/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Who /tech/ here. Fucking help

Anyone contacted the owner yet?

Goddammit OP, I wanted to make this post.

There was a thread here about two weeks ago from an anon claiming there was something fishy about archive.is. He had completed a ton of research on the owner / creator and it turns out he was a spook. I wish I had screen capped it.

What server are you being sent to and which archived sites are doing this?

waybackmachine may still work also

Has someone tried contacting the owner to tell him his shit's fucked?

https://twitter.com/archiveis

[email protected]

webmaster at archive dot fo in case cuckflare shits on the address.

There was a thread here about two weeks ago from an anon claiming there was something fishy about archive.is. He had completed a ton of research on the owner / creator and it turns out he was a spook.

I wish I had screen capped it.

>>8057977

Noscript does not protect against this.

It's a simple img src tag loading the image; thus the embedded image does not rely on a script.

The exploit used to put it onto archive on the first place may have required a script, but that doesn't matter once it's up.

>>8057986

Always screencap, anon. ALWAYS.

Fuck fuck fuck does this only happen if you've opened an archive link or do you just need to open a thread with one? I haven't really clicked any.

I'm on my phone so I have no idea if that makes it better or worse.

>>8057986

Saw it, blocked the domain immediately.

Bump for importance

>>8058010

if you click an archive.is link, and get a spinning loady thingy. That's the point at which your browser has requested the image from their server.

>>8057989

>What server are you being sent to and which archived sites are doing this?

the tracking image is www.henley-putnam.edu/Portals/_default/Skins/henley/images/loading.gif

the archive from the post referenced in OP is one. i noticed it earlier too

>>8057981

sorry, I didn't want to wait and let other anons fall for it

idea: anyone know of sites where we can post this image from their server and get some bad info in their logs?

>>8058010

Only if you click the affected link.

>>8057944

https://archive is/osfU4

This link does that.

>>8058008

Fuck. Archive was our best way to prove that something was the way it was. Now shit can get memory hole'd.

>>8058039

le reddit Use a fucking VPN next time

>>8058072

dang, maybe we can get it pinned. seems pretty important

>>8057875

here's some of the people we're dealing with:

Founder

Nirmalya Bhowmick, PhD. (h.c.), Founder and Special Advisor to the Board and CEO

Administration

James P. Killin, President

Amy DiMaio, PhD., Provost of Academics

Raymond M. Asad, MBA., Director of Finance

Nancy Reggio, Director of Admissions

Henley-Putnam University Board of Directors

G. Michael Stakias, President, Liberty Partners:

William A. Landman, Chief Investment Officer, CMS Companies:

Tim Foster, CEO, Concorde Career Colleges:

Karen P. Tandy

Michael Hillyard

Walter Burl Huffman

Richard (Tom) Ingram

Peter Bennett

Will tor browser reveal my ip too? or It will just reveal the exit node's ip?

>>8058112

Should we post those links allover to give him false positives?

>>8058137

yes, i would say so.

>>8058119

Tor should not reveal your IP but there are some java script and flash based exploits. That's why those things are disabled by default

>>8058155

Do you carry? Be on your toes and watch your back.

>>8058155

I think it just means someone is harvesting the IP's of people who view archives of pages.

>>8058137

Yea, it'll help the anons who were spoofing their referrer at least

>>8058192

i guess they should know too, im banned forever for trying to dox CTR there though

>>8058075

Here are some alternatives. They need to be vetted though.

http://webcitation.org/archive

https://www.freezepage.com/

>>8058218

Change your IP and go back to cuckchan, rapefugee.

got a VPN. am i good?

>>8058192

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95832746

Someone bump if before it dies

>>8057875

>>8058039

>>8058116

>>8058218

>Lack of proper capitalization and punctuation

View this poster with skepticism. There has been a rash of subhumans posting for unknown but coordinated purposes recently.

>>8058260

>>8058268

wut?

>>8058230

This is the real deal, we need to spread this link to muddle the IP's

>>8058260

Yea, you good.

>>8058278

The following archives are BAD. Spread them around to muddle ip's

https://archive.is/dhn3L

https://archive.is/osfU4

https://archive.fo/fsnL7

https://archive.is/72f3y

>>8058278

This. Though you'd need a lot of IP addresses (not VPNs but innocent bystanders) to access these links to saturate it. You could post them on twitter and bait normalfags to click on them.

No links are working currently, in fact archive.is redirects to archive.fo.

This site has always been blocked in China and it's made it impossible for me to view half of the links posted here.

>>8058380

But to add, there's a problem, referrer data. They'll be able to focus on ones of 8chan origin. So you'd need a way to bombard it with forged referrer data.

>>8058398

This. The entire thing must be fucked, either maliciously or not.

>>8058330

I scoped it out yesterday because I was curious to see how a certain event was being shilled there.

The place was filled with posts like these

>>8058288

>>8058275

>>8058260

>>8058218

>>8058039

The capitalization errors are the real key. They crop up over and over in the strangest way. They shill various angles in waves so that it is impossible to tell what the true aim of the effort is.

pardon me just testing

https://www.whatismyreferer.com/

>>8058420

Maybe a script that constantly changes referrer and user agent that is always loading that gif address?

Does it still get my IP if I have uBlock Origin with all the privacy boxes checked?

I think I've seen archive.is in this state before, months ago.

>>8058492

Yup, I suggest you spread the link to cober your ass.

>>8058492

If you saw the image, they got you.*

*If you saw the image, but you hide your referrer, you will be kind of hidden going forward after we dilute the links, but they got you.

>>8058243

i only went there once to post dox, not really worth it. maybe its better to let them be honeypotted and get the spooks off our backs

>>8058535

>i only went there once to post dox, not really worth it. maybe its better to let them be honeypotted and get the spooks off our backs

If you can't type like a Nazi, you can't be a Nazi; and if you aren't a Nazi, you need to get the fuck off of /pol/.

Main archive.is page is back.

Site still slow as shit.

>>8058591

fucking ban me then, i made this thread asshole

So this is how those fucking bastards are going to shut down archive.is and erase all the evidence of their various crimes against humanity?

I think that's what happens when the website itself is overloaded or whatever.

>>8058600

Stop niggering up your own thread cuckchanner.

>>8058475

Something like that, yeah.

>>8058530

Funny, I didn't see the image at all, just a blank page. Doesn't mean I wasn't affected though as the very act of requesting would have been enough.

>>8058604

seems odd that it would use an image hosted on an intelligence school's website

>>8058037

Fuck. I got one of those. Am i fucked now?

>>8058637

nah you can remove the tracking cookie by deleting system32 folder

>>8058637

they're probably honeypotting to perform metrics on who's looking at what. I doubt it would get you v& or anything

>>8058604

>I think that's what happens when the website itself is overloaded or whatever.

INCORRECT.

The site is likely under attack, but real archived pages still load, albeit slow as shit.

Here's one that was crawled a few months ago.

https://archive.is/Jcz88

(Also an interesting read about an ancient lulzcow from USENET in the 90's that you kids have probably never heard of)

Archive.is/today has been doing something weird for over six months anyways. Never heard anybody else talk about it.

Basically, if using script blockers blocking even first party, every so many months or so (maybe two months)? It will only load a blank page when trying to load an archived page, script blocker will show no scripts blocked, but if you unblock script/XHR for first party then reload then the page will load. You can then block first party again for whatever amount of time it is until it triggers again and archived pages will still load

>>8058680

tfw archive.is has been a honeypot all this time

>>8058680

Like, you have to allow scripts even though scripts don't necessarily show as even being there. At least once every few months or so run the script to "whitelist" yourself. That's my take

archive.is is already registered*

% This is the ISNIC Whois server.

%

% Rights restricted by copyright.

% See https://www.isnic.is/en/about/copyright

domain: archive.is

registrant: DP1659-IS

admin-c: DP36-IS

tech-c: DP36-IS

zone-c: CN25-IS

billing-c: DP36-IS

nserver: anna.ns.cloudflare.com

nserver: ben.ns.cloudflare.com

dnssec: unsigned delegation

created: May 16 2012

expires: May 16 2017

source: ISNIC

person: Denis Petrov

nic-hdl: DP1659-IS

address: B?lkova 16

address: CZ-11000 Prague

phone: +420 775168924

e-mail: [email protected]

created: May 16 2012

source: ISNIC

person: Denis Petrov

nic-hdl: DP36-IS

address: B?lkova 16

address: CZ-11000 Prague

phone: +420 775168924

e-mail: [email protected]

created: May 16 2012

source: ISNIC

Website is owned by a Denis Petrov from Prague, Austria. It's hosted in France. It's been serving the image from Henley-Putnam for months. We need to find out what Petrov's relationship ti Henley-Putnam is. An anon researched this two weeks ago and came to the conclusion that he's spoof, but no one screenscapped it and everyone forgot about it.

>>8058714

That he's a spook I mean. Sorry for the typos.

>>8058702

how are they funded?

>>8058630

Just made a pajeet tier script, forgot about the captcha so it's damn near useless. Best bet is gonna be spreading the links manually.

I would not trust anything about archive .is right now, if this was a legitmate attack I doubt they would host the script on a college's server.

>>8058508

I know they shill for donations. I don't know if that's there only or primary source of funding.

>>8058702

I don't know what really goes on here but for fucks sake due to one news story we have mods begging us to thank based stasi/FBI. This entire board is really ridiculous lately

And not that I want to give advertising money to various clickbait sites and whatnot but anybody with some working logic would wonder what is archive.today/is and what benefit it has to continue operation?

Or I guess like every other hard question, just explain it away as "magick"

>>8058751

It is possible that the person using the script is a student, or associate, of the university.

>>8057875

To what end?

I mean how many anons get no knock raids or are denied security clearance based on this stuff.

I am not saying that the government is not watching us, but this seems like data mining is going into some vault for no reason. What are the consequences for us as anons when they do this?

The suspense is killing me

so how do you make this exploit work? if i want to log IPs for everyone who visits my link to a pro-globalism/pro-communist social network, how would I go about that, friends?

>>8058800

>denied security clearance

That's a real possibility, actually.

Association with certain groups is grounds for denial of a clearance.

>>8058809

You would just need a server in between the social network and the person clicking on the link that logged IPs. After that you'd just serve a link that redirects to wherever you wanted.

>>8058794

The front page of archive .is is compromised as well, if this was an "attack" it would not be condoned by a university for being illegal. And if a student/associate was responsible why would they tie it to their school for no reason?

Archive is involved somehow.

>>8058800

>>8058757

>archive.today/is and what benefit it has to continue operation?

unless theyre making ad money (they aren't) the only use they have is to record information (intel). i'm not really worried about this whole thing, cause i'm probably on 6 million lists already and they haven't iced me yet. If hillary somehow gets in, we should probably be more careful

>>8058824

My security clearance was never denied, however I admit I have only had secret, but I still hold it.

>>8058006

RequestPolicy then. You should be using both anyway.

>>8058859

>If Hillary somehow gets in, we should probably be more careful

I agree with that, shill be gigging for frogs as her first executive order

>>8058877

loled

>>8058877

You do realize that the news websites can easily track you with their cookies too, right? Especially sites for kike-right like kikebart, not to mention big black cuck or cnn.

>>8058800

I think there is a massive, multi-front effort to trace the patterns and pathways of nationalism rather than any single nationalist. Every individual piece of the puzzle is so sloppy that it gets found out eventually, right down to the shills that push them, but nothing that is visible compromises the entire picture.

Remember that trashy paper documenting the spread of google=nigger? That sort of intelligence operation at a more competent level.

>>8058809

>so how do you make this exploit work? if i

Somebody should warn the guy who runs the site about this. He's on Twitter.

How to beat this:

spam the links everywhere you can and dilute their data pool.

>>8058944

Someone already did

https://twitter com/Another_Human/status/794059808605237248

Dammit I had some important stuff on archive.is. Since the site is fucked, where can I archive now?

>>8058944

They didn't get hacked, they've been doing this since their inception. You faggots only just now noticed.

>>8058974

Alternatives were posted in this thread. Does no one read the thread before replying anymore? Go back to cuckchan you fuckin' nigger.

>>8058960

Highlighting and go to still sends referral. Gotta break it up so they have to copy paste then edit in a '.' or the like to stop that.

tfw all my posts go through a burner phone with the GPS ripped out

>>8058591

go to leftpol

So what archiving site should we use instead of archive.is? And we need to make some memes to spread this shit out to our associates and minions elsewhere.

>>8059036

Read the fuckin' thread you nigger.

Just look at how blatant some of them are. I know shilling has been bad in the past, but it now seems to be reaching some new crescendo.

>>8059026

>go to leftpol

So what do we use instead of Archive.is?

>>8059064

which ones, like twitter?

>>8059094

Wayback time machine

>>8059064

Don't be so quick to assume, their homepage has also been exploited. Treat Archive.is with caution, backup anything important you have on there. Something very fishy is going on.

>>8058909

That makes sense, see what nationalists do and act so you catch many bad eggs all at once rather then a handful wasting time and money.

Its a passive approach but I can see it a bit easier then I can much else.

>>8057944

Is this what the "honeypot" is?

If so, it's a false alarm. This happens every time they get overburdened. I think it's a Cloudflare page. It's been doing this intermittently all day.

>be me

>now somebody has my phone's

>the fucking CIA keeps posting cheese encrusted digornios

>all I wanted to do was lurk

>>8059182

phone's ip*

>>8059183

people are learning about us? In a school?

>>8059196

>wipe a server? With a cloth?

Dont be daft.

>>8059183

This.

>>8059196

if I had to guess we're being studied to do either counterterrorism or counterpropaganda, the first will be interested in our general profile to do risk assessment, the latter will be interested in our demographics and how to prevent people from getting here

>>8059203

Well if its a school a paper trail exists from a to b with an outflow if information on a large scale.

many forms of learning exist other then school

>>8059206

So we've graduated to being something above an anime shitposting site. Yay.

If they've got this much time and energy to study us, they should go investigate hillary.

>>8058891

Then we fight. What the fuck are you scared of? Death? LOL

I knew something was fucky with that page not loading, and displaying some kind of loading animation that shouldn't exist on archive.is

I don't really care if some fag has my IP address though.

This can be prevented as follows. install https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix (you should be using it anyway) and add the following rules:

archive.is * css block
archive.is * image block
archive.is archive.is css allow
archive.is archive.is image allow

>>8059271

Death is a natural thing to have, fighting that fear for the greater good is what makes a man white, but realizing that white blood must flow as little as possible for it is valuable.

Fight if you must fight, dont when you can, waist no what is precious and given.

So has anyone contacted the owner yet to see if he can fix this exploit?

>>8059368

In my opinion that's not how it should look, although (without studying everything in this thread) it might work for protecting from exploit this thread is about.

You should really when starting out with umatrix, switch scope to "*" and disable first party then save for scope and switch back to regular scope for the site you are on. That way first party scripts are not run by default. It's the only thing that noscript does better by default, basic configuration disallowing first party. There are many reasons why allowing first party scripts by default is a bad idea. You can always allow them for whatever sites you trust and umatrix is still about a trillion times less involved to use than noscript so I recommend it.

Although I still wonder about what I experienced twice as detailed in the below post (both times were months ago, one at least four months ago, the other at least a few)

>>8058680

TBH it may have been not an exploit but something to prevent the site from being used as a generic web host by spammers etc? But I never trusted archive.is much because what do they benefit from being used almost exclusively by "internet nazis" with no obvious revenue stream? Then again I feel the same way about the vols here for different reasons

Also only marginally on-topic but anybody remember the imgur exploit?

I did a little research on some of the pages that linked to those bad archives.

>>8053522

>>8054040

>>8050244

These are the pages that clicked over to that. They look like they could have been made by one of us. Nice work CIA.

>>8059418

>You should really when starting out with umatrix, switch scope to "*" and disable first party then save for scope and switch back to regular scope for the site you are on. That way first party scripts are not run by default.

Correct. this is only a patch over the default behavior (first party everything enabled / all images and CSS enabled). But this is likely what you'll end up using: manually enabling all content requires too many clicks for casual browsing.

It does make sense to do so in a specialized profile, though (one you'd create solely for 8ch/archive.is/maybe some social media), but expect that any sites outside that will break.

>>8058800

>>8057875

They are looking for the FBI informant, or any other federal agent that's "with us" perhaps?

>>8059420

>anybody remember the imgur exploit?

can you remind us about it?

>>8059330

Privoxy rules to do this?

Still wish we use something else more hidden, and run by us, than archive.is to archive shit

>>8059451

Someone injected code into imgur that caused every page view (millions) to ping 8chan and 4chan.

>>8059444

I've personally found that with umatrix even with first party scripts disabled by default, that I only have to take manual action for about two days of normal surfing until I've hit all of my regular sites and enabled first party (and in particular cases, other scripts/frames) and then it's nearly hands-off. I frankly love umatrix and think it's ingenious, and categorizes scripts and threats and objects etc much better than noscript which is just a fuckhuge list with no order that makes sense. I mean, you don't know with noscript which scripts depend upon which ones etc etc so it's a crapshoot enabling them to get some specific functionality.

>>8059451

It wasn't the same thing except it was targeted at us, it was interesting though

>>8059457

>Privoxy rules to do this?

Privoxy doesn't filter HTTPS, so would be useless for remote images. (You could install a CA and MITM everything, but I would not advise that.)

>>8059480

I guess I'll have to give block everything mode a try. Thanks for the field report, anon.

It might be true that some connections still escape, notably WebRTC and Websockets. What do we do about those? There's uBlock Origin Websockets extension but it is not supported by uMatrix. I'm also using "WebRTC Network Limiter", but not sure how effective that is.

Which extensions do you use?

My go to list is: uBlock origin (+ websockets plugin), uMatrix, WebRTC Network Limiter, and HTTPS Everywhere (+ a few userscripts via TamperMonkey). Should I be using anything more?

>>8059506

I couldn't even start to list everything, ublock has something to disable webrtc, https everywhere is good. Then I have hundreds of about:config changes that were important but frankly I'd have to research all over again to give a report worth a damn.

I'm practically stuck on firefox now due to the huge amounts of configuration put in.

SSleuth is also nice for a quick rundown of problems with TLS on sites you visit.

For a long time you couldn't let firefox update without having some new fuckery that needed to be disabled, "pocket" etc

>>8059536

I'm using Chromium here mostly because its sandboxing is top notch. I doubt anyone would waste a 0day here, but Firefox is the go to browser for claiming pwn2owns (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pwn2Own)

I really wish it wasn't so: we need a secure browser that's not backed by an ad company.

Also if using firefox I recommend running wireshark, setting your homepage to about:blank beforehand, starting firefox and seeing what connections it makes. There's no reason for it to announce that you just started a browsing session to the sjws at mozilla.

I have about:config changes relevant to stopping this, but fuck it would take some work to find it. If you really care you need to do your own looking at your network traffic.

I expect my OS and browser to not make traffic or activity when doing nothing. I need to revisit this myself

>>8058714

archive.is is fishy as fuck. The owner doesn't say shit, answers few questions on tumblr and says that they are paying the hosting costs out of pocket. They were going to release what are their hosting costs, but didnt.

Not to be trusted but we are fucked they are not based archive services out there. So far archive.is hasn't deleted anything, that we know of, but, they are for sure scraping ips.

>>8058755

>>8059559

Yeah I understand the benefits of chromium/blink but have never been able to trust it or even consider switching after the amount of effort I've put into my own stuff.

There are sandboxing options for firefox (firejail) or even whole OS like Qubes that I've wanted to play with (especially since I finally have a system capable) but haven't gotten around to it

>>8059573

>Not to be trusted but we are fucked they are not based archive services out there

what are the legal issues in setting up one?

There is web.archive.org, but they honor robots.txt. Bookmarklet:

javascript:void(open('https://web.archive.org/save/'+document.location))

>>8057875

It is clever, since that loading gif, goes by so fast. I can confirm that I pull that image as well.

>>8058230

>tfw my IP goes to the nearby city, not my house for some reason

>>8059482

That sucks… I wounder if i could get some anons to fork off privoxy and setup blacklisted CAs to install, to replace the defaults. Because really have you seen the default CAs and who it lets in on your tls/ssl? I mean just looking under my /usr/share/ca-certificates/ is giving me spooks right now.

>>8059606

>javascript:void(open('https://web.archive.org/save/'+document.location))

Legal issues are not the problem just the high server costs. An anon tried to make an archive of 8chan a while back and it cost him too much. That was only 1 site imagine a global archive service.

>>8059626

That's normal, you're seeing the location for the office or whatever that the IP block was registered to. It doesn't stop law enforcement from knowing which address the IP was actually assigned to, given warrant or extralegal access to that info

>>8059626

Like, because you have a dynamic IP you're seeing the physical address that your ISP registered the block of IPs that your IP was temporarily assigned to

>>8059652

Makes sense, alright

block scripts by default everywhere

>>8059444 (checked)

Thanks for the script. Just started using uMatrix recently and it rocks. Is there any value to using uBlock at the same time, or do yall use uMatrix alone?

>>8059667

I even failed to explain it properly there, although it would be close if you replaced the final "to" with "from"

Anyways, for the average home user with dynamic IP (basically most people with DSL or cable etc) when visiting a site, assuming no other fuckery, the site can't determine your home address. They will get an address registered to the ISP. If you did something that got the attention of LEOs, the LEO would contact the ISP with your IP address at the time, a description of your crime (or just the implication of it), a warrant request if needed, and the time of the offense. The ISP would reply back giving the account information associated with the IP at that time. Because when your DSL or cable modem gets the lease for that IP address, it is associated with a username and password (saved on your modem box) that is tied to your account. The ISP must store this associated info. So blah blah anyways with the information your ISP has your activity can be correlated with your physical address (although there are still several caveats).

Hence why people recommend VPN in non-cooperating nations, because then you're hiding your specific internet traffic from your ISP and only cooperation from the VPN company (which may not have legal obligation or even desire to cooperate with requests) could reveal more info. And even then would probably not be able to get down to specific customer/address. Although it can get way way more complicated for a number of technical reasons and it's hard for even full-paranoid anon to deal with all of it.

>>8059713

Anoonymoose, and others recommend private internet access for vpn. Mullvad considering how cucked sweden is. I don't think they can be trusted, and well when I used their service, the reliability was bad. Do you vouch for privateinternetaccess? Or should we just stick with some Russian VPN provider?

I've seen that loading shit before, but I'm connecting from a university dorm so the IP they get doesn't really matter as at least 500 other people use it.

I wouldn't worry too much about it anyway, I doubt they can do anything with the IP except collect metrics as other people in this thread have mentioned. IPs change all the time and sometimes if you use a shitty VPN, someone can use you as an exit node.

For that reason, IPs are not a very reliable method of tracking people as they can be easily spoofed, hijacked or muddled.

>>8059722

I can't really say, I don't even bother with that level of paranoia. Don't take my advice about VPN etc because I have what may be a naive view that I still have freedom of speech and if somebody has a problem they can take it up with me at my door.

>>8059710

I use both. uBlock lets you traverse the last mile of the blocking: removing crap that is served under the same domain as the site itself. uMatrix lets either everything from a domain pass or nothing, uBlock will filter by URL/apply cosmetic filters/etc.

For example, some Wikipedia sites benefit from uMatrix passing through requests to meta.wikimedia.org, but I still don't want to see their shilling for donations, so I have:

||meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BannerLoader&*

>>8059742

(have that in my uBlock, that is)

>>8059129

see:

>>8059114

>>8059263

>If they've got this much time and energy to study us, they should go investigate hillary.

they're privately run aka bad guys

>>8059445

>They are looking for the FBI informant, or any other federal agent that's "with us" perhaps?

that is a likely scenario

>>8059429

>I did a little research on some of the pages that linked to those bad archives.

thanks, so we know those threads are probably bullshit

>>8058714

>Website is owned by a Denis Petrov from Prague, Austria.

>Prague, Austria

>Prague

>Austria

u wot

Could this have something to do the pedos saving 8chan cp threads/boards on archive last year? If so why would they target /pol/, unless it's an attempt to harvest 8anons IPs. Have we found any of the affected URLs posted to sites other than 8ch?

>some guy post a thread and says archive.is is honeypot bullshit

>he gets banned (i think)

>now this

>>8058155

Why hasn't this been shooped to read "Racism… It's always acceptable"

>>8058116

It's almost pointless to look any further than Henley-Putnam. What else is there to find? They are closely associated with every alphabet and there are many papers to be found about domestic extremists, every kind of buzzword used to describe the userbse here, etc etc.

Interesting considering all of the pinned "based FBI" threads lately.

>>8059801

If the Henley-Putnam link is correct it's just data collection regarding "potential domestic extremists" blah blah

>>8058629

>>8058591

>>8058243

how bout you fuckers stop derailing this thread?

>>8059843

not bad, thanks m8

>>8059856

Why would I not point out the subhuman shills in a thread started by a subhuman shill? Or any thread really, but in this case it isn't even derailing from the OP as he is among the guilty.

henley-putnam.edu/Portals/_default/Skins/henley/images/loading.gif

They're using dotnetnuke like a skids.

Microsoft-IIS/7.5

ASP.NET 4.0.30319

Login page: http:// www.hen ley-putnam.edu/login.aspx

Mail server: 247501781.mail.outlook.com

Do anybody want to look for credentials in databases?

Also if we say that a large botnet is to visit the links it will ruin their information and data. They can try to hide links but I am now watching.

>>8059938

They found out. They're watching.

It's kind of interesting if you search for the full URL for the loading image, you get a result from reddit from 2015 with a person noting "Oddly enough, the Loading image Isn't on archive.is."

Also some poo-in-loo tutorials for infinite scrolling page coding that just use the url for the loading gif in the tutorials because it's basically a free hotlinkable image.

Well, 8chan is already on cloudfare, so your IP is already sent to a third party.

>>8059760

>>>8059445

>>They are looking for the FBI informant, or any other federal agent that's "with us" perhaps?

>that is a likely scenario

Nah, I think the likely scenario is that this is just some more HBGary type shit where some dumbass thinks they can find info on pol users and package it up for some sweet sweet gov contract money.

>>8059957

XCritcs on fling.com database (related info?)

bi tcoin.stackexchange.com/users/4532/xcritics

http://www.h ackinguniversity.in/2013/02/infinite-scroll-blogger-1.html

Is it shitty copy paste or real code?

>>8059845

I got news for those idiots. We are the majority bub, Trump is going to get 70+% of the vote

>>8059938

They or (((they))) keep /pol/ under surveillance and they found out we know.

>>8058751

>>8058161

>>8058230

Would making a script where all links you click go through a redirector like anonym.to, help?

This why folks everyone should have a VPN and use NoScript while blocking webRTC for good measure.

>>8060023

It's a multi-pronged, ongoing probe. Any link discussed by posters using improper grammar and capitalization is suspect.

For a quick and dirty operation, it doesn't even matter if you say, "This link is compromised," Because just by posting it, a few people will click it. It's a way to maximize short term exposure at the cost of long term efficacy.

God what a fucking asshole.

>>8057907

techfag here, basically besides needing to noscript archive.is now, all we can really do is wait for the archive.is owner to fix this

>>8058668

>Hates being 'embarrassed' but repeatedly puts himself in situations were his sexual activities with dogs were made very clear (such as phoning his vet to ask if swallowing dog semen is dangerous).

lol

also that link doesn't appear to have the compromised code

Shit, does noone here know what "escape text" is?

EASY BREAKDOWN FOR THE TECH-ILLITERATE

Whenever you type text in a field of a website, that field may or may not be a possible vector of attack. To prevent shit like that, developers write "sanitization" code. To turn shit like "/" into some other text, like "&64" for instance.

This is because frequently, what you wrote will be posted and be part of the webpage returned to you. What would happen if you posted actual code instead of just text?

This is what we call "escape". By using using an escape character (or expression) the text you write in a form starts by declaring "all right, the text ends HERE. The rest is code" and you do all sorts of funny shit.

So what is happening here?

Whenever you archive.is something, imagine there's a fuck huge text box. And everything in the site you're archiving is automatically typed in it.

Now, someone found out that text-field doesn't have proper sanitization and is vulnerable.

So you make your site. You post something about "multiculturalism" or "Hillary killing niggers live". And then, you write a bit of code. The escape code. Followed by whatever payload you want in your attack.

For now, that payload is a simple image tag to log your IP. In the future, it might be a full blown keylogger or something worse.

It's not archive.is doing this anons although the guy running it is weird.

It's people writing sites with this shit, archiving them on purpose and linking them here.

Wouldn't surprise me if this catches on and becomes an anti-archive defense for newssites in the future.

Now if some other motherfuckers keep posting instead of reading the thread, remind them that the source of the attacks ISN'T on the archive.is.

It's on the actual sites being archived.

I'm seeing a lot of (1)'s asking for alternatives, and it seems a lot like someone wants us to ditch archive.is for another service. One that may already be compromised and controlled.

>>8060125

That actually cleared it up, so in response to >>8060130 is there any defense against this and alternative to it?

>>8060144 (checked)

Ctrl+F and read all the posts above about uBlock Origin and uMatrix and learn how to set them up. If you're really concerned about it, be as paranoid as possible and deal with the fact it's a little extra work.

>>8059466

I remember that. They even wrote "Sorry Hotwheelz :(" in the code.

>>8058230

Couldn't we just share those links outside to drown out the IPs they are looking for?

>>8057875

S H U T

H

U

T

I T

T

D O W N

O

W

N

>>8060227

They would just ignore the loads of new IPs and any future ones that link catches, while keeping the old IPs.

>>8058155

how the fuck is that racism? i never understood that

>>8060306

Looks like a reddit goy.

>>8060306

Maybe I am a cali girl? Maybe it's just late.

Got a specific problem with the content of my posts rather than the style?

>there are still people on 8chan who have not installed requestpolicy continued

>there are still people on 8chan who have not installed requestpolicy continued

>>8058278

> spread this link to muddle the IP's

There's no point doing that if they're collecting the referrer info too. They just filter out the IPs from dud referrals (i.e. links clicked from outside /pol).

>>8059429

>>8059760

>>8060094

For what it's worth, I'm the one who created the Clinton sex crimes thread and I'm most assuredly not CIA. The archive.is link was fine at first, but a few hours into the thread it got corrupted and people started complaining. That doesn't mean the TruePundit story is necessarily true, but it does mean that someone from the outside took a perfectly functional archive.is link and fucked it up. I apologize to anyone I may have unwittingly led into a honeypot.

>>8057875

I SAY THAT YESTERDAY !

>>8060144

Don't listen to the other idiots about uMatrix and uBlock.

They're well intended (and you should indeed use those things) but they they don't protect against this.

The only solution is not clicking it. We're back to warez days of shady "jenna_jameson_nude.mpeg.exe" links. You click it, you're fucked.

For a more complicated answer, (and uMatrix might give you that option) it's possible to block conections to certain sites/servers/pages.

So if that image tag remains the same, we can block it once, post the "blocklist" here for other anons and stay safe. And if all else fails, editing your hosts file is a last resort that cuts the problem by the root.

The main issue though, is that they can generate new articles, put another server/another image in the tag. They'll archive it, post it here and in the time it takes us to figure out it's a new attempt, some anons will end up clicking it.

We can always jihad it up anyway. Some of us are already on lists. Those can click on archive.is links and screenshot it/confirm it's legit.

Some anons are writing an archive.is extension though. The main purpose was diferent, but we could ask them to put a "verify" link feature. If there's an archive link in a page and it leads to a broken page, it simply warns you or outright refuses to open it.

It's time to call upon /g/, install Gentoo and cross our fingers. We're close, we're winning, and this half-assed attempt to round us up in FEMA camps is a clear display of desperation. Well done anons.

Like I give a shit eitherway, I'm portuguese, they can't do jackshit in here, nor do they care about us.

Is there any active threads with those links?

>>8058155

I'm a broken down wizard with a bad back, let them come. I'm ready.

>>8057875

It wouldn't be surprising if the person doing this had a direct connection to Hillary. They already modeled memetic spread on cuckchan to some extent in the UN (((study))) done earlier. (((George Soros))) probably wants some statistics on what he's dealing with when it comes to communities of people that don't want his pinko commie jew bullshit.

>>8060446

/pol/ack persecution if she becomes president?

>>8060449

>implying she even needs to do that directly

As long as the rapefugees flood in then they will do all of the violence and dirty work for her.

So who do we have to meme out of reality over this?

>>8057875

That putnam address always shows up when archive is down and then vanishes when the site is back up. I don't know what's the deal with it but it's nothing new.

Also stop falling for the honeypot meme and wait for some more info instead of falling into obvious bait like you did with Freech's "reddit spacing" crap.

Seems to be up and working this morning. Just archived some stuff.

>>8058886

>>8058809

So this is basically a man in the middle attack kf you click a bad link?

Is it strictly just IP harvesting or could it be used to load malicious code into your browser? What would that even do; most modern browsers stop you from going to bad domains or downloading without permission? Also, arent IP addresses considered semi public? Does this exploit let them have a live page that will always differ from the archive? (I've seen that you need to rearchive it to update the page)

Asking because i dont know shit, and this seems minor from my point of view

Goon genocide now.

/tech/ here

First of all you guys are overreacting. Whenever a Youtube video is embedded here the exact same thing happens. The thumbnail is loaded from google's servers. That's why you can't embed on our board.

Is someone posting malicious links archive links to track users here? Probably but this is sort of tracking is easily defeated without using an addon.

Second NoScript tracks you as well with the WAN IP protection that's enabled by default, most well known security addons track their users and sell the data. >>>/tech/674876 If you're not analyzing your web traffic don't pretend to know what you're doing, most technical sites giving advice are full of shit and paid to lie. And on top of all this NoScript wouldn't stop that picture from loading giving away your IP.

Protecting yourself from this attack is as simple as going into your browser preferences and selecting that only images from the originating server be loaded. By browsing this way most of the web will appear broken thanks to sites using CDNs to reduced bandwidth costs. You'll get used to it.

>>8057875

>thus giving them the user's IP.

>>8057944

Well done, you just found my proxy's IP!

Seriously.. use proxies guys. I barely browse 8chan without one.

>>8060700

>If you're not analyzing your web traffic

You mean TCP UDP connections?

I do that, but what should I look out for? When I started observing I found many google and apple connections without even having their programs installed. They tend to throw some shit in hidden file paths like AppData, or leave files in program files.

Block all connections.. but if things don't connect properly - try to figure out what connection is required.

I've learned A LOT about the files on my computer from doing that.

>>8060700

>The thumbnail is loaded from google's servers. That's why you can't embed on our board.

wouldn't it be pretty simple to have 8ch download the thumbnail and host it as the embed's thumbnail?

>>8060661

People need to use an "all sites are data mining" approach.

I do whatever I can to limit their tracing abilities.

>>8057875

>I dont know what a honeypot is

>I dont know what XSS is

>I dont know what SQL is

>I dont know what escaping is.

>I'm going to use a bunch of terms I dont understand to sound smart.

>>8060742

He said he didn't know.

And /pol/ tech threads are a good idea. Assange's '1984' warning warned us it's going to be harder to use /pol/ etc without putting yourself at risk.

Clearly the corporatocracy is trying to assert it's dominance. Which is funny.. all we do is observe accessible information and shitpost.

>>8058230

Maybe it's Trump, trying to find qualified RWDS members.

>>8057875

wow it's google analytics. it's fucking nothing. also that gif doesn't exist, and that page load error is real because the gif doesn't exist.

calm down faggot

>>8060760

Better safe than sorry.

Train stations are expensive.

Okay reading through this thread, none of it makes sense. Other links to random archived shit also have the spinning thing. The main site is fucked as well. Plus worried about IPs? Seriously this thread is overreaction and misinfo

>>8060793

You have to ask yourself who get's benefited by demonizing archive.is and making /pol/ (as well as others) to drop it entirely

>>8060760

>wow it's google analytics. it's fucking nothing.

Actually, it raises concerns about Google.

Google is evil it seems. Why are they exploiting client-side scripting to obtain data?

Yes they say the application requires the client to execute the program - but why is that necessary or allowable?

t. technical puppy

>>8060803

This is ultimate unwarranted self importance. Archives that are innocuous and have never even been posted here are also broken.

>>8060760

actually i take that back the gif exists, but the rest is still google analytics so still nothing.

>>8060814

because it gives the site owner's more data about their users. sometimes that is useful even if you don't like it.

>>8060819

He's got a point, though.

it should at least be looked into.

>>8057875

I have the QuickJava add-on for Firefox + uBlock Origin and I started to see a loading screen on some Archive.is links a few days ago. I've never seen that before so it's a fresh trick / exploit. A page on Archive.is shouldn't have any JavaScript trying to load.

If your browsers don't have an add-on that enables you to completely disable JavaScript & Java go get one today and only turn on JavaScript when necessary.

Also: people shouldn't only post an Archive.is link. The original link should also be posted.

>>8060843

It seems Archive.is has been slow to load these past few days. Maybe there's too many people using it? Yesterday evening I couldn't load any of these pages:

https://archive.is/http://www.wsj.com/articles/secret-recordings-fueled-fbi-feud-in-clinton-probe-1478135518

But this morning I can without any problem.

>>8060803

>You have to ask yourself who get's benefited by demonizing archive.is and making /pol/ (as well as others) to drop it entirely

Fuck off.

I use /pol/ and archive.is in a 'business' deal like fashion - aware of their potential conflicts of interest and scrutinizing them to make those conflicts are visible to me.

I largely trust /pol/, but not entirely. You should never trust anything on the internet without scrutinizing who you're dealing with.

Otherwise they'd potentially fuck you over or mislead.

I doubt /pol/ would do that, they've done a lot of good work. So has archive.is.. just making a point about mindless trust on the internet.

>>8060863

.. don't they usually have different URLs than that?

claiming ID ed9a4a, I got disconnected

>>8060819

when the site is having issues and that henley-putnam thing shows up none of the links work, it doesn't affect specific archived links.

>>8060843

>Also: people shouldn't only post an Archive.is link. The original link should also be posted.

there's no reason to post direct links, you can still use archive.org as an emergency alternative

>>8060884

>claiming ID ed9a4a, I got disconnected

Me too, what was that?

>>8057875

Not requesting from that website anymore?

Cant see anything with RequestPolicy

>>8060890

Maybe just a coincidence, I get dc often because my internet is worse than Zimbabwe's. Their gorillas have better connection than me

>>8060893

It only requests stuff from that site when archives is having problems.

>>8060910

What do you mean by problems?

>>8060910

>I get dc often because my internet is worse than Zimbabwe's. Their gorillas have better connection than me

Straya?

Fucking hell I hate our internet.

>>8060737

This.

>>8060863

What's that? it's in the source code in those links, at the very bottom:

//top-fwz1.mail.ru/js/code.js

&

img src="//top-fwz1.mail.ru/counter?id=2825109;js=na" style="border:0;" height="1" width="1"

it looks like it's in every Archive.is page

>>8060884

So if no links work and sites fucked and "loading" forever, why would it be tracking on every archive link and innocuous stuff? I'm confused here.

>>8058260

Just to be sure, connect to your VPN and look online for an IPV6 leak tester. Always important to know you're not leaking your real IP.

>>8060728

Just install a firewall and check the logs regularly, you seem to be on the right track asides for using Windows. If something doesn't look right investigate it. That's how I found out NoScript was contacting a server in Italy. The deeper you go the more you realize that major browsers spy on users by default.

Every URL you access in Firefox or Chrome is sent to Google under their 'Safe Browsing' initiative. There's also telemetry data to be concerned about.

>>8060731

No, it's technically possible but violates their API. They could block 8ch like they did NicoNico. Tracking where their videos get embedded and how many people see it and either watch or don't watch it is worth money to them. They're not allowing sites to embed as a public service or to promote their brand.

>>8060917

>What do you mean by problems?

Like when it gets stuck with the spinning thing and prevents you from archiving or reading archived links. I have uMatrix so I noticed every time archive goes tits up that spinning-thing requesting scripts from henley-putnam shows up

>>8060884

>there's no reason to post direct links, you can still use archive.org as an emergency alternative

I didn't mean posting a direct link to the original source but at least we should know what the source is before we click on an Archive.is link which means posting a broken link to the original source next to the Archive.is link is a good idea. And sometimes people here mask their shitty source / click bait website by just posting the Archive.is link.

>>8060932

I don't know why, maybe some fallback page with leftover script? Maybe used to track how many people where trying to access it when the site goes down?

>>8060753

>And /pol/ tech threads are a good idea.

No they're not. All it is will be autists spurging out trying to sound smart when they dont understand a god damn thing they're saying. The dunning kruger effect here is massive. Case in point is this very thread.

I always hated clicking on archive.is links, there's no fucking way of knowing what's on the other side.

ISN'T THIS JUST PEOPLE ARCHIVING MALWARE/SPYWARE SITES AND LINKING IT?

>>8060985

>All it is will be autists spurging out trying to sound smart when they dont understand a god damn thing they're saying

Exactly.

It's where real tech nerds tear them to shreds. I take any tech knowledge inaccuracy on the chin. It really helps learning how computers and the internet works.

>>8060952

>>8060950

I suggest the "Privacy Settings" addon for Firefox.

>>8060952

Haven't seen that. Only seen this https://top-fwz1.mail.ru/js/code.js

which is a shitty tracking script

The loading gif just seems to be a loading gif.

Nothing strange about it, just that it is hosted on another website

t. sysadmin

>>8057977

>NoScript

Not only will that not help, but it's worse.

https://liltinkerer.surge.sh/noscript.html

>>8060950

>Every URL you access in Firefox or Chrome is sent to Google under their 'Safe Browsing' initiative

So.. Tor is compromised?

>>8061012

Why… would you use either of those browsers over tor?

>>8061012

No.

There are settings in Firefox in about:config that you can use to disable this.

Tor Browser disables it

>>8061003

>Nothing strange about it, just that it is hosted on another website

>hosted on another website

That sounds strange to me anon.

>>8057875

I just checked the source code of that Archive.is page >>8053522 that OP is talking about and I don't see any henley-putnam.edu image or any Google analytics script.

Is it because I have JavaScript disabled by default?

>>8057875

What do we use now?

>>8061018

Go load any news website

I guarantee 5+ tracks scripts and dozens of instances of content loaded from other websites

I rest my case

>>8061011

Bullshit

The code is open source

The malware thing seems to be bs as when I load up the website with a Windows computer, nothing different happens, no banners

The AdBlockPlus thing is inter fighting over competition, nothing particularly super bad about it

Does it not seem strange to anybody that archive.is offers (so far as I can tell) unlimited storage space to document virtually any requested web page, and with no visible ad support? And with how heavily we use it to archive articles, threads, and twitter posts…

>>8061041

>Go load any news website

>I guarantee 5+ tracks scripts and dozens of instances of content loaded from other websites

If that's correct then we have a far bigger problem than we thought. I doubt those sites simply link to a gif file. Clearly there's something in it for them - that's why they get sites to load data from their site.

Either the masses need to learn about this or it needs to be better regulated.

>>8061069

>Does it not seem strange to anybody that archive.is offers (so far as I can tell) unlimited storage space to document virtually any requested web page, and with no visible ad support?

Not quite, because I bet the person who started it did so with the intention of 'digger's' storing the data. Why would he want that? Because they dig into the tyranny of governments.

That said, unless the guy is wealthy - he aint doing it for free.

>>8061058

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/55n860/noscript_is_harmful_and_promotes_malware/

Everyone should be running NoScript at all times.

>>8061070

>I think analytics is something new

>I dont understand how google got to be where it is

>>8061077

>That said, unless the guy is wealthy - he aint doing it for free.

I take that back, I'm not wealthy and I dig into emails for free as part of a hobby and a stupid sense of duty.

But the guy that made archive.is needs at least a half decent wage to support that site - or many donators.

>>8061085

>implying I think it's new

I know they've been a tyrant for a long time. Mainly because a lot of politicians are blind to what they do.

>>8061070

most of is used for analytics/user data to sell to advertisers, etc

So yeah, it is a problem

Wonder why these kinds of privacy/security software are created? To stop them, but of course the average user is not aware and does not care

>>8061080

Top comment explains why that's bullshit.

>>8057875

>>8057907

>>8057944

Use Tor.

>>8061097

I am aware

>>8061101

Also found this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12624000

not malware but unwanted software which takes 6 clicks from the original ad on noscript

>>8061094

>Wonder why these kinds of privacy/security software are created?

You mean the privacy/security software on our computers?

>>8061099

The issue is if a site requires an application to be open on the client's side.

Wouldn't that potentially render it useless?

>>8061141

Yes, browser addons included

>>8061112

>>8061111

This is where you really need to know how these scripts are structured and how they work.

And that means studying programming and languages.

>>8061041

btw there's an addon that helps minimizing tracking through cdns

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/decentraleyes/

https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes

this way you don't have to connect to google and the like on 80% of sites, since most of them use cdns to keep down hosting costs

>>8061152

You can already get a basic knowledge of how they work without needing programming skills

Posted the thread on /tech/, but that board is completely compromised. Later posts in this thread that look extra shilly, that's where it's coming from. They used to just be normal autism.

>>>/tech/675465

>>8059000

>>8059064

Stop lying, kike. Go ahead, try to make a new archive, even of a twitter post.

>>8059856

>contribute to thread

>make one post telling OP to stop being a faggot

>"derailing"

>>>/reddit/

>>8060985

The only sperging is from /tech/ shills like you.

>>8061154

I know.

I use:

uBlock Origin

DecentralEyes

NoScript

RequestPolicy Continued

Privacy Settings

Self-Destructing Cookies

Random Agent Spoofer

and sometimes uMatrix

pretty good list tbh

>>8061173

So fucking teach yourself, cuck.

>>8061157

>You can already get a basic knowledge

That's my point. I don't think that's good enough and our education system needs another overhaul.

After we eliminate the subversion.

>>8061173

(((b456f8))) is one of the goon shills from /tech/, filter it and move on.

>>8061177

>NoScript

>and sometimes uMatrix

nigger wtf are you doing

>>8061181

What do you think I'm here for?

Asking questions is part of learning.

I'm not just using what anons are posting, I'm looking up various sources about the programs mentioned. I find /pol/ helpful in steering the ship - but sometimes I need to check the map just in case.

>>8061188

I know, but sometimes replying to shills helps your own thinking. Otherwise they inadvertently condition you by ignoring what they say.

Sure, take it with a pinch of salt, but don't simply ignore it. I've had some good arguments with what seemed to be CTR believe it or not.

They stopped responding when they started to realize something though - that's conditioning for ya!

>>8061158

/tech/ got overrun by freech and butthurt Null drones last time I checked it

>>8061177

>RequestPolicy Continued

I used to get memory leaks with that until I swapped with umatrix

>>8061188

I came here from front page, lmao. Are your fee-fees being hurt?

Who am I being paid by, pray tell?

>>8061191

A free-thinking, enlightened individual such as yourself should already know this. If you don't know what XSS means, you deserve to suffer the consequences. Not like you're not already vulnerable and being tracked.

It's so funny to see you fucking retards being brought down to earth for once by the realization that no, you can't lift for shit. No, you're not that fucking smart. Sorry, most of you aren't worth more to society than a sandnigger immigrant.

>>8060924

here is //top-fwz1.mail.ru/js/code.js

http://pastebin.com/g8VkiXjQ

Question anons, was this happening way before the fibby twatter page drop, or does this coincide in anyway?

>>8060394

>The main issue though, is that they can generate new articles, put another server/another image in the tag. They'll archive it, post it here and in the time it takes us to figure out it's a new attempt, some anons will end up clicking it.

So you just block any third party connections for archive.is, right?

Swiss here, I don't care that much too, but injecting foreign stuff into my sides isn't pleasant. huehue.

There should be an extension with an attached DHT. I think that we could use the Bittorrent DHT and simply make a hash of each site snapshot and store it into the DHT. Futher, if any IT-fag reads this, look into ipfs and cjdns. IPFS especially could be used to store archive.is-like snapshots and make them available as long as needed. The problem is: All decentralized proposals are chatty. Right now, archive.is sees all, but we don't know who accesses what. IPFS over tor/cjdns works about the same, but each node has some knowledge. And if they set up huge nodes (like in tor today), any big actor can snoop on us.

>>8061216

>Not like you're not already vulnerable and being tracked.

My approach is try to lay low, reduce your footprint to what's practical, assume you're being tracked.

>It's so funny to see you fucking retards being brought down to earth for once by the realization that no, you can't lift for shit.

Clearly you didn't see the posts saying "tech pleb" or "tech puppy".

We know we suck. But we're becoming eager to get gud.

>No, you're not that fucking smart. Sorry, most of you aren't worth more to society than a sandnigger immigrant.

Now you're just being a meanie weenie.

>>8061184

Up to two years ago, before they analyzed who blocks what it was a safe bet to just block any content you did not like - and you weren't any more visible because of that. Any basic knowledge of how the Internet and the www works was sufficient. Now the only thing you can do is to mimic a blind person, because their setup filters A LOT by default. If you just dabble here and there, you are on a list somewhere. And if only as "doesn't like adverts/non-conformist".

>>8061222

upon closer inspection appears to be loading a Shockwave Flash object

oops accidental sage. polite bump

>>8061222

>>8060924

>.ru

Russian?

>>8061229

>So you just block any third party connections

I don't really blame you guys, because this is shit a normal user doesn't need to know. It's more for the tech wizards and neckbeards that have sex with undefined procs.

But I just wanted to let you know that that sentence hurt to read.

It's okay anon, you didn't mean it. But it still hurt.

>>8061245

Ah, yes, laying low by posting from your home over clearnet using google chrome.

>we're eager to become good

No. You're eager to be spoonfed, that's why you're lazing around in this thread. That's also why so many of you faggots are overweight and don't even know it.

You're far from the worst here, but even you believe your own shit.

Delete all archive.is page links here.The enemy is matching the IPs they hacked from the archive.is with the archive.is links posted here.

Dox to come soon.

Your reputations may be at risk!!!!

Do you have anything useful to write? Or even anything funny?

Got no time.

A few weeks ago I noticed archive.is redirecting to .fo

It triggered Firefox unsafe page

Archive.fo is bad bad bad

I am a very active archiver of pol threads but since then I stayed clear for the most part.

On archive.fo if you then go to archive.is it will not redirect back again.

>>8061267

maybe. FQDNs can be assigned to any non-CIDR IP address.

who owns these blocks 217.69.133.* (my DNS is resolving top-fwz1.mail.ru to .145 on that subnet)

>>8061288

>(1)

Let me guess, tomorrow by this time, you're gonna tell us all about this new site that propped up and is a 10/10 alternative to archive.is, right?

Man, you're either a stupid, tech-illiterate CTR faggot, or you're just stupid and tech-illiterate

>>8061267

Wait a tick..

>>8060924

>it looks like it's in every Archive.is page

Hahahah Maybe Clinton might have difficulties taking out the site if it's backed up in Russia.

Not totally sure if that happens using that script - but it sure would be funny

>>8061274

>No. You're eager to be spoonfed, that's why you're lazing around in this thread.

>lazing around

What part of actively going to site and observing the thread is "lazing around"

Just because it's not an official source of information doesn't mean it's not a source of information.

This thread is like training wheels to me.

>You're far from the worst here, but even you believe your own shit.

My shit don't stink I'm perfect.

>>8061296

Official explanation for .fo is something about https not working with .is for some shit reason, and something about having a backup domain if whoever owns .is is a faggot like whoever owns .today.

>>8061288

No

Just us a proxie like me for archive.is

I thought that a tech literate guy loke yourself would know this,so i left it assumed

>>8061325

>>8061288

WE HAVE IDS SHILL

>>8061305

>backed up in Russia

well i just looked up 217.69.133.145 in a few different places and all seem to indicate it is Moscow, Russia and owned by an LLC.

There is no fucking way I'm going to enable Flash and load the obfuscated object in that javascript. Anyone got an air-gapped sandbox to test it out for us?

>>8061093

>Access an IP address

>From an air-gapped machine

jesus christ why do you tards keep on using terminology you clearly have no understanding of

>>8061363

>shilling for google this hard

WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT ALL THE THOUSANDS OF PAGE LINKS WE’VE ARCHIVED BUT NOW CAN’T GET THE ORIGINALS OF?

>>8060710

I'm still pretty new. Do you have a link or an image about proxies/vpns/other steps that should be taken to aid safety & anonymity?

>>8061383

>What part of actively going to site and observing the thread is "lazing around"

>>8061363

>From an air-gapped machine

Comcast air-gapped my machine when they suspended my account

>>8061288

>The enemy is matching the IPs they hacked from the archive.is with the archive.is links posted here.

So.. they linked a proxy IP to another proxy IP?

Sounds silly.

>>8061300

>FQDNs can be assigned to any non-CIDR IP address

Oooookay this is getting a bit out of reach for me. Cheers for the help in this thread.

>>8061343

Yep.. I probably should come back after I look some things up.

>>8061363

That wasn't me anon..

>>8061383

I used search engines to figure out Tor as it was reasonably straight forward. /tech/ has alot of guides. Go to catalog and search for 'infograph' or something. I also recommend reading a little bit about how IPs work.

>>8061363

>From an air-gapped machine

>jesus christ why do you tards keep on using terminology you clearly have no understanding of

if you're too retarded to figure out how to get the Shockwave Flash object onto an air-gapped machine to test you're too retarded to criticize my suggestion.

>>8061377

>WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT ALL THE THOUSANDS OF PAGE LINKS WE’VE ARCHIVED BUT NOW CAN’T GET THE ORIGINALS OF?

>not capping the obvious "shut it down" targets

Just use a public wifi and a crappy spare computer. There are more practical solutions if you need them anon.

That's why people physically destroy hard drives rather than "wipe them clean".

>>8061386

>>8061363

>miss-linked anons twice and quoted me

What the shit?

>>8061431

Sorry, here's your (you)

I was just pointing out how astute your observation skills are :^)

>>8061425

They do that because you never wipe a hard drive clean unless you format your drives and replace every single byte with trash data. Even then, there are pointers that would allow access to some of your "removed" data. Destroying hard drive is the only way to destroy your data. Destroying it thoroughly, of course. You could probably still get a lot of intact pieces from a drive you dropped on the floor or drove a weak magnet through.

>>8061141

>The issue is if a site requires an application to be open on the client's side.

>Wouldn't that potentially render it useless?

What do you mean?

>>8061141

>The issue is if a site requires an application to be open on the client's side.

>Wouldn't that potentially render it useless?

What do you mean?