@scottadamssays Thought about it. There’s zero evidence to back it up. Nor is it logical. But congrats on the RTs. You must be proud.
If there are no sponsored terror attacks before Election Day, it means ISIS prefers Clinton. They have the means. Think about it. #Trump
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@TVietor08 You left out the part about what is illogical. Is it because ISIS wants the U.S. President with the strongest immigration stand? - その他の返信を表示
-
@scottadamssays You have no idea how ISIS thinks. No evidence previous attacks have benefitted Trump or how US would respond. It’s baseless. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays wow - that's brilliant - did you say up all night to come up with that? - その他の返信を表示
-
@Sunil_2096 Nice try, paid Clinton bully. - その他の返信を表示
-
@ScottAdamsSays@Sunil_2096 Every counter argument from you consists of calling people clinton bullies. Can't believe I ever read dilbert. -
@versus19@Sunil_2096 That's a 14 and a 25 combo. Nice! http://bit.ly/2eZeb8q - その他の返信を表示
-
@ScottAdamsSays@Sunil_2096 You deflect. I stated that you only respond by calling people bullies. You have no response. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays brilliant. -
@SeanFine27 I'm just getting started ;-) - その他の返信を表示
-
@ScottAdamsSays@SeanFine27 would you credit the literature you recommended with helping you come up with this stuff? - その他の返信を表示
-
@thiagovscoelho@SeanFine27 Some of it. - さらに表示
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays By that logic, if they do they prefer Trump. So are you hoping for an attack or not? - その他の返信を表示
-
@inexemplum Do you still beat your spouse? - その他の返信を表示
-
@ScottAdamsSays@inexemplum Loses argument, then starts to throw things at wall. Dilbert sucks too. -
@versus19@inexemplum I'll call that a 24 and a 4. http://bit.ly/2eZeb8q -
@ScottAdamsSays@inexemplum I'll call that a 25: deflect the arguments with mediocre humor, and hope followers don't remember your fallacy.
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。