R1: In the poster's purported rule 1 explanation here SMGB_NeonYoshi claims that the video is incorrect because:

1. it doesn't prove evolution in the video
2. that the video switches between using "different types" of evolution

To answer both points:

1. The video is not attempting to prove evolution. It is just debunking commonly held myths about evolution. The video's statement that all evidence points to evolution being true is a fact, not bad science.
2. While there are different patterns of evolution that sometimes referred to as types of evolution(divergent, convergent and parallel) these distinctions are not relevant to the definition of evolution used in the video. The video never changes the "type" of evolution it is referring to.

It is worth pointing out that SMGB_NeonYoshi is the moderator of a creationist subreddit and has a creationist blog.