-
-
@seculardotorg why it called The Treaty of "Tripoli" ? - その他の返信を表示
-
@Abohumam@seculardotorg Because it was first signed in the city of Tripoli. Just like the Treaty of Rome was first signed in Rome. -
@JohnGBeckett@seculardotorg ya that would be very logic , but why something to do with US Congress was sighed in another country ? - その他の返信を表示
-
@Abohumam@JohnGBeckett@seculardotorg it had to do with the Barbary wars. -
@MasterGibson@Abohumam@seculardotorg That was the reason for the treaty, but not the name - which was the original question.
-
-
@seculardotorg Christianity is a religion that attracts nitwits that model their lives on nonsense! No Proof that Jesus lived exists-- MYTH! -
@seculardotorg It was the third time that Congress had unanimously done Anything. It was read aloud in its entirety and released publicly. -
@seculardotorg Love it. -
@seculardotorg U r wrong. Congress don't sign the treaty in Novemberhttps://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/5b8mjq/220_years_ago_today_congress_unanimously_signed/d9mxpwo/ … -
@seculardotorg@imrejele oh, and the treat was broken by Tripoli 4 years later. So it's null and void. Can't trust pirates. -
@seculardotorg@imrejele it's evidence that senators didn't read what they were signing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli#Translation_and_Article_11 … -
-
@seculardotorg Kinda sucks that the Muslims broke that treaty... kinda sad Americans had to appease Muslims by adding that passage. -
@GlynGreen1982@seculardotorg not sure I understand
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。