When you take things to their absurd extreme for satirical purposes you're not supposed to be anticipating literal reality.
When I wrote this panel, from a cartoon the week Scalia died, I thought it was, you know, a joke.pic.twitter.com/ND90Diovd5
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@MaxCUA@tomtomorrow@BenMank77 The irony of a Trump surrogate's lamenting bullying after 18 months of Trump on the stump is mind-boggling. - その他の返信を表示
-
every trump rally = paid violent >>
@Todus@tomtomorrow@BenMank77<<#hillaryNAZISpic.twitter.com/raANx5lVbZ -
@MaxCUA@MLKconservative@Todus@tomtomorrow@BenMank77 they deserved it and going to get more next week. -
Proof Hillary Pays to Incite Violence pic.twitter.com/kV2cAx8mcr
#NAZIS=@watson_mpls2@MaxCUA@Todus@tomtomorrow@BenMank77@campusreform -
@MLKconservative@MaxCUA@Todus@tomtomorrow@BenMank77@campusreform proof isn't a fake news channel - さらに表示
-
-
@tomtomorrow@siracusa the POTUS doesn't pick SCOTUS judges. S/he nominates them. - その他の返信を表示
-
@ErikEvenson@tomtomorrow@siracusa Not exactly, both nominates and "appoints" Justices. See Art. II, U.S. Const. "Pick" is appropriate. -
@DavidLewis61@tomtomorrow@siracusa "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate" so no, it is not appropriate. - その他の返信を表示
-
@ErikEvenson@tomtomorrow@siracusa And if the Senate defaults on its duty of "Adv. and Cons." Prez "shall appoint." Mandatory language. - その他の返信を表示
-
@DavidLewis61@tomtomorrow@siracusa which is why we have nine justices right now. Oh...wait... -
@ErikEvenson@tomtomorrow@siracusa 1) Obviously, Obama has not pushed it 'cause Clinton will win, and GOP said they'd "let people decide." -
@ErikEvenson@tomtomorrow@siracusa 2) But if GOP really stonewalls Clinton for four years, this will get litigated. And she'll win. -
@ErikEvenson@tomtomorrow@siracusa 3) Because even Anthony Kennedy and John Roberts know bad faith bullshit when they see it. - さらに表示
-
-
@tomtomorrow It's become so hard to write satire these days.
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。