全 1 件のコメント

[–]wordjedi 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

in US and you sign a pre-nup it is very clear cut and prenup trumps all so you can protect all your assets.

Not true. In the US judges can throw them out even if it's a legal prenup.

Unconscionable Terms

The terms of your prenup must not be unconscionable, particularly if your state does not impose a waiting period between the time of the signing and your wedding, or if your spouse waived her right to separate legal counsel – that is, if a lawyer would have told her that what she was agreeing to was blatantly unfair. An unconscionable premarital contract is one that is so grossly one-sided, the judge would have to wonder about the circumstances under which your spouse signed it. For example, if your agreement states that everything you earned or acquired before your wedding is yours, that all property acquired during your marriage is yours, and that your spouse has no right to either spousal support or an equitable division of property, the court will probably void your prenup because its terms are unconscionable.

So call it a "prenuptial suggestion".

Marriage is a serious financial assets contract, that women throw away like a high school romance. And then we have to pay them.