上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (0子コメント)

Thread Locked because people can't keep shit civil.

[–]itsnotlupus 113ポイント114ポイント  (29子コメント)

I see this sub is exploring the fine line between being morally neutral and being morally bankrupt.

Will they find the line? Stay tuned.

[–]moistowelettes 218ポイント219ポイント  (160子コメント)

I think this sub is running out of subs

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 15ポイント16ポイント  (36子コメント)

you try finding new subreddits that have 500+ subscribers and that haven't been featured before in /r/SubredditOfTheDay whilst also having enough substance in them to make an interesting read and then making sure that you have a post for every day of every month in the year... its hard man

[–]XENOVICE 113ポイント114ポイント  (3子コメント)

Because what you do here is so important. That's how you rationalize promoting this? Jesus.

[–]Dominator27 96ポイント97ポイント  (22子コメント)

Why don't you at least not promote nazis. It can't be that hard to do a quick scan of that sub and conclude these people are racist nazis and then move on to another eligible subreddit.

Also Why should racist bigots get a award because your too lazy to find non racist sexist subreddits?

[–]Kropotqueer 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

"boohoohoo it's so hard to find a sub to feature, so we're literally going to give nazis a platform"

shut the fuck up

[–]xxfay6 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, I don't mind giving Nazis a platform if they're going to stick to it. Denying history and completely shunning them is what makes us repeat mistakes.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 20ポイント21ポイント  (122子コメント)

When we feature subs you don't like that doesn't mean we're running out of subs, it means we're featuring subs you don't like. The srotd team is a diverse group of individuals each with their own interests and style. That is why we're able to select a new interesting subreddit every single day.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 247ポイント248ポイント  (47子コメント)

Yeah, that's the problem with Nazis.

Not the mass genocide and ethnic cleansing.

No, it's the fact that they have different opinions is the REAL issue!

[–]cookingfragsyum 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fucking A-game smackdown in this thread, Spectre. You are a fine example.

[–]XENOVICE 111ポイント112ポイント  (11子コメント)

You're promoting hate.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 7ポイント8ポイント  (7子コメント)

France excluding non-French = Hate. France becoming non-French = Love.

[–]XENOVICE 30ポイント31ポイント  (5子コメント)

Culture is a fluid thing, always has been. Accomplishing this thing you call 'exclusion' involves inflicting mass suffering on people. We can't roll back time.

Culture is also what you do, how you speak with others, and who you speak with. The modern state of those things is irrevocably different from anything that came before it. Even if you were to force an 'exclusion' (as previous authoritarian regimes have tried, to horror), it would lead to an entirely new form of culture bearing even less resemblance to your fantasy of the past than before.

This desire is self defeating but is propagated by power hungry people willing to do the violence while you lay around shitposting 'remove kebab' memes.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

You can't make a German into a Japanese person. No matter how long he lives in Japan he will never be Japanese.

Once the French are a minority in France it isn't France anymore.

[–]XENOVICE 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

None of those things are monolithic. There are more Americas then there are Americans. Initiating violence against innocent people on behalf of an abstraction is indefensible, and an ideology that promotes racial supremacy promotes racial violence.

[–]scobes 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

When was the last time you visited France?

[–]NWVoS 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tell me, how similar are the Franks of old to the French of now?

[–]Hell_Libertine 108ポイント109ポイント  (26子コメント)

Shame on you for promoting hatred. What's next? You're going to link subs promoting ISIS? You're promoting fucking Neo-Nazis so that won't surprise me.

[–]Dominator27 52ポイント53ポイント  (24子コメント)

remember moderator when you give out this award you give these people a voice, however they don't deserve a voice for their racist propaganda that takes advantage of insecure whites nor a award for it

Edit: Protest Subreddit is up /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]Fubby2 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reddit. The only place where forced diversity is a sin, until you are supporting Nazis.

[–]-Lautrec- 90ポイント91ポイント  (7子コメント)

But as we all know; Reddit is extremely liberally biased. Ultimately we will be banned if for no other reason than we’ve become too popular.

Reddit is so liberally biased that every second /r/all submission comes from the-donald

[–]Carl_B 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't let facts get in the way of a persecution complex!

[–]Mr_Barry_Shitpeas 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, so biased against them that manipulating votes never got them banned.

[–]Dominator27 128ポイント129ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hey anyone who happens to read this. Altright got featured because the writer is a bias mod who used his power to promote his garbage beliefs. He posts in mutiple pro-Trump subreddits and rants about SJWs and his comments here clearly prove he agrees with them. I thought Trumpers would be againist bias mods considering how much they complained about r/politics! SAD! This guy let his personal bias chose who to nominate for the award SROTD. Oh and his avatar is a nazi anime girl [the girl is pulled straight from the post] damning proof right there that this mod is with the altright (altright loves memes and anime) but cleary altright is not nazis of course not, just "racist realists" or "people who take pride in being white". We need to stand up to this mod's corruption of this subreddit and how he rigged the system to get nazis featured on this subreddit because he is one. We will start a movement and start a new Subreddit!!! /r/goodsubredditoftheday!

Hey mods don't remove this unless you want to be a facist! Because that's how free speech works!/s

[–]Kropotqueer 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

by the way, this is the largest alt right sub on the net.

just in case anyone was wondering whether they were actually nazis.

[–]CantSayISaidSo 96ポイント97ポイント  (16子コメント)

I'd like to put a huge target on my back and let all you fascist fucks know that myself and my two very white, very Anglo-descended brothers have all procreated with women of color.

Death to your vision of America. I'm proud to be doing my part.

[–]RuthBuzzisback 329ポイント330ポイント  (273子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me..?

[–]YopperApe 131ポイント132ポイント  (124子コメント)

Wow.

Just wow.

I can't even...

[–]Agastopia 138ポイント139ポイント  (123子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

I see you're new to the alt right.

to demonize all Jew's just seems too similar to me to blacks demonizing all whites for the success of many.

Are whites actively undermining blacks? No? Then it's not comparable.

Listen, I'm sure good jews exist. I mean there's the color of crime guy and Paul Gottfried. Outside of that though? Zip. Nada. Zilch.

encourage you to look for exceptions. I tried for a long time to find "good jew" exceptions but consistently they would start jewing somehow and come out in favour of everything we're against. Like the "conservative" jews who ends up being in favour of muslim immigration. Or "libertarian" jews who end up being in favour of importing mestizos. Or "free speech" jews who end up being in favour of political correctness. It never fails, they always jew you in the end.

I can agree there is theoretically a capacity for certain jews to contribute in a positive manner. However it is like finding a unicorn pretty much. And the chance he's gonna jew you and undermine your entire movement is magnitudes higher. Hence for our own preservation we can't really risk anything.

[–]YopperApe 71ポイント72ポイント  (77子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

Yes we are. That's one of the defining features of the alt-right, that we're racist. Where did you get the idea that it was otherwise?

[–]Agastopia 132ポイント133ポイント  (44子コメント)

At least you admit it

[–]YopperApe 29ポイント30ポイント  (43子コメント)

Now that that's out of the way, what was your point?

[–]SpectreOfLenin 105ポイント106ポイント  (39子コメント)

Are you racist because you have penile issues or inadequacy issues?

[–]SocialNationalism 22ポイント23ポイント  (36子コメント)

No Patrick, muh dik is not an argument.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 69ポイント70ポイント  (35子コメント)

Inadequacy it is!

[–]SocialNationalism 11ポイント12ポイント  (34子コメント)

No Patrick, Jewish psychoanalysis is not an argument either.

[–]anechoicmedia -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is the modern equivalent of calling someone a faggot to end the discussion. It's disgusting the degree of sexist, anti-male insults that the left is allowed to get away with deploying in argumentative retreat from the right.

[–]survivalsong 32ポイント33ポイント  (1子コメント)

I love this attitude that if you just front up about being racist people will be stumped somehow. Like if you own it you'll take all the power out of it. We already know that alt-right is built on unreconstructed old-school racism.

[–]RushofBlood52 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, that was basically it.

[–]TotesMessenger 31ポイント32ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]Mulche_ 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

Remember guys, "that's racist" isn't a counter-argument.

[–]_The_Burn_ 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Although racism is a cardinal sin to most, within the Alt Right, it is irrelevant. There is a dichotomy between the standards of morality.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 14ポイント15ポイント  (24子コメント)

...well what is your counter? And remember: not every member speaks for the group. Why don't you target Israeli subs or groups for being the most "racist" country on the planet. They do ethnic DNA test for entry and have a machine gun mounted border wall, and take in no "refugees." Pointing out the hypocrisy and subversion of the Jewish tribe is a core principle in the Alt Right.

[–]flint97 22ポイント23ポイント  (11子コメント)

Counter to what? The claim that this guy has only met stereotypical jews? We are not clairvoyant. And why should random jews who quite possibly do not even live in Israel be forced to answer for the racism there?

[–]lordthat100188 2ポイント3ポイント  (9子コメント)

Why should all nationalists who don't believe in genocide be forced to answer for the holocaust?

[–]baebridge 18ポイント19ポイント  (8子コメント)

Because judging someone by their choices is different from judging them by their ethnicity?

[–]reactionarytree 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

clutching your pearls is not an argument.

[–]butrosbutrosfunky 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

-( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╯╲___卐卐卐卐 Don't mind me just walking the mods

[–]Javalavadingdong 29ポイント30ポイント  (138子コメント)

No, grow up and realize people have different opinions than your own.

[–]Agastopia 126ポイント127ポイント  (126子コメント)

White supremacy is awesome!

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] 20ポイント21ポイント  (48子コメント)

No its not.

[–]Agastopia 82ポイント83ポイント  (45子コメント)

I feel like you don't know what subreddit you've made subreddit of the day...

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 28ポイント29ポイント  (36子コメント)

wasn't written by me or my choice to post it, if it was I would have not featured it

[–]Javalavadingdong 22ポイント23ポイント  (51子コメント)

What's so wrong with being proud of your race? Every other race except whites can have pride for their race.

[–]guncha 56ポイント57ポイント  (49子コメント)

Every other race pride is as dumb as white pride.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

bullshit. You wouldnt dare go up to a black guy with his fist in the air and tell him black power is dumb.

[–]MarcusCamillius 17ポイント18ポイント  (12子コメント)

You should tell that to BLM, la Raza and other racial pride groups. I know you won't, because you only hate White people, and you want us to be individuals while encouraging other groups to have racial solidarity.

[–]guncha 47ポイント48ポイント  (9子コメント)

I will call them dumb if they come here and start arguing that black or hispanic pride is somehow an exception. I will call you dumb too if you keep jumping to conclusions:

because you only hate White people

You capitalized "white"? Really?

[–]quaerere_veritatem 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I do that too, I also capitalize Black

[–]MarcusCamillius 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lol no you won't. You'll spend your time calling out White people for loving their heritage because you hate White people.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 8ポイント9ポイント  (11子コメント)

But that's not the propaganda that people are constantly bombarded with.

[–]Yenwodyah_ 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

How many lynchings have black pride movements carried out? How many nations have black supremacist governments invaded?

[–]GreatApeNiggy 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Apparently you don't know much about Haiti, South Africa, Zimbabwe, or even the intense white on black crime in the U.S.

[–]bitchy_witcher 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

he meant "black on white crime," by the way. White on black crime basically does not exist.

[–]penguinseatsocks 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

this narrative has been the absolute, hands-down stupidest one following the election. "don't be mad because your candidate lost!" really? are we voting for the next fucking dorito flavor?

[–]Dominator27 124ポイント125ポイント  (30子コメント)

What the Fuck! The Alt right gets featured it's like r/theredpill all over again. First Furry porn then a bunch of KKK endorsers who believe nonsense like the "white genocide" conspiracy. A bunch of neo-nazis (with pepes) don't deserve this reward!

Edit: I've created a protest Subreddit! To protest clear mod bias and giving a voice to some of the most digusting people on reddit /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]theaccountismine 30ポイント31ポイント  (7子コメント)

the SPLC literally has a profile on the alt right. it is a self professed white supremacist group.

if anyone else is sick of this shit, imzy is public and needs a bigger userbase. Nazis need not apply.

[–]xfLyFPS 12ポイント13ポイント  (6子コメント)

SPLC also thinks fucking Infowars is a nazi site. They're a joke.

[–]Karmaisforsuckers 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

So the SPLC is right again

[–]xfLyFPS 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't see any swastikas and calls to gas the kikes and lynch the niggers on Infowars. That's the Daily Stormer.

[–]theaccountismine 18ポイント19ポイント  (3子コメント)

Stunningly, a guy who constantly shouts about (((globalists))) is loved by anti semites. Who would've thought?

[–]xfLyFPS 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that you and many Jews on twitter draw an equality mark between globalists and Jewish people even though Alex and Trump never name the Jew says enough about who the globalists really are. Can't even hide the shtick properly - SAD!

[–]Lokismoke 52ポイント53ポイント  (7子コメント)

Reddit's very own NatSoc community.

I take it you mean National Socialist community?! TF?! That's "Alt Right" in the same way the sounds of a man stuffing a pile of baby gerbils into a hollowed out watermelon is "Alt Rock."

[–]cxl61 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the Nazi description is somewhat accurate, even though not all people on that sub are at the Hitler level of racist. (These groups were the first to call themselves alt-right, while the term only more recently came to denote the more moderate pro-Trump movements that primarily oppose the political establishment)

[–]081624 26ポイント27ポイント  (3子コメント)

No, that is alt right. Ok not all alt right people are national socialists but they are all racists, and that's the entire point. You just think alt right isn't about racism because people like Hillary Clinton told you it's about racism, and redditors have this Pavlovian response where whenever Hillary says something you assume it's false and call her out of touch.

[–]PurpleKneesocks 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think it's about racism because the sidebar of the subreddit says it's in support of racial purity, and a lot of the users posting here seem to really hate Jews and racial "inbreeding".

[–]Shitgenstein 14ポイント15ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm curious for any alt-right users here, I have a question. I will not try to argue against your answer. I will respect your right to have the views which you have.

How do things like "Human Bio-Diversity" and "race realism" differ from concepts like polygenism and scientific racism which are widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

[–]George_Rockwell 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

This has only happened because the culture has demanded it.

See my additional sources here

[–]RedPillDessert 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even with monogenism, a lot can happen in 100,000 years in terms of evolution, especially if you subscribe to the Punctuated Equilibrium theory in evolution.

As for the term "race realism", I think that's partially a rebranding of "scientific racism" and I can speculate (but can't be 100% sure) that the latter was discredited due to left-wing/liberal bias, and never really went away.

[–]CertifiedRabbi 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's pretty obvious that human biodiversity and race realism are just politically correct euphemisms for scientific racism. The only reason that we use those terms is to put people at ease because modern sensibilities have been so skewed towards automatically and violently rejecting White bigotry. But the idea that scientific racism has been thoroughly debunked is a talking point that anti-racist liberals like to spout in order to discredit our ideas. And just because certain aspects of 19th century and early 20th century scientific racism were nonsense, that doesn't mean that everything that they espoused was nonsense or that more recent scientific racism is just a rehash of discredited ideas.

Reality also isn't a popularity contest. I could be the only person in the entire world that believes that not all racial groups are equally intelligent and civilized, but that wouldn't mean that I'm wrong. Yes, we know that the scientific and academic community completely despises us, but that isn't because our ideas are BS. Our views simply aren't politically correct.

Eugenics is a perfect example of a completely valid scientific idea falling out of fashion simply because it offends modern liberal sensibilities. Not only is it possible to improve the human gene pool through genetic screening, embryo selection, cloning, genetic engineering, selective breeding, polygamy, artificial insemination, et cetera, but it's absolutely vital to the long-term health of our species and our environment.

It's widely known in environmentalist circles that human overpopulation is the root cause of most environmental issues. Everything from climate change to overfishing is mostly caused by too many people living on this planet. So, if the human population needs to be dramatically reduced in order to fix this problem (which most scientists and environmentalists are hesitant to publicly acknowledge because they don't want to be accused of being evil Nazis), then eugenics is obviously the most logical solution to this problem, because if you have to dramatically reduce the human population then obviously it just makes sense to select for the best and the brightest.

Who wouldn't want to live in an environmentally sustainable society that had a guaranteed income, an army of AI robots (but not so smart that they pose a threat to us) to take care of the dirty work, and a beautiful and healthy citizenry comprised of Mensa members? We'll soon have the scientific know-how to make that neo-Nazi utopia a reality, but what we lack is the political will to implement it (thanks to the progressive Left). The Alt-Right exists to solve this problem.

Dysgenics is also a massive problem that's being completely ignored because the solutions lead you down a path towards the Fourth Reich.

Eugenics has to be one of the most important and powerful ideas in all of human history, but it's being suppressed simply because it reeks of Nazism. So, while the progressive Left just loves to claim that the conservative religious Right is getting in the way of scientific and human progress, when it comes to eugenics it's the liberal Left that's preventing our species from making the next major leap forward.

You can tell that the scientific community is completely terrified of new developments in genetic research bolstering our racist weltanschauung. Once we get a better idea of which genes are responsible for human behavior, we'll finally be able to solidly prove that some racial groups are inherently superior to other racial groups. You can also tell that the scientific community is extremely nervous about discovering that the genes that are responsible for intelligence won't be evenly distributed throughout the various "population groups" (the politically correct term for race). Acknowledging that racial and class differences have a genetic basis will completely undermine the central pillar of modern progressive ideology.

Scientists like James Watson and Hans Eysenck weren't quacks. They were treated like heretics for daring to dissent from modern progressive orthodoxy.

If you want to learn more about modern scientific racism, then you should check out people like Stephen Hsu [1][2][3]. He's allowed to get away with espousing racist, Nazi-ish ideas because he isn't White, and because he's very careful to moderate his views by paying lip service to progressive egalitarian ideology.

[–]AFlyingMexican5 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Okay but let's say that you're right and that scientists have stopped studying "race realism" and what not. How can you guys probe you're correct, are any of you folks scientists?

[–]bitchy_witcher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The data still exists. Most scientists refuse to draw conclusions from it, but you don't need an advanced degree to grasp the implications of a government-funded double-blind study that reveals black people are twice as likely to speed.

And there are still some scientists whose loyalty to scientific truth is stronger than their need for funding. A famous example is James Watson, Nobel prize winner and co-discoverer of the DNA double helix structure, who said:

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address. His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”. He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”. He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.

[–]bitchy_witcher 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's better to say that "scientific racism" is a dysphemism for human biodiversity and race realism.

[–]Spelr 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol fuck reddit

fuck this place

[–]Monk_on_Fire 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, fuck this shit. That subreddit ought to be banned and here you are promoting it.

[–]sverzino 10ポイント11ポイント  (2子コメント)

I like how alt-righters think they're so much smarter than everyone else but they placed their faith into a failed businessman who has never held firmly onto an opinion in his life.

[–]Meatssacre 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

What the actual fuck?

[–]Dominator27 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

The moderator is a member of the/supports /r/altright so he featured it

[–]quearere_veritatem 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

The people involved on this sub are vicious, vile, close minded. I haven't seen more than a few real arguments against the alt right, just slander and hatred. Rediculous.

[–]Spelr 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, how dare people be unfriendly to your intolerance

[–]TheMissourian 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oy Vey! How could you feature this subreddit!? I will jave you know i was gassed over 7 times and Cremated twice by the Nazis in Ww2 and I dont approve of such racism! Dirty Goyim!

[–]Captain_Arrrg 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Bunch of white people trying to make themselves feel better about being worthless by associating themselves with achievements they had absolutely nothing to do with, based solely on thier melanin content. Makes total sense me.

[–]ProudWhiteMann 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not really it's mostly about combating white guilt making sure we don't become minorities in our own lands and recognizing racial differences.

[–]roflocalypselol 21ポイント22ポイント  (6子コメント)

Okay since apparently this is happening... the Alt Right as defined by its creators is a racial awareness movement. The alt-right as coopted by Breitbart, The_donald, Milo, etc. is not. They just wanted a way to say non-establishment conservatives and well...picked a confusing label. The Alt Right considers those people 'alt light' or still 'normies'.

[–]cxl61 22ポイント23ポイント  (2子コメント)

The sub featured here is more of that actual white nationalist movement, compared to that less extreme Trump movement that's also used the label.

[–]roflocalypselol 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Trump movement, etc. simply coopted the name without researching it much, I think. T_D is very inclusive. The real Alt Right includes white identitarians and other race realists, but only some are actual NatSoc.

[–]cxl61 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Definitely. T_D will accept pretty anyone who supports Trump (they love highlighting token minority supporters in that sub), while the true and less visible alt-right usually do believe that racially homogeneous societies are most successful (and consider minorities to be "them" compared to "us" being white people).

[–]CuckNorris1 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Alt light is still fairly race realist, they just dog whistle more and don't write about it as clearly.

[–]roflocalypselol 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some are, many aren't. I'd say most subscribe to cultural explanations that correlate with race, rather than genetic determination.

[–]jereddit 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this for real? That sub is some stormfront shit. It should be fucking quarantined.

[–]CTRaccounting 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well fuck the concept of subreddit of the day

[–]EagleDarkX 6ポイント7ポイント  (7子コメント)

What would a website be without it's own NatSoc community AKA Nazi's?

Wait, I know that one, a better place to be.

[–]waystogetaround 13ポイント14ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wow..., Oh my, the poor naive souls over at SRD and other metasureddits are going to have hard time to even.

These are the people who are convinced that the folks at /r/The_Donald are literally(for real) Hitler 2.0, wonder what that makes us.

[–]Myne1001 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I commented this on an article about Breitbart around the time Bannon joined the Trump campaign

"You think Breitbart is bad? Just you wait until you go further down the rabbit hole. Then you'll be thinking Breitbart is moderate"

[–]picassopolo 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice job promoting hate speech!

[–]citizen_beyond 19ポイント20ポイント  (28子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity.

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State. All problems in the world are to be ultimately solved by the State. Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before. But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 50ポイント51ポイント  (23子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity

/r/im14andthisisdeep

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Did you just put together a bunch of words that would make you sound smart?

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

Ah, yes.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

I know the whole IQ thing is a big sticking point for Nazis, but the difference in IQ between white people and non-white people is not large enough to completely exclude any chance of being as good or better than the average white person.

You're acting like the mental function between a black person and a white person is as wide as it is between a human and a dog.

The smartest, functioning dog is not smarter than the dumbest functioning human.

Whereas the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State

The fuck?

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means.

And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

[–]SocialNationalism 6ポイント7ポイント  (9子コメント)

r/Iam14andthisisdeep

r/notanargument

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Christianity isn't necessarily theistic, it could be about Jesus' teachings and interpretations of them without believing in his divinity; obviously this is just semantic snark over a thing called a metaphor.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

r/notanargument and you're responding to a comment about a meme with stereotypes about a group of people. Also, *renowned.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Assertion without evidence.

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means. And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

NAxALT, bro.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

The liberal mind in a nutshell.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 20ポイント21ポイント  (8子コメント)

Assertion without evidence

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

NAxALT, bro

I have a tip for white nationalists who want to make arguments.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories?

Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets?

Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung.

SUCH SUCCESS.

MUCH PARADISE.

[–]SocialNationalism 6ポイント7ポイント  (7子コメント)

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

No... Unless you are including eugenics.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories? Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets? Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung. SUCH SUCCESS. MUCH PARADISE.

Not an argument.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 17ポイント18ポイント  (4子コメント)

No...

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

It wasn't meant to be an argument, you dullard.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

There's nothing to argue.

It was just facts.

Deal with it.

[–]SocialNationalism 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Finally you get something right.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

It was just facts.

Asking dumb questions then calling them facts... that's not an argument.

[–]George_Rockwell 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm enjoying watching a /u/SocialNationalism go at it with a /u/SpectreOfLenin

Truly 2016 is the best timeline

[–]SocialNationalism 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

ikr seeing this shit is like bait to me

[–]George_Rockwell 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

You're gonna want to hold onto your tendies for this one:

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis "supports the traditional racial groups classification." http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

96-97% of whites have no African ancestry. http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans.3.html

97% of Whites have no black ancestry whatsoever. http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-white-black-a-murky-distinction-grows-still-murkier/

There was "minimal gene flow" between archaic Europeans and Asians. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning. http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf

Human intelligence is highly heritable. http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The average African IQ is estimated at 79. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has a 40-50% genetic basis. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among Whites. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n 2005-1.pdf

[–]SpectreOfLenin 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

None of that dispels what the core of my arguments are; and frankly there is quite a lot of assumption going on here.

Assuming that I'm in favor of mass, unregulated migration. I'm not.

Assuming that I said there is no biological difference between races. I didn't. I said that if there is a difference it is negligible with that persons conditions.

And you're assuming I think people are naturally intercultural. I didn't.

I openly acknowledge that people tend toward their own culture. What I have said is that it is more beneficial to us if we base our society off cooperation between peoples rather than forceful separation of cultures

If you don't want mass migration, get rid of the conditions that cause it. Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

Those have always been the core of my arguments. What you typed is just noise.

[–]George_Rockwell 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

A society of 70 IQ people simply will not achieve what one made up of 100 IQ people will. Ever.

Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

I think I can agree with almost all of this, actually.

[–]citizen_beyond 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

Liberal Progressives often resort to Lewontin's fallacy and ad hominem attacks when their religious views are questioned.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 33ポイント34ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's the funniest part about Nazis.

They claim to be scientific but all the shit that comes out of their mouths are logical fallacies.

"MUH STATISTICS"

"MUH ETHNOSTATE"

"DAE RELIGION?!"

[–]spunk_wizard 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Did you just equate statistics to being fallacies? Liberal denial, everyone

[–]SpectreOfLenin 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

Trying to get biological fact from statistics alone IS a fallacy.

Try thinking for two seconds, frumpis.

[–]thorneedsahaircut 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, this is an actual physical form of autism

[–]ElvishisnotTengwar 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you fucking joking?

[–]RedPillDessert 7ポイント8ポイント  (9子コメント)

Speaking as an alt-right user over there:

Consider than white people in the US have dropped from 90% to 60% of the population in the space of sixty years, and are dropping fast. Less than 50% of US births are now white. The same thing is happening all over Europe too. We are looking at demographic replacement on a vast scale as never seen before.

Personally, I think that's incredibly tragic.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 15ポイント16ポイント  (8子コメント)

The entire reason places like Japan and European countries are successful is because people have career-orientated lifestyles that leave less time to raise a family.

You're paradox is that you want white people to grow in population while maintaining the success that was brought with career-orientated societies.

You can't have it both ways.

[–]Tazer_Swift 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes white and asian countries had career driven people, all the way back to the days of their success. AND THEY GREW IN POPULATION RAPIDLY! Prior to feminism it was the father who was career driven with the mother following her biological imperative; which is what made those societies successful. You're arguing that whites and asians, who now have two full time working parents, in countries that now have embraced feminism, must now have two full time working parents(in the only countries who have accepted that the planet is over populated) which has resulted in elites telling us we now need immigrants to survive to support the ever growing older population.

"Diversity is the only way forward."

No.

[–]RedPillDessert 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

I don't mind NOT growing in population as long as we don't decline and let others overwhelm us instead. White parents can be given incentives to have children. We're almost at two on average, and that's all we need.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

White people get the same welfare and benefits from having children as non-white people do.

Incentive clearly isn't the issue.

Standard of living and careers are what cause decline in population.

The same reason the Alt-Right think white people are superior is the same reason their population is declining.

It's the height of absurb.

[–]quearere_veritatem 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Incentive is the issue... Affirmative action alone is the most anti-white policy ever created. It gives an automatic boost to blacks on sat scores of 250 fucking points. And it puts blacks as a massive priority over white in job hiring.. height of absurd

[–]Static_Line_Bait 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Woodrow "let's bring segregation back!" Wilson. Color me shocked. Shitbag.

[–]clarabutt 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

what the fuck is wrong with you?

[–]IBYMBYBMYL 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I just wanna send a message to all you alt rights fucks here.

Drink bleach and die you fucking scum. I'm not a fan of gulags, but I would love to see all your asses put up against the wall and paint it pink and red with your brains.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 19ポイント20ポイント  (26子コメント)

I wouldn't exactly call us a NatSoc community. Are there NatSoc's who consider themselves Alt Right? Sure. But there are many other groups, as well.

[–]CountAardvark 15ポイント16ポイント  (4子コメント)

NatSoc? Does 'Nazi' not work for you?

[–]GreatApeNiggy 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Nazi is a Jewish slur.

[–]CountAardvark 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

...suuuure, buddy.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Look up who coined the phrase...

[–]PurpleKneesocks 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your name is "GreatApeNiggy"

I don't think I need to look up shit to know that you're a racist shitbag who hates MUH JEWS because you have a hard on for Adolf Hitler.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 17ポイント18ポイント  (19子コメント)

I was basing that title on the fact that Hitler and Mussolini are featured on the topbar of /r/altright.

Don't take anything that I said in the feature as a description of the alt right in general. Everything that I wrote is intended to be a description of your sub and it's interpretation of the alt right.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 11ポイント12ポイント  (16子コメント)

Not an issue. I was just pointing out that the Alt Right is a spectrum. You've got NatSocs and even people further right than that on one end and still others on the other end who think that NatSoc ideology is counter-productive. Ultimately we try to give a nod to all factions without judgement, which is why Jared Taylor is also on the banner, a person who some consider weak on the JQ.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 6ポイント7ポイント  (12子コメント)

That makes sense. Well, if I could do it over again I'd give it a different title but there's already way too many comments to delete this thread.

[–]BeNobleEnough 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

go fuck yourself

[–]quaerere_veritatem 16ポイント17ポイント  (40子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect. Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences. The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity. There are some supremacists in the Alt Right. It would be impossible for such a movement to prevent entry of such people (even if they even wanted to). If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 82ポイント83ポイント  (38子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect.

Name one thing a white person can do that a black person somewhere can't also do.

I'll be waiting.

Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences.

Ah, see I was under the impression that "same talents" meant that a black person and white person can have the same skill set.

But in Nazi fantasy world it means statistical difference in average IQ.

LOGIC!

The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity.

Considering the majority of white people don't identify as Alt-Right doesn't that means the white identity doesn't involve your ideology?

Oh dear. Did you fuck up?

If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

Oh I see, so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics.

Again. LOGIC!

[–]survivalsong 34ポイント35ポイント  (0子コメント)

I admire your patience dealing with these pseudo-intellectual dorks.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 8ポイント9ポイント  (32子コメント)

Well, don't you bring a special type of idiocy to the table...

"Name one thing a white person can do that a black person can't also do"

-This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument. Oh look, you figured it out all by yourself but still didn't edit your first question...hmmm... but i will still oblige: Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves... but I'll leave you with this: Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived! Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

"majority of white people don't identify with alt right doesn't that mean the white identity doesn't involve alt right idiology?"

-You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent.

"so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics"

-No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

You can use your emotional spewing and cries out of racism, but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 55ポイント56ポイント  (8子コメント)

This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument

If you don't want logically fallacious counter arguments, don't use logically fallacious base arguments.

Don't blame me because you don't know how to make sound arguments.

Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves

Oh so were going from "Black people don't have the same talents as white people" to "Ok some do but white people thought of stuff first!"

LOGIC!

Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived!

Yeah those poor blacks.

Suffering under the crushing tyranny of not being slaves.

Thank god we freed them from the shackles of not being involved in world wars and mass genocide!

Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

I love how you have this view of humanity as if white people were just born with the tools to develop things like rocket science and physics.

These things were developed over time. Not because white people are biologically presupposed to be smart but because of the free flow of information between schools of thought.

Take Japan and China for instance.

On average, Japanese and Chinese people have a higher IQ than white people but it wasn't until after WW2 until China and Japan fully industrialized.

So clearly there is something other than genetics at play.

Access to resources, class mobility and the openness of society is what drives innovation.

Not that fact that your white ass well out of a white womans snatch.

You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent

Well at least you're ideology and my question have something in common!

No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

First of all, I'm not a liberal.

I know for someone who doesn't understand political science, the idea that the world isn't just "Us" and "liberals", but I'm not a Liberal.

And secondly if you had actually gone to a UNIVERSITY (Run by the JOOZ undoubtedly) you would know that trying to extract biological fact from statistics makes you look like a joke.

Go ahead and write a thesis to the National Bureau of Statistics and try telling them that statistical disproportion is proof of biolocal inferiority and have them laugh your ass out of the building.

Of course I'm sure that's run by the JOOZ as well.

You can use your emotional spewing

Oh diddums, am I being too emotional?

cries out of racism

Cry or not, where there's shit there's flies and you, my friend, are shit.

but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

Oh BOOO bringing in the Mooslims now?

How about you stop clinging to your statistics like a Jew clings to his gold.

There you go, there's a funnier analogy.

[–]dissdigg 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Imagine being this mad on the internet.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

Bahahaha... your idiocy is entertaining, however, I can't keep arguing with a moron; it's a circular conversation and I think third parties have enough to realize where we stand.

[–]kobbled 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

You see, it's funny because you didn't make a single logically sound argument in this whole thread and your "proof" would have you laughed out of any respectable educational institution

[–]MrRaie 28ポイント29ポイント  (21子コメント)

Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived!

What about the Swahili trade coast? Great Zimbabwe? All the stuff in Ethiopia like the Zagwe? The Kingdom of the Kongo?

Fucking Mali? Mansu Musu was so rich that he messed up the economy of the North African Mediterranean when he went on pilgrimage to Mecca.