Here is a clear distinction between real investigations and one that in no way attempted to actually obtain a conviction

4 People given immunity from destruction of evidence.

Immunity agreements are being hidden from the public to avoid further exposure on how much leverage the FBI gave away with no effort.

No investigation was done into any of the people who were given immunity, zero effort was put into building a case against them to use as leverage, instead they opted to give immunity to 5 people that we know of so far instead of doing any investigation into them.

4 of Clinton's aides used their personal email accounts to transmit classified information. There doesn't seem to have been any follow-up on any of them. credit

Mills given immunity from destruction of evidence in exchange for a laptop that they could have easily gotten via subpoena based on email chains with her email address having classified information. They knew she had classified information on that laptop based on the email chains, but refused to go get a subpoena to get the laptop.

Clinton doesn't know what (c) is, FBI for some reason believes she is telling the truth.

Combetta claims he deleted the backup with no knowledge of any preservation order and did so on his own accord even though he had a phone conference with Clinton staff the day before deleting them. Zero investigation takes place to look into it, immunity granted.

After receiving immunity, Combetta was allowed to claim attorney-client privilege when questioned about the call that occurred between himself and Clinton staff the day before deleting the email backups when he knew there was a preservation order even though none of these people was his attorney at any point. FBI just allowed this to happen and took no issue with it, they allowed themselves to be stonewalled about the details of the call linking the Clinton camp directly to the deletion that happened the next day.

People with immunity sit in on Clinton FBI interview and are allowed to coach her even after they had given testimony themselves. No issue with coordination of testimony or any attempt to avoid it, simply allow them to coach each other right there live on the spot.

No attempt to convene a grand jury at all, instead opting for immunity to every single person other than Hillary Clinton who had anything to do with the case. Zero subpoenas due to this decision, leading to zero ability to pressure anyone or capture any evidence that may or may not have been hidden.

5 people with access to classified+ material without clearance and every single one has immunity.

Tens of thousands of deleted emails, many turn out to be work related, but no charges, no issue with it at all, FBI simply allows it.

Combetta caught saying "they" wanted him to be able to alter the database where the emails were stored, which would lead to the inability for FOIA and other investigative requests to locate emails from the altered email addresses. Also claims he alone was doing this, yet specifically says "they" in the messages, FBI simply believes him and does zero investigation into "they" or anything else related to it at all.

IT guy "jokes" about Clinton Cover Up Operation, FBI thinks it is funny and innocent, apparently.

Combetta lied directly to FBI and they decided to reward him with immunity instead of building a case, convening a grand jury, subpoenas, or any sort of investigating.

DOJ/FBI, after giving immunity from destruction of evidence to Clinton lawyers and others, decide to limit the scope of their investigation of the electronic correspondence on the devices to a time frame that does not include when the destruction of evidence occurred, bitbleach, exposure of the server itself, potential communications with Combetta, or any point after many formal requests were made for the emails, resulting in zero investigation into the aftermath communications of the revealing of Clinton's email server. Literally every single item past 1/31/15 was completely ignored.

DOJ/FBI decides, after not investigating the time frame where destruction of evidence and fallout communications occurred, to destroy electronic devices that contain the correspondence that they did not investigate, wiping all possibility of ever retrieving the correspondence from the time frame including any possible communications related to bitbleach, Combetta orders related to the backups, decisions to destroy evidence linked to anyone at all, reactions to the revealing of the server, and the requests for records. Literally every single item past 1/31/15 was destroyed.

Two boxes of paper emails gone missing. FBI not interested in looking into it, makes no effort to investigate.

Bill Clinton meets with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the person responsible for filing charges against Hillary Clinton, shortly before it is decided they will not file charges.

The Obama administration coordinated with Clinton's campaign and the State Department about the email scandal.

A laptop and a flash drive each had a complete archive of Clinton's emails, including the stockpile of classified information she stored there. There's no indication the FBI bothered to search for either, as far as I can tell from the notes. credit

The Clinton camp had contacts within the DOJ during the investigation and litigation into her emails.

This posting is being constantly censored on r/politics by mods when posted to relevant articles because they do not want the facts to get out. People who are unable to refute the points being made are constantly claiming it is spam, attacking the sources, etc - anything to avoid addressing the facts presented and the obvious questionable actions that were taken during this investigation.

That which was found on her server was sent to her.

Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified

But the FBI investigation found that Clinton sent and received classified information over her private server.

Here is a clear distinction between a real investigation and one that in no way attempted to actually obtain a conviction

• Scott Foval, National Field Director at Americans United for Change, is recorded on camera discussing a number of unethical (and perhaps illegal) activities conducted by the liberal advocacy group Americans United for Change, in conjunction with various PACs and the DNC
• Evidence of Democrat organizers sending instigators to Trump rallies in efforts to make Trump supporters look bad. [2:18] Foval also says that agitators are trained to instigate confrontations "in the line" rather than inside the rally where "they're under Secret Service's control." [7:30] He also directly says that the agitators must receive "central agitator training" before they are sent to rallies. He also describes various agitator training programs in various states [8:50] If agitators are injured or arrested, Foval has their medical and legal bills paid for. [11:30]
• Evidence that there is collusion between super PACs and the DNC. He describes having middlemen who circumvent the law in order to collude. [3:10] [5:34] Scott Foval is recorded saying "The thing that we have to watch is making sure there is a double blind between the campaign and the actual DNC and what we're doing. There's a double blind there. So they can plausibly deny that they knew anything about it." [6:50]
• Discusses strategy for "initiating conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic" - Foval is referring to paying agitators to instigate trouble at Trump events, calling their hired agitators "naturally psychotic." [7:37]
• Aaron Black, DNC Rapid Response Coordinator, boasts about coordinating a Chicago protest at a Trump event. Two Chicago police officers were injured. [9:35]
• They also take credit for the "Arizona [protest] where we shut the highway down." [11:10]
• Scott Foval admits to instigating an event where a "supporter" (friend of Foval) gets roughed up at a Scott Walker event. He also staged other people in the crowd there for a "reaction." [12:05]
• The 69-year old women who was "sucker punched at a Trump rally" was a hired activist (a "birddog") sent to the rally by Foval. [12:50] His description of the event fits exactly.
• Scott Foval brags about hiring homeless people, and mentally ill people, to protest and agitate at various Trump events. [13:48]
• Foval calls half of the state of Iowa "racist as fuck." Wisconsin is "just as bad." [15:10]