Let's define rape "as an act/behaviour or multiple acts/behaviors which cause a sexual intercourse which would have not happened otherwise " so according this definition everything falls into the rape category because as we know women are always reactive and not proactive and they always give a NO as their first answer , whether the NO is transformed into a YES using some patterns and strategies (seduction , throwing money at them , buying gifts , vacations ) or by physical violence is exactly the same thing....
Before such actions occurred the woman clearly expressed her denial of consent .
Even around charismatic , rich and powerful guys (alphas) women put up some mild form of resistance , if the man challenges that resistance in any form and doesn't back up and apologize for his disrespecting behavior then his behavior falls under the rape definition because she clearly signaled her non consent .
Being someone whom the female wants to mate with is irrelevant , given that females are not proactive , they will gravitate around their "target" and lower their barriers to a minimum , but still they are incapable of taking the initiative and he still has to take them with some kind of force (hence rape) , and they would still put up some mild form of resistance ( saying stuff like "maybe we're rushing up things too much") that he still has to forcefully (physically or psychologically) break (hence rape) . Plus you could argue that in the process of becoming successful rich and charismatic the guy was already raping her because were he not rich , charismatic and successful , women would have not ended up gravitating around him and if he tried to have sex with them , they would have thrown a full cranked up resistance at him (exactly what happens when a zero status , zero charisma zero money guy like a homeless tries to forcefully take and cum into a woman .....if he succeeds everybody calls that a rape) by fighting with all her physical and mental forces , crying , screaming for help , trying to run away while signaling her presence to other people....Back to the charismatic , rich and successful guy what he does is 90% socially acceptable rape (using patterns and behaviors to have women gravitating around him and lower to a minimum their barriers , doing so he transforms a NO into a YES BEFORE EVEN MEETING OR INTERACTING WITH THEM) and 10% actual rape (when he finally breaks through the mild resistance put up by the woman) . Society just doesn't care about socially acceptable rape because physically speaking the force necessary to break through a woman's resistance to sex is applied over a very long time span with a constant intensity and not with sudden high peaks during the literally few minutes of a forced sexual interaction
It's a societal bias to praise or prosecute it's members depending on how each and everyone of them decides to apply such force (constant on long timespans or with high peaks on very short timespans)...we should prosecute everybody who tries to break through a resistance or decide that such resistance is not worth protecting at all , we can't do both , that is the same of prosecuting a man who robbed a 7-11 but letting go a politician who took a bribe
ここには何もないようです