partially a rebranding of "scientific racism" and I can speculate (but can't be 100% sure) that the latter was discredited due to left-wing/liberal bias, and never really went away.

[–]RAKtheUndead 40ポイント41ポイント  (7子コメント)

Oh, yes, because what Reddit really needs is more springboards for these fascist lunatics.

[–]CuckzBTFO 4ポイント5ポイント  (6子コメント)

Nah, we need more liberal echo-chambers full of Marxist thinkers.

[–]RAKtheUndead 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Guess what? There are political opinions between the far-left and far-right and the vast majority of them work better than your "find the scapegoat, blame the scapegoat" antics.

Interesting username as well. Hope you don't mind me rubbing one out to your insecurity and fear.

[–]No_Politics_ 29ポイント30ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good job Reddit! The sub of the day literally has Hitler in their banner. Literally fucking Hitler.

[–]TotesMessenger 58ポイント59ポイント  (32子コメント)

[–]Lokismoke 90ポイント91ポイント  (11子コメント)

Reddit's very own NatSoc community.

I take it you mean National Socialist community?! TF?! That's "Alt Right" in the same way the sounds of a man stuffing a pile of baby gerbils into a hollowed out watermelon is "Alt Rock."

[–]cxl61 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think the Nazi description is somewhat accurate, even though not all people on that sub are at the Hitler level of racist. (These groups were the first to call themselves alt-right, while the term only more recently came to denote the more moderate pro-Trump movements that primarily oppose the political establishment)

[–]081624 63ポイント64ポイント  (5子コメント)

No, that is alt right. Ok not all alt right people are national socialists but they are all racists, and that's the entire point. You just think alt right isn't about racism because people like Hillary Clinton told you it's about racism, and redditors have this Pavlovian response where whenever Hillary says something you assume it's false and call her out of touch.

[–]PurpleKneesocks 32ポイント33ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think it's about racism because the sidebar of the subreddit says it's in support of racial purity, and a lot of the users posting here seem to really hate Jews and racial "inbreeding".

[–]EagleDarkX 44ポイント45ポイント  (7子コメント)

What would a website be without it's own NatSoc community AKA Nazi's?

Wait, I know that one, a better place to be.

[–]jereddit 39ポイント40ポイント  (6子コメント)

Is this for real? That sub is some stormfront shit. It should be fucking quarantined.

[–]LynxRufus 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well. We've normalized racism by allowing this shit. Time to get louder. Reddit enables racism. Reddit is a part of the problem.

[–]picassopolo 29ポイント30ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice job promoting hate speech!

[–]oscillator- 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is there a viable reddit alternative? TD has permeated reddit to strongly and its tiring. I can only read so much hate propaganda per day. I do not want to give ad revenue to a company that supports each speech (i.e. reddit)

[–]ElvishisnotTengwar 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you fucking joking?

[–]BaloneyFactory 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

I thought /r/stormfront was already dealt with.

Then I went to the actual sub. Are you kidding me? It's literally a hate group networking site. WTF, Reddit? Just mirror 4chan already.

[–]yesididmakeanother 40ポイント41ポイント  (12子コメント)

/r/altright is a subreddit of peace.

[–]TwerkersOfTheWorld 15ポイント16ポイント  (7子コメント)

* for whites only

[–]ddplz 5ポイント6ポイント  (6子コメント)

Isn't that what the BLM movement has been about? Creating safe places of colour?

[–]aggie1391 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

Which is why my lily white ass has been welcome at BLM protests, right? Or maybe that's because I'm a (((globalist))) and we're funding them or some bullshit, right?

[–]ddplz 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

They have no issue with nu-males who will bend to their will. Don't expect to stick around if they ever get their way.

[–]ruddiger718 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nope, its about POC getting the privileges whites have enjoyed so long, if they were taken away, they would complain about losing basic rights; i.e. NOT getting killed by police, NOT being turned away from jobs because the color of their skin, NOT being seen a second rate citizen. You know, basic human shit. America is supposed to be the safe place for ALL colors, white, black, and all shades inbetween. Would you prefer water fountains and the back of busses be considered the "safe space" for POC?

[–]ddplz 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you agreeing with me? My whole point is BLM protestors on campuses rallying for "blacks only" rooms and racial segregation in the name of "safe spaces".

The water fountain thing is what they want.

[–]TrumpHasASmallPenis 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No. It's about fighting against institutional racism and standing up for your rights.

[–]aggie1391 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Except for praising the dude who committed genocide against Jews like me. Yeah totally nothing wrong there!

[–]roflocalypselol 26ポイント27ポイント  (6子コメント)

Okay since apparently this is happening... the Alt Right as defined by its creators is a racial awareness movement. The alt-right as coopted by Breitbart, The_donald, Milo, etc. is not. They just wanted a way to say non-establishment conservatives and well...picked a confusing label. The Alt Right considers those people 'alt light' or still 'normies'.

[–]cxl61 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

The sub featured here is more of that actual white nationalist movement, compared to that less extreme Trump movement that's also used the label.

[–]CuckNorris1 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Alt light is still fairly race realist, they just dog whistle more and don't write about it as clearly.

[–]roflocalypselol 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some are, many aren't. I'd say most subscribe to cultural explanations that correlate with race, rather than genetic determination.

[–]boomshrub 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj6QIy4ph4I

Promoting this ideology is disgraceful and you should be ashamed.

[–]waystogetaround 16ポイント17ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wow..., Oh my, the poor naive souls over at SRD and other metasureddits are going to have hard time to even.

These are the people who are convinced that the folks at /r/The_Donald are literally(for real) Hitler 2.0, wonder what that makes us.

[–]Myne1001 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I commented this on an article about Breitbart around the time Bannon joined the Trump campaign

"You think Breitbart is bad? Just you wait until you go further down the rabbit hole. Then you'll be thinking Breitbart is moderate"

[–]George_Rockwell 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

christ I can't wait. If we thought the salt from this election was yuuge...

[–]raging_dope_fiend 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm pretty sure even the_donald hates these people (if their putting down stakes on r/thenewright is any indicator).

[–]Gigadweeb 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

lmao fucking reddit promoting literal fascists

why do I even bother visiting

[–]varukasalt 1ポイント2ポイント  (9子コメント)

What in the holy Fuck? Have you lost your fucking minds? Literally ZERO reason to promote these Nazi scum. I can only assume the mods here are sympathizers. Fuck everything about this.

[–]citizen_beyond 27ポイント28ポイント  (47子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity.

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State. All problems in the world are to be ultimately solved by the State. Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before. But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 84ポイント85ポイント  (42子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity

/r/im14andthisisdeep

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Did you just put together a bunch of words that would make you sound smart?

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

Ah, yes.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

I know the whole IQ thing is a big sticking point for Nazis, but the difference in IQ between white people and non-white people is not large enough to completely exclude any chance of being as good or better than the average white person.

You're acting like the mental function between a black person and a white person is as wide as it is between a human and a dog.

The smartest, functioning dog is not smarter than the dumbest functioning human.

Whereas the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State

The fuck?

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means.

And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

[–]anechoicmedia 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

We had to cross many ideological boundaries to get where we are today, reading books that may have been illegal in our countries, going against the dominant media message, making changes that lost us family and friends. We grew up in the same liberal-egalitarian monoculture as everyone else, and we left it.

Dissidence is no guarantee of truth, but if anyone here is to lay claim to having demonstrated an openness to new ways of thinking, it's those on the Alt-Right.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Often asserted, never proved. For what it's worth, most intelligence researchers think there is a genetic contribution to black-white intelligence gaps in the United States, probably a large contribution, and that's not something that culture and economy can paper over.

the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

"The tallest woman is taller than the shortest man, therefore the male-female height gap has no genetic component."

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

The United States was a de jure white supermajority state prior to the 1965 Hart-Celler Act.

[–]SocialNationalism 10ポイント11ポイント  (12子コメント)

r/Iam14andthisisdeep

r/notanargument

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Christianity isn't necessarily theistic, it could be about Jesus' teachings and interpretations of them without believing in his divinity; obviously this is just semantic snark over a thing called a metaphor.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

r/notanargument and you're responding to a comment about a meme with stereotypes about a group of people. Also, *renowned.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Assertion without evidence.

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means. And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

NAxALT, bro.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

The liberal mind in a nutshell.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 38ポイント39ポイント  (11子コメント)

Assertion without evidence

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

NAxALT, bro

I have a tip for white nationalists who want to make arguments.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories?

Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets?

Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung.

SUCH SUCCESS.

MUCH PARADISE.

[–]SocialNationalism 5ポイント6ポイント  (10子コメント)

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

No... Unless you are including eugenics.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories? Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets? Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung. SUCH SUCCESS. MUCH PARADISE.

Not an argument.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 28ポイント29ポイント  (7子コメント)

No...

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

It wasn't meant to be an argument, you dullard.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

There's nothing to argue.

It was just facts.

Deal with it.

[–]SocialNationalism 7ポイント8ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Finally you get something right.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

It was just facts.

Asking dumb questions then calling them facts... that's not an argument.

[–]George_Rockwell 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm enjoying watching a /u/SocialNationalism go at it with a /u/SpectreOfLenin

Truly 2016 is the best timeline

[–]SocialNationalism 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

ikr seeing this shit is like bait to me

[–]George_Rockwell 10ポイント11ポイント  (18子コメント)

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

You're gonna want to hold onto your tendies for this one:

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis "supports the traditional racial groups classification." http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

96-97% of whites have no African ancestry. http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans.3.html

97% of Whites have no black ancestry whatsoever. http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-white-black-a-murky-distinction-grows-still-murkier/

There was "minimal gene flow" between archaic Europeans and Asians. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning. http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf

Human intelligence is highly heritable. http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The average African IQ is estimated at 79. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has a 40-50% genetic basis. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among Whites. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n 2005-1.pdf

[–]SpectreOfLenin 33ポイント34ポイント  (15子コメント)

None of that dispels what the core of my arguments are; and frankly there is quite a lot of assumption going on here.

Assuming that I'm in favor of mass, unregulated migration. I'm not.

Assuming that I said there is no biological difference between races. I didn't. I said that if there is a difference it is negligible with that persons conditions.

And you're assuming I think people are naturally intercultural. I didn't.

I openly acknowledge that people tend toward their own culture. What I have said is that it is more beneficial to us if we base our society off cooperation between peoples rather than forceful separation of cultures

If you don't want mass migration, get rid of the conditions that cause it. Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

Those have always been the core of my arguments. What you typed is just noise.

[–]George_Rockwell 11ポイント12ポイント  (9子コメント)

A society of 70 IQ people simply will not achieve what one made up of 100 IQ people will. Ever.

Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

I think I can agree with almost all of this, actually.

[–]cojago 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

I said that if there is a difference it is negligible with that persons conditions.

This is demonstrably wrong based on sources posted by /u/George_Rockwell. A quick look through the sources shows data showing that blacks from the wealthiest set of families, even raised among wealthy white families, perform more poorly, academically, than the white children of the poorest set of white families. The data implies that race is a better indicator of academic performance than income, opportunity, or culture, the exact opposite of your claim.

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

[–]anechoicmedia 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Assuming that I'm in favor of mass, unregulated migration. I'm not.

You previously criticized efforts at large scale deportation as resulting in inevitable genocide. I don't see how one can oppose the enforcement action necessary to control immigration and not be, de facto, in favor of mass unregulated immigration.

[–]stairway-to-kevin 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I seriously don't have time to fully address this, but none of your claims are true (at least regarding the biological reality of race and the genetics of IQ) and any third party seeing this should know that.

[–]thorneedsahaircut 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, this is an actual physical form of autism

[–]treebog 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it's trying to communicate

[–]GreatApeNiggy 22ポイント23ポイント  (45子コメント)

I wouldn't exactly call us a NatSoc community. Are there NatSoc's who consider themselves Alt Right? Sure. But there are many other groups, as well.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 22ポイント23ポイント  (30子コメント)

I was basing that title on the fact that Hitler and Mussolini are featured on the topbar of /r/altright.

Don't take anything that I said in the feature as a description of the alt right in general. Everything that I wrote is intended to be a description of your sub and it's interpretation of the alt right.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 11ポイント12ポイント  (26子コメント)

Not an issue. I was just pointing out that the Alt Right is a spectrum. You've got NatSocs and even people further right than that on one end and still others on the other end who think that NatSoc ideology is counter-productive. Ultimately we try to give a nod to all factions without judgement, which is why Jared Taylor is also on the banner, a person who some consider weak on the JQ.

[–]Charli3R 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

They have Hitler in their header. HITLER. Thanks.

[–]Ad_Homonym_ 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not sure if this was your intention, but the SPLC just got a $100 donation. Fuck the alt-right.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (14子コメント)

There is exists no intellectual curiosity here. Im certain most of you did not read the intro, much less checked out any of the alt right websites. I say this because your complaints are far off the mark

[–]RAKtheUndead 15ポイント16ポイント  (10子コメント)

Well, given that the last time that fascists controlled the world's most powerful countries, my relatives were being bombed and shot at by the soldiers of those fascist countries, I don't think there's anything to be curious about.

[–]George_Rockwell 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Reminder: Sort by controversial.

This should be good fam.