上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (1子コメント)

This thread will remain open but will be heavily policed by the moderation team. Please actually try and use this as a place for civil discussion and not just screaming and swearing looks at SRS and just behave in general. Report any comments that are not civil (in the sense of if they attack another user or are agressive) DO NOT REPORT JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT AGREE WITH SOMEONE'S OPINION. enjoy

EDIT: To all the people saying "er mah gudd how could you endorse a neo nazi"... read the sidebar:

  • " Once a day we shine a spotlight on the small, the big, the new and the old. Our mission is to spotlight unique reddit communities, every damn day."

Nowhere there does it say we endorse ANY of the communities we feature, we just put them under the spotlight for YOU GUYS to make YOUR OWN opinions.

[–]-Lautrec- 122ポイント123ポイント  (9子コメント)

But as we all know; Reddit is extremely liberally biased. Ultimately we will be banned if for no other reason than we’ve become too popular.

Reddit is so liberally biased that every second /r/all submission comes from the-donald

[–]Lord_Kek 38ポイント39ポイント  (3子コメント)

It would be every post but they had to nerf r/all.

[–]stubing 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

It wasn't so much as a nerf, but more of the Admins removing that sticky voting trick.

[–]Lord_Kek 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

It wasn't so much that they modified reddit's algorithm so they could stop a certain sub's posts getting to the front page. It's that they modified reddit's algorithm to stop a certain sub's posts from getting to the front page.

[–]quantumhovercraft 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It wasn't so much that they modified reddit's algorithm so they could stop a certain sub's posts getting to the front page. It's that they modified reddit's algorithm to stop a certain sub's posts covering the entire front page.

[–]Carl_B 23ポイント24ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't let facts get in the way of a persecution complex!

[–]Mr_Barry_Shitpeas 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes, so biased against them that manipulating votes never got them banned.

[–]CrsIaanix 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

manipulating votes

Still no evidence of this. Keep spreading the false narrative though, that's what you people are good at.

[–]moistowelettes 238ポイント239ポイント  (193子コメント)

I think this sub is running out of subs

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 19ポイント20ポイント  (54子コメント)

you try finding new subreddits that have 500+ subscribers and that haven't been featured before in /r/SubredditOfTheDay whilst also having enough substance in them to make an interesting read and then making sure that you have a post for every day of every month in the year... its hard man

[–]XENOVICE 130ポイント131ポイント  (5子コメント)

Because what you do here is so important. That's how you rationalize promoting this? Jesus.

[–]Dominator27 113ポイント114ポイント  (24子コメント)

Why don't you at least not promote nazis. It can't be that hard to do a quick scan of that sub and conclude these people are racist nazis and then move on to another eligible subreddit.

Also Why should racist bigots get a award because your too lazy to find non racist sexist subreddits?

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 22ポイント23ポイント  (137子コメント)

When we feature subs you don't like that doesn't mean we're running out of subs, it means we're featuring subs you don't like. The srotd team is a diverse group of individuals each with their own interests and style. That is why we're able to select a new interesting subreddit every single day.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 284ポイント285ポイント  (50子コメント)

Yeah, that's the problem with Nazis.

Not the mass genocide and ethnic cleansing.

No, it's the fact that they have different opinions is the REAL issue!

[–]cookingfragsyum 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fucking A-game smackdown in this thread, Spectre. You are a fine example.

[–]Dominator27 62ポイント63ポイント  (24子コメント)

remember moderator when you give out this award you give these people a voice, however they don't deserve a voice for their racist propaganda that takes advantage of insecure whites nor a award for it

Edit: Protest Subreddit is up /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]Hell_Libertine 124ポイント125ポイント  (33子コメント)

Shame on you for promoting hatred. What's next? You're going to link subs promoting ISIS? You're promoting fucking Neo-Nazis so that won't surprise me.

[–]XENOVICE 131ポイント132ポイント  (12子コメント)

You're promoting hate.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 9ポイント10ポイント  (8子コメント)

France excluding non-French = Hate. France becoming non-French = Love.

[–]XENOVICE 44ポイント45ポイント  (5子コメント)

Culture is a fluid thing, always has been. Accomplishing this thing you call 'exclusion' involves inflicting mass suffering on people. We can't roll back time.

Culture is also what you do, how you speak with others, and who you speak with. The modern state of those things is irrevocably different from anything that came before it. Even if you were to force an 'exclusion' (as previous authoritarian regimes have tried, to horror), it would lead to an entirely new form of culture bearing even less resemblance to your fantasy of the past than before.

This desire is self defeating but is propagated by power hungry people willing to do the violence while you lay around shitposting 'remove kebab' memes.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

You can't make a German into a Japanese person. No matter how long he lives in Japan he will never be Japanese.

Once the French are a minority in France it isn't France anymore.

[–]XENOVICE 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

None of those things are monolithic. There are more Americas then there are Americans. Initiating violence against innocent people on behalf of an abstraction is indefensible, and an ideology that promotes racial supremacy promotes racial violence.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why does nearly all of the world promote racial violence by keeping their nations the same?

[–]scobes 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

When was the last time you visited France?

[–]NWVoS 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tell me, how similar are the Franks of old to the French of now?

[–]Fubby2 29ポイント30ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reddit. The only place where forced diversity is a sin, until you are supporting Nazis.

[–]f3ldman2 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at you! Opening up our minds and filling it with racists and nazis! Thanks so much for expanding our horizons!

[–]Sansa_Culotte_ 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

subs you don't like

Yea, being a Nazi is just like enjoying light beer instead of dark beer!

How can you be against preferring light beer? See! Nothing wrong with Nazis.

[–]CantSayISaidSo 135ポイント136ポイント  (20子コメント)

I'd like to put a huge target on my back and let all you fascist fucks know that myself and my two very white, very Anglo-descended brothers have all procreated with women of color.

Death to your vision of America. I'm proud to be doing my part.

[–]atheistness 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

You sir are a true patriot. Have an upvote.

[–]TheManInsideMe 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

This post is awesome and you're awesome. I've been waiting to get my 'race traitor' card for a while.

How's your inbox doing?

[–]itsnotlupus 119ポイント120ポイント  (34子コメント)

I see this sub is exploring the fine line between being morally neutral and being morally bankrupt.

Will they find the line? Stay tuned.

[–]Dominator27 164ポイント165ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hey anyone who happens to read this. Altright got featured because the writer is a bias mod who used his power to promote his garbage beliefs. He posts in mutiple pro-Trump subreddits and rants about SJWs and his comments here clearly prove he agrees with them. I thought Trumpers would be againist bias mods considering how much they complained about r/politics! SAD! This guy let his personal bias chose who to nominate for the award SROTD. Oh and his avatar is a nazi anime girl [the girl is pulled straight from the post] damning proof right there that this mod is with the altright (altright loves memes and anime) but cleary altright is not nazis of course not, just "racist realists" or "people who take pride in being white". We need to stand up to this mod's corruption of this subreddit and how he rigged the system to get nazis featured on this subreddit because he is one. We will start a movement and start a new Subreddit!!! /r/goodsubredditoftheday!

Hey mods don't remove this unless you want to be a facist! Because that's how free speech works!/s

[–]Kropotqueer 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

by the way, this is the largest alt right sub on the net.

just in case anyone was wondering whether they were actually nazis.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are not being uncivil (at least in this comment) so I see no reason to remove this. You assume that my strict adherence to the principle of freedom of expression is just a cover for underlying bias. That is just not true.

[–]RuthBuzzisback 365ポイント366ポイント  (287子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me..?

[–]YopperApe 149ポイント150ポイント  (128子コメント)

Wow.

Just wow.

I can't even...

[–]Agastopia 152ポイント153ポイント  (127子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

I see you're new to the alt right.

to demonize all Jew's just seems too similar to me to blacks demonizing all whites for the success of many.

Are whites actively undermining blacks? No? Then it's not comparable.

Listen, I'm sure good jews exist. I mean there's the color of crime guy and Paul Gottfried. Outside of that though? Zip. Nada. Zilch.

encourage you to look for exceptions. I tried for a long time to find "good jew" exceptions but consistently they would start jewing somehow and come out in favour of everything we're against. Like the "conservative" jews who ends up being in favour of muslim immigration. Or "libertarian" jews who end up being in favour of importing mestizos. Or "free speech" jews who end up being in favour of political correctness. It never fails, they always jew you in the end.

I can agree there is theoretically a capacity for certain jews to contribute in a positive manner. However it is like finding a unicorn pretty much. And the chance he's gonna jew you and undermine your entire movement is magnitudes higher. Hence for our own preservation we can't really risk anything.

[–]Mulche_ 29ポイント30ポイント  (3子コメント)

Remember guys, "that's racist" isn't a counter-argument.

[–]_The_Burn_ 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

Although racism is a cardinal sin to most, within the Alt Right, it is irrelevant. There is a dichotomy between the standards of morality.

[–]snipper303 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not anymore. America is very quickly realizing "DATS RACYISSSSS" Isn't a valid argument. Not just the alt right, but everywhere. It's very refreshing.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 11ポイント12ポイント  (24子コメント)

...well what is your counter? And remember: not every member speaks for the group. Why don't you target Israeli subs or groups for being the most "racist" country on the planet. They do ethnic DNA test for entry and have a machine gun mounted border wall, and take in no "refugees." Pointing out the hypocrisy and subversion of the Jewish tribe is a core principle in the Alt Right.

[–]flint97 28ポイント29ポイント  (11子コメント)

Counter to what? The claim that this guy has only met stereotypical jews? We are not clairvoyant. And why should random jews who quite possibly do not even live in Israel be forced to answer for the racism there?

[–]reactionarytree 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

clutching your pearls is not an argument.

[–]butrosbutrosfunky 37ポイント38ポイント  (0子コメント)

-( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╯╲___卐卐卐卐 Don't mind me just walking the mods

[–]Javalavadingdong 30ポイント31ポイント  (148子コメント)

No, grow up and realize people have different opinions than your own.

[–]Agastopia 142ポイント143ポイント  (135子コメント)

White supremacy is awesome!

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] 29ポイント30ポイント  (50子コメント)

No its not.

[–]Agastopia 102ポイント103ポイント  (47子コメント)

I feel like you don't know what subreddit you've made subreddit of the day...

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 36ポイント37ポイント  (38子コメント)

wasn't written by me or my choice to post it, if it was I would have not featured it

[–]quaerere_veritatem 6ポイント7ポイント  (7子コメント)

I feel like you are too close minded to realize their points

[–]Javalavadingdong 23ポイント24ポイント  (57子コメント)

What's so wrong with being proud of your race? Every other race except whites can have pride for their race.

[–]guncha 65ポイント66ポイント  (53子コメント)

Every other race pride is as dumb as white pride.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

bullshit. You wouldnt dare go up to a black guy with his fist in the air and tell him black power is dumb.

[–]oscillator- 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

in fear of getting socked in the face, no i wouldn't. However, black power is dumb, white power is dumb, whatever race power is stupid. Anyone that bases opinion on race about anything is a fucking retard.

[–]MarcusCamillius 22ポイント23ポイント  (12子コメント)

You should tell that to BLM, la Raza and other racial pride groups. I know you won't, because you only hate White people, and you want us to be individuals while encouraging other groups to have racial solidarity.

[–]guncha 54ポイント55ポイント  (9子コメント)

I will call them dumb if they come here and start arguing that black or hispanic pride is somehow an exception. I will call you dumb too if you keep jumping to conclusions:

because you only hate White people

You capitalized "white"? Really?

[–]GreatApeNiggy 11ポイント12ポイント  (14子コメント)

But that's not the propaganda that people are constantly bombarded with.

[–]Yenwodyah_ 16ポイント17ポイント  (6子コメント)

How many lynchings have black pride movements carried out? How many nations have black supremacist governments invaded?

[–]penguinseatsocks 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

this narrative has been the absolute, hands-down stupidest one following the election. "don't be mad because your candidate lost!" really? are we voting for the next fucking dorito flavor?

[–]OverlordXenu 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

White supremacy isn't an opinion.

[–]Dominator27 140ポイント141ポイント  (30子コメント)

What the Fuck! The Alt right gets featured it's like r/theredpill all over again. First Furry porn then a bunch of KKK endorsers who believe nonsense like the "white genocide" conspiracy. A bunch of neo-nazis (with pepes) don't deserve this reward!

Edit: I've created a protest Subreddit! To protest clear mod bias and giving a voice to some of the most digusting people on reddit /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]theaccountismine 44ポイント45ポイント  (8子コメント)

the SPLC literally has a profile on the alt right. it is a self professed white supremacist group.

if anyone else is sick of this shit, imzy is public and needs a bigger userbase. Nazis need not apply.

[–]xfLyFPS 19ポイント20ポイント  (7子コメント)

SPLC also thinks fucking Infowars is a nazi site. They're a joke.

[–]Karmaisforsuckers 42ポイント43ポイント  (1子コメント)

So the SPLC is right again

[–]xfLyFPS 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't see any swastikas and calls to gas the kikes and lynch the niggers on Infowars. That's the Daily Stormer.

[–]theaccountismine 27ポイント28ポイント  (4子コメント)

Stunningly, a guy who constantly shouts about (((globalists))) is loved by anti semites. Who would've thought?

[–]xfLyFPS 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

The fact that you and many Jews on twitter draw an equality mark between globalists and Jewish people even though Alex and Trump never name the Jew says enough about who the globalists really are. Can't even hide the shtick properly - SAD!

[–]Shitgenstein 20ポイント21ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm curious for any alt-right users here, I have a question. I will not try to argue against your answer. I will respect your right to have the views which you have.

How do things like "Human Bio-Diversity" and "race realism" differ from concepts like polygenism and scientific racism which are widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

[–]RedPillDessert 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even with monogenism, a lot can happen in 100,000 years in terms of evolution, especially if you subscribe to the Punctuated Equilibrium theory in evolution.

As for the term "race realism", I think that's partially a rebranding of "scientific racism" and I can speculate (but can't be 100% sure) that the latter was discredited due to left-wing/liberal bias, and never really went away.

[–]George_Rockwell 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

This has only happened because the culture has demanded it.

See my additional sources here

[–]CertifiedRabbi 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's pretty obvious that human biodiversity and race realism are just politically correct euphemisms for scientific racism. The only reason that we use those terms is to put people at ease because modern sensibilities have been so skewed towards automatically and violently rejecting White bigotry. But the idea that scientific racism has been thoroughly debunked is a talking point that anti-racist liberals like to spout in order to discredit our ideas. And just because certain aspects of 19th century and early 20th century scientific racism were nonsense, that doesn't mean that everything that they espoused was nonsense or that more recent scientific racism is just a rehash of discredited ideas.

Reality also isn't a popularity contest. I could be the only person in the entire world that believes that not all racial groups are equally intelligent and civilized, but that wouldn't mean that I'm wrong. Yes, we know that the scientific and academic community completely despises us, but that isn't because our ideas are BS. Our views simply aren't politically correct.

Eugenics is a perfect example of a completely valid scientific idea falling out of fashion simply because it offends modern liberal sensibilities. Not only is it possible to improve the human gene pool through genetic screening, embryo selection, cloning, genetic engineering, selective breeding, polygamy, artificial insemination, et cetera, but it's absolutely vital to the long-term health of our species and our environment.

It's widely known in environmentalist circles that human overpopulation is the root cause of most environmental issues. Everything from climate change to overfishing is mostly caused by too many people living on this planet. So, if the human population needs to be dramatically reduced in order to fix this problem (which most scientists and environmentalists are hesitant to publicly acknowledge because they don't want to be accused of being evil Nazis), then eugenics is obviously the most logical solution to this problem, because if you have to dramatically reduce the human population then obviously it just makes sense to select for the best and the brightest.

Who wouldn't want to live in an environmentally sustainable society that had a guaranteed income, an army of AI robots (but not so smart that they pose a threat to us) to take care of the dirty work, and a beautiful and healthy citizenry comprised of Mensa members? We'll soon have the scientific know-how to make that neo-Nazi utopia a reality, but what we lack is the political will to implement it (thanks to the progressive Left). The Alt-Right exists to solve this problem.

Dysgenics is also a massive problem that's being completely ignored because the solutions lead you down a path towards the Fourth Reich.

Eugenics has to be one of the most important and powerful ideas in all of human history, but it's being suppressed simply because it reeks of Nazism. So, while the progressive Left just loves to claim that the conservative religious Right is getting in the way of scientific and human progress, when it comes to eugenics it's the liberal Left that's preventing our species from making the next major leap forward.

You can tell that the scientific community is completely terrified of new developments in genetic research bolstering our racist weltanschauung. Once we get a better idea of which genes are responsible for human behavior, we'll finally be able to solidly prove that some racial groups are inherently superior to other racial groups. You can also tell that the scientific community is extremely nervous about discovering that the genes that are responsible for intelligence won't be evenly distributed throughout the various "population groups" (the politically correct term for race). Acknowledging that racial and class differences have a genetic basis will completely undermine the central pillar of modern progressive ideology.

Scientists like James Watson and Hans Eysenck weren't quacks. They were treated like heretics for daring to dissent from modern progressive orthodoxy.

If you want to learn more about modern scientific racism, then you should check out people like Stephen Hsu [1][2][3]. He's allowed to get away with espousing racist, Nazi-ish ideas because he isn't White, and because he's very careful to moderate his views by paying lip service to progressive egalitarian ideology.

[–]AFlyingMexican5 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Okay but let's say that you're right and that scientists have stopped studying "race realism" and what not. How can you guys probe you're correct, are any of you folks scientists?

[–]bitchy_witcher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The data still exists. Most scientists refuse to draw conclusions from it, but you don't need an advanced degree to grasp the implications of a government-funded double-blind study that reveals black people are twice as likely to speed.

And there are still some scientists whose loyalty to scientific truth is stronger than their need for funding. A famous example is James Watson, Nobel prize winner and co-discoverer of the DNA double helix structure, who said:

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address. His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”. He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”. He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.

[–]bitchy_witcher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's better to say that "scientific racism" is a dysphemism for human biodiversity and race realism.

[–]Lokismoke 57ポイント58ポイント  (7子コメント)

Reddit's very own NatSoc community.

I take it you mean National Socialist community?! TF?! That's "Alt Right" in the same way the sounds of a man stuffing a pile of baby gerbils into a hollowed out watermelon is "Alt Rock."

[–]cxl61 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the Nazi description is somewhat accurate, even though not all people on that sub are at the Hitler level of racist. (These groups were the first to call themselves alt-right, while the term only more recently came to denote the more moderate pro-Trump movements that primarily oppose the political establishment)

[–]081624 34ポイント35ポイント  (3子コメント)

No, that is alt right. Ok not all alt right people are national socialists but they are all racists, and that's the entire point. You just think alt right isn't about racism because people like Hillary Clinton told you it's about racism, and redditors have this Pavlovian response where whenever Hillary says something you assume it's false and call her out of touch.

[–]PurpleKneesocks 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think it's about racism because the sidebar of the subreddit says it's in support of racial purity, and a lot of the users posting here seem to really hate Jews and racial "inbreeding".

[–]sverzino 17ポイント18ポイント  (2子コメント)

I like how alt-righters think they're so much smarter than everyone else but they placed their faith into a failed businessman who has never held firmly onto an opinion in his life.

[–]Meatssacre 31ポイント32ポイント  (1子コメント)

What the actual fuck?

[–]Dominator27 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

The moderator is a member of the/supports /r/altright so he featured it

[–]Monk_on_Fire 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, fuck this shit. That subreddit ought to be banned and here you are promoting it.

[–]Captain_Arrrg 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Bunch of white people trying to make themselves feel better about being worthless by associating themselves with achievements they had absolutely nothing to do with, based solely on thier melanin content. Makes total sense me.

[–]ProudWhiteMann 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not really it's mostly about combating white guilt making sure we don't become minorities in our own lands and recognizing racial differences.

[–]TotesMessenger 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

[–]quearere_veritatem 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

The people involved on this sub are vicious, vile, close minded. I haven't seen more than a few real arguments against the alt right, just slander and hatred. Rediculous.

[–]Spelr 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, how dare people be unfriendly to your intolerance

[–]empyreanmax 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The people involved on this sub are vicious, vile, close minded.

Preach brother!

I haven't seen more than a few real arguments against the alt right, just slander and hatred.

Oh...by "this sub" you meant suboftheday, not altright...

[–]EagleDarkX 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

What would a website be without it's own NatSoc community AKA Nazi's?

Wait, I know that one, a better place to be.

[–]jereddit 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this for real? That sub is some stormfront shit. It should be fucking quarantined.

[–]yesididmakeanother 26ポイント27ポイント  (6子コメント)

/r/altright is a subreddit of peace.

[–]magadorspartacus 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I read that as /r/alright which I would imagine would be pretty chill.

[–]TwerkersOfTheWorld 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

* for whites only

[–]ddplz 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Isn't that what the BLM movement has been about? Creating safe places of colour?

[–]picassopolo 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice job promoting hate speech!

[–]roflocalypselol 20ポイント21ポイント  (6子コメント)

Okay since apparently this is happening... the Alt Right as defined by its creators is a racial awareness movement. The alt-right as coopted by Breitbart, The_donald, Milo, etc. is not. They just wanted a way to say non-establishment conservatives and well...picked a confusing label. The Alt Right considers those people 'alt light' or still 'normies'.

[–]cxl61 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

The sub featured here is more of that actual white nationalist movement, compared to that less extreme Trump movement that's also used the label.

[–]roflocalypselol 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Trump movement, etc. simply coopted the name without researching it much, I think. T_D is very inclusive. The real Alt Right includes white identitarians and other race realists, but only some are actual NatSoc.

[–]cxl61 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Definitely. T_D will accept pretty anyone who supports Trump (they love highlighting token minority supporters in that sub), while the true and less visible alt-right usually do believe that racially homogeneous societies are most successful (and consider minorities to be "them" compared to "us" being white people).

[–]CuckNorris1 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Alt light is still fairly race realist, they just dog whistle more and don't write about it as clearly.

[–]roflocalypselol 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some are, many aren't. I'd say most subscribe to cultural explanations that correlate with race, rather than genetic determination.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

There is exists no intellectual curiosity here. Im certain most of you did not read the intro, much less checked out any of the alt right websites. I say this because your complaints are far off the mark

[–]RAKtheUndead 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well, given that the last time that fascists controlled the world's most powerful countries, my relatives were being bombed and shot at by the soldiers of those fascist countries, I don't think there's anything to be curious about.

[–]ElvishisnotTengwar 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you fucking joking?

[–]waystogetaround 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wow..., Oh my, the poor naive souls over at SRD and other metasureddits are going to have hard time to even.

These are the people who are convinced that the folks at /r/The_Donald are literally(for real) Hitler 2.0, wonder what that makes us.

[–]Myne1001 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I commented this on an article about Breitbart around the time Bannon joined the Trump campaign

"You think Breitbart is bad? Just you wait until you go further down the rabbit hole. Then you'll be thinking Breitbart is moderate"

[–]RedPillDessert 11ポイント12ポイント  (13子コメント)

Speaking as an alt-right user over there:

Consider than white people in the US have dropped from 90% to 60% of the population in the space of sixty years, and are dropping fast. Less than 50% of US births are now white. The same thing is happening all over Europe too. We are looking at demographic replacement on a vast scale as never seen before.

Personally, I think that's incredibly tragic.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 17ポイント18ポイント  (10子コメント)

The entire reason places like Japan and European countries are successful is because people have career-orientated lifestyles that leave less time to raise a family.

You're paradox is that you want white people to grow in population while maintaining the success that was brought with career-orientated societies.

You can't have it both ways.

[–]Tazer_Swift 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes white and asian countries had career driven people, all the way back to the days of their success. AND THEY GREW IN POPULATION RAPIDLY! Prior to feminism it was the father who was career driven with the mother following her biological imperative; which is what made those societies successful. You're arguing that whites and asians, who now have two full time working parents, in countries that now have embraced feminism, must now have two full time working parents(in the only countries who have accepted that the planet is over populated) which has resulted in elites telling us we now need immigrants to survive to support the ever growing older population.

"Diversity is the only way forward."

No.

[–]RedPillDessert 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

I don't mind NOT growing in population as long as we don't decline and let others overwhelm us instead. White parents can be given incentives to have children. We're almost at two on average, and that's all we need.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 15ポイント16ポイント  (5子コメント)

White people get the same welfare and benefits from having children as non-white people do.

Incentive clearly isn't the issue.

Standard of living and careers are what cause decline in population.

The same reason the Alt-Right think white people are superior is the same reason their population is declining.

It's the height of absurb.

[–]quearere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Incentive is the issue... Affirmative action alone is the most anti-white policy ever created. It gives an automatic boost to blacks on sat scores of 250 fucking points. And it puts blacks as a massive priority over white in job hiring.. height of absurd

[–]anechoicmedia 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Standard of living and careers are what cause decline in population.

Ideology matters. Conservatives and the religious have more marriages and children controlling for education and income.

In the 1960s, there was a massive decline in birthrates out of nowhere, simultaneously, in several white nations, that had nothing to do with economics; It was all about ideology and the cultural revolution.

[–]RAKtheUndead 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, yes, because what Reddit really needs is more springboards for these fascist lunatics.

[–]citizen_beyond 24ポイント25ポイント  (30子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity.

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State. All problems in the world are to be ultimately solved by the State. Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before. But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 55ポイント56ポイント  (25子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity

/r/im14andthisisdeep

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Did you just put together a bunch of words that would make you sound smart?

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

Ah, yes.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

I know the whole IQ thing is a big sticking point for Nazis, but the difference in IQ between white people and non-white people is not large enough to completely exclude any chance of being as good or better than the average white person.

You're acting like the mental function between a black person and a white person is as wide as it is between a human and a dog.

The smartest, functioning dog is not smarter than the dumbest functioning human.

Whereas the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State

The fuck?

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means.

And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

[–]SocialNationalism 9ポイント10ポイント  (9子コメント)

r/Iam14andthisisdeep

r/notanargument

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Christianity isn't necessarily theistic, it could be about Jesus' teachings and interpretations of them without believing in his divinity; obviously this is just semantic snark over a thing called a metaphor.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

r/notanargument and you're responding to a comment about a meme with stereotypes about a group of people. Also, *renowned.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Assertion without evidence.

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means. And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

NAxALT, bro.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

The liberal mind in a nutshell.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 19ポイント20ポイント  (8子コメント)

Assertion without evidence

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

NAxALT, bro

I have a tip for white nationalists who want to make arguments.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories?

Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets?

Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung.

SUCH SUCCESS.

MUCH PARADISE.

[–]SocialNationalism 7ポイント8ポイント  (7子コメント)

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

No... Unless you are including eugenics.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories? Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets? Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung. SUCH SUCCESS. MUCH PARADISE.

Not an argument.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 20ポイント21ポイント  (4子コメント)

No...

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

It wasn't meant to be an argument, you dullard.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

There's nothing to argue.

It was just facts.

Deal with it.

[–]SocialNationalism 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Finally you get something right.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

It was just facts.

Asking dumb questions then calling them facts... that's not an argument.

[–]George_Rockwell 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm enjoying watching a /u/SocialNationalism go at it with a /u/SpectreOfLenin

Truly 2016 is the best timeline

[–]SocialNationalism 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

ikr seeing this shit is like bait to me

[–]George_Rockwell 6ポイント7ポイント  (7子コメント)

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

You're gonna want to hold onto your tendies for this one:

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis "supports the traditional racial groups classification." http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

96-97% of whites have no African ancestry. http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans.3.html

97% of Whites have no black ancestry whatsoever. http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-white-black-a-murky-distinction-grows-still-murkier/

There was "minimal gene flow" between archaic Europeans and Asians. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning. http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf

Human intelligence is highly heritable. http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The average African IQ is estimated at 79. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has a 40-50% genetic basis. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among Whites. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n 2005-1.pdf

[–]SpectreOfLenin 18ポイント19ポイント  (4子コメント)

None of that dispels what the core of my arguments are; and frankly there is quite a lot of assumption going on here.

Assuming that I'm in favor of mass, unregulated migration. I'm not.

Assuming that I said there is no biological difference between races. I didn't. I said that if there is a difference it is negligible with that persons conditions.

And you're assuming I think people are naturally intercultural. I didn't.

I openly acknowledge that people tend toward their own culture. What I have said is that it is more beneficial to us if we base our society off cooperation between peoples rather than forceful separation of cultures

If you don't want mass migration, get rid of the conditions that cause it. Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

Those have always been the core of my arguments. What you typed is just noise.

[–]George_Rockwell 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

A society of 70 IQ people simply will not achieve what one made up of 100 IQ people will. Ever.

Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

I think I can agree with almost all of this, actually.

[–]thorneedsahaircut 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, this is an actual physical form of autism

[–]oscillator- 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is there a viable reddit alternative? TD has permeated reddit to strongly and its tiring. I can only read so much hate propaganda per day. I do not want to give ad revenue to a company that supports each speech (i.e. reddit)

[–]No_Politics_ 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good job Reddit! The sub of the day literally has Hitler in their banner. Literally fucking Hitler.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 21ポイント22ポイント  (27子コメント)

I wouldn't exactly call us a NatSoc community. Are there NatSoc's who consider themselves Alt Right? Sure. But there are many other groups, as well.

[–]CountAardvark 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

NatSoc? Does 'Nazi' not work for you?

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 18ポイント19ポイント  (19子コメント)

I was basing that title on the fact that Hitler and Mussolini are featured on the topbar of /r/altright.

Don't take anything that I said in the feature as a description of the alt right in general. Everything that I wrote is intended to be a description of your sub and it's interpretation of the alt right.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 14ポイント15ポイント  (16子コメント)

Not an issue. I was just pointing out that the Alt Right is a spectrum. You've got NatSocs and even people further right than that on one end and still others on the other end who think that NatSoc ideology is counter-productive. Ultimately we try to give a nod to all factions without judgement, which is why Jared Taylor is also on the banner, a person who some consider weak on the JQ.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 6ポイント7ポイント  (12子コメント)

That makes sense. Well, if I could do it over again I'd give it a different title but there's already way too many comments to delete this thread.