@Deadspin @recordsANDradio Judges are there to be impartial and decide based on legislative law and case history. Seems she's deviating
The Trump campaign wants to make names of Nevada poll workers public. Judge's response:pic.twitter.com/tes99IMbbH
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@ryKeough@Deadspin lol, the suit was a bunch of bullshit, go read about it via@RalstonReports. - その他の返信を表示
-
@recordsANDradio@Deadspin Not what I meant. Don't think many judicial guidelines use the words troll or twitter. She's making it personal - その他の返信を表示
-
@ryKeough@recordsANDradio@Deadspin What is gained from releasing their names? - その他の返信を表示
-
@liberalincincy@recordsANDradio@Deadspin Not saying I'm against the ruling. But decide without making it personal. Did I say she allow it? - その他の返信を表示
-
@ryKeough@liberalincincy@recordsANDradio@Deadspin she didn't make it personal at all. She just said, "This is WHY it's like this." -
@ryKeough@liberalincincy@recordsANDradio@Deadspin I'm not sure how that sounds personal to you. She said nothing personal. -
@kellybarnhill@ryKeough@liberalincincy@recordsANDradio@Deadspin Yeah...how does the term troll make it personal? - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
Judge not having any of this Trump bullshit.
@Deadspinhttps://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/796076676480434176 …0:33 - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
-
@MMSnodgrass@Deadspin Actually got a little misty, myself.
-
-
@Deadspin Got to love how the lawyer promises there would be no harassment if the names were revealed. Thank God the judge knows better. -
@Deadspin Hell yeah, that judge. -
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@BiffMixalot that image makes me chuckle. He definitely deserves a gavel flung at his head.
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。