First i would like to adress the annoying word democratic socialist. The people who use this word to describe their view of the world and the economy and most of the time socialdemocrats, regulated capitalism. Contrary to that demsocs are usualy fighting for socialism by election, this is an important distinction, and both the Bernie Sanders supporters and Steven crowder fails to explain that.
Now badpolitics time, first i would like to start of with Denmark, Denmark is a socialdemocratic wealthfare state and therefor it makes sense for the american left to bring it up as an example. The reason my prime minister felt he needed to bring up that we have a marked economy is that many americans simply dont understand the difference between socdems and socialists. But now to the realy juicy stuff. Crowder claims that society is divided into 2 groups the makers and the takers, i dont see any evidence to support that. ," Now the idea that taxation is taking someone elses money, here i disagree personaly, but he clearly needs to be clear that it is his opinion, not a neutral observation.
R2 Steven Crowder dosent understand what democratic socialism means, and spews some pretty clearly right-wring opinions disguised as neutral observation.
link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvF_D4tVfYU
ここには何もないようです