For anyone out there who is still trying to argue that Julian isn't a shitbag: please. Julian is a shitbag.
Ex-KKK leader sends message of adoring support to Wikileaks. Wikileaks respond by... tweeting antisemitism.pic.twitter.com/dsvUONPQKK
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
Some people are questioning whether the Wikileaks tweet is antisemitic. In case anyone is sincerely wondering: yes, it is, & here's why. >
- その他の返信を表示
-
Rothschild conspiracies and "Jews control the media!" tropes are as old as the hills. The Rothschilds do not control The Economist.
- その他の返信を表示
-
The Rothschild family is a minority shareholder along with Cadbury, Schroder, other families. Biggest shareholder is Exor: Agnelli family.
- その他の返信を表示
-
The Economist has editorial independence. The Economist Group (owners) do not tell it what to say. http://www.economistgroup.com/results_and_governance/ownership.html …
- その他の返信を表示
-
So why would Wikileaks claim a minority shareholder "controls" The Economist? Specifically, the one who happens to be called Rothschild?
- その他の返信を表示
-
Some are still trying to deny Wikileaks' tweet is antisemitic this morning. Here's more context. They have form:http://forward.com/news/national/347546/why-does-wikileaks-have-a-reputation-for-anti-semitism/ …
- その他の返信を表示
-
Furthermore, just think about the chain of logic: The Economist has a negative cover about Putin. Why would they do that? ROTHSCHILDS!!!1!
- その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
@alexvtunzelmann how the hell is that anti Semitic? - その他の返信を表示
-
@jayvit4 "Rothschilds control the media" is as old as the hills. Majority shareholder in Economist group is Agnelli family. - その他の返信を表示
-
@alexvtunzelmann well she is still a non executive director and snareholder. Exor owns 43% but the Rothschild's % is not disclosed -
@jayvit4 It's a minority. She does not control the group or the magazine. The magazine is editorially independent. -
@alexvtunzelmann it's amazing how many times you are having to say the same thing and still some are not getting it. Admire your patience - その他の返信を表示
-
-
-
@alexvtunzelmann It isn't anti-Semitic to point out that a Clinton ally owns the publication. You are being will fully reductive. - その他の返信を表示
-
@padwantwo She isn't even the majority shareholder. You're being wilfully naive. - その他の返信を表示
-
@alexvtunzelmann a major stakeholder is still an owner. Whether or not Assange is a twat, it's true. - その他の返信を表示
-
@padwantwo No, it isn't. Look at my feed for a fuller rebuttal if you must.
-
-
-
@alexvtunzelmann I see no anti-Semitism in Wiki post -
So why would Wikileaks claim a minority shareholder "controls" The Economist? Specifically, the one who happens to be called Rothschild?
- その他の返信を表示
-
@alexvtunzelmann Just pointing out the owners as friend of Clinton and no more -
@GregPaulHayes Try again. Read from here. Top of the thread this time.https://twitter.com/alexvtunzelmann/status/789942495387975682 … -
@alexvtunzelmann I did. Where is the anti-Semitism? -
@GregPaulHayes In the bits I said. -
@alexvtunzelmann The difference is that she is a director and also owns A shares that have more voting rights. Exor only own B shares. -
@GregPaulHayes She's non-exec. The magazine is editorially independent of the group. It's really tiresome explaining this repeatedly. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。