I learned nothing from that letter.

Edit, putting this at the top because it's important: "a device" from an unrelated investigation led to the discovery of additional emails *not from Clinton* (h/t Pete Williams, investigative reporter for NBC News)

Edit 2, "BREAKING: WASHINGTON (AP) — US official: Newly discovered emails related to Clinton investigation did not come from her private server."

Edit 3: (NYT) New emails tied to the FBI's Clinton inquiry were discovered during the investigation into Anthony Weiner's sexting

U.S. law enforcement officials said Friday that the new emails uncovered in the closed investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server were discovered after the F.B.I. seized electronic devices belonging to Huma Abedin and her husband, Anthony Weiner.

I definitely didn't see that third edit coming. I'm just laughing my ass off right now.

---

Edit: here's what I've got. The investigation was apparently never formally closed, only Comey's announcement of non-indictment in July. Jason Chaffetz reportedly the one who used the language "reopening investigation", not Comey.

Still not clear:

• Evidence contrary to testimony given by HRC?
• Source of emails? (Podesta?)
• Content of emails?
• Why now?

---

• Edit: Not related to Wikileaks or Russian hacking
• (cont'd) Separate investigation unrelated to HRC led to discovery of a "device" with additional emails (not from Clinton)
• (cont'd) Not a matter of withholding evidence
• (cont'd) "while the political consequences of today's news could be substantial, they might not be legally" (h/t Pete Williams/NBC)
• (cont'd) language used is "pertinent to the investigation"; seems not to be Clinton emails?
• short version: emails not from Wikileaks, and were not withheld during initial investigation