全 4 件のコメント

[–]ExpiresAfterUseQuality Contributor[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You can find the announcement thread here. This thread contains a few questions and answers.

[–]ExpiresAfterUseQuality Contributor[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

/u/JustSysadminThings asked:

What is the process to challenge the validity of a states electoral results? Does it start in state court or is this something that goes straight to the supreme court for consideration?

[–]ExpiresAfterUseQuality Contributor[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

The answer to that question is not going to be what you are looking for. A "regular" voter does not have the standing to challenge the validity of election results. If Mr. Trump or Sec. Clinton wish to contest election results in say, oh just a random state, Florida, they must do so themselves. That is why it is Bush v. Gore, not Random Citizen v. State of Florida.

As for the actual process in Bush v. Gore started in Florida State Court. Gore actually won at the state court level, and that is when then-Gov. Bush appealed to SCOTUS and we got the Bush v. Gore ruling. Notice that Bush is the plaintiff and Gore the defendant.

[–]UsuallySunnyQuality Contributor 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree. The cases definitely don't go directly to SCOTUS. Some states have specific provisions for election challenges, including who can bring them, in which court, and the grounds for the challenge. They require specific evidence, more than just anecdotes.

Election challenges are different from the automatic recount laws, which says that if an election is within x percentage/number of votes, a recount automatically happens. IIRC the Florida challenge in 2000 started as an automatic recount.