A sample of the low-scoring reviews I see:

Score: 0

Terrible cartoon graphics it looks like they created a mobile game and then ported it to PC. The AI is even worse than in Civ V. They downgraded pretty much everything that made Civilization V good and they can't even get the **** leaders right (seriously Catherine de Medici as leader of France wtf?????) and by the time you get the full game (when they release all their DLC money scheme products) you will have spend well over $100.

I'll give him the graphics argument, it's not for everyone, and the art style is definitely less realistic than IV and V were. On the other hand, Catherine de' Medici was most definitely Queen of France. Moving on, last time I played vanilla Civ IV and V they were both perfectly playable, even if their expansions made them better. Isn't that the point of an expansion?

Score: 1

Obviously not a review or anything

Oh, okay.