全 92 件のコメント

[–]seubenjamin 84ポイント85ポイント  (5子コメント)

Probably something involving cherry wood. I used to work as a carpenter and I love the smell when it's cut- very warm and refined. It's like Christmas. Nothing too fancy but I'd like some stern iron handles. Might go back to the warehouse and make one tomorrow now that I think about it.

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 11ポイント12ポイント  (4子コメント)

Ah yes, I should have capitalized Cabinet, my mistake.

[–]seubenjamin 20ポイント21ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ah shoot, I thought I was on /r/woodworking and I didn't see the text after the title. I'm on mobile, forgive me.

[–]neemarita 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Aw, man, I thought you were being funny posting that. I was laughing. Have an upvote. :)

[–]TedyCruzHEREEE'S TEDYY 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

+1 for Cherry on top

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 23ポイント24ポイント  (41子コメント)

Cabinet Positions:

  • Secretary of State
    Newt Gingrich - He's a Trump insider and outstanding statesman.
  • Secretary of the Treasury
    Mitt Romney - He knows Wall Street and isn't doing anything.
  • Secretary of Defense
    John McCain - Arizona is a red state with a Republican Governor and it would get him out of the Senate. Backup: Lindsey Graham for the same reasons. South Carolina can do better.
  • Attorney General (Department of Justice)
    Trey Gowdy - I heard his name thrown around and I liked the idea. He was outstanding from a congressional oversight position.
  • Secretary of the Interior
    Clive Bundy - Hahaha can you imagine? No, someone more sane who will get the BLM under control. If Trump was serious about Sarah Palin, this would be the spot.
  • Secretary of Agriculture
    Not sure - Someone who would put family farms first but wouldn't be anti large agricultural corporations.
  • Secretary of Commerce
    Carly Fiorina - She opposes unnecessary regulation and understands the burden government puts on small business.
  • Secretary of Labor
    Chris Christie - I would love to see him left out in the cold, but if he's going to get a spot Labor makes the most sense.
  • Secretary of Health and Human Services
    Not sure - Dr. Ben Carson jumps to mind, but I bet there are better candidates out there.
  • Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
    Not sure - Someone against racial preferences and for basing rules purely on socio-economic factors.
  • Secretary of Transportation
    Get rid of this department at the federal level.
  • Secretary of Energy
    Not sure - A global warming skeptic who supports alternative energy for other reasons.
  • Secretary of Education
    Get rid of this department at the federal level.
  • Secretary of Veterans Affairs
    General Petraeus - I believe he is capable of fixing this embarrassment to the country.
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
    Ron Paul - No joke. He would put a quick end to spying on American citizens.

Non-Statutory Cabinet-Level Positions:

  • White House Chief of Staff
    Rudy Giuliani - If anyone can organize an administration it's Giuliani.
  • Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
    Tim Kessler - Conservationist and Chairman of Pheasants Forever.
  • Director of Office of Management & Budget
    Not sure - Anyone who is on the side of the Austrian school of economics.
  • Ambassador to the United States Trade Representative
    Not sure - I assume Trump knows a guy.
  • Ambassador to the United States Mission to the United Nations
    Caroline Glick - She's extremely pro-Israel and extremely capable.
  • Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
    Not sure - Anyone who is on the side of the Austrian school of economics.
  • Administrator of the Small Business Administration
    Get rid of this department at the federal level.

[–]freemcflurry 22ポイント23ポイント  (2子コメント)

Secretary of Energy Not sure - A global warming skeptic who supports alternative energy for other reasons.

How about someone pro-nuclear? Good for energy costs, industry and the environment.

[–]schlondark [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Was it jindal who was pro nuclear in the primaries? I'd love to see someone mention the word thorium

[–]shatter321 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Nothing pisses me off more than an anti nuclear liberal.

"We need to do everything we can to stop climate change! Except nuclear plants. The steam is scary."

[–]TheGoatsMustBeCrazy 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

Administrator of the Small Business Administration

Administrator of the administration. This government has grown beyond parody.

Also, I love the idea of getting Squishy McCain out of the senate.

[–]M74 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

You've named several people who would rather be caught dead than work under Trump (Romney, McCain, Graham).

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Winning has a way of bringing people around and it would be to Trump's advantage to bring these people under the Trump umbrella.

[–]House_of_Flip-Flop 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

True, although one of the hopes with this administration is that he puts differences aside to get the best people possible.

[–]M74 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think the question is will they, not Trump, be willing to put differences aside?

[–]GuitarWizard90 7ポイント8ポイント  (10子コメント)

How about Michael Flynn for Secretary of Defense? He was very helpful in the campaign, and him and Trump have already built a relationship. And wasn't he fired from his position at the DIA by Obama because he disagreed with Obama's soft approach to defeating ISIS? I think he's ideal for the job. Homeland Security is another position that may be suitable for him. You said Ron Paul, but I don't think he's experienced enough in that field.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite 2ポイント3ポイント  (9子コメント)

He'd have to get a waiver, considering the Sec Def requires you to be retired 7 years, but he's not a bad get.

[–]gizayabasuTrump Conservative 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

The left keeps on accusing him of being an agent of Russia, but let's hope we're over this accusing everyone being an agent of Russia thing in the coming months.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Really? I honestly hadn't heard that bogus accusation about Flynn. I do disagree with the Russian appeasement policy they seem keen on.

[–]gizayabasuTrump Conservative 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

[–]MAGA_trump [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I thought this was a joke but that's fucking hillarious. How would Flynn actually get a waiver though?

[–]M74 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

What's the purpose of the 7-year retirement requirement? I've never heard of that.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

SecDef is part of the idea of civilian control over the military (it's an extension of the executive branch of civilian government). As such, they put in a seven year requirement. This is good for freedom, by the way (reduces number of devastating military coups, etc.)

[–]Colonize_The_Moon 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

It also helps to avoid letting SecDef become a five-star promotion for generals. E.g. a super-successful/popular (C)JCS or 4-star can't retire and immediately 'promote' to overall command of the entire military. Even if not malicious, there are veerrrrry few 4-stars whose thinking hasn't ossified completely. They're at the tail end of 30+ year careers and typically aren't going to rock the boat or bring about radical transformations. You need fresh blood, often an outsider or someone who didn't rise to power through the uniformed side of the DoD.

[–]yanksb4life 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's interesting. Have any secretaries ever been granted a waiver?

[–]yanksb4life 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Romney would be a big get. But I don't see it happening.

[–]House_of_Flip-Flop 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Love McCain as defense secretary. I don't think Carson would be good, Trump shouldn't surround himself with many people who are as inexperienced in politics as he (trump) is. I agree Energy should be a Global Warming skeptic, but I hope he picks someone that wants to research it as much as possible.

Does Giuliani have enough energy to be CoS?

[–]FallOutShelterBoy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Is Surgeon General an appointment? Cause I think Carson would be perfect for that

[–]TheRollingTideONE PARTY 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Not sure - Someone against racial preferences and for basing rules purely on socio-economic factors.

How about Herman Cain?

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Can't get behind Gingrich or McCain. Gowdy... yes. Although he does a good job in Congress so it would be a big loss there. Giuliani... yes but I can't see him playing this kind of a junior role. Tres Sec... yes. I'd like to see Romney at the UN. HUD I'd say Cain. I'd like to see Rick Perry in there somewhere.

[–]GAV17 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

  • Secretary of Energy
    Not sure - A global warming skeptic who supports alternative energy for other reasons.

This person exists?

[–]TedyCruzHEREEE'S TEDYY 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes! For example I'm a skeptic but i also own a bicycle company for car commuters as alternative transport. Save money, cut pollution, improve heath, cut traffic.

Green energy and global warming should be 2 separate things all together, to me green energy should be about being self sufficient, cutting pollution (a real problem) and cutting energy costs via competition

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Energy futures and diversity are important. You don't want to be too reliant on one form of energy, because if a shortage appears your economy tanks.

I'm a skeptic who supports alternative energies, though I don't think any are viable enough to be competitive in a market. In terms of people who could do the job? Not sure.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good list. With the exception of transportation, the list is very much "ideal, but somewhat possible".

I'd take Graham over McCain. Graham has a few more terms left in him.

I like Gowdy for AG.

I think I might want someone with more of an economist's background for Treasury over Romney.

Christie: out. Bridgegate... Just not worth it. Palin, too. Fake another aircraft problem if you have to.

Sec State... Don't know that Newt is who we want here (despite all the talk). Get someone with senate foreign relations experience and/or an ex-Ambassador. I almost like Rubio for this in four years. I see Newt as shaping domestic policy somehow.

HUD - I'd be pretty cool with Newt.

Labor - go dig up Chao again. See if McConnell will lend her to America again?

Transportation? Chris Christie. Or, no one. I like that idea, but isn't likely...

Energy will go to big oil. If I had it my way, I'd frankly like someone to be promoted out of the nuclear side of the DOE.

[–]iwingletotheleft 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No way Mitt or McCain would get anything

[–]Portal007 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Rumor from my friend in the Kansas gop is pat Roberts or Brownback will be sec of Ag

[–]mattcruise 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

General Petraeus Doesn't his conviction prevent him from holding office?

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

His misdemeanor? No, he's fine.

[–]mattcruise 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was mistaken that was a misdemeanor, but considering everything we have said about Clinton, any history of mishandling of classified materials should probably be a deal breaker.

[–]ShadowSwipe [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Very unlikely Congress would approve of someone for that position who mishandeled information like that. Especially bad since we attacked Hillary over that.

[–]TedyCruzHEREEE'S TEDYY 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice list!

All I ask is that he doesn't give any positions to family and friends. Is that too much to ask?

[–]JoleneAL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No to McCain .. he needs to retire and he's way out of touch with the new military.

We need younger blood in there.

I say Col (R) West instead.

:D

[–]zwiebelsaft [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I may be biased as hell, but I would probably throw in Dennis Daugaard as Secretary of Agriculture. Otherwise this is very solid.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No way in hell Romney is a part of the cabinet after he held a press conference just to trash Trump during the primaries. Plenty of other Republicans were against Trump but had the brain to keep their mouth shut.

[–]alpha2224 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No to McCain. We don't need someone that meets with terrorist leaders high up in the executive branch

[–]mulch17 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

tl;dr - Jim Webb would be a perfect fit for Secretary of Defense. He's extremely qualified with foreign policy experience. He's a true moderate that's a Democrat in name only, and his stances are actually quite similar to Trump (just without the extremely polarizing and offensive language).

He's opposed to the Iran deal. He was one of the few people that actually came out and opposed the War in Iraq before it was declared. He very accurately predicted in August 2015 during his campaign that working midwest white voters were the key to this election, and his proposed solution was to cut the corporate tax rate, bring offshore money back into the US, and incentivize infrastructure investments to bring jobs back into the USA, specifically the midwest. AKA exactly what won Trump the election.

I doubt this will happen, but I would love to see Jim Webb be considered for Secretary of Defense or Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

He was one of the few people that opposed the Iraq War before it was ever declared.

He authored and introduced the Post 9/11 GI Bill, which is a very powerful and popular law that supports Trump's campaign narrative that we should finally start taking care of our veterans.

Although he served in the Senate as a Democrat, he was the prime example of a conservative blue dog Democrat. Yet he also served as the Secretary of the Navy under Ronald Reagan in the 80s. He is a true moderate.

He resigned as SECNAV in protest because he wanted to increase the size of the Navy, and was strongly opposed to decreasing its size. Something that Donald Trump supports.

Most people remember him for being the guy that complained about not getting enough time during the first Democratic debate, but I felt like he gave a very strong performance that was overlooked.

On a national Democratic debate stage, surrounded by far left liberals and socialists, he openly admitted to being a gun owner and NRA supporter, and called out Hillary Clinton for wanting to take away guns from ordinary citizens, while she keeps armed guards around her 24/7.

He was also the only candidate on the stage to even say a word about China, and expressed how important it is to prevent their expanding military and cybersecurity aggression. On a Democratic debate stage next to Hillary Clinton, who of course did not address the issue. Relations with China were a big part of Trump's campaign speeches.

Webb's campaign never took off because true moderate blue dogs like himself were abandoned by the Democratic party, in favor of extreme leftist liberal ideology from Clinton and Sanders. Much like Trump's supporters. So he officially left the party and said he was very uncomfortable with their views. He didn't answer yes/no to supporting Trump, but he quickly came out against Hillary Clinton shortly afterwards.

It would be a great "reach across the aisle", although I wouldn't even technically call it that, because Webb is a military leader, and not a career politician. His background is not in politics, and he does not think or speak like one. He is a boring, dry, yet super intelligent and experienced policy guru. This will never win more than 1% in the polls, but it is great for an appointed technical position like this.

He is a great person with great character. I think he would be a great fit on the Cabinet, and I really hope that this longshot comes through.

EDIT: I would highly recommend watching this 4-minute interview with Webb in August 2015.

He explicitly said that the white working class vote was the key to this election, and called out the Democratic Party for not including them in their campaign. In August 2015. He was dead on the money, but nobody cared or listened to him.

When he was asked for a solution, he proposed cutting(!) the corporate tax rate, and incentivizing infrastructure investments to create jobs here in America, specifically within poor midwest areas. He is seriously a Democrat in name only. His answers were exactly what Trump promised to America, and why he got elected. Only Webb figured it out way before everyone else. I love this guy.

[–]narutouzLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I agree with you on Jim Webb. The Democrats probably want him to help them appeal to blue collar workers next election. Let's steal him while we can. His foreign policy postions are perfect for the job.

[–]thunderfanH 11ポイント12ポイント  (6子コメント)

Bonus : Supreme Court Justice.

I want Cruz. God that would be awesome. It would be glorious.

[–]MAGA_trump [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I come in peace but Cruz has a shot here. He won't primary trump in 2020 and is a strict constitutionalist. The only issue is that trump promised to adhere to a strict list.

[–]MAGA_trump [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

If most conservatives are willing to accept a deviation from trumps list, then Cruz will get the nod.

[–]MAGA_trump [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The last thing (before you think Im crazy) is that Cruz is really young. This is something Trump has considered for some time - finding young SC justices who believe in the Constitution and don't legislate from the bench. I had a call today but Trump wants a supreme court who is conservative for 40 years (optimistic, not impossible). Cruz would do all of that - added bonus: He won't primary Trump in 2020.

[–]gizayabasuTrump Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think it's a job that Cruz would fit very well in, but I'm not sure if it's a job Cruz wants just yet. He has other political ambitions, and I'm not sure if he still believes in them. He's also valuable in the senate.

With that being said, he would be an amazing SC Justice.

[–]BenchSpyder [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think Cruz might not be a bad pick. He would be the youngest at 45 (Kagan is 56), and he's certainly Conservative. I have to think the traditional Conservatives in the party would be optimistic with this choice, but we have to be careful about losing a Republican in the Senate. Harvard Law and a slew of judicially related career positions plus he's a pretty strict Constitutionalist. Although he doesn't seem as pro-immigration reform. I know he wanted to be President but this would be a lifetime appointment and give him the power to shape US politics for probably 30 years.

Needless to say the left would hate it.

[–]Colonize_The_Moon 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

SecState -Newt. He's got experience, he's conservative, and his beliefs and policies are well known. Got to hear him speak in person earlier this year, with Q&A afterwards.

SecTreas - Haven't researched possible candidates enough.

SecDef - Carter is still doing a good job and I like his Force of the Future plans. I say keep him on.

AG - Gowdy or Chaffetz.

No input on most of the rest, but Energy needs to be someone less hostile to fossil fuels and more open to nuclear power. Particularly nuclear power.

[–]big_taste 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Chaffetz isn't a lawyer. He also doesn't have the intellect of somebody I'd want in that position, though I do appreciate his stance on certain issues. Gowdy is who I'd want for AG.

[–]JIDF-Shill 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Michael Flynn for Defense. Rudy for AG.

[–]EuropaClash [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump needs to take Peter Thiel and make him Secretary of Commerce, and get rid of the Labor Secretary position all together and rolls those offices into one.

Thiel should have an immense level of influence.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

I don't even care. Trump is already surrounded by professionals and I trust that he'll pick the best man for the job instead of this bullshit [insert token minority here] that the Democrats pull.

[–]House_of_Flip-Flop 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

instead of this bullshit [insert token minority here] that the Democrats pull.

Freal

[–]SkalforusConstitutional Conservative [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It's 2016. You can't just say things like that...

[–]personAAAConservative 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Various ideas:

The big three: Giuliani, Gingrich, Christie all will have roles of at least Senior Advisor. Not sure if I give them Cabinet jobs.

To help lead the Obamacare repeal and replace, HHS: Yuval Levin or James C. Capretta

Keep Ash Carter as Sec. of Defense. One carryover for unity and show the press Trump can govern.

In some role as an advisor: Norman J. Ornstein and Ramesh Ponnuru.

Do not hire, but Trump will anyways: John Yoo as National Security Advisor

[–]0ttervonBismarckCanadian Conservative 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Keep Ash Carter as Sec. of Defense. One carryover for unity and show the press Trump can govern.

This isn't bad idea actually.

[–]JoleneAL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Carter is pushing for the woosification of the military - he must go.

[–]Q2Tas [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Chuck Hagel could return as Sec of Defense, couldn't he? He'd be less likely to have conflicts with the administration, and he only left the position in 2015.

[–]DylanHousman 11ポイント12ポイント  (9子コメント)

I just want to say anyone who believes in "Drain the Swamp" yet wants to put newt Gingrich in the cabinet is an idiot

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 8ポイント9ポイント  (5子コメント)

He's one of Trump's closest advisors. He'll either be in the cabinet or he'll be a high-level policy advisor in the White House.

[–]DylanHousman 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm aware that it's going to happen. I'm saying it's the opposite of draining the Swamp.

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

What in particular do you dislike about him? His time as Speaker of the House?

[–]DylanHousman 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

He's probably the most establishment Republican alive right now barring the Bush family. He's 100% an establishment political insider, which is exactly what trump was supposedly fighting against. I think it's just really hypocritical.

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Establishment changes in time. For instance Reagan was anti-establishment, and then was the establishment.

Newt was literally ran out of D.C. by his own party. He is not on the best of terms, and it's hard to say that he is "establishment".

I think it's just really hypocritical.

Hypocritical arguments are not really good arguments, as people change over time. Unless they are actively being two faced (which Trump has been on several occasions), it's not really a argument to make.

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gotcha. That's valid.

[–]Dakodat 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I agree. So much for voting for an anti-establishment candidate who will bring change partly based on the fact that he isn't a career politician. Trump is just going to be surrounded by a plethora of career republicans who are going to completely run the show.

[–]JoleneAL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The Contract with America. It is the only reason President Clinton is given credit for anything good from his term.

Newt did that.

[–]OoopsItSlipped 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Clive Bundy....

Hahaha. That would be hilarious just to see the reaction

[–]legalizehazing [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

As much as I'd love to tap some talent in the Senate.. it'd have to come from a solidly Republican state so we don't jeopardize the majority.

I'd love to see Carson, Sessions!!, Cruz, Perry, Gingrich, Romney, McCain(we've got a conservative replacement lined up), Gowdy, Christie, Giuliani, like any 5 of our favorite generals, Ron mf Paul for Treasury!! Lolo idk I'm to elated to think clearly

[–]Mier- [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

John Bolton - Ambassador to the UN

Heads would explode at the UN to have this skeptic back in there.

[–]tehForce [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Not sure on people, but closing a number of these departments could save us a ton of money.

[–]Joshmofo1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Bolton for SecState (I'd love Rubio) but not sure how the senate race will work down there if Rubio isn't the candidate.

Gowdy for Attorney General.

Christie for Homeland security.

Flynn or Patreaus for Defense.

Love the idea of Romney in the cabinet as Treasury.

Carson as either Surgeon General or Health and Human Services.

[–]DEYoungRepublicans [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Mr. Trump has made an official announcement that he is seeking advice for these positions: https://www.greatagain.gov/news/help-wanted-4000-presidential-appointees.html

Who knows, maybe we can make it happen? Make conservatism Great Again!

[–]caesarfecit [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Secretary of State

John Bolton would blow leftie minds. But he's who I'd pick. Widely respected and feared amongst foreign policy experts. Candid and effective. I'm skeptical of Gingrich in this role as he's really a domestic policy guy.

Secretary of the Treasury

If Trump could get him, Mitt Romney would be a great choice. Tax reform is something they could get together on easy. But that's if they're both willing.

Secretary of Defense

Gen. Flynn seems the natural choice, or a rehabilitated Petraeus.

Attorney General (Department of Justice)

Duh. Rudy.

Secretary of Commerce

Darrell Issa would be my first choice. Entrepreneur, self-made man. Give him regulatory reform and stand back.

Secretary of Energy

I think this could be the return of Sarah Palin. She's been deep in the background in the Trump Campaign; her and Trump actually go way back. Energy policy is her strong suit, and I'd bet money Trump wants her in the Cabinet, if not here then Interior.

Secretary of the Interior

Jan Brewer might not be a bad choice. See also: Palin.

Secretary of Health and Human Services

Ben Carson. But he'll need good people under him to help him navigate the bureaucracy.

Secretary of Homeland Security

This isn't a bad spot for Christie.

Secretary of Education

Michelle Rhee is exactly who I'd pick. She's a Democrat, pro charter schools, and a legit reformer. She actually fired teachers...in DC!

Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Somebody mentioned Jim Webb - that's not a bad idea!

White House Chief of Staff

This is the one I'm really not sure about. It could be anyone from Gingrich to Paul Ryan for all I know.

[–]nice_guy_nick 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hasn't it been made clear that no one who opposed Trump is going to be part of his administration? That leaves guys like Romney (and other talent) out.

[–]Jamesfm007 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Disband EPA, and seriously reconsider our UN commitment.

[–]gustaveIebon -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I want some unknowns to come in, shift things up. I would hope Trump stays clear of cuckservatives.