use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~53 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
What is the Alternative Right?
The Alt-Right, unlike the dominant ideology of the 20th Century (Liberalism/Conservatism), examines the world through a lens of realism. Rather than continue to look at the world through the ideological blinders that Liberalism imposes in its dogmatic evangelism of the Equalitarian religion, we prefer to look & examine social relations & demographics from a perspective of what's real. Thus, racial & sexual realism is a key component of the Alt-Right - perhaps the key component that ties the diverse factions within it together.
Another core principle of the Alt-Right is Identitarianism. Identitarianism is the prioritization of social identity, regardless of political persuasion. Thus, the Alt-Right promotes White Identity and White Nationalism.
As a counter-culture, we've developed a plethora of in-jokes & terminology. For a guide to the lexicon, please refer to the TRS Lexicon guide or to Social Matter's NRx Compendium of concepts & terms.
Rules:
Related Sites:
Podcasts/Radio
Youtube
Comedy
Best Of
I brung up racial realism in class (self.altright)
Whoisscott が 6時間前 投稿
I brung up the iq differences of whites and blacks and my peer keeps reiterating the point that blacks just don't have a good education as whites. How can I counter this ? Blacks in white countries still get lower iq than whites
[–]awful_website 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 4時間前 (2子コメント)
Brought up**
Might as well learn how to speak if you're going to insult blacks for being stupid. You look as bad as they do right now. Don't space before punctuation either, you look illiterate when you do that
[–]SuperDanceParty -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 3時間前* (1子コメント)
Facts are insulting?
Stop falling into the liberal trap of thinking the truth is offensive. We should be making them all feel stupid for being offended by truth, not vindicating their complex.
IQ isn't even based on education or knowledge. People have higher IQs as children, that lower to their regular level as adults.
[–]awful_website 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Facts are insulting when they come from someone who can barely conjure up the English language, as if it's some form of arcane sorcery
[–]The--Goyim--know 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Don't reveal your power level IRL until you're well read on the specific subject and can counter the common rebuttals. Also, work on your grammar as others have said. Try not to reinforce the dumb racist stereotype.
[–]jinglejangle101 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5時間前* (0子コメント)
The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study proved that intelligence is in fact inherited and something like around 60% of someone's intelligence is inherited from their parents, while the rest is environmental. They did a study on black children adopted by white middle class parents and at 17 they were all given the Stanford–Binet IQ test. The results were that the average IQ of the black children was 89, just 4 points away from the whole black average of the United States. The study also included white children adopted into white middle class families and the average was 106. The type of communities blacks create and live in not only in the United States, but around the world is because that is what low IQ populations create. If they are still not convinced, tell them the physical differences such as skull size and brain capacity. For skull structure you can easily distinguish African, European, and Asian skulls from one another by just looking at them side by side and you can even show them a picture. A review of the world literature on brain size and IQ by Rushton [Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: a life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction] found that African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm3.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X
[–]Europepean 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
< Cranial Capicity < Brain Sizes < Admit Asians are the most naturally intelligent to deflect any suspiction of White supremacy bla bla bla.
[–]winterfjell 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
you brought up. also read the sticky
[–]NESIRGNIKClassical Conservative| Neo-Reactionary| Racialist Capitalist 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
To start I can't believe you'd do this. Secondly, the answer is that IQ is .75-.80 heritable, and the rest that isn't is mostly impacted by catastrophic conditions and illness, not education.
[–]mehwoot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
I done brung up
[–]BigMattesonSecond Amendment protects all other amendments. 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 31分前 (0子コメント)
*I done did broughten up.
FTFY
[–]reactionarytree 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Point to how Asians and Ashkenazis have higher IQs than Whites if quality of education is their response. If Asians and Ashkenazis are receiving the same quality of education as Whites, then they should not have higher on average IQs.
[–]Lifting1488 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 39分前 (0子コメント)
They don't have as good of an education due to their low iq. Remember some points from here.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-298.html
[–]TealRhymes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 55分前 (0子コメント)
I've done this before too. Fortunately for me my class was comprised mostly of Asians, and so they were not insulted when I discussed their relative IQ superiority. Honestly just use statistics and always sound confident when you speak, and speak fluently. Unfortunately to most onlookers what you say is less important than the way you say it.
π Rendered by PID 13803 on app-633 at 2016-10-18 12:44:17.381344+00:00 running 088fd84 country code: JP.
[–]awful_website 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]SuperDanceParty -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]awful_website 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]The--Goyim--know 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jinglejangle101 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Europepean 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]winterfjell 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NESIRGNIKClassical Conservative| Neo-Reactionary| Racialist Capitalist 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mehwoot 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]BigMattesonSecond Amendment protects all other amendments. 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]reactionarytree 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Lifting1488 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TealRhymes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)