上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 346

[–]moistowelettes 58ポイント59ポイント  (71子コメント)

I think this sub is running out of subs

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 5ポイント6ポイント  (14子コメント)

you try finding new subreddits that have 500+ subscribers and that haven't been featured before in /r/SubredditOfTheDay whilst also having enough substance in them to make an interesting read and then making sure that you have a post for every day of every month in the year... its hard man

[–]XENOVICE 20ポイント21ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because what you do here is so important. That's how you rationalize promoting this? Jesus.

[–]Fastball14 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Butthurt level: over 9000!

[–]Dominator27 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Smug Twat level: Over 10000 Trump walls!

[–]Dominator27 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

Why don't you at least not promote nazis. It can't be that hard to do a quick scan of that sub and conclude these people are racist nazis and then move on to another eligible subreddit.

Also Why should racist bigots get a award because your too lazy to find non racist sexist subreddits?

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 10ポイント11ポイント  (55子コメント)

When we feature subs you don't like that doesn't mean we're running out of subs, it means we're featuring subs you don't like. The srotd team is a diverse group of individuals each with their own interests and style. That is why we're able to select a new interesting subreddit every single day.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 54ポイント55ポイント  (31子コメント)

Yeah, that's the problem with Nazis.

Not the mass genocide and ethnic cleansing.

No, it's the fact that they have different opinions is the REAL issue!

[–]bitchy_witcher 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

You cannot meet us on the field of truth.

You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda.

You cannot meet us on the field of war.

You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I getting a sort of BDSM vibe from that article.

Sounds like it was written by someone who desperately wants to be held down and sexually abused.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

HAHA Projection of this magnitude caused me to laugh out loud.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think you know what that means.

[–]XENOVICE 23ポイント24ポイント  (7子コメント)

You're promoting hate.

[–]Myne1001 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

White people? Showing self interest? On MY reddit???

OH MY GOD THIS IS HATE SPEECH LITERALLY NAZIS! OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN!

[–]mavriksfan11 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, the literal top post of the sub is:

We must strengthen the Indoctrination Stations for the goyim children so they can never get a leg up on us again

So it's anti-Semitic...seems pretty close to what Nazis were...but who knows for sure. I mean they aren't German.

[–]Hell_Libertine 18ポイント19ポイント  (4子コメント)

Shame on you for promoting hatred. What's next? You're going to link subs promoting ISIS? You're promoting fucking Neo-Nazis so that won't surprise me.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is there a sub that promotes ISIS? Please point me in it's direction. It would make for a fun feature.

[–]RedPillDessert 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well there's always r/Islam...

I kid.... I kid...... ;)

Seriously, your adoption to free speech is rare and very commendable.

[–]RuthBuzzisback 98ポイント99ポイント  (118子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me..?

[–]YopperApe 36ポイント37ポイント  (42子コメント)

Wow.

Just wow.

I can't even...

[–]Agastopia 39ポイント40ポイント  (41子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

I see you're new to the alt right.

to demonize all Jew's just seems too similar to me to blacks demonizing all whites for the success of many.

Are whites actively undermining blacks? No? Then it's not comparable.

Listen, I'm sure good jews exist. I mean there's the color of crime guy and Paul Gottfried. Outside of that though? Zip. Nada. Zilch.

encourage you to look for exceptions. I tried for a long time to find "good jew" exceptions but consistently they would start jewing somehow and come out in favour of everything we're against. Like the "conservative" jews who ends up being in favour of muslim immigration. Or "libertarian" jews who end up being in favour of importing mestizos. Or "free speech" jews who end up being in favour of political correctness. It never fails, they always jew you in the end.

I can agree there is theoretically a capacity for certain jews to contribute in a positive manner. However it is like finding a unicorn pretty much. And the chance he's gonna jew you and undermine your entire movement is magnitudes higher. Hence for our own preservation we can't really risk anything.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

...well what is your counter? And remember: not every member speaks for the group. Why don't you target Israeli subs or groups for being the most "racist" country on the planet. They do ethnic DNA test for entry and have a machine gun mounted border wall, and take in no "refugees." Pointing out the hypocrisy and subversion of the Jewish tribe is a core principle in the Alt Right.

[–]YopperApe 26ポイント27ポイント  (29子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

Yes we are. That's one of the defining features of the alt-right, that we're racist. Where did you get the idea that it was otherwise?

[–]Agastopia 15ポイント16ポイント  (19子コメント)

At least you admit it

[–]YopperApe 20ポイント21ポイント  (18子コメント)

Now that that's out of the way, what was your point?

[–]SpectreOfLenin 9ポイント10ポイント  (17子コメント)

Are you racist because you have penile issues or inadequacy issues?

[–]SocialNationalism 4ポイント5ポイント  (15子コメント)

No Patrick, muh dik is not an argument.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

This guy has done nothing but bring ridiculous arguments against the Alt Right... sad thing is, he isn't trolling. He is just simple.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

its not racist to prefer white people and defend white interests. Its not racist to point out scientific data. The alt-right isnt inherently racist, but it is inherently pro-white.

[–]Imogens 18ポイント19ポイント  (4子コメント)

Except preferring white people is inherently racist. You are defining a whole group of people based on the colour of their skin and judging them negatively for that. What does pro-white even mean? I'm sure I can find more in common with POC than with you so why would your group best represent my interests as a white person?

[–]Skylord_ah 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

i wouldnt argue with someone named "godemperortrump1488"

[–]George_Rockwell 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Race is not skin color. An albino black is still a member of the black race.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Except preferring white people is inherently racist.

wtf. no its not. youre fucking retarded. Biological preference for your own kind is fucking genetic in origin. You dont know what the fuck your talking about. You also probably dont know what the definition of racism and racist is.

[–]Mulche_ 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

Remember guys, "that's racist" isn't a counter-argument.

[–]_The_Burn_ 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Although racism is a cardinal sin to most, within the Alt Right, it is irrelevant. There is a dichotomy between the standards of morality.

[–]reactionarytree 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

clutching your pearls is not an argument.

[–]waystogetaround 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

Who cares, you honestly think that word, "racist" mean anything to us anymore? We don't need moral validation for vile hypocrites like you and your peers.

The overtton window must swing, believe me, if it's not us it's the rabit 14/88 we try to keep calm and at bay.

[–]itsnotlupus 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not clear on the difference between "rabit 14/88" and the alt right.

Are you some kind of "nazi lite" ideological flavor, shielding us from the carb-heavier full fledged nazis?

Is it possible to Godwin an altright thread? Does that even mean anything at that point?

[–]Incubuns 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shit, were we supposed to be keeping those guys at bay?

[–]PuzzlePirate 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

if it's not us it's the rabit 14/88 we try to keep calm and at bay.

Yeah the Left really doesn't get this. Though I will be laughing on the day, if the alt-Right fails, when the 1488'ers show up and liberals are crying "omg please bring back Pepe!"

[–]Fastball14 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The alt right are peaceful milquetoast compromisers compared to Ironmarch. These basic bitch redditors really have no idea who they're dealing with do they?

[–]Javalavadingdong 26ポイント27ポイント  (67子コメント)

No, grow up and realize people have different opinions than your own.

[–]Agastopia 37ポイント38ポイント  (64子コメント)

White supremacy is awesome!

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] 10ポイント11ポイント  (8子コメント)

No its not.

[–]Agastopia 21ポイント22ポイント  (6子コメント)

I feel like you don't know what subreddit you've made subreddit of the day...

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

wasn't written by me or my choice to post it, if it was I would have not featured it

[–]quaerere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why? That is silly. Preference is not hate! If I prefer light beer rather than dark beer, does this make me hate dark beer, or dark beer drinkers?

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

its just too controversial a topic for my liking plus it means more mod work for me policing the thread

[–]quaerere_veritatem 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I feel like you are too close minded to realize their points

[–]quaerere_veritatem 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Supremacy is something the Alt Right has tried to deal with; we try to let people know that supremacy is mainly subjective, but it is important that identity and preservation of identity is important. However, the facts do point to European people and East Asian people as creating societies that are objectively better when measuring standards of living, crime rates, and technology. So the argument of supremacy in certain areas is quite legitimate.

[–]Javalavadingdong 23ポイント24ポイント  (35子コメント)

What's so wrong with being proud of your race? Every other race except whites can have pride for their race.

[–]guncha 23ポイント24ポイント  (34子コメント)

Every other race pride is as dumb as white pride.

[–]MarcusCamillius 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

You should tell that to BLM, la Raza and other racial pride groups. I know you won't, because you only hate White people, and you want us to be individuals while encouraging other groups to have racial solidarity.

[–]guncha 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

I will call them dumb if they come here and start arguing that black or hispanic pride is somehow an exception. I will call you dumb too if you keep jumping to conclusions:

because you only hate White people

You capitalized "white"? Really?

[–]quaerere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I do that too, I also capitalize Black

[–]yesididmakeanother 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think capitalizing "white" is kinda gay usually, but if I'm in the middle of a conversation and someone puts "white" in scare quotes because they think race is a social construct and there's no such thing as white people, then I'll capitalize it.

[–]Fastball14 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

White is a proper noun in this context. Capitalization is appropriate.

[–]MarcusCamillius 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lol no you won't. You'll spend your time calling out White people for loving their heritage because you hate White people.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

bullshit. You wouldnt dare go up to a black guy with his fist in the air and tell him black power is dumb.

[–]Javalavadingdong 3ポイント4ポイント  (19子コメント)

And why it stupid? It's unhealthy to feel guilty about something you can't change.

[–]guncha 4ポイント5ポイント  (18子コメント)

Exactly, and by the same token it's stupid to feel proud of something that you didn't choose and can't change.

I think it's hard for Americans because when you are an Irish-German-Italian, it's hard to feel connected to and be proud of either of those cultures.

People just want to belong and, when lacking better options, they'll pick something obvious like race to separate their group from the others.

I'd much rather people be proud of their home state or their city, because then at least they're not pissing off their next door neighbors.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 7ポイント8ポイント  (15子コメント)

This notion that you can't be proud of something you were born with is insane. So Einstein shouldn't be proud he was smart, An American shouldn't be proud of being born in the USA, a person shouldn't have ancestral pride. Stop talking out your ass. It is legitimate to be proud of whatever you feel is worthy of pride.

[–]DrEnzope 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

The emotion you feel about your country is legitimate. But you must consider weather that emotion helps or hinders your thinking about the well being of your country and the world.

Einstein shouldn't have pride in being intelligent; he should have pride in his theory of general and special relativity.

If he hadn't produced those theories he may have been remembered as the patent's office most brilliant clerk. But, he certainly wouldn't have the renown that he currently has in our culture.

Not to mention the fact that Einstein himself was deeply critical of Nationalism.

[–]bobsbigboi 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

DrEnzope - the final authority on which of your emotions are legitimate.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Perhaps Einstein would have never pursued physics if not for his happiness and pride in his natural born abilities, you generally don't pursue things you don't like or have an affinity for. I get what you are saying for sure, but it is still ok to admire your talents and your culture, even if you didn't chose them. I do believe pride in non earned gains should only be had if the objective is to press forward and not use the pride as an excuse to be complacent

[–]Sp0rks 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

I have a personal bias against pride. It makes me really cringe when people are prideful of things they were born with. America was founded on the principal of meritocracy so I have no idea where things like nationalism and ethnic pride come from.

When someone says 'being Italian is awesome' or my father goes on and on about his British heritage my eyes just gloss over.

Sorry to put you on the spot, but could you try to change my view on this?

[–]Mulche_ 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

One of the things about pride in ancestry or heritage is the idea that "if they accomplished this great thing, then I can do something just as great."

Pride doesn't mean you walk around thinking all day "man, I'm better than everyone because I'm ___," it just means you derive some strength from knowing that people just like you were able to accomplish great things in their lives, and you carry their blood and/or ideals.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ya, that does put me on the spot... society is most efficient with meritocracy, but the argument being made isn't whether White people should get priority over others when applying to jobs, ect... it's simply being happy with what you have and capitalizing on it. Like the priority I give to and pride I have in my siblings, simply for being family. It is natural and healthy. It becomes destructive when the pride is not accompanied by pursuit or isn't being represented properly; but the Alt Right is not a circle jerk of narcissists, these are people willing to spend time (like I'm doing now) to express concern about the destructive path the west is taking, whether you agree or not with the assessment. We genuinely care about preserving what we have come to admire. It's hard o explain, but I don't like the idea that someone can't have pride in ancestry, culture, talents, other non earned abilities.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'd much rather people be proud of their home state or their city, because then at least they're not pissing off their next door neighbors.

You must not be too familiar with gang culture. Diversity literally kills each other based on what city they "represent".

[–]yesididmakeanother 7ポイント8ポイント  (17子コメント)

Almost no one in the alt right is a white supremacist.

They are many other things, but not white supremacists.

[–]Agastopia 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

[–]yesididmakeanother 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yeah, that's pretty accurate.

It's racism and it's white nationalism, but it's not white supremacy.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

In a sense, yes, I would never call a random White person supreme to a random Black person, but when it comes to societies and groups, very compelling supremacists arguments can be made as I'm sure you can understand. No individual should be judged based on a group tho... that's important to the Alt Right

[–]Fastball14 6ポイント7ポイント  (10子コメント)

Whites should be supreme in our homelands just like the Japanese should be supreme in Japan.

[–]dtam21 4ポイント5ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm pretty sure Europe is still pretty white. You're more than welcome to go back.

[–]Fastball14 10ポイント11ポイント  (7子コメント)

That situation is changing with the millions of non Whites swarming the continent. Soon there will be no White countries left. It is an ongoing, worldwide program to genocide our people.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

And birthrates are sky rocketing. it doesn't take long to see drastic changes

[–]dtam21 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

Well you better get back there quick! Keep the numbers up!

[–]penguinseatsocks 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

this narrative has been the absolute, hands-down stupidest one following the election. "don't be mad because your candidate lost!" really? are we voting for the next fucking dorito flavor?

[–]itsnotlupus 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

I see this sub is exploring the fine line between being morally neutral and being morally bankrupt.

Will they find the line? Stay tuned.

[–]roflocalypselol 12ポイント13ポイント  (5子コメント)

Okay since apparently this is happening... the Alt Right as defined by its creators is a racial awareness movement. The alt-right as coopted by Breitbart, The_donald, Milo, etc. is not. They just wanted a way to say non-establishment conservatives and well...picked a confusing label. The Alt Right considers those people 'alt light' or still 'normies'.

[–]cxl61 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

The sub featured here is more of that actual white nationalist movement, compared to that less extreme Trump movement that's also used the label.

[–]roflocalypselol 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Trump movement, etc. simply coopted the name without researching it much, I think. T_D is very inclusive. The real Alt Right includes white identitarians and other race realists, but only some are actual NatSoc.

[–]cxl61 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Definitely. T_D will accept pretty anyone who supports Trump (they love highlighting token minority supporters in that sub), while the true and less visible alt-right usually do believe that racially homogeneous societies are most successful (and consider minorities to be "them" compared to "us" being white people).

[–]CuckNorris1 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Alt light is still fairly race realist, they just dog whistle more and don't write about it as clearly.

[–]Lokismoke 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

Reddit's very own NatSoc community.

I take it you mean National Socialist community?! TF?! That's "Alt Right" in the same way the sounds of a man stuffing a pile of baby gerbils into a hollowed out watermelon is "Alt Rock."

[–]cxl61 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the Nazi description is somewhat accurate, even though not all people on that sub are at the Hitler level of racist. (These groups were the first to call themselves alt-right, while the term only more recently came to denote the more moderate pro-Trump movements that primarily oppose the political establishment)

[–]081624 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, that is alt right. Ok not all alt right people are national socialists but they are all racists, and that's the entire point. You just think alt right isn't about racism because people like Hillary Clinton told you it's about racism, and redditors have this Pavlovian response where whenever Hillary says something you assume it's false and call her out of touch.

[–]Golden_Dawn 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

If Hillary Clinton said the sun would come up tomorrow, the whole planet would need to prepare for the coming darkness. Corrupt has never knowingly said a true thing in her life.

[–]flydigh 23ポイント24ポイント  (4子コメント)

As a fan of chaos this pleases me.

[–]Fastball14 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

[–]jaskano 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Praise kek and his prophet Donald Trump

[–]The--Goyim--know 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT KEK!!!

[–]Fastball14 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Prophets are a Semitic thing. Pepe is the avatar of Kek. Trump might or might not be the reincarnation of Wotan. He seems to fit the trope/archetype/ancestral memory, anyway. Aryan mythology is all about heroes.

[–]waystogetaround 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wow..., Oh my, the poor naive souls over at SRD and other metasureddits are going to have hard time to even.

These are the people who are convinced that the folks at /r/The_Donald are literally(for real) Hitler 2.0, wonder what that makes us.

[–]Myne1001 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I commented this on an article about Breitbart around the time Bannon joined the Trump campaign

"You think Breitbart is bad? Just you wait until you go further down the rabbit hole. Then you'll be thinking Breitbart is moderate"

[–]Dominator27 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

What the Fuck! The Alt right gets featured it's like r/theredpill all over again. First Furry porn then a bunch of KKK endorsers who believe nonsense like the "white genocide" conspiracy. A bunch of neo-nazis (with pepes) don't deserve this reward!

[–]yesididmakeanother 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

/r/altright is a subreddit of peace.

[–]magadorspartacus 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I read that as /r/alright which I would imagine would be pretty chill.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 15ポイント16ポイント  (20子コメント)

I wouldn't exactly call us a NatSoc community. Are there NatSoc's who consider themselves Alt Right? Sure. But there are many other groups, as well.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 10ポイント11ポイント  (18子コメント)

I was basing that title on the fact that Hitler and Mussolini are featured on the topbar of /r/altright.

Don't take anything that I said in the feature as a description of the alt right in general. Everything that I wrote is intended to be a description of your sub and it's interpretation of the alt right.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 10ポイント11ポイント  (15子コメント)

Not an issue. I was just pointing out that the Alt Right is a spectrum. You've got NatSocs and even people further right than that on one end and still others on the other end who think that NatSoc ideology is counter-productive. Ultimately we try to give a nod to all factions without judgement, which is why Jared Taylor is also on the banner, a person who some consider weak on the JQ.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 5ポイント6ポイント  (11子コメント)

That makes sense. Well, if I could do it over again I'd give it a different title but there's already way too many comments to delete this thread.

[–]CuckNorris1 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

They recently changed the banner and it annoyed the hell out of me for exactly this reason. The Hitler banner and the iron crosses everywhere make it too NatSoc. Most of those people wouldn't want to be in a banner with Hitler.

I don't have an issue with the National Socialists in the movement, but they aren't everyone.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't let it bother you too much. Every NatSoc in the Alt Right will openly admit that it is White Nationalist only movement. Hitler pics are as much an admiration as it is meant to trigger liberals for fun.

[–]citizen_beyond 19ポイント20ポイント  (20子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity.

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State. All problems in the world are to be ultimately solved by the State. Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before. But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 19ポイント20ポイント  (16子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity

/r/im14andthisisdeep

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Did you just put together a bunch of words that would make you sound smart?

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

Ah, yes.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

I know the whole IQ thing is a big sticking point for Nazis, but the difference in IQ between white people and non-white people is not large enough to completely exclude any chance of being as good or better than the average white person.

You're acting like the mental function between a black person and a white person is as wide as it is between a human and a dog.

The smartest, functioning dog is not smarter than the dumbest functioning human.

Whereas the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State

The fuck?

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means.

And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

[–]citizen_beyond 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Liberal Progressives often resort to Lewontin's fallacy and ad hominem attacks when their religious views are questioned.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's the funniest part about Nazis.

They claim to be scientific but all the shit that comes out of their mouths are logical fallacies.

"MUH STATISTICS"

"MUH ETHNOSTATE"

"DAE RELIGION?!"

[–]SocialNationalism 0ポイント1ポイント  (8子コメント)

r/Iam14andthisisdeep

r/notanargument

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Christianity isn't necessarily theistic, it could be about Jesus' teachings and interpretations of them without believing in his divinity; obviously this is just semantic snark over a thing called a metaphor.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

r/notanargument and you're responding to a comment about a meme with stereotypes about a group of people. Also, *renowned.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Assertion without evidence.

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means. And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

NAxALT, bro.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

The liberal mind in a nutshell.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 6ポイント7ポイント  (7子コメント)

Assertion without evidence

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

NAxALT, bro

I have a tip for white nationalists who want to make arguments.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories?

Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets?

Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung.

SUCH SUCCESS.

MUCH PARADISE.

[–]thorneedsahaircut 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, this is an actual physical form of autism

[–]quaerere_veritatem 10ポイント11ポイント  (10子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect. Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences. The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity. There are some supremacists in the Alt Right. It would be impossible for such a movement to prevent entry of such people (even if they even wanted to). If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 9ポイント10ポイント  (9子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect.

Name one thing a white person can do that a black person somewhere can't also do.

I'll be waiting.

Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences.

Ah, see I was under the impression that "same talents" meant that a black person and white person can have the same skill set.

But in Nazi fantasy world it means statistical difference in average IQ.

LOGIC!

The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity.

Considering the majority of white people don't identify as Alt-Right doesn't that means the white identity doesn't involve your ideology?

Oh dear. Did you fuck up?

If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

Oh I see, so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics.

Again. LOGIC!

[–]quaerere_veritatem 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well, don't you bring a special type of idiocy to the table...

"Name one thing a white person can do that a black person can't also do"

-This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument. Oh look, you figured it out all by yourself but still didn't edit your first question...hmmm... but i will still oblige: Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves... but I'll leave you with this: Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived! Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

"majority of white people don't identify with alt right doesn't that mean the white identity doesn't involve alt right idiology?"

-You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent.

"so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics"

-No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

You can use your emotional spewing and cries out of racism, but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 8ポイント9ポイント  (5子コメント)

This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument

If you don't want logically fallacious counter arguments, don't use logically fallacious base arguments.

Don't blame me because you don't know how to make sound arguments.

Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves

Oh so were going from "Black people don't have the same talents as white people" to "Ok some do but white people thought of stuff first!"

LOGIC!

Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived!

Yeah those poor blacks.

Suffering under the crushing tyranny of not being slaves.

Thank god we freed them from the shackles of not being involved in world wars and mass genocide!

Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

I love how you have this view of humanity as if white people were just born with the tools to develop things like rocket science and physics.

These things were developed over time. Not because white people are biologically presupposed to be smart but because of the free flow of information between schools of thought.

Take Japan and China for instance.

On average, Japanese and Chinese people have a higher IQ than white people but it wasn't until after WW2 until China and Japan fully industrialized.

So clearly there is something other than genetics at play.

Access to resources, class mobility and the openness of society is what drives innovation.

Not that fact that your white ass well out of a white womans snatch.

You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent

Well at least you're ideology and my question have something in common!

No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

First of all, I'm not a liberal.

I know for someone who doesn't understand political science, the idea that the world isn't just "Us" and "liberals", but I'm not a Liberal.

And secondly if you had actually gone to a UNIVERSITY (Run by the JOOZ undoubtedly) you would know that trying to extract biological fact from statistics makes you look like a joke.

Go ahead and write a thesis to the National Bureau of Statistics and try telling them that statistical disproportion is proof of biolocal inferiority and have them laugh your ass out of the building.

Of course I'm sure that's run by the JOOZ as well.

You can use your emotional spewing

Oh diddums, am I being too emotional?

cries out of racism

Cry or not, where there's shit there's flies and you, my friend, are shit.

but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

Oh BOOO bringing in the Mooslims now?

How about you stop clinging to your statistics like a Jew clings to his gold.

There you go, there's a funnier analogy.

[–]dissdigg 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Imagine being this mad on the internet.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Bahahaha... your idiocy is entertaining, however, I can't keep arguing with a moron; it's a circular conversation and I think third parties have enough to realize where we stand.

[–]Shitgenstein 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm curious for any alt-right users here, I have a question. I will not try to argue against your answer. I will respect your right to have the views which you have.

How do things like "Human Bio-Diversity" and "race realism" differ from concepts like polygenism and scientific racism which are widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

[–]Daniel_Walker89 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

I have no idea what the alt right is. All I know is that White people must become a minority in every country they live. That is love. That is tolerance.

[–]CantSayISaidSo 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd like to put a huge target on my back and let all you fascist fucks know that myself and my two very white, very Anglo-descended brothers have all procreated with women of color.

Death to your vision of America. I'm proud to be doing my part.

[–]Psycho_Logically 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

As the description above entails, the AltRight is an ideology entirely concerned with seeking the truth, and representing empirical reality through their beliefs (unlike modern liberalism or conservatism). As such, if you have a problem with any of their viewpoints, and you think you have the evidence to argue against it, you'll be welcomed for an open and honest discussion (but then laughed at when you're wrong).

[–]BeyondTheModel 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Odd, a feel like this subreddit has a foundation that leans in a specific direction.. to the right, perhaps?

[–]gujnh 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The alt-right isn't about epistemic rationality or empiricism. It's entirely possible to believe HBD is empirically accurate but reject their racial-purity value system in favor of liberalism. The alt-right doesn't seem to understand the difference between descriptive (empirical) and normative claims. And, while I think HBD has a good chance of being true (or mostly true, at least), the other major factual beliefs associated with the alt-right are clearly stupid (Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories, etc.)

[–]GordoSSGranudo 0ポイント1ポイント  (23子コメント)

Hahhaa!

All the liberals crying!

That's right.

Liberals, your days of crying+complaining to get what you want are over.

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] 21ポイント22ポイント  (21子コメント)

Grow up

[–]GordoSSGranudo 7ポイント8ポイント  (20子コメント)

Is this not what this comment section is? Liberals complaining we were made sub of the day?

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 10ポイント11ポイント  (19子コメント)

three of the comments are people complaining, yes, but even so you don't need to be so immature and petty, we are all people at the end of the day

[–]OneZedArmy 6ポイント7ポイント  (10子コメント)

we are all people at the end of the day

Humans yes, but not people.

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 9ポイント10ポイント  (9子コメント)

behave.

[–]Golden_Dawn 3ポイント4ポイント  (8子コメント)

"Behavior" is part and parcel of being alive. Any entity that's alive can't help but exhibit behavior in an ongoing and continuous process.

the way in which an animal or person acts in response to a particular situation or stimulus.

Stimulus is ongoing and constant, whether it be from our sensory apparatus, or from our consciousness itself. The result? Behavior.

Bottom line: /u/OneZedArmy is behaving.

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

piss off

On the counsel of my fellow moderators moderator I have been duly reminded that as a moderator of this weird and wonderful community I must lead by example on how one should conduct themselves in this subreddit. My comment was so obviously outrageous and aggressive and for that I apologise. perhaps I may phrase it better now:

"please don't be pedantic you know what I meant when I said behave"

there we go :)))))))))

[–]Golden_Dawn 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hahaha, I actually just came back from my user page to add an edit to my above comment, because, that was so pedantic that it verged dangerously close to snarky. What have I become‽

But it was also a bit of commentary on the undertones in the exchange between you and /u/OneZedArmy. Which needs nothing further.

Your fellow moderator has good counsel. 🐸

[–]Fastball14 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

You are technically correct, but this is the Jewiest comment I've seen in months.

[–]GordoSSGranudo 5ポイント6ポイント  (7子コメント)

Me immature and petty? I'm not the one rioting in cities raging because trump lost.

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 9ポイント10ポイント  (5子コメント)

And neither are the people commenting in this thread.

[–]Golden_Dawn 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Spreading corruption on the internet instead of through beatings and violence in the street is more an artifact of their physicality and social adjustment than their desire and ethics. Fact is, both wings (internet and street) of that human corruption movement are wearing the same brownshirts under their their intolerant and hateful guise.

an external form, appearance, or manner of presentation, typically concealing the true nature of something.

Underneath... We've seen the most abhorrent and, really, anti-human behavior and practices from that human corruption movement generally known as "the left", or "progressives".

[–]SpectreOfLenin 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Spreading corruption on the internet instead of through beatings and violence in the street is more an artifact of their physicality and social adjustment than their desire and ethics. Fact is, both wings (internet and street) of that human corruption movement are wearing the same brownshirts under their their intolerant and hateful guise.

[[[[NEO-NAZI TRANSALTION MACHINE!]]]]

"HAVING OPINIONS I DISAGREE WITH IS LITERALLY VIOLENCE. HELP IM BEING RAPED."

[–]quaerere_veritatem 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, to be honest we don't see the same backlash for those rioting groups as we see with peaceful groups like the Alt Right.

[–]Neveronlyadream131 -1ポイント0ポイント  (37子コメント)

unofficial alt right representative here to answer all your questions about the political and racial movement that just took the white house!

AMA

MAGA

[–]CigaretteFactory 6ポイント7ポイント  (31子コメント)

The Alt-Right, unlike the dominant ideology of the 20th Century (Liberalism/Conservatism), examines the world through a lens of realism. Rather than continue to look at the world through the ideological blinders that Liberalism imposes

What exactly are these "ideological blinders"? To me this sounds like "realism > ethics". Feel free to correct me

[–]RoboChrist 10ポイント11ポイント  (25子コメント)

Its also bullshit. Everyone who believes in something disgusting claims they're just being a realist. No, you're just a racist/eugenicist/sociopath who thinks that's what "reality" is.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

No, you're just a racist/eugenicist/sociopath who thinks that's what "reality" is.

Do you really believe that name-calling is going to work? The takeaway from the latest US presidential election should be that name-calling has failed you and it's time to move on to using actual arguments.

[–]RoboChrist 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

People ignoring reality doesn't change reality.

[–]SoupTyrant 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's kind of ironic considering your post above this one.

[–]RoboChrist 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

To you.

[–]SoupTyrant 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, it is ironic to me. It would be to you as well if you had some self awareness.

[–]Fastball14 6ポイント7ポイント  (14子コメント)

What's bad about eugenics? If we don't plan for a eugenic society the only other option is dysgenics.

[–]RoboChrist 3ポイント4ポイント  (13子コメント)

The people who take it upon themselves to decide what genes are "good genes" tend to have a bias.

Plus, genetic variety means a society less likely to be wiped out by a single cause. Eugenics necessarily reduces genetic variety.

[–]Fastball14 2ポイント3ポイント  (9子コメント)

There are a lot of misconceptions about eugenics. Here is a good website about it http://www.eugenics.net

[–]RoboChrist 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

No thank you.

[–]Golden_Dawn 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

The open minded liberal, at a glance.

[–]RoboChrist 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

The problem with being open-minded is that certain people always try to fill it with bullshit.

[–]FuckingWrites 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Can't you choose which parts to be filled and with what? Aren't you smart enough to think critically?

[–]quaerere_veritatem 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Only for some genes, not for objectively good ones, like those that influence intelligence and health

[–]RoboChrist 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Only for some genes, not for objectively good ones, like those that influence intelligence and health

That's still subjective. Intelligence is associated with mental illness in many cases. Conditions like sickle cell anemia prevent malaria, especially if you're heterozygous for it. If a gene is universally, objectively good, it would be far more dominant.

And what happens if we have someone like Steven Hawking, who had a genetic predisposition for ALS, but is extremely brilliant? Screen him out of the gene pool and you lose a lot.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

You didn't argue anything I said. Intelligence -in some cases- might come with baggage, like depression and anxiety. But that isn't to say it can't be rid of. And eugenics isn't about perfection more than it is about betterment. Better population health can be achieved and of course there will still be issues. I should note that I support incentivized eugenics, not forced eugenics. People should not be told they can't breed with the person they love.

[–]ThatFeministGirl 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

"Realism" as used by the alt right and others has a fixed meaning that isn't the same as what normal people say. They mean that phenomenon often considered to be a sociological optical illusion or a social construct, like race and gender, are actually real phenomenon. It isn't just a fancy way of saying "We're right".

[–]SocialNationalism 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

Species is a social construct.

[–]Fastball14 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Check your vertebrae privilege

[–]quaerere_veritatem 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

The continents, terrain, and tree species are too, however, this doesn't at all refute that they have extreme differences. What is you point in saying this?

[–]citizen_beyond 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Have you ever started down an awkward conversation and said "I don't think we're supposed to be talking about this"?

[–]Psycho_Logically 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Perhaps one of the most prominant "ideological blinders" is described very succinctly by u/citizen_beyond in his comment above:

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

[–]NuclearSpaceLegos 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why do you support Trump? He's not alt right.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wait, was Hillary a secret Alt Right Nominee?

[–]NuclearSpaceLegos 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, but Trump isn't alt right. Even your fellow alt righters think so.

[–]TheSnowNinja 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have a question. What exactly is White Identity? What does that mean?

I am a white guy with genealogy that goes back to Scotland, Sweden, and a variety of European countries tries. I celebrate that heritage. I play in a Scottish Pipe and Drum band. I eat Haggis and wear a kilt. We occasionally eat Swedish food and visit towns with Swedish history.

White Identify seems vague and a response to ideas like "Black Power" instead of being an identity in itself. How many alt-right people know their genealogical roots at all?