With Hillary's Alt-Right speech last week, there's been understandable concern and alarm by people (myself included) about entryists coming into the Alt-Right and derailing our movement. The most visible example of this was Paul Joseph Watson's disgusting hijacking of the #AltRightMeans hashtag, pozzing our moment with his typical basic bitch rhetoric, DR3 nonsense, and even posted Sikhs under a hashtag for White Nationalists. The shapeshifter has no shame.
Recent attempts have been made to define what the Alt-Right actually is. Lawrence Murray put out a list of six tenets or ideas, and Vox Day published a longer first draft of sixteen. But sixteen or even six loose ideas aren't enough to concisely communicate what we believe. Our movement, which lives and dies by memes, must be able to understand itself through memes.
And so without further ado, I present the Four Memetic Pillars of the Alt-Right:
- Race realism and inegalitarianism
- Protecting Heritage and Tradition
- White Nationalism
- The Jewish Question
If you sufficiently understand these four pillars, you can claim to be a member of the Alt-Right. You'll notice I haven't defined what they actually mean, because we all know what they mean (and if you understand Packwood's Memetic Magick, you know they're symbolic representations of our ideas).
Now, if you examine them closely, you'll see they're all interconnected. We can restate them as answers to four questions and the connection becomes clear:
- Is the white race different from other races? Are men the different from women? If so, how? (Race realism/inegalitarianism)
- Should these differences be preserved? (Yes, through heritage and tradition)
- How should these differences be preserved? (With a white nationalist state)
- How do we prevent our movement and our efforts from being subverted? (By acknowledging the problems caused by Jews)
The reason I believe these four pillars are superior to what has been proffered so far is it provides a scientific formula for redpilling and propaganda: you can redpill someone on any one pillar, and the other three logically follow. This allows you to switch weapons to better target your audience depending on which pillar they are most likely to respond to. It is also precisely what we need to ensure cohesiveness in our movement and prevent subversion.
Below I'll address some of the other issues that have come up where I've seen confusion.
On First Issues and Second Issues
Within any ideological movement, there are "first issues", which represent core beliefs that people should agree on, and "second issues", which are lesser principles. The Four Pillars represent first issues where there can be no disagreement, because without agreement, we lose control of our brand.
But the spoopy thing is if you apply the Four Pillars to other secondary issues, there's >98% chance everyone will agree. For example, Pillar #2 sufficiently covers our anti-degeneracy stance, and Pillar #3 covers our anti-globalist stance.
On Non-Essential Issues
We can discuss, debate, and disagree on implementation of first and second issues, but these questions should not divide us since they're pie in the sky at this point and in some cases we don't have all the information we need. The only time non-essential issues become real issues is when they illustrate a misunderstanding of the Four Pillars.
On The Importance of Ideas & Winning
If you're going to say ideas don't matter on the Alt-Right, throw some echoes on your (((name))) and get the fuck out. The only people who think that winning is everything are Jews whose idea of winning involves the destruction of our values. The Alt-Right is a constructive movement, and thus requires ideas to move forward, nevermind the fact that ideas are what bond us to shitpost together in the ether.
Given the interrelated nature of the Four Pillars, cucking on one means cucking on all of them, making the Alt-Right meaningless as we know it.
On Members versus Leaders
Even though the Alt-Right is a decentralized online movement, there is still a distinction between members and "leadership". This distinction carries with it two different standards:
- Members - these are your average shitlords, your new members, and people who are just beginning their redpill journey. They are not expected to have perfect understanding of the Four Pillars, but they are expected to listen to sources of authority about what is and isn't Alt-Right on first issues. If they disagree, they need to not call themselves Alt-Right.
- Leadership - Since we have no formal organization, we are essentially a movement lead by de facto propagandists. These are your content creators with wider audiences like the TRS guys like Seventh Son, Enoch, and Jazzhands, Ricky Vaughn on Twitter, or Richard Spencer. Because they reach such wider audiences and their mistakes can create schisms, they must be held to a higher standard on correctness.
On The Jews and Their Lies
Technically speaking, Pillar #4 is Pillar #1 just applied to Jews. However, it is worth repeating as a security measure and elevating to a Pillar to prevent them from ever entering.
If you have any issues with what's posted here, take it up with me on Twitter.