use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~14 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
/r/TumblrInAction's very own serious business discussion area.
Want to talk about radical SJWs or real social justice issues, debate theories, guess why some of these people are so nuts, and chat about issues important to you in a more serious, less circlejerky environment than the main TiA sub? Well, this is the place to do it!
Same basic rules of TiA apply here - don't be a massive twat etc.
Read them here!
Text posts only here.
No circlejerking.
If you post memes I will shoot you right in between your eyes.
Stories of real life interactions and venting posts belong to /r/SJWstories, topic discussion only here.
If you wish to post about the recent or past behaviour of any of the TiA subs, link specific examples for each claim. Remember, multiple sources are always more credible than one!
The TiA Network
Other Social Justice Discussion Subreddits
What exactly is the alt-right? (self.TiADiscussion)
alex_the_bolshevik が 5日前 投稿
Is it some millennial conservative movement that's not necessarily openly racist, but they like to sweep it under the rug and have a lot of right wing views like eugenics and shit?
[–]shivux 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 5日前* (7子コメント)
It really depends on who you ask. By its broadest definition, the term refers any "right wing" elements outside of the conservative mainstream, and could potentially include everyone from Libertarians to Neo-Nazis to Monarchists. Usually though, people are talking about those that explicitly reject, or express disdain for, mainstream/moderate conservatives, anything they see as "political correctness" (like notions of race and gender equality), and sometimes even Classical Liberal/Enlightenment values. They might be explicit racist, they might just be implicitly racist, or they might not be racist at all. I don't think racism isn't inherent to alt-right ideologies, though it (or something like it, such as "ethnic nationalism") is certainly common to quite a few.
A side note on eugenics: I'm all for it! So long as it's ethically implemented and doesn't violate any human rights. I really hope one day we'll be able to eliminate harmful disorders through eugenics policies and gene editing the same way we can eliminate viral diseases with vaccines.
[–]weberc2 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4日前 (3子コメント)
I don't know of many who consider "equality" to be political correctness; that is unless your definition of equality has something to do with punishing folks with different definitions of "equality". I'm sure there are some wing nuts out there, but your characterization makes it hard to tell if you're talking about them or the average non-SJW.
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
I've exchanged words with plenty of such people, though only online so it's difficult to judge their sincerity.
[–]AverageUnknown 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4日前 (1子コメント)
I don't know of many, but they do exist.
[–]weberc2 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
Seems wrong to characterize the majority by the minority then, eh?
[–]MosDaf -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 4日前 (2子コメント)
Nobody thinks that race and "gender" equality are PC.
[–]GammaKingTriggered by the letter 'f' 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
Oh yes they do... I've dealt with a lot of assholes. Usually they're the same people that can't follow TiA's rules and degenerate into calling the mods "SJWs" because they were asked not to hurl abuse at other users.
[–]shivux 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
What do you mean?
[–]GodInASimulation 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント 5日前 (0子コメント)
the opposite of ctrl left.
[–]Mouon 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4日前* (0子コメント)
Its the anti-establishment right. Its a grassroots sort of phenomena of people on the right getting fed up of the mainstream center-left and center-right not representing them and not dealing with issues they find important, like immigration, and also reacting to the encroaching influence of social justice and radical feminism, et al.
but they like to sweep it under the rug and have a lot of right wing views like eugenics and shit?
No, thats the 'Dark Enlightenment', a very small but relatively vocal subsection of the Alt-Right. The Dark Enlightenment is a bit like what Stalinism is to the left, but in the Alt Right.
[–]Yesofcoursenaturally 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 5日前 (8子コメント)
It's a term which covers a certain range of views, which Breitbart does a decent job of covering. You have some diehards insisting that their set of views is the only 'real' alt-right (usually the crazier ones), but for the most part there's a few touchstones:
The idea that most 'racist' cries are bullshit ('They cast Batman as a white guy AGAIN omg') or are complaints about things which aren't even bad ('What do you MEAN you like to mostly hang around white people who speak english omg').
A belief that white people have every right to be proud of being white, and even to look after their community's interests the same way that blacks, asians, etc do.
The willingness to openly discuss or even accept views that are regarded as beyond the pale - 'average racial IQs are not some horrible conspiracy, they reflect a reality, for better or for worse.'
It goes on, and a lot of it can be summed up as people, particularly white people, who are defiantly talking about topics or holding views that are considered taboo among what passes for the mainstream media and culture.
That's the real answer. The answer some people may be looking for is 'Those horrible people who are totally racist and bad, they're SJWs just right wing, because it's always that simple'.
[–]SRSLovesGawker 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
Milo had an interesting twist on this idea in segment on CNBC. He's of the opinion is alt-right isn't racist so much as it believes in western post-enlightment superiority. I don't know if that holds true in all cases (there are deffo some genuine racists and white nationalists mixed in there) but it does seem to match closer to what I've personally seen.
[–]hayakyak -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 5日前 (6子コメント)
Let's also remember that eugenics is a progressive stance, not right-wing. In fact, the left-wing Nazis even looked towards Margaret Sanger and her allies for some their policies.
[–]Yesofcoursenaturally 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
Yep. The whole 'progressive'/'conservative' language is fucked up anyway. Another bunch of bullshit altogether.
[–]edmiborn 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4日前 (4子コメント)
left-wing Nazis
Wut. No. Nazis are right wing. Didn't think I'd see this particular myth in this sub of all places...
Margaret Sanger and her allies
Were socialists. Planned Parenthood's idea of eugenics was different from and had little to do with the Nazis', although yes it was racist to some extent.
[–]EggplantWizard5000Eggplantkin 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 4日前 (3子コメント)
Actually, there was a split within the Nazi party between the Hitler wing and the more literally socialist (though still anti-Semitic) Strasser wing. Hitler eliminated Strasser as a rival, but there was a legitimate socialist presence within the Nazis. Josef Goebbels was a socialist himself for a long time, before succumbing to the less socialist views of the Fuhrer (which he thought was his duty).
Also, Mussolini was a disillusioned socialist himself. He, along with other ex-socialists like Robert Michels, wanted to achieve the goals of socialism via the new fascist movement.
Now your overall point is valid. 99% of the time when people call the Nazis or fascists "left wing" they are full of shit. However, the actual reality is fairly complex. Fascism (including Nazism) was an ideological (and logically incoherent) grab bag of different ideas, of which socialism was one.
[–]edmiborn 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
You are correct.
Now your overall point is valid. 99% of the time when people call the Nazis or fascists "left wing" they are full of shit.
This is what I was responding to.
[–]hayakyak 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 4日前* (1子コメント)
This, and the Nazis also exhibited quite a lot of left-wing characteristics usually in opposition to conservative or traditionalist positions and ideals. If they were not left-wing, they sure as hell weren't right-wing. The "right-wing" myth came about initially as the result of show trials in the USSR and the Comunist Party line of denouncing anyone to their right as right-wing; Communism being about as far-left as you can go, lots of lefties got grouped in. It was then reenforced by Frankfurt Schooler Theodor Adorno's intellelectually bankrupt The Authoritarian Personality, which branded anyone who prefered who prefered tradition ways of life as a fascist--never mind the fact that fascism was hardly traditional.
As a supporting point to the main point of my comment, I didn't really feel like going into a history lesson on the topic; it may be slightly inaccurate to describe the Nazi regime as left-wing considering that Hitler was not especially ideological, but like I said, they had lots of left-wing characteristics. If it looks like a duck, it's close enough for short-hand in this kind of situation.
[–]Capn__Morgan -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
The Nazi's policy wise were authoritarians with no real leanings, closer to today's Democrats which are centrist compared to Republicans who are right-wing. calling them left wing is a stretch but when people call the National Socialist party right wing it is very inaccurate.
[–]itsreallyfuckingcold 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 4日前* (3子コメント)
A socially conservative, fiscally liberal group that believes in race realism, and opposes multi-culturalism. Donald Trump is not a true alt-right candidate (I'll get to why), but he hits more of their list than anyone else by far.
the alt-right is a racial movement, first and foremost. It has never not been a racial movement. The alt-rights earliest founders include Richard Spencer, noted race realist philosopher, who coined the term Alternative Right.
Europe and America were built by the white race for the white race. Whatever Africans want to do is fine, but they have to keep it there. Immigration of non-Europeans upsets the cultural balance, which is first and foremost the greatest concern of the country.
Mantaining white homelands is important, no so much because whites are the "master race" but simply because diversity does not work: people so not get along with those from other "tribes." Asians are statistically smarter than whites, yes, but they belong with their own people, and whites belong their own people as well. Essentially, look to Japan: a country that is 98% all the same ethnicity, proud of it, and they aren't going to change.
primacy of marriage as an institution - this is why Milo is not a member of the alt-right: he's gay. This is also why they oppose feminism: it diminishes the central importance of marriage as a social structure.
On board with state socialism: everybody works and you get taken care of. It doesn't work now because freeloaders from other countries are taking all of our shit.
Christianity is good: whether or not God exists is irrelevant, it gets everybody on the same page and minimizes subversive elements that go against the grain (gays should stay in the closet.)
the cuck insult comes from cuckolded men who raise offspring that aren't theirs. Conservatives have sold out the country to immigrants in exchange for votes, and are now taking resources from American born whites and giving them to the others.
Those are the big ones.
This is the definition of the alt-right from the alt right, it is not libertarianism, it is not Breitbart conservative, it is not trolling Milo, it is not Trump. It is a racial movement, pure and simple. It has become a catch all for right wingers you don't like, but it has a very specific criteria.
EDIT: Trump is the candidate most of the alt-right likes because he's the only one to take a hard line stance against immigration and globalism. However, his past marriage issues conflict with alt-right mentality (they consider him "lewd,"), his daughter converted to Judaism, and he's more of a civic nationalist, but he is not publicly racially aware, which excludes him from the alt-right by default. He is the cloesest they will get at this current time.
[–]Megraptor 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 4日前 (2子コメント)
So it's basically the opposite of a Libertarian... even though Libertarians get lumped in with them.
Also why do people consider all Libertarians to be Conservative? I mean, there are Liberal Libertarians...
[–]SRSLovesGawker 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
In north america, the "liberal" umbrella includes collectivist/socialist monetary policy. Anything outside that is considered conservative because for whatever reason, the bulk of people can't understand anything beyond an 'us vs. them' duality.
[–]Capn__Morgan 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Liberal Libertarians are Syndicalism believers, conservative Libertarians are Capitalists. There aren't many Syndics because it hasn't had a lick of success and overlaps heavily with anarchism.
[–]Askvicer 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
They are essentially the right-wing's sjws. They tend to be white and very disenfranchised by this outroar in PC culture the past 2 years. So they get sucked into this more welcoming movement.
They're both obsessed with identity politics.
Alot of people on both sides were just awkward and loney kids that kind of found their way to these movements. The draw is a sense of belonging. Tumblr tends to draw you into sjw madness, while the chans do the opposite.
SJWs complain about how academia, business, and government are controlled by the "cis white male patriarchy". The Alt-Right complains about how all of that is controlled by Jews, minorities, and cultural marxists.
SJWs believe everything Anita tells them. The Alt-Right has their own celebrities too. Alex Jones for example. Also people on the Donald unironically citing the National Inqurior.
SJWs use arrogant and poorly optimized gifs of brown celebrities like Beyonce to pat themselves in the back. The Alt-Right uses pictures of smug anime girls, pepe, and nazis.
SJWs have their safe spaces of course. The Alt-Right has the same phenomenon. I like to browse steam groups and I have seen people calling for certain people to be banned in /pol/ steam groups because they're gay, marxist, or whatever.
The Alt-Right in contrast to traditional american conservatives, do not really care for democracy, many are pseudo-facists. They hate the idea of race-mixing, though the Alt-Right does have some lgbt members, but they constitute a very small minority. Also they're more younger and techsavvy than stormfront.
I will say SJWs make the Alt-Right stronger and vice versa. They feed off of each other. SJWs kind of have weaseled their way into legislature and entertainment. The Alt-Right not so much. They control certain parts of Youtube and the chans though.
Fix your algorithms Google and Youtube. You're making the world a much more volatile and divided this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_manipulation_effect
[–]Mouon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
This explains it pretty well, I cannot recommend Jonathan Haidt enough:
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/07/10/when-and-why-nationalism-beats-globalism/
[–]RancidNugget 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5日前 (2子コメント)
I've seen it used a lot as a way to smear anyone who disagrees with the current wave of identity politics.
Most of the people I've seen smeared with that term tend to be left of center, but not left enough to satisfy those doing the smearing.
[–]weberc2 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
There needs to be a better term for "right of extremely left of center".
[–]capitalsfan08 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
What beliefs does the alt-right share with anyone left of center?
[–]Kanaric 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5日前* (1子コメント)
www.dailystormer.com
stormfront
golden dawn in greece
etc.
New PC word for fascists. You uncle whose a "conservative" but is actually a big government guy who thinks "certain people" need to be controlled? He used to say we need to nuke Arabia into a glass desert? Says racist things casually? Alt-right.
The alt-right isn't something new. It's something that's existed for quite a while and just got a new label. The old white nationalist types basically have done an epic relabeling and marketing campaign in one of those successful examples of that kind of thing in history. They basically begin the indoctrination by getting you to be upset about SJWs and PC culture in an extreme manner far more than us that post here. That is like the initial breadcrumb to lead you into scientific racism. It actually worked on one of my best friends and he's an alt-right guy now.
[–]Askvicer -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
My friend became one too. PM me if you wanna chat buddy
[–]ComradeShitlordShitlords of the world, unite! 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
The alt-right is fascist. I don't mean that in the sense of "evil authoritarians who I don't like," I mean the actual ideology of fascism. It's important to note that fascism is an extremely populist movement. In fact, from the inside it looks a whole lot like democracy. If you see yourself as part of the majority and your leaders are doing what you want them to do, then why wouldn't you assume they serve the will of the people?
Fascism is based on the idea that the world is a scary place full of people who are out to get you. If you want to survive, you need to be able to defend yourself. But an individual alone is ultimately powerless, which means you need to form a tribe with people who are like you. For your tribe to be strong, it needs to be unified, which means dissenting opinions aren't particularly welcome, and it needs a strong leader. Then, every member of the tribe should do their best to follow the example set by the leader, so that they can contribute the most to the strength of the tribe.
All of those ideas are pretty easy to see in any alt-right community. Certainly there's a prevalent attitude that they're under siege, especially from neoprogressives and Muslims. We all know who the leader is. And of course, anyone who voices a dissenting opinion like, say, supporting Hillary, must be a shill who's trying to spread disunity.
Also note that fascism isn't necessarily equivalent with racism, although the two often go hand in hand. Fascism requires the presence of threatening outgroups, which are often other racial or ethnic groups, but they could also be political or religious groups, for example.
[–]edmiborn 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 5日前 (11子コメント)
Yes, pretty much. They're basically the right wing version of tumblrites (assuming tumblrites aren't basically right wing already). Avoid them like the plague.
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5日前 (4子コメント)
Is there a big overlap between them and the socially incompatible weirdos who obsess about the military after high school despite never getting in shape and being able to follow through with the mindset they preach?
[–]shivux 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5日前 (0子コメント)
I wouldn't be surprised. Though many might also be reluctant to fight for a country they feel has gone so wrong (which is almost every modern, liberal democracy).
[–]comfortablesexualityDon't turn this into TiA 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 5日前 (0子コメント)
almost certainly.
[–]Kanaric 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5日前 (1子コメント)
All the people I know like that are alt-right
One of them is a cop who was a former marine that bragged about the civilians he killed in Iraq. His dad is a pro-mussolini fascist and he raised his children to be racists. I used to be friends with him when I was a child but my parents caught him "teaching" me things lol.
This guy was known to hand out neo-nazi literature at the local high school.
[–]shivux -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 5日前 (0子コメント)
Guess he's one of those "bad apples" they're always talking about.
[–]Mouon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 4日前 (5子コメント)
If thats what you think you are failing to understand them as people. This may help you to understand them a bit better:
[–]SabbathMode 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4日前 (4子コメント)
That article makes the comparison seem very apt. Just like tumblr SJW's, these nationalists believe that cultures are cohesive moral entities which ought to be kept separate from each other for everyone's good.
I would reiterate and second the advice to avoid such people like the plague.
[–]Mouon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4日前* (3子コメント)
Not all nationalists are the same, and think of it more as a scale between nationalism and globalism. It makes more sense to me to be in the middle. I think I'm slightly more in the nationalist direction though, not that I'd call myself a nationalist, but I understand that certain factors, like cultural integration of immigrant communities, for example, and other factors, are important. These are considerations globalism cannot address, though too far in the nationalist directing creates blindspots and problems too.
these nationalists believe that cultures are cohesive moral entities which ought to be kept separate from each other for everyone's good.
Only those who are strongly nationalist.
A lot of them are much more mild than you think. They arn't all the extreme 'dark enlightenment' sorts who advocate eugenics, monarch, or even fascism.
Its people who are more attuned with but also overly/hyper focused on threats that can exist. Its a double edged sword, as long as its not taken too far. And I don't deny there are benefits of mild globalism, in that I like free trade and open markets, and immigration is beneficial if its not excessive and is controlled. But you will learn something from engaging with them as the people are, and doing some research what their motivations and ideas are. Demonizing them like you are does not help you understand them. And even if you view them as an enemy, to defeat an enemy you must understand them.
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3日前 (2子コメント)
Nah. They aren't an "enemy" worth taking the time to counter. Their ideology is self-defeating, because it pits them against the rest of society, as well as the demographic and economic trends of the foreseeable future.
[–]Mouon 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3日前 (1子コメント)
Thats naive. Theres a reason why the alt right is growing.
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3日前 (0子コメント)
Of course there is. Things don't happen for no reason. But there's a natural cap on that growth, and they're already pushing it; uneducated white Christians just aren't the voting block they used to be.
Look, I don't know what you're after here. I read your article and I deal with such people on the regular, in my extended family and online. I think I understand them pretty well, but as it happens I don't need to "understand them as people" to judge their ideas. They believe things that range from slightly misguided to downright horrible, and they pride themselves on not being able to get along with anyone else. It's self-defeating.
[–]Timewalker102 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
Fascism.
[–]i_dont_like_math 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
u/alex_the_bolshevik the video below should answer your question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoLi4rC6xm8
[–]OdiumNostrum 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4日前* (0子コメント)
Pseudo-fascist slave morality for alienated whites in our degenerate generation. Actually willing to play the democratic game in order to empower themselves, because raw power is what this is really about. Maybe a dialectical counterpart of the post-Marxist genderfreaks running around college campuses. Use the same strange mixture of identity politics, standpoint epistemology, and 19th-century race essentialism (all the while claiming that "whiteness is a social construct born out of modernity," but some sort of "lived social reality" that one has to fall back on anyway - because, really, power is what this is about, not coherent thinking). Tend to backread whiteness onto pre-modern figures of Western culture ("Gosh I love white culture, aren't Bach and Homer wonderful?"). Advocate for a re-entrenchment in dead or dying bastions of Western culture by shielding themselves from 20th century philosophical developments. Like the Nazis, they are very bad Nietzscheans - unable to come to terms with Western decadence and mourn it, celebrate the tragedy of life and the cycle of civilizational rise and decline, and face collective death with indifferent nobility. Weak totalitarian ideology for weak, misguided, but well-meaning people who are too ill-constituted to survive in anything but a stable universe. Thus they make recourse to infantile fictions and anachronistic myth. Odin and Christ are dead - get over it and forge ahead into an uncertain destiny.
Anyway, they have a few agreeable insights and impulses here and there (generally opposed to the universalization of liberal-democracy). Iron Pill comics are sick sometimes, but I think Evola is retarded.
[–]Gamers_Are_Racist 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3日前 (3子コメント)
Naked Ape did a good video on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8vILWviTHo
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3日前 (2子コメント)
Wow... Nice find!
Why are these weird nerdy guys so obsessed it muh hiraeth or muh culture or whatever weird reasons? Culture has been evolving for thousands of years and now they suddenly want to freeze it in place because they want some weird thing to stay the same?
I haven't heard the word before, but I'm familiar with the concept. Neckbeards are constantly obsessed with Imperial Germany.
[–]Gamers_Are_Racist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3日前 (1子コメント)
In the context provided in the video, they are scared that their stable European countries will be disrupted with a huge influx of people from a largely different background and culture. Add to the fact that many times the police in several countries have let muslims get away with crimes to avoid being labeled as "racist" and that there are areas now with large muslim populations that are essentially no-go for locals and police, it's not hard to understand why they think that these migrants are a threat to their way of life. Humans hate drastic change.
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3日前 (0子コメント)
I get that. I think the well has been poisoned against them from my personal experience with the Imperial Germany weirdos.
[+]soullessgeth スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 4日前 (0子コメント)
people who rightfully blame israel for america's foreign policy blunders and extremely wasteful and pointless military spending.
π Rendered by PID 11681 on app-625 at 2016-10-30 23:16:57.912732+00:00 running 0f78c16 country code: JP.
[–]shivux 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]weberc2 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AverageUnknown 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]weberc2 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MosDaf -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]GammaKingTriggered by the letter 'f' 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shivux 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GodInASimulation 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Mouon 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Yesofcoursenaturally 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]SRSLovesGawker 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hayakyak -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Yesofcoursenaturally 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]edmiborn 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]EggplantWizard5000Eggplantkin 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]edmiborn 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hayakyak 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Capn__Morgan -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]itsreallyfuckingcold 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Megraptor 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]SRSLovesGawker 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Capn__Morgan 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Askvicer 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Mouon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RancidNugget 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]weberc2 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]capitalsfan08 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Kanaric 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Askvicer -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ComradeShitlordShitlords of the world, unite! 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]edmiborn 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]shivux 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]comfortablesexualityDon't turn this into TiA 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Kanaric 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]shivux -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Mouon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]SabbathMode 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Mouon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Mouon 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SabbathMode 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Timewalker102 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]i_dont_like_math 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]OdiumNostrum 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gamers_Are_Racist 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Gamers_Are_Racist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]alex_the_bolshevik[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]soullessgeth スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (0子コメント)