全 64 件のコメント

[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 62ポイント63ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why work when you can ride on the Pussy Pass?

[–]nbennett2q5 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Women were given rights, the world crumbles..

[–]PipBoyTInkerer 79ポイント80ポイント  (20子コメント)

Because STEM degrees take discipline and effort to obtain. It requires objective reasoning, memorization of countless formulas, and showing your work to excel at. It's far easier to get a fluff degree and then cry misogyny for the rest of your life as you live off the work of others (be it the taxpayers or some poor bastard's alimony checks).

The most important resource required for a STEM degree is time. Time spent in the library or the lab studying your ass off or finishing that assignment. Time that could easily be spent sucking off the football team like a women's studies degree affords them.

[–]gundahir 25ポイント26ポイント  (0子コメント)

aint got no time for this when you ride the cock carousel having the time of your life

[–]DatFeeler 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

Actually, I think that the issue is that in STEM you can't hamster reality. The correct answers are non-negotiable. There is no feelings. There is no arguments. You either got the right answer or solved the problem or you did not. Unlike every other degree filled with women, which basically allows you to state your own opinion and hamster away as to why you're correct, inspite evidence against you, because it's your opinion. That's why women don't enter and don't survive STEM or Business. You can't hamster your way into getting a 12% return on investment if you didn't. It's black and white.

[–]MrJugsMcBulge 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've seen more than a few people in STEM who had no problem with fudging numbers and manipulating data until the results agreed with what they 'felt' the result should be.

[–]Shnook82 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I see you're familiar with my work.

[–]_________not_so_fast 8ポイント9ポイント  (11子コメント)

that could easily be spent sucking off the football team

No idea why sex is always used to shame women.

Why not say it like it is: time to spend their daddy's money shopping for shoes and bags.

[–]Saiserit 13ポイント14ポイント  (6子コメント)

Dont resent sluts. Sluts are amazing. Only resent whores. Whores corrode all of life's meaning.

[–]MajorBeef24 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow that was deep and so true. Despite the fact so many people use the words interchangeably, they're almost opposites. And actual sluts are still quite rare - whores are what we have unprecedented loads of.

[–]Saiserit 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you had to sum up my life philosophy and ethic in a single sentence: "Whatever it is you do with your life, be a slut, not a whore."

[–]_________not_so_fast 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sluts are amazing.

Exactly.

Only resent whores.

Literal whores, aka sex workers? No. They sell a good and important service, and are mostly honest.

Gold diggers are the ones I don't like. They lie. They are only after your money. And the lie.

[–]Saiserit 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Burroughs:

Beware of whores who say they don't want money. The hell they don't. What they mean is they want more money. Much more.

[–]TheSpiceMustAirflow -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, just accept female nature for what it is. When they want to ride the carousel, be there to enjoy it. Just know when to bail, haha.

[–]basalticlava 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seriously, sex is a major upside of women, certainly nothing to be ashamed of.

[–]T0000009 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

No idea why sex is always used to shame women.

  • Equality
  • Quid pro quo
  • That's all they have

Pick one, or get the box set.

[–]N0vaPr0sp3kt 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't know if you noticed but the men on here don't have the healthiest views on women............

[–]_________not_so_fast 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

don't have the healthiest views on women

They have a realistic view, mostly.

[–]Jcart105 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Honestly, when it comes down to it. The vast majority of women just don't have the upper level of intelligence required to be successful in quantitative and scientifically-intensive degrees.

[–]Zombocom1911 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

you may be right. Who knows why, nature vs nurture, but, yeah.

[–]chronoic 16ポイント17ポイント  (22子コメント)

I guess when you arnt smart enough or is willing to work on going into the STEM field and your a woman, you can always take the back route as a woman and take woman studies and complain and hope people in STEM fields would hire you. Because your a woman, instead of having the skills to do it.

Isnt that how most woman get their jobs today over a more qualify man? Because you know, you cant hire base on the abilitly of the appicate, but must hire on the gender.

[–]realpra 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

There was a great study done on chosen job applicants where they masked the genders thinking - "This will even out the misogyny!".

The results slapped them right in the face with women doing much worse when people thought they were men and vice-versa.

[–]LeAgente 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this the study you're talking about? They didn't find that the voice masking made much of a difference, but they did find that women were way more likely to quit than men after a bad interview.

[–]T0000009 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

must hire on the gender.

  • And race
  • And age
  • And 5,000 other pointless "qualifiers"

[–]MajorBeef24 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

All in the name of ending (insert group here)-ism, ironically.

[–]T0000009 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So they say... Reality doesn't agree, which is obvious sexism and racism.

[–]chronoic 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The only qualifer I think should matter is "how qualify a person's skill is"

[–]T0000009 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

How much coke have you snorted today?

Those days are over and gone.

[–]Mojo_of_Jojos 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's spelled *you're when you want to say "you are"

[–]chronoic 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks you for the spell check. I would hire you but.. I rather buy better things.

[–]Skydiver860 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (12子コメント)

Please tell me English isn't your first language. Otherwise, with your spelling and grammar, you should be the last person to insult someone's intelligence.

[–]0Fsgivin 9ポイント10ポイント  (11子コメント)

Uh.. grammer is education level. Specifically related to english. IQ is how easily you can learn something.

So you can argue he's lazy. But grammar has 0 to do with intelligence.

Generally, the people who point to grammar as a sign of intelligence were not in gifted programs as kids. They are the kids smarter than the average bear but always self concious of how far from the top they are.

Had you been in gifted classes you would have probably known not to make that rather misleading argument in the first place.

[–]Skydiver860 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (10子コメント)

If you can't use proper grammar then you obviously didn't learn to properly use it very well. That translates into them clearly not easily learning such a thing. Therefore, not intelligent.

[–]0Fsgivin 3ポイント4ポイント  (9子コメント)

No..thats not how that works haha. Im guessing you were NOT invited to participate in gifted classes based on your silence on the matter.

Heres a fun fact. There is no essay portion on an IQ test. Nor a speech portion. Perhaps you should google why.

Also, there are certainly reasons why someone chooses to proofread a college paper vrs an internet forum post

[–]Skydiver860 4ポイント5ポイント  (8子コメント)

Dude whatever. If it was one or two grammar and spelling errors i can see that. That entire paragraph was riddled with grammar and spelling errors. i don't think there's a single sentence that doesn't have an error in it. I don't care if it's intelligence or education level. If English is their first and that's how they talk, in my eyes they're an idiot.

Im guessing you were NOT invited to participate in gifted classes based on your silence on the matter.

Nope I wasn't but i got straight A's in school so i don't think i'm stupid. do what you will with that info. I don't claim to be a genius or even pretty smart. I just know that unless that person had some sore of severe learning disability or was retarded, in my eyes they're pretty stupid.

[–]chronoic 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ill let you know when I get my english major as soon as Im done with my doctorate PhD in Accounting. If I feel like wasting my life on a wrothless english degree to learn better english, maybe I should of went into gender studies too, that might make my english better. Is MGTOW now a white only club too while im at it?

To answer your question, english is not my first, and I am a Accounting major, have my master, past the CPA. Getting my PHD right now, and I am working for a fourtune 500 company making good money.

And mgtow is teaching me to not lose that money.

[–]humanoid_proxy 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Worthless english [sic] degree... PhD in Accounting."

Fucking L-O-L. Enjoy your rat-race of a life. Your entire purpose in life is to count someone else's money, dickhead.

[–]chronoic 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yup and it pays really good too, you know to count someone else's money. Could be working at mcdonald for less I assume.

All men should aim as high as they can. Me maybe after I get my PHD and network some more, ill own my own firm and then maybe someone will like the money I pay them to count someone else's money too.

[–]0Fsgivin 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Or they just don't give a fuck about grammar. Or again might not give a shit about grammar on an internet forum you're not being paid for nor graded on.

[–]Skydiver860 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

eh so be it. i just felt like being a dick apparently.

[–]0Fsgivin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

eh. your human. Trust me I make illogical arguments when angry all the time.

[–]poloppoyop 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Using proper grammar is a sign you respect the person reading by making it easier.

If you don't care about being read just go ahead and "your/there/should of" all you want.

[–]_________not_so_fast 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

Because its hard. Its much easier to study some blah field and then marry a guy who studied a difficult field and will earn the money.

Duck "feminists" and their bullshit.

[–]fuckhillaryinthebutt 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I was in a Chemistry 101 class working towards a BSEE. There was this one girl in it that I started talking to, eventually banging. There was a test coming up. She said she spent 6 hours studying, and then let out a big sigh and said "I need to get married!".
Shit was a moment I'll never forget. She was pretty much saying that school was too hard and she wanted to get married so she could have a cushy life letting her beta bucks take care of her.
I pumped and dumped soon after that.

[–]MajorBeef24 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

University/College is seen as a IRL dating website by a fair amount of women IMO. Go to party and have fun, whilst trying to bag a guy doing a tough subject who has a decent chance of earning lots later in life.

Medical students beware - the most common thing I've heard is trying to lock down a trainee doctor for $$$.

[–]broadwayguru 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yep, they even have a name for it: the "MRS degree."

[–]MajorBeef24 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Haha never heard that but it's good :)

[–]Kristina_Gilliam 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I could never finish a gender studies degree. My eyes would roll so much that it would cause permanent physical injury.

[–]MTGOStark 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

STEM favors women to men with job opportunities and scholarships on a 3-1 basis. If there still aren't "enough" women in STEM, it's because they don't want to do it.

[–]T0000009 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

they don't want to do it.

Cant....

[–]ScopaLeapo 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I went to a respected engineering undergraduate program. Around 100 students began in it and only 35 graduated in my class a little more than a decade ago. Six women started but only 2 finished and one was a Russian girl on a full boat scholarship and earned it. I can't say why it is that the girls aren't interested in technical fields, but what I saw was that the girls that applied themselves were the ones that tended to succeed. Additionally, I had and still have, absolutely no responsibility or involvement in whether or not a girl (or anyone else) wants to be a scientist or engineer. When I fly I would like to think that the aircraft manufacturer has prioritized my safety over anything else. It's saddening that "studies" programs seem to be devoted to assigning blame and responsibility (to me? cause I'm a guy?) for someone else's choices. It really is pathetic. STEM skill is a result of hard work, sacrifice, and perseverance.

[–]blank_zilla 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Profile pic checks out.

[–]SnapshillBot 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - 1, 2, 3

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

[–]ILXXLI 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, we know the answer to that question. She isn't smart enough or disciplined enough to major in STEM.

[–]bloodfoxtrue 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

An oldie but a goldie.

Well, the ladies could maybe study half-way into something resembling a techinical degree and then hope they get picked by Yahoo...

[–]the-capitan 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

gavin was saying on one of his vids that in the high-cuck/high-misandry/low-misogyny countries of sweden/norway, women go into STEM even less than the high misogyny western and asian countries.

one of my engineering classes had over 400 people in it, and literally only 4 girls. i'm sure admissions and all the professors had a conspiracy going to exclude female participation to <1%, right?

[–]ConfusedGuyNoMore 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

not once did I hear girls in my classes ever say there aren't enough women in the stem fields... They just needed 2-4 girls in the class and they were good.

[–]feedmecarrots 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I had to deal witha feminist here recently. I suggested that she ask for a refund.

[–]leoberto 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Its like playing chess against a carrot, you will win but it will be a hollow victory.

[–]black-trash-man 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow. That's all I could say.