Wikileaks Releases Another 1,100 Emails From John Podesta In Third Data Dump

Tyler Durden's picture

Moments ago, Wikileaks just released its third data dump from the hacked email account of Hillary Clinton's Campaign Chair, John Podesta, which is becoming a true headache for Hillary Clinton and her supporter base.

There are as many as 1,190 new emails in the latest release, adding to the more than 4,000 emails from Podesta already released by the whistleblowing website, and bringing the total to 5,336. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has claimed he is sitting on as much as 50,000 messages.

 

Among the email chains included in in the release is an email chain from February 15, 2016 titled ‘Pushback on immigration,’ which shows a request for Ken Salazar, who was the US secretary of the interior from 2009 to 2013, to write an op-ed to smear Bernie Sanders' "professed support for immigration."

The emails also reveal frustration from Clinton’s camp over President Obama’s reluctance to show support for her. Dated March 12, 2016, over a month after primaries began, advisor Neera Tanden asks Podesta “Can Obama even hint of support of Hillary before Tuesday? Really, just a directional nod would be helpful.”

“Maybe they don't want to do this, but the stakes are pretty damn high in this election for him," Tanden says. Podesta asks “Why don't you push Valerie a little bit,” possibly referencing Valerie Jarrett, senior advisor to Obama.

* * *

In December 2013, Bloomberg reporter Mike Dorning contacted Jake Siewert, former White House press secretary who became head of corporate communications for Goldman Sachs. Dorning was asking about the role Podesta played during Bill Clinton’s second term “push to use executive actions to further agenda.”

“Guidance?” Siewert wrote to Podesta and Palmieri, attaching Dorning’s inquiry. “I can make stuff up but happy to emphasize whatever you'd like. Was thinking of stressing the deep knowledge and expertise around executive power and what can be done independent of congressional action.”

* * *

In the previous release, we learned that some Hillary advisers pushed for Bill’s role in his wife’s campaign for presidency to be reduced, as his “sex life could be damaging to her”.

Clinton has confirmed the authenticity of the hacked emails, clarifying comments exposed by the leak during Sunday’s second presidential debate. Her admission to the National Multi-Housing Council in 2013 that politicians have “both a private position and a public position” was explained as being a discussion she had regarding the film ‘Lincoln’.

While we are going through the latest document dump, as usual, we urge readers to flag and point us to any of the more notable emails, starting with yet another beauty from CNBC's own "unbiased" political commentator John Harwood emailed to Hillary's campaign chairman, John Podesta.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
localsavage's picture

Just more info the MSM will ignore.

EscapeKey's picture

watch the Democrats disown him in the event something truly damaging is uncovered

Arnold's picture

You mean like the last "Demos do Debbie".

Promote him to what?

roxyNL's picture

 

Don't be delusioned, Clinton already won.

She has the support of ((( wall street ))), the ((( media ))) and even the GOP.

80% of americans ar just sheep following MSM and looking to pay the next batch of bills and debts.

You sold your soul to the (((usurers))) ... you have to bend !

 

MillionDollarBonus_'s picture

What about Trump's already leaked tape documenting his appalling treatment of womyn!! And what's the controversy here? Is Hillary not allowed to have a professional relationship with the media? Surely that's part of your responsibility as a high level politician?

Why Undocumented Immigrants Should be Allowed to Vote

EscapeKey's picture

yeah i think the "professional relationship" here is akin to that between a prostitute and a punter

bobnoxy's picture

Trump is a serial loser and he'll lose this one too. Hilary is going easy on him so he doesn't drop out, or get booted by the party. He's going down slowly, but he's still looking for the bottom. What a loser, just like anyone still on his bandwagon. Pathetic display, really.

EscapeKey's picture

are you one of those Correct the Record losers who doesn't get laid?

even your masters laugh at you. they'll probably attempt to flee the scene without paying your paycheques as well, post nov 9.

bamawatson's picture

he takes it up the ass from a puss oozing hiv positive admirer of b hussein homobama

NoDebt's picture

This Wikileaks stuff is some pretty fucking weak gruel.  This is it?  This is all there is?  Wow, they admit to themselves internally that Bill's sex life might be a negative during the campaign?  This is supposed to be shocking?  I'd be shocked if they WEREN'T talking about it.

NoDebt's picture

@MDB-  I can't believe how badly you've missed the narrative on this.  The narrative, if you had half a brain in your head and bothered to think about it, is the following:

"There's nothing shocking in these emails becuase there's nothing bad going on in Hillary's world.  No criminal behavior, nothing more than what a seasoned political figure does behind the scenes to put forth their strongest case for being the next POTUS.  Accentuating the positives and downplaying the negatives is what running an election campaign is all about.  It's American politics at it's best!"

Now that you read that, you know I'm right.  Bashing Trump is too juvenile and predictable from you.  It's boring, frankly.  You're not putting any effort into this.  It's pathetic.  

EscapeKey's picture

On Apr 19, 2015, at 4:20 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

 

I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use

it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and

everyday Americans need a champion.

 

I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice and say we false

started in Iowa.

 

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433

 

CuttingEdge's picture

Nice bit of interplay here between some  cunt called Brent Budowsky and the Exec Director of the NYT over the "Clinton Csh" book pre-release:

My problem would be if the NYT has some sort of partnership, relationship, with such a hard-core partisan book that makes the NYT an effective agent of, or collaborator with, a partisan political operator or operation seeking to influence an election. The places the NYT reputation and clout on the side of a partisan political project, as opposed to merely receiving an advance copy and then doing independent news stories. Please note, a) while I am a columnist who supports Hillary Clinton I have publicly written critically of foreign donations to the Clinton foundation, and b) while I am a columnist in the opinion section of the paper I have higher standards for fact-checking than many beat reporters in the news sections that cover politics, which is why I am investing the time to get this story right.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1840

A true insight into the fucked up head of a libfucktard progressive and how they try to kill true investigative journalism.

And a gem about the strategy to combat the "Clinton Cash" release:

CLINTON CASH RESPONSE/LAUNCH OF "THE BRIEFING"

On Tuesday morning we will launch The Briefing page on our website. This page will be where supporters and others can get information and points on what she is for, but also where we would post pushback on the book. Below is what we currently plan to post on Tuesday related to the book.

We are also considering a Podesta post that we would put on Medium and oursite that unveils the concept of The Briefing, debunks the book a bit, and notes that while we will respond aggressively to attacks - we know that they are just designed to stop her bc R's know that she has right vision/policies to win and will not be distracted from our main highway of selling the positive. John and I discussed yesterday and think it is important that supporters and press know that we will deal aggressively with unfair attacks, but our real focus and her's is her proactive vision. Important that we do not appear beleaguered.

Clinton Cash Content for The Briefing:

 1) a comprehensive post that debunks the book with all of our attacks in one place;

2) a short video narrated by Brian Fallon highlighting most egregious errors (we will need more time to do comprehensive version we discussed with HRC on Friday, but think it is worth doing short one for the book release on Tuesday);

3) a number of social media products that our supporters can share and are designed to get buzz with press and supporters and further discredit the author and the book;

4) the products we have already put out over the course of the last week.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1842

 

Actually, I get a sniff of MDB about some of the phraseology...

CuttingEdge's picture

How about Podesta emailing all the usual supects about the strategy of "pushing back" against that classification tag with all manner of shite:

From:tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com, jp66@hillaryclinton.com, pschiliro@sb-atalaya.com, hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com, jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, cheryl.mills@gmail.com Date: 2016-01-29 00:50

Subject: Pushback on classification & other documents

Friends,

A big thanks to the team here, attached are some pushback documents that can help for tomorrow. Please let us know if we can provide any more information.

Tony

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1846

 

Arming her against congressional hearing or the FBI one wonders?

The Saint's picture

“I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans...."

If Trump will hammer on that statement by Podesta, it should sink Benedict Hillary.

 

UDATE: At least $6MM being spent to falsly combat Hillary bad news on Social Media:

https://stream.org/astroturf-outrage-machine-of-paid-trolls-floods-socia...

 

Is MDB a Paid Troll?

 

UselessEater's picture

It reads as if she does not like the turn of phrase 'everyday Americans"

One email has caused debate over whether Podesta is revealing that Clinton hates everyday Americans, though it appears the problem is with the phrase “everyday Americans” being included in a speech.

“I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.” Podesta wrote to Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton's Director of Communications, in April 2015.

https://www.rt.com/usa/362358-wikileaks-third-podesta-emails/

css1971's picture

No, but maybe he could apply.

 

I know she has begun to hate "everyday Americans"


You can't use that term to attack Clinton, it's missing some quotation marks, that's all. everyday Americans is a slogan, that's all.

Tarzan's picture

"Is MDB a Paid Troll?"

Yes, there's no way he believes the shit he posts, nobody who reads the independent blogs could be so partisan, so dumb!

AlaricBalth's picture

Whatever happened to attorney-client confidentiality?

9/11 Plaintiff's attorney is offering briefings to the Clinton team concerning 9/11 Plaintiffs litigation with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The attorney feels due to the KSA donations to the Clinton Foundation, perhaps non-public information obtained during discovery could be useful to Clinton.

"you may find it helpful to receive a briefing on the status of our discovery efforts, our responses to KSA's motion to dismiss and our best assessment of prospects for the litigation and its final resolution..."

This is highly unethical and borderline illegal. If Clinton's team receives pretrial briefings from plaintiffs attorney, you can be assured that Clinton will give a heads up to her friends in Saudi Arabia as to their vulnerabilities in the litigation.

 

 

Begin forwarded message:

 From: Jack Quinn

<jquinn@quinngillespie.com<mailto:jquinn@quinngillespie.com>>

Date: March 25, 2015 at 10:53:31 AM EDT

To: John Podesta

<jpodesta@americanprogress.org<mailto:jpodesta@americanprogress.org>>, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com<mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com>>

 

Subject: Litigation Against KSA

 

Dear John and Cheryl:

I hope this finds you well. And, I hope I have a correct email for John, namely a CAP email; if this is wrong, I will be grateful, Cheryl, if you will forward this to John.

For the past several years I have been serving as co-counsel to a large number of plaintiffs in the "9/11 cases" ("In re Terrorist Attack on September 11, 2001") pending in the Southern District of New York. Included among our clients are more than a third of the families of the victims of the World Trade Center attack.

My involvement in this grew out of a similar assignment I had regarding the resolution of the litigation against Libya arising from the bombing of Pan Am 103 (the so-called "Lockerbie" attack). Over the years since the 9/11 attack and the filing of our litigation, the families and other plaintiffs have had a long history of dealings with the Department of State and the Congress, principally through counsel.

Much of that interaction has involved the legal question whether the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia should be dismissed from the suit on grounds of sovereign immunity and whether there are ways in which we might expedite resolution of this matter in the interests of justice, a goal we are convinced can be achieved consistent with our national security interests. KSA's efforts to escape the suit were for a time successful, but, after the Second Circuit acknowledged error in an earlier decision, KSA is back in the case (though actively continuing its efforts to be dismissed).

In the meantime, robust discovery has taken place, some of which has been the subject of press attention of which you may be aware. Recently, and quite separately, we have been alert to press notice of Saudi donations to the Foundation. This, in turn, has raised the question on our legal team whether you may find it helpful to receive a briefing on the status of our discovery efforts, our responses to KSA's motion to dismiss and our best assessment of prospects for the litigation and its final resolution. Please let me know if this would be of any interest to you. Either way, please also let me know if you received this note and, if I may impose, share the best emails through which to reach you. Very best personal regards to you both.... Jack

Jack Quinn ________________________________

1133 Connecticut Avenue NW 5th Floor Washington DC 20036

(P) 202-429-6871 (F) 202-457-1130

jquinn2000@gmail.com<mailto:jquinn2000@gmail.com> jquinn@qga.com<mailto:jquinn@qga.com>

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4102

Captain Benny's picture

Exactly!  This is another huge one for all the families in the case!  This guy needs to be canned immediately.

CuttingEdge's picture

Former Ambassador to Europe Stuart Eizenstat, explaining in March last year Obama's situation visa-a-via the Iran deal to Jake Sullivan, and giving advice on how Hillary may tone down the rhetoric:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1805

Starts with this insight:

Dear Jake,

The Obama White House-Bibi relationship is obviously deteriorating to the point of no return.

It is more poisonous than US-Israeli relationship in my lifetime.

 

booboo's picture

I am sure the 9/11 victims that they represent would want to know if they are being fairly represented by their attorney that is too shit scared to actually win the case as it might reveal the Clinton Crime Family's complicancy by taking "shut the fuck up" money from the saudi's. These attorneys need to be fired and sued for this bullshit.

AlaricBalth's picture

The attorney for the 9/11 Plaintiffs, John (Jack) Quinn is a major donor to Hillary Clinton, Democrat politicians and PAC's.

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.php?&name=john%20quinn&employ=&...

AViewFromDublin's picture

On Apr 19, 2015, at 4:20 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans,but I think we should use

it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and

everyday Americans need a champion.

Misanthrope

 

1. A Human who hates all of mankind as a whole but is not necessarily against having friends. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Misanthrope

 

 

Money Boo Boo's picture

What ever came of the Wells Fargo fraud revelaed last weeK? Just askin. 

StychoKiller's picture

Gad, ya know it's pretty bad when you have to instruct a Troll on how to troll effectively! :>D

r0mulus's picture

Don't be daft- leaks like this are HUGE news.

bobnoxy's picture

Hurts to have hooked your little wagon to a guy who can't beat the most disliked candidate on record, doesn't it. No, wait, she's the second most disliked after that asshole Trump. Ha!!

EscapeKey's picture

aren't you supposed to be locked up in a room somewhere, with your fellow nerdy virgin friends?

PavlovPup's picture

Special fantasy in mind ?

AlaricBalth's picture

 

Jennifer Palmieri, Director of Communications for the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign wrote to John Podesta saying, "I know she (Hillary) has begun to hate everyday Americans..." 

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433


css1971's picture

It's just missing quotation marks.

chindit13's picture

Since the media is unlikely to cover that one, it is up to all of us to spread it far and wide.

Ideally Trump begins quoting it...he should actually hold up a page and read off of it at his rallies

Obviously it should be highlighted in the next debate, too.

 

CuttingEdge's picture

Damn MDB, engage a bit of moral grey matter on the proven evidence out there, otherwise you are non-sensical.

Trump talks the talk but its Bill Clinton who grabs the pussy. And he fucks children. And its not as if he hasn't been prosecuted. And your babe Hillary wants to put him in charge of the rebuilding the nation when she gets in? Has morallity sunk so low that it is now a distant memory to many people such as yourself in the US? Where such a wide disparity between the two individuals above can be greyed out when convenient. Must be a pretty dismal and degrading fucking world you inhabit.

michelp's picture

"Damn MDB, engage a bit of moral grey matter on the proven evidence out there, otherwise you are non-sensical."

Seems, judging by the votes down, that MDB is still entertaining to some here - no clue why - he's not even funny! He's a troll.

First, we should all, collectively, IGNORE him and ultimately he should be blocked from this site for causing distractions, noise and deflections, and preventing considered opinions from evolving.

My model here is the comment section of:

http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/

m.

PavlovPup's picture

Why you always gotta hack on the kicker?Last man back, often makes the play if the return coverage is blown, and a specialized skill set. He wants to relax after the game, it's consensual, as long as everyone is of age I am not into moraly judging athletes for everything they do. Oh wait.... never mind.

lastdance's picture

Bingo, Don't like it?  Don't watch their shows read their "reporting" and as much as possible, byucot, their sponsors.  Time we shared the pain.

 

Mroex's picture

Still calling ILLEGALS undocumented I see, now they should vote? 

How much cock have you sucked? I think drinking all that cum has affected your brain

Davidduke2000's picture

clinton killed a million people in the middle east, if you support her you are as evil as her. who cares about pussy talk, it's the way men and women  lived for 2000 years, you simply have to watch sex in the city to learn. 

Bastiat's picture

How can you not expect good things from someone who hates you, thinks your deplorable and beyond redemption?

Kidbuck's picture

My idea of a good night out:
-
1.) Groped in the pussy by Trump:

2.) Fucked in the ass by Hillary:

williambanzai7's picture

What's a womyn pilgrim? Some kind of stupid assed troll?

cayman's picture

Thanks MDB.  Somebody grab him by the pussy.

And here is altar boy Paul Ryan, revealing to everyone that he is composed of feces.

http://www.infowars.com/did-paul-ryans-top-advisor-leak-the-trump-tape/

nightwish's picture

"professional relationship with the media"

lol, that is classic liberalspeak, which in the near future will transition to "newspeak"

PT's picture

1.  Is there a link I can click on that will allow me to download the whole haystack in one hit?
2.  How big is the hay stack?
3.  Apologies for my laziness, but believe it or not, I also have other things that need doing.  Has anyone extracted all the needles yet?  Is there a link to just all the needles?

HenryKissingerChurchill's picture

Don't be delusioned, Clinton already won.

She has the support of ((( wall street ))), the ((( media ))) and even the GOP.

and Israel MIC ?

VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

Flyover country can take them.....please don't make us.

The Merovingian's picture

No such luck. The fly over states are our best and last hope. Let the great grain rebellion begin.