•
•

I'm confused (self.EnoughTrumpSpam)

-Natsoc- が 投稿

So I always hear that Hillary has all these investigations because "she has been in public service for 30 years and faced nonstop partisan attacks", but then why is she the only one facing such scrutiny? Nothing like this happened to Obama, or Kerry, or Gore... could it be that she is reaping what she sowed? Or is every criticism of HRC automatically "a witch hunt"? Does 30 years of investigations mean that any current investigation is automatically a "partisan fake witch hunt"? Is it not possible that she actually committed a crime?

全 5 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]penguinseed 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just go ahead and vote for Jill Stein or Trump, we don't give a shit about you or trying to change your view.

[–]FormerDittoHead 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is it not possible that she actually committed a crime?

Honest question: Are you from the US? Do you know how our law works?

So let's just do a google:

(Gore was VP and as such, really didn't do much of anything to get in trouble for)

John Kerry was a Senator and as such, was fairly insulated from any investigation as was Hillary when she was Senator. If he ran for President now, he'd be held to task for everything Obama is having him do.

But the fact is that the scandal machine has always been running, and the fact is that because Hillary's gotten "double lumped" because of her informal connection to her husband's administration and her serving under Obama.

The saddest thing is that the blackest eye that the Clinton Whitehouse got was over something which she herself was a victim.

[–]LynxRufus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Possible, yes, likely, no. Imagine if the FBI went through every single one of your emails with a fine tooth comb and found nothing. Either you're super corrupt and a brilliant mega criminal comic book villian who is so brilliant that you covered your tracks perfectly... or you're a boring regular person with nothing to hide. Now, keeping in mind that this is real life and not Fox News fantasy land, which is more likely?

[–]autism_ape 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Clinton's supposed crimes are like a carrot on a stick. From the outside, it's obvious that a lot of people are already sure she's guilty before they have any evidence. Except no smoking gun ever seems to emerge. So what are we supposed to think after decades of this?

[–]Jazzhandsjr 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something something bill Clinton. They've had it out for the family for years. I don't even remember the initial reason. It certainly wasn't the office blow job fiasco.

Regardless it doesn't matter if you're an undecided. It won't change your mind. All I can tell you is that the people who voted third party during bush/gore had the same exact mantra as you.

Guess what? Nothing changed. Third parties aren't more visible. There was no revolution. All we got was 8 years of an idiot for president, two wars and a recession.

Apples to oranges Clinton is definitely NOT as bad as the cheeto bandito.