No.1037768
Did he even win because he's a good candidate? Or were people voting along party lines and just no one gave a shit about Hilary?
No.1037773
>>1037768
Hello! Michigander here.
Trump won because all the inbred hicks and white trash voted but the niggers stayed home. If the niggers voted Hillary would have won and we wouldn't be in the middle of preparing the bunkers right now.
No.1037775
No.1037778
>>1037773
I dunno, I don't see how that would make that much of a difference
No.1037780
Now that the election is over, can we have an american election general thread, so shit trump/Hillary threads don't need to be made every five fucking minutes?
No.1037789
Comparing all women to Hillary Clinton is the most cruelly sexist thing I can think of.
No.1037801
can you imagine a world where chicks under 24 were not allowed to own social media
can you imagine just one day not encountering a shitty piece of "lol white ppl" (usually coming from a white girl trying to paint herself as different) wisdom when you're trying to read the your facebook feeds
No.1037808
>>1037768
>sabotage the campaign of their most popular candidate in favor of a corrupt party favorite that was literally under FBI investigation while campaigning
>demonized your most active and energetic element of your constituency
>act as though you've already won months before voting even starts
>have a tepid centrist platform bogged down in meaningless details
>sell your candidate entirely on the fact that she isn't Trump
>pander to moderate republicans and a small cadre of centrist policy wonks
>take a condescending attitude towards the working class, act as though they owe you their vote regardless of what you do
>completely ignore all criticism and try to blame the Russians for trying to sabotage your campaign even though at most all they did was air your dirty laundry
Clearly, it's everyone else's fault that the Democrats lost.
No.1037810
>>1037785
>total Republican rule
>Textbook fascism
No.1037820
>>1037773
>relying on people who can't afford to skip a days earnings in their wageslavery job for votes
>be surprised you're not getting votes
durr
No.1037852
>>1037785
God I fucking hate that cunt.
No.1037861
>>1037801
I lived that world. A common internet joke was that online all men are men, all women are men, and all children are the FBI. I really miss those days not because there were less women, but because the internet wasn't overrun by normalfags and social media as we know it didn't exist.
No.1037862
>>1037801
can you imagine a world where men under 24 were not allowed to own social media
can you imagine just one day not encountering a shitty piece of "lol feminists" (usually coming from a young man trying to paint himself as edgy) wisdom when you're trying to read the your facebook feeds
No.1037864
>>1037801
>>1037862
Twice in a row? Confirmed /pol/ copy pasta
No.1037869
>>1037861
4chan/8chan are pretty much snapshots of the old internet.
No.1037876
>>1037869
No you're not you faggot, we didn't have shits like /v/ or /pol/ back then
No.1037882
Man those silly alt-right and their conspiracy theories…oh wait
No.1037886
>>1037876
There was racism all over the internet in the 90s. Political correctness wasn't really a thing back then and especially not on the internet. The only difference is the racism wasn't edgy in the 90s and now it's edgy but it's the same kind of stuff like it was preserved in permafrost the entire time.
No.1037908
>>1037869
True, but imageboard culture has changed for the worse since then.
No.1037926
>>1037802
>twitter blackout
fucking liberals lmao
No.1037987
Moviebob has been going nuclear
No.1037990
>>1037987
it's like an amalgation of all the liberal nonsense I've been hearing in one neat little package
No.1037993
>>1037987
Literally talking shit about the working class.
Liberals are the retarded """""""""left"""""""""
No.1037995
As a Berniebro i think Shillary was the problem she was a terrible candidate.
No.1037996
>being so drunk on idpol you don't even know what you're protesting besides UGHHH RACISM
No.1038135
>>1037987
>Worst thing won't be if Clinton loses, worst thing will be bro'gressive narrative that it was "corruption" and not deep systemic hatred of women
you can tell how desperate he is to get laid with that sentence alone
>History (fair or not) will eventually remember Hillary as a hero,
even the Yemeni children who are starving to death because of her?
> however imperfect,
she screwed up the easiest electoral win in the world
>who was failed by the country she tried to save
remember, It's YOUR FAULT Hillary isn't president right now, not hers
No.1038149
>>1037987
>>1038135
jesus christ cinema robert is the fucking avatar of deluded self-important upper-class liberals.
No.1038161
>>1037995
>As a Berniebro i think Shillary was the problem she was a terrible candidate.
I know most of /pol/ was assuming it was going to be bernie from the beginning. Most of the nuclear-grade memes were prepared for Bernie and we had to scramble for the Hillary stuff.
I think he would have won, but then again I never thought Trump would win period.
All that being said, I feel strongly that Hillary was the best possible candidate for Trump to face and the media did everything in their power to tick off a lot of the afterberners into voting stein, johnson, or even Trump.
No.1038170
>>1037987
>there's no economic anxiety, only racism
…
No.1038200
>bust your ass and politically scheme for over 4 decades
>finally make the push for President that you've dreamed about since you were a little girl
>lose
>to a celebrity
>celebrity billionaire Donald Trump
>all because of the exact same scheming you've been doing for over 4 drcades
No.1038225
>>1037987
Liberals in power: Lol, fucking rednecks, why are you so afraid of change?
Liberals in opposition: AARGH the country i changing in a way I don't like, this is terrifying!
No.1038237
>>1037987
>contempt for plebs intensifies
No.1038241
>>1038239
>this is how the future voted
No.1038258
>>1038241
lel. Honestly, we should just skip out all the middle men and have one election every ten years where only 14-24 year olds vote.
No.1038268
>>1037882
One side keeps blaming the other for rigging elections, when they are both part of it.
No.1038279
Anything more delicious than libtard infighting?
No.1038287
>>1038279
We should fuel it until their leaders are all gone and the masses get behind us. We need some central figures like the Alt-Right got Milo, Alex Jones, etc., though.
No.1038294
>>1038287
You should try to claim based professor.
No.1038295
No.1038297
>>1038287
Any time you find yourself thinking "we need an Alex Jones," you should stop and reevaluate your whole life.
No.1038310
>>1038297
Get yourself a couple extra billion neurons, then come back and re-read what I've wrote.
No.1038320
Jeez, imagine being a cunt. The men hate you for being to liberal and now all non-whites hate you for not being liberal enough.
No.1038344
>>1038310
I did read what you wrote.
Fringe political movements, especially on the Internet, tend to attract cultists and attention whoring weirdos, like Alex Jones and Milo.
Even if the movement started with some level of sense or good intentions, these leaders will insure it becomes a laughingstock when they go full cultist, for example Posadism.
No.1038348
>>1038320
>women should have loyalty to other women above all else
The difference between liberal idpol and Nazis grows less and less by the day.
No.1038388
>>1037987
This is so fucking emblematic of the liberal left today. They see working class white people voting Trump and assume that it's because they're all racist and sexist, they compeltely refuse to recognizes that these people clearly feel abandoned by the political establishment and neoliberalism, as well as constantly being brushed off as "privledged" by liberals and having their concerns dismissed. For fuck's sake these same people turned out in droves to vote for Bernie. There is such an untapped well of possible leftist sentiment here it's not even fucking funny. Clearly the democrats and their shills are too retarded to mobilize it, hopefully somebody like the IWW will be smart enough to realize the potential.
No.1038408
I wanted trump to lose simply so /pol/ would cry about it, but the silver lining is that now liberals are crying, and Hillary might go to prison.
No.1038411
>>1038279
so are they calling women who voted trump feminists? im confused now
No.1038440
>>1038279
>Flat Chested Feminism
Why is this person sexualizing non-whites, while leaving the white girl immaculate and pure.
<spoiler> Can I play Idpol too? </spoiler>
No.1038453
>>1038440
Pretty sure the artist was attacking white women in that pic. Probably a joke about how white women have flat chests and asses.
No.1038470
>>1038411
you could always read the article…
No.1038471
>>1037802
Holy shit they are doing a twitter black out!
No.1038473
>>1038453
Which is basically just contributing to the sexualization of Woc. This isn't even mentioning the fact the white girl is dressed more professionally.
I also noticed only the blonde people have hands, is that another message?
I'm not really trying to be realistic, just finding things to help in the death spiral.
No.1038481
>>1038455
>things that definitely happened
No.1038491
>>1038473
Yeah, calling out libtards as racist/sexist is pretty kek.
No.1038497
>>1038455
Is this what liberals think is actually what goes on in reality?
No.1038514
>>1038497
Oh it's happening. I was walking to work yesterday, and I saw a group of young white males in red hats. They approached me and said "Can I see your papers". I responded, frightened, that they were not the authorities. One said "Trump President Nao, he gonna make all white people authorities." At this point I ran, knowing my life was in danger.
>yfw liberals are more ridiculous about trump than conservative paranoiacs were about obama.
No.1038523
All of this outrage reminds me of when John Kerry lost against GWB in 2004. I don't think many of these kids remember that time.
A Trump presidency will forge these children into adults.
No.1038556
>>1038268
yeah because everyone is wrong, except you. and nobody has made a political movement for the exact reasons that you want to. therefor everyone is wrong except you
No.1038561
>>1038287
can we finally unite against something? or are you also just people from (the real) /pol?
No.1038644
>>1038561
Who is "we"? We can unite against the Bourgeois when the liberal ideologues have been removed and their liberal followers are ideologically exhausted enough to switch to our side.
No.1038659
>>1038561
I've always been supportive of your fight against bigoted SJWs such as the ones posted in this thread. The problem is that a lot of /pol/ just seem to be mirror images of those SJWs. If you swap white for black, men for women, cis for trans, straight for gay, they start to be very hard to tell apart. I don't give a shit about any of those attributes. With that in mind, I'm not sure how much our goals actually overlap.
No.1038670
>>1038659
to be fair, /pol/ still supports freedom of speech. Sure, they'll shout at those they disagree with, but tehy don't seek to have big daddy government come in and protect them from words.
inb4 screencaps of /pol/ bans, two can play at that game
No.1038687
>>1038670
The libertarian side of /pol/ aren't too bad. From what I've seen though, the authoritarian anti-free-speech faction have gained control of the moderation and most of the discussion on the board. Tankies on /leftypol/ piss me off too, of course, but there is a vast difference in moderation between the two. For instance, /pol/ wouldn't tolerate endless fucking threads by anfems and /pol/ repeating exactly the same boring, shitty bait over and over and over and over and over again every day.
No.1038699
>>1038455
I mean, I DO believe that racial aggression are something that can happen, but why do you have to make it so unbelievable?
No.1038902
>>1038699
Why don't you believe her lived experience? Are you some sort of bigot? Are you trying Caucationalize her lived experience away?
No.1039053
>>1038902
>Caucationalize
Shit,i hope this catches on
No.1039074
>>1038411
No the are calling them FUCKING WHITE FEMALES!!!
No.1039083
Liberal-tards. Why is Twitter so full of stupid people?
No.1039087
>>1039083
leftist twitter is actually good and makes fun of these tards
No.1039108
>>1038279
This was par of the problem to be honest. All you triggered whites boys always want to forget about super struture.
No.1039112
>>1038200
I understand the reference behind that pic and it makes me both upset and hilarious.
No.1039124
>>1038239
>>1038241
>>1038258
They did the same with Remain as well, culminating in a hilarious debate with David Starkey asking some dumb libtards if they wanted to have an age ceiling for voting or give younger voters multiple votes
No.1039126
>>1039124
Brexit* not Remain
No.1039127
>>1037869
Not anymore, normalfags rule, even here.
No.1039147
>>1039087
Put some posts up please.
No.1039155
>>1038348
>"Assimilate into my culture"
fuck you man. I fully support leftist economics, but immigrants better fucking assimilate, or go back wherever they're from.
No.1039165
>>1039155
Culture is a spook TBH.
No.1039170
>>1039155
>assimilate
Are you the Borg or something?
No.1039171
Watching Arthur Chu have a full-blown meltdown made me grin like a fucking madman. There's few people I truly despise, but Arthur Chink is truly deserving of all my hatred and then some.
No.1039173
>>1039165
I don't give a fuck. I don't want colony of foreigners building enclaves inside my country. If they come here, they join my country, speak my language and follow our cultural traditions.
No.1039175
>>1038320
>literally referring to women as pairs of genitals
>ladies, us communists don't hate you like those OTHER men, honest!
t. /leftypol/
No.1039179
>>1039173
I meant all culture, my property.
No.1039182
>>1039173
>they join my country
Do you own the country?
No.1039183
>>1039170
A great example of non-assimilating immigrants is the russians in Estonia who right now want to be part of russia. They've lived on estonian land since stalin, but can't speak a word of estonian. This demographic literally sabotages their country in favour of their true homeland.
Same thing happens in Finland, with Fennoswedes demanding special treatment.
non-assimilating immigrants = Bad news for future of a country.
No.1039184
>>1039175
This applies to PoC as well.
No.1039187
>>1039182
Country is collective ownership of the people who are citizens. I have vested interest to make sure my people don't get consumed.
No.1039189
>>1039184
Black is not a collor, though.
And neither is white.
Also, PoC is a racist term.
No.1039191
>>1039173
>muh cultural norms
You mean those standards that change multiple times every generation and that natives can freely participate in or rebel against without question, so long as they aren't spooky scary foreigners?
No.1039192
>>1039187
And there I thought this was a Nation…
And that a nation is a capitalist creation…
Hm…
No.1039200
>>1039192
>And that a nation is a capitalist creation…
if that is so, then why are capitalists trying to break down borders and build globalist world? Why are neoliberals pushing for destruction of ethnic identity?
No.1039201
>>1039184
I'd rather be called a "fucking white woman" than literally referred to as a vagina.
No.1039205
>>1039201
Should men have a problem with being referred to as a "dick" then?
No.1039207
>>1039201
Well think about it this way, that's the only thing that differentiates you from a dude
No.1039209
>>1039155
The goal is to build a better culture. Existing cultures in every country are kind of shit.
No.1039213
>>1039175
Hating or not hating wymyns doesn't define a communist. Wanting to end the bourgeoisie rule and class system does.
Fuck off.
>>>/reddit/
No.1039215
>>1039175
>>ladies, us communists don't hate you like those OTHER men, honest!
Don't worry anfem poster, we hate you even more than the other men. To be honest 3DPD in general are pretty shitty.
No.1039221
>>1039200
Yet they only try to do it in terms of markets, while keeping the borders on for actual people…
HMMMM!!!!
>>1039201
Greetings, fucking white woman!
No.1039224
>>1039191
yes. I mean those norms. Evolution of culture is very different from replacement.
This is why leftists will continue to lose and far right will continue to rise. Because you're hell-bent on the destruction of national identities, something which majority of people ON PLANET EARTH believe in.
I wonder what would happen if 1 million Wisconsinites moved into the middle of Tanzania, refused to learn the Swahili language and refused to follow their cultural norms.
I don't want my cultural identity to suffer the same fate as native americans or as the britons who were displaced by anglos and saxons.
No.1039226
>>1039207
Most dudes I know aren't cancerous shitposters who live and breathe idpol.
No.1039228
>>1039155
I agree.
Also, nazicunts don't want people to integrate into their culture they want anyone that doesn't look like them to fuck off their countries.
No.1039230
>>1039221
>while keeping the borders on for actual people…
you serious bro?
Do you not notice what happens in europe? Or the fact that neo-liberals like Clinton literally dream of open borders?
No.1039231
>>1039205
I think multiple men on this board would get triggered if I said "dicks" or even "pigs" instead of "men", but not if I called an individual man a dick.
That doesn't really matter though, seeing as men haven't historically been enslaved for their reproductive capacity (via the institution of marriage) and denied rights afforded to women.
No.1039240
>>1039224
>The left is about Culture.
NICE MEME!
>>1039230
>I live in Europa.
>I have the refugees here, cause the borders are closed.
>I don't even travel to the rest of the EU, cause I don't have the money to.
YET NEOLIBS ARE ABOUT "NO BORDERS".
>Trump is not pro neoliberalism.
KEK!
>>1039231
I said "dicks" or even "pigs"
I would get triggered with pig. Whoever called you an animal or something? Why pig? What's even wrong with pigs? I for one love bacon…
No.1039246
>>1039213
Engels called discrimination against women the "first class oppression".
>hey if you're going to make a point about people hating women for not agreeing with them maybe don't call women cunts
>FUCKIGN IDPOL ANFEM GET OUT
Every time.
No.1039248
>>1039209
>The goal is to build a better culture. Existing cultures in every country are kind of shit.
yes, building a better culture by importing cultures deeply infected by theocracy.
The truth is that no fusion of cultures ever occurs, instead you get multiple competing cultures and identities. You get violence and tribalism.
you know what happens when you don't legally enforce assimilation!? YOU GET CANADA.
Compare Quebec and Louisiana. Can you imagine if Louisiana was like Quebec? A french speaking section of the united states that punishes people for having signs in english in order to protect "french identity".
Look at Belgium. How many years have they been a country with two cultures? Still no fusion. They went for a period of 2 years without a government because they couldnt decide, constant threat of secession.
How can you look at these multicultural countries and say you want the same for your own country? I feel like people who support multiculturalism are just idiots who want to feel like they're living in an exciting place. Just go travelling if you want excitement.
No.1039249
>>1039231
Calling someone a pig is to deny their humanity. To call all men dicks is to generalize unfairly. You got triggered over a single woman being called a cunt.
>That doesn't really matter though, seeing as men haven't historically been enslaved for their reproductive capacity (via the institution of marriage) and denied rights afforded to women.
No, instead they've been enslaved for other forms of labor. However, neither of these is at all relevant to the insult at hand.
No.1039259
>>1039240
I am not talking about refugees. Neoliberals succeeded in destroying european borders within the EU. How can you say that they don't support open borders when thats literally their many stated goals?
No.1039262
>>1039248
Please stop pretending like you understand anything you're talking about, I'm about to cringe to death.
No.1039264
>>1039246
Yep.
Leopold was cutting of hands, at the same time.
Is this the 19th century?
>>1039259
Again, open borders for capital. NOT PEOPLE.
Or people to serve capital… that applies too.. you know … modern slaves…
No.1039268
>>1039249
I did not get triggered over a single woman being called a cunt, the post said "imagine being a cunt" in place of "imagine being a woman". Could have made the same point without being dehumanizing.
No.1039283
>>1039264
Would you be this indignant if a black person objected to a post about the high numbers of blacks voting for Clinton that the same breath called him a nigger?
No.1039284
>>1039262
can't argue, so you just throw around insults.
why don't you point out what you think i am wrong about?
I think multiculturalism is bad for a country's long time survival. Quebec will eventually get independence and Belgium will collapse too, because two different identities can not exist in peace in one country.
No.1039289
>>1039264
>open borders for capital. NOT PEOPLE.
what part of schengen don't you get, bro?
No.1039299
>>1039231
>I think multiple men on this board would get triggered if I said "dicks"
bollocks, you lying dick
No.1039304
>>1039284
You are right the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat can not exist in peace
No.1039307
>>1039283
You mean calling a nigger a nigger?
Well, if he's a nigger.
#EDGY
>>1039289
How are you to cross a border, if you don't have the money to travel?
If you are a multycorp though…
Plus, you can still have nations to keep the people spooked.
No.1039310
>>1039268
You interpreted it that way yourself.
No.1039315
No.1039320
>>1037987
>moviebob working hard to earn his spot up against the wall.
No.1039321
>>1039310
Because that's what the grammar used clearly implies…
>>1039307
>dude like lmao why didn't niggers just vote for bernie xD
No.1039323
>>1039307
you're changing the subject, you slippery weasel.
My point is that neoliberals are pursuing open borders. It is their goal. Hillary Clinton is on record literally saying that is her dream. The EU liberals literally destroyed internal european borders, and are even flirting with the prospect of weakening external borders.
Destruction of nation state is liberal project.
And you're here talking about "WAHHH I AM TOO POOR TO TRAVEL SO ALL THIS SHIT ISN'T REAL"
No.1039332
>>1039315
that song is about a man disparaging men so he can get pussy.
And we're talking about usage of words for genitalia as generic insults. I have never heard of a man getting angry about usage of the word dick. But I have personally heard women get hysterical about usage of "Cunt".
No.1039344
>>1039321
>Because that's what the grammar used clearly implies…
Replace "cunt" with "asshole". Suddenly doesn't read that way, huh? You've got a chip on your shoulder so you purposely took it in the most offensive way possible.
No.1039345
>>1039284
Actually, Quebec has mostly come to terms with the reasonable reality of confederation. They've overwhelmingly veered towards support for federalist parties.
No.1039349
>>1039320
Earn his spot? Man's got a lifetime subscription, VIP.
No.1039350
>>1038455
There's no way, no way this isn't /pol/ false flag. Nooo way.
No.1039351
>>1039332
No. It's about a woman not trusting men, the lyrics that seem to be from a man's perspective is just the woman mocking what men say to her all the time.
>I have never heard of a man getting angry about usage of the word dick. But I have personally heard women get hysterical about usage of "Cunt".
Maybe it has something to do with the historical materialism of men and women as distinct classes…. NAW cunts just too sensitive, just like dem naggers
No.1039352
>>1039345
thats all worthless. Scotland has not been a country for centuries, but suddenly it starts flaring up in the late 20th century.
No reason to believe Quebec won't start sabotaging canada in the next century. Multiculturalism is a burden
No.1039353
>>1039332
>>1039332
>But I have personally heard women get hysterical about usage of "Cunt".
Because they're histrionic cunts.
No.1039354
>>1039344
Oh wow it's almost like using gendered slurs changes the context of an insult :^)
No.1039355
>>1039351
I find it hilarious when women compare their "oppression" of being called cunts to the very real oppression historically faced by black MEN who were literally lynched on the streets because of the words of white women.
No.1039357
>>1039353
>calmly point out hypocrisy
>oMg ShEs HyStErIcAlllllllllllll
No.1039362
>>1039355
>Marital rape and wife beating have always been illegal
>women have always been able to own and inherit property [not that anyone should]
>women have always been able to vote
>women have never been publicly executed because of the words of men
k
No.1039364
>>1039332
>I have never heard of a man getting angry about usage of the word dick.
This is because men are really passive aggressive most of the time and know that it's NOT actually reducing someone to their genitals. I mean, heck, I even call men cunts!
No.1039366
>>1039351
>>1039354
mein gott
It is historical materialism, but understanding that means recognizing that the specific forms of how distinct identities, not classes, are oppressed within given societies gives rise to reactive forces. Women react to the word "cunt" because they are taught that they should. It's not culturally relevant to care about being called a dick. In other words, women are not inherently too sensitive, the sensitivity to this issue is learned culturally. That doesn't make the use of one word over the other objectively more or less harmful or meaningful.
No.1039368
>>1039323
Capitalism needs nations and nationalism is it's last resort, though.
Unless… The corporation becomes your relegion and nation…
But with Trump the cyberpunk dystopia is averted?
RIGHT???
>>1039357
>>1039362
>>1039364
You could stop making it all about "muh women" you know…
Unless you enjoy it! I don't judge people's kinks…
No.1039372
>>1039366
>women are not inherently too sensitive
I disagree. "Woman" is desireness itself; they are imaginary really.
>>1039368
>Unless you enjoy it! I don't judge people's kinks…
Finally, you get it…after all this time Greco anon…
No.1039374
>>1039368
Also, should stop linking other (You)s together. It's a little annoying to most people.
No.1039376
>>1039368
>Capitalism needs nations and nationalism is it's last resort, though.
HOW? I don't follow your thought process.
Globalists are literally working to destroy borders and you're still claiming that capitalism needs nationstates. It fucking doesn't. They want big massive market with free movement of goods and labour.
They want cheap labour to live in the same place as the customers, so they dont have to transport shit for millions of dollars.
Picture related is what they want for every country.
No.1039377
>>1039368
You could stop deriding women and ethnic minorities and still only acknowledge the class struggle, you know….
No.1039384
>>1039362
WAHHH I'M SO OPPRESSED BECAUSE MAN ON BUS SPREAD HIS LEGS TOO WIDE! I'M JUST AS OPPRESSED AS THE BLACK MEN GETTING KILLED BY COPS!!!
No.1039386
>>1039372
>"Woman" is desireness itself; they are imaginary really.
No.1039387
>>1039386
>he still thinks womz are real
Read Lacan nigga!
No.1039390
>>1039374
And waste all the precious board space? INEFFICIENT!
I am a Leninist, you know…
>>1039377
I could. And I mostly do. Except for, when you make it all about them.
No.1039396
>>1039201
OK, then we're going to call you a "queen" while you stay unemployed and on the streets. Problem solved!
No.1039398
>>1039387
Are you black? Because if not then I don't think you have enough oppression points to use the N word. And if you are, post skin tone. You have to be at least nutmeg level.
No.1039405
>>1039384
nice straw-woman bro
>>1039387
One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.
>>1039390
Maybe you could just…. acknowledge my point in a civil manner, re-affirm your own point which isn't detracted from in any way by mine, and proceed with the thread?
No.1039407
>>1039396
holy shit I regret voting for Bernie and Stein now thanks porky
No.1039413
>>1039405
> acknowledge my point in a civil manner,
Where's the fun in that?
No.1039414
>>1038408
Also all of a sudden pro-Sanders sites are surging and pro-Sanders comments are not deleted or downvoted.
Guess the Shill factory is collectively drunk or fired.
No.1039416
Reminder to ignore anfems.
No.1039423
>>1039376
Capitalists want profit first and foremost. You have bigger profits when there is no restriction on trade and no borders. But you wont have any profit if such thing as socialism happens. And it have a risk of happening when people are fucked over. So better Nationalism which allow profit (with cosmetic restrictions on trade) and is thirsty or communist's blood than socialism from the bourgeois pov.
No.1039425
>>1038455
>jamface jigaboo nigger
Either she's actually speaking the truth or this is a /pol/ false flag
No.1039428
>>1039407
typical Idpol. Stop supporting bernie because someone on an imageboard used the world cunt.
Thank God for Trump. He is the punishment you and your kind deserve for derailing the left with your identity bullshit. Hope he makes abortion illegal and says some more inflammatory stuff about women which will keep you in a state of butthurt for the next 4 years.
No.1039436
>>1039407
Voting for some candidate doesn't absolve you from the mental struggle one has to do to get thoroughly rid of one's ideology and replace it with another one. There are always lapses though, because this world of mass social media tries to re-brainwash you 24/7.
Don't take it personally, we're just helping each other break the conditioning.
No.1039437
>>1039390
In Communism, you can have all the board space you want! Even to fap on…idk, whatever, you know.
>>1039398
>oppression points
What are these? Is that like a wage? Wait a sec Anon, u tryna cheat me again?
>>1039405
>ywn go full tankie with Simone and rape your students with Sartre
No.1039439
>don't display prejudice for women or ethnic minorities
>omg literally porky!!!!
The irony is if you didn't have such a boner for your own edginess you might succeed in converting more of the mainstream left to Socialism.
No.1039451
>>1039376
You are operating under the faulty assumption that nation-states inhibit global capitalism in any way. They do not. National trade laws, taxes, and tariffs are written by individuals working on behalf of particular bourgeois interests. As such, they are designed to facilitate trade that benefits thos interests.
Also, they most certainly do not want producers living beside consumers. That is a recipe for rebellion. What they want is producers and consumers living in near-by but isolated communities that are only ever close enough to distrust one another.
No.1039468
>>1039463
You must be new here.
No.1039476
>>1039428
I donated money to Bernie's campaign. You're either trolling or shit at reading sarcasm
>>1039436
Sure is breaking conditioning to shitpost about "cunts and niggers", so revolutionary.
>>1039437
>googled "simone de beauvoir rape"
>""""Lolita Syndrome"""""
>corruption of a minor
>""passing on students to sartre""
jesus christ i'm going to be sick
No.1039482
>>1039463
Why can't we both destroy the liberal establishment together though? Like "a bundle of rods" (fascio), to speak your language.
No.1039485
>>1039463
Seeing you people still believing he'll even do one thing out of what he promised…
It's sad actually.
No.1039487
I think women should be second class citizens.
I'm still pretty spooked.
No.1039492
>>1039463
>/pol/yp still thinks we supported Hillary
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b4vHSiotAFA
No.1039508
>>1039423
>But you wont have any profit if such thing as socialism happens. And it have a risk of happening when people are fucked over
We've had how many years of globalisation yet there's been no major movement to the Left in any First World country's politics.
"Socialism via globalisation" clearly isn't happening anytime soon, then again what else would you expect from an ideology that glorifies worker's being fucked over because that means we're this much closer to the Revolution, comrade!
No.1039550
>>1039508
>We've had how many years of globalisation yet there's been no major movement to the Left in any First World country's politics.
Not anon, but we had anti-globalization movement around 2000, which of course failed to do anything. Because the left has generally given up on opposing the system (they became protectors of liberal status quo against the working class "bigots") anti-globalization sentiment was then captured by the right, which is where we are now. I support Alex Jones' language of "globalists" being our enemy, I just hope the mainstream left would learn something from their own irrelevancy (we can't even use the words "their own failures", that's how irrelevant they are).
No.1039580
>>1039209
>Our lego bricks are made of shit
>I know, let's stack them on top of each other, that'll make it not-shit!
The real goal is to build a better species.
No.1039627
>>1039580
>humans are to blame for their stupidity
That's the logic of a Hillary supporter. While the left tries to offer an actual political analysis, with possible strategies for the future.
No.1039676
>>1037773
Michigander here.
The "white trash" and "inbred hicks" are the working class, and we want you out of our state.
Also, the border will have bunkers to blast away the Mexicans with artillery and machine guns.
KILL ALL LUMPEN NIGGERS RRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
No.1039696
>>1039627
>We're somehow SPECIALER than all the other frolicking, wallowing, shit eating animals on Earth because ____?
If you think humans aren't stupid af you are stupid af.
No.1039710
>>1039696
What makes us "special" is that we're filled with ideology. Animals have none. And any ideology we're filled with can be replaced by another one. Dismissing the whole human species as stupid because of some political situation is just part of one particular ideology.
No.1039750
>>1039710
>What makes us "special" is because we're spooked
Sorry, not seeing it anon. We're a doomed species who upended ourselves by our own stupidity.
See you in a century.
No.1039789
>>1039750
I don't really understand your response… Are you conforming my statement that we're spooked or not?
No.1039824
>>1039248
You know noting about Quebec
No.1039837
>>1039826
>the news network all conspired against the Democrat
ughhh… But I welcome this explicit idiocy from the system that doesn't even try to hide behind more subtle ideology.
No.1039842
>>1039362
>women have never been publicly executed because of the words of men.
A lot fewer than black men having been publicly executed because of the words of white women. I also couldn't help but notice none of those were slavery.
No.1039847
>>1039826
We have come full circle.
No.1039872
>>1039826
>media conspired against Clinton
>FBI persecuted her
They cannot possibly believe that anyone will buy this. Clinton backers literally own every major media outlet, and before the election they went about buying up a bunch of the minor outlets. As for the FBI, which happens to work for Barrack Obama, they bent over backwards to make the mountain of criminal accusations against her disappear as quickly as possible. Everyone saw that, right? There is no way that anyone could have missed those obvious realities.
No.1039910
>>1039842
>literally playing oppression olympics
tumblr please go
No.1039941
>>1037785
This fat whore needs to be sent to the gulags
No.1039950
>>1039872
>They cannot possibly believe that anyone will buy this.
I hate to break it to you homie.
No.1039984
>>1037785
Laci Green is Riley Reid if she overdosed on cheeseburgers and identity politics.
No.1039986
Surprisingly self-aware:
>Shame on us liberal elites for missing all the signs
http://onmilwaukee.com/buzz/articles/shame-on-liberal-elite.html
No.1040029
>fucks up big time
>s-stop victim shaming me, it's offensive and f-futile
>also go die in a fire jill stein it's your fault
No.1040035
>>1040029
throughout the democratic race liberals also pushed this idea that sanders fantasised about rape and that his voters were sexist and racist
it's the most bizarre shit
No.1040133
>>1040029
I call this victimism. It's the belief that being a victim gives moral legitimacy to your actions and makes your position or opinion superior.
It's not just limited to liberals. Whenever there are terrorist attacks almost whole nations can become victimists.
No.1040173
>>1040029
>Hillary and her supporters
>victims
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard
No.1040191
Jimmy seems pretty depressed tbqh:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-yo1Jyw_Bg
I hope he'll eventually exorcise that liberal within him.
No.1040218
Reregistering my NeoGAF account. Can't wait to speak my mind as I was literally banned for saying Clinton should have been indicted for the emails, as someone who has worked exclusively with classified documentation before and saw co-workers completely FUCKED for far less than what Clinton did. (Such as, wearing a security lapel visible as they went to the cafe across the road, thousands of dollars in fines and being fired.)
The "Queenie" circlejerk on that board is hilarious and it's great that 95% of the userbase has now come out as pro Bernie and is shitting on the Hillbot clique.
No.1040353
Jordan from TYT Politics risks his life by going into the wild to document the behavior of Clintonite losers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1hg6VrXcjg
No.1040365
>>1039984
Didn't Riley Reid endorse Bernie Sanders?
>>1040029
bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Keep digging that hole, Democraps. You're only making the fire rise higher.
No.1040428
>>1040218
Why would you post on a forum where the mods act like the Gestapo when a person so much says that he voted for Trump and gave his reasons, no matter how obscene they were? That isn't civil or even an atmosphere to promote discussion.
Liberals are cancer and Evilore is a douche. I still have my account but never posted.
No.1040608
>>1039362
>women were oppressed in the past
>therefore it's okay for me to bitch endlessly about it in the present
Are you cunts time travelers or some shit?
No.1040985
Something I've noticed in all of this salt: most liberals care more about hurting "undeserving" whites than actually helping minorities. Many aren't even willing to consider things that help both because it might potentially make the lives of poor whites less miserable. They don't really give a shit about the "POC" they claim to advocate for but just about tribalism and their Twitter friends.
No.1041039
>>1040029
>victim shaming
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
No.1042054
>>1039231
>men haven't historically been enslaved for their reproductive capacity (via the institution of marriage)
Historically, until very recently, they've been exactly half of the people enslaved in that way.
No.1043259
>>1042791
Do you have any more trashman memes
No.1043324
>>1040029
I look forward to the day when these cunts openly claim to be victims of the 2016 election for the simple reason that they voted for Clinton.
No.1043344
>>1039362
Marital rape is an incoherent concept
No.1043349
>https://medium.com/soapbox-dc/democrats-are-about-to-plunge-into-a-civil-war-e2ac6f65eb48#.cdkwzr9wv
they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn they just dont learn
No.1043350
>>1039231
Le wives are slaves meme
No.1043377
>>1043349
>The virtues of diversity and inclusion that Hillary Clinton championed would have been led to forefront of the public conscious. Government policy would have reflected these ideals, and we all would have been better for it.
I don't even know what to say.
I've come to view these people the same way I view Republican proponents: they must be willfully ignorant, to the point where it is no different than malice. In fact it may be worse.
No.1043378
>>1038514
idk i once saw a guy on the northwest front blog saying that obama being elected, had the same effect on white americans, as the isreali 1948 invasion had on arabs
No.1043403
>>1043344
you're right it's incoherent to believe that you own someone as sex slave just because you marry them
No.1043405
>>1043377
>The virtues of diversity and inclusion that Hillary Clinton championed would have been led to forefront of the public conscious.
I don't get it. Did Obama not champion these issues too?
No.1043423
>>1043405
Modern American liberals will do whatever it takes to rationalize their actions and claim that they are the oppressed, under-privileged good guys fighting evil racists.
No.1043438
>>1043423
Dying movements cling to their ideals until the end.
No.1043472
>>1043405
It's always at the forefront of their consciousness. It's all they goddamn talk about. Economic issues? What are those?
No.1043483
>>1037768
Neither. He won because of a broken electoral college system and massive voter suppression and election fraud.
No.1043554
No.1043556
>>1043483
so are you still on the payroll for the rest of the month or something?
really thought you lot would have been let go by now
No.1043561
Wow. Liberals have actually become the new Religious Right. I thought it was a meme.
No.1043598
>>1043518
>telling people how they couldn't have beaten Trump is useless and needs to stop
One million years gulag.
No.1043609
Ivory tower liberal #1: the proles are unhappy with us, what should we do?
Ivory tower liberal #2: listen to their concerns?
Ivory tower liberal #1: nah, we should just find better celebrities to brainwash them
No.1043638
>>1043349
Well I know who I'm going to be paying a visit to if the revolution breaks out.
No.1043782
Look on the bright side guys. Liberals are becoming seen as a joke, and progressives are getting a more prominent role in the Dem part under Bernie. Keith Ellison is probably gonna be the next DNC chair, assuming elite Dems aren't completely retarded.
No.1043830
>>1043349
>Are we so out of touch?
>No, it's the voters who are wrong.
No.1043857
>>1043609
Liberal morons need to realise that no ones gives a single shit about their precious celebs and their satires except them
No.1043885
>>1043782
>Implying that it's possible to reform the democratic party
>Implying that "progressives" like Bernie are not right wing imperialist like all American politicians.
I remember when I was this naive.
No.1043912
>>1043377
>>1043405
Obama didn't champion anything and Hillary wouldn't have championed anything. The Democrats all do the same shit. They make a bunch of promises and after they're elected they don't do any of it and just sort of try to be somewhat better than the Republicans and try to use that to stay in power forever because not voting for them means letting the Republican in.
They don't even rise to the standard of their own tepid liberalism.
No.1043916
No.1043986
>>1043782
Are you dumb? The destruction of democucks is the best case scenario for the left.
No.1043991
>>1043885
>Bernie
>right wing imperialist
nigga wut
No.1043996
>>1043912
Yup. All neolib, neocons.
No.1044006
>>1043986
I felt the same until I realized that's the only chance of leftist policies getting instituted.
If we're being honest, most of us on here are middle class and can afford to treat political discussion as a hobby that doesn't affect us too badly financially. But the poor don't have the option of "um no fuck dems. We'll just slowly build 3rd party for 50 years and then get it going. :^)"
The progressive movement is already being laid out. No reason to shrug it off, when answers are in front of us.
No.1044008
medium.com/soapbox-dc/democrats-are-about-to-plunge-into-a-civil-war-e2ac6f65eb48#.otsl8kpps
This has to be the most tone deaf article I've read post-election.
No.1044032
>>1044006
> "um no fuck dems. We'll just slowly build 3rd party for 50 years and then get it going. :^)"
I thought the collapse of the Dems meant actual collapse rather than years-long decline
No.1044042
>>1043991
He's made no effort to seriously oppose America's imperialism and he's never seriously opposed capitalism or proposed a radical socialist platform. The average republican for the 60s is further to the left then he is.
No.1044058
>>1044032
>I thought the collapse of the Dems meant actual collapse rather than years-long decline
That won't happen though.
No.1044084
>>1044008
>but the short story is that Bernie’s message was colorblind. He didn’t care to recognize the racial barriers that minorities face in our institutions.
As a Black Berner™, I just want you to know this guy is in a last-bid desperate defense of establishment of Dems. If Bernie runs in 2020 and gets adequate media coverage, he'll annihilate the margins with PoC. Clinton won among us, solely on name-recongnition.
No.1044095
>>1044058
Come on, don't kill my hope yet, I want demoshits to burn
No.1044204
>>1043609
they're not gonna learn are they
No.1044235
>>1044008
It's articles like this that really make me think so many of the Idpol adherents really are just smug as fuck hipsters who want to shit on white poor people for being white poor people for daring to worry about their own economic conditions than falling into line with idpol shit.
No.1044288
>>1044095
Their pundits will feel the burn (no pun intended) for a while as everyone laughs at them. But the party itself will survive and resurge under Bernie Sanders, Keith Ellison, and the other progressives.
Be hopeful, anon. Feel free to laugh at Dembasses on Twitter as I have been, but ultimately, you know I'm right.
No.1044350
>>1038455
>grab my pussy so fucking hard that kool aid would come out
No.1044358
>>1038481
>>1038497
>>1038637
>>1038699
How are you all this fucking retarded. This is the most obvious /pol/ troll ever.
>>1039350
>>1039425
Thank you for not being retarded.
No.1044375
Jimmy Dore returned to his more liberal ways now…
No.1044424
>>1038287
Chapo Trap House
No.1044534
Here's a meltdown about the stupidity of the liberals from a lefty liberal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs
No.1044717
>>1044534
that was a preddy good one
No.1044848
>>1044350
>il-dine-avec-hollande-et-castro-et-insulte-le-gouvernement.jpg
MÉLENCHON 2017
No.1044863
>>1044534
These liberal memes don't make any sense
>non-apolisiging
Did Hilary ever apologise for making an "off-hand" "joke" about bombing Julian Assagne? Didn't Trump apologise DURING the second debate?
>tax avoiding
http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/the-clintons-connection-to-the-panama-papers/
Like I get that he doesn't like Hilary but whats unique about Trump?
No.1045576
>>1044863
I think the point is more that there's clearly something wrong with the liberals' politics and strategy if Trump won despite being painted as so horrible by all the media.