上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 337

[–]lowercase_capitalist 69ポイント70ポイント  (8子コメント)

Could I just go deploy a hotspot for him?

[–]WooTs_67 33ポイント34ポイント  (4子コメント)

they probably have shit set up to block signals from going in and out of there

[–]cuteman 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

they probably have shit set up to block signals from going in and out of there

Yeah that's the only way around it otherwise they could throw up some ad hoc wireless mesh networks. It wouldn't be as fast but it wouldn't be 0. Sounds like they cut the hard line to the embassy as well as blocking wireless.

[–]0x000420 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

this is exactly what i was thinking. If enough people participated in a wireless mesh, they could provide him with an external communication source. All he would need is a linux box with a nice antenna.

for those unfamiliar with mesh networking, it's an isolated P2P network, run by connecting peers via antenna : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network

[–]inexorabledonger 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

how good do you think the jamming is? would it be possible for someone on the ground near the building to extend a phone's internet connection via a 5 watt wifi booster with a high gain antenna to a drone hovering a few feet from his apartment transmitting the signal with another 5 watt booster + high gain antenna? if the jamming is coming from inside, it may be futile, but if it's just a van on the ground, it might be possible to use a few drones with directional antennas to beam a signal in from ~200m away

[–]fckingmiracles 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

a drone hovering a few feet from his apartment

I don't think the Ecuadorian embassy appreciates strange flying objects hovering above their grounds for hours though.

[–]unclezipper 132ポイント133ポイント  (9子コメント)

[–]24Aids37 31ポイント32ポイント  (2子コメント)

How did Verizon find that? He didn't tag them in it.

[–]mitchb6 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

Someone retweeted it and said verizon was shit and then they responded. I have seen another comment that it was a bots automatic response when someone calls them shit.

[–]TheRegretfulBandit 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Verizon support searches for the word Verizon in twitter search, finds tweets with "Verizon" that are having internet issues, helps them.

[–]Jabbajaw 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does Peter Jackson have to do with all of this?

[–]mph88delorean 366ポイント367ポイント  (114子コメント)

Hey Brits, you mind going over there and STARTING A FUCKING PROTEST!

[–]6079_Smith_W_MiniTru 137ポイント138ポイント  (56子コメント)

[–]Sl31gh3r86 24ポイント25ポイント  (46子コメント)

On a school campus how I download without repercussions

[–]mastigia 93ポイント94ポイント  (32子コメント)

Torrents aren't illegal. Torrenting copyrighted material is. Since it's just an encrypted file, it is just a bunch of random bits as far as the folks Who watch for copyright infringement are concerned.

[–]MoonlitDrive 9ポイント10ポイント  (22子コメント)

The campus only watches for copywrite material?

Mine sends me emails when I have a torrent application running on my computer while on campus.

[–]PM_ME_INFOSEC_DOCS 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Use a VPN like Private Internet Access (PIA). You're campus is probably looking for traffic going to known torrent sites is all. A VPN would cover that up and protect your anonymity. It's very easy to set up. Can't link because mobile, but very easy to find on Google

[–]ruok4a69 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

They also look on default ports.

Always change the default ports.

[–]PM_ME_INFOSEC_DOCS [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

which is complete bullshit because they are not "well known" ports so you can use them for whatever you want. there are legitimate uses for those ports and if you happen to use them, you can be flagged for torrenting. its crap.

[–]dwmfives [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They are also probably looking at usage. If your usage is consistently significantly higher than everyone else, you are gonna get a knock on the door. And chances are, you signed a paper allowing them to inspect any device attached to their network.

[–]Syzygye 13ポイント14ポイント  (10子コメント)

Tell them to sod off. Nothing wrong with torrents

[–]diachi 12ポイント13ポイント  (9子コメント)

The network admin may disagree with you.

[–]Syzygye 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

Then he'd be wrong?

[–]throwingks 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

He can make whatever rules he wants.

[–]broskiatwork 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not if he is monitoring traffic and is concerned with bandwidth as opposed to what's inside of it.

[–]twavisdegwet 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nah, Torrents use a lot of network resources. Some require you to be talking to 1000 hosts all at once. It's totally understandable to have the protocol disabled.

You can use the "but I downloaded Ubuntu once" argument all you'd like but at the end of the day torrents aren't something most network admins want running on their systems.

[–]dwmfives [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Network admin owns that network, and along with his/her superiors, decides what traffic is allowed on the network.

A campus full of torrents is likely to severely affect the network negatively, impacting what it's actually for, which is education.

They could allow access to only educational and on campus resources if they wanted to, and they would in the right to do so.

[–]window_owl [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

There are 2 reasons why a school would tell you off for torrenting:

  1. "Abuse of Resources". While downloading, your torrent is using an awful lot of bandwidth, competing with everybody else using the same school internet infrastructure. When you're seeding, you can place an even greater load on the infrastructure, because most internet hardware is optimized for downloading rather than uploading.

  2. Because somebody complained. Corporations that own copyrighted media will often monitor online torrents and send cease-and-desist letters to all of the IP addresses that are downloading or seeding it, and to the the internet service providers of those IP addresses. While you are on campus, your school is your internet service provider. If they got a letter saying that someone was downloading illicit copyrighted material on their network, they are legally obliged to inform you and to take some measure to ensure that you don't do it again.

Schools themselves don't actually monitor all of their internet for copyrighted material. It would place to much of a burden on them. They can, and sometimes do, block individual ports or protocols. However, most of the "I got in trouble for torrenting at school" stories are from people who got caught by the rightsholder, and the school was informed.

If you want to test this, try torrenting something that is not copyrighted. [The Internet Archive](archive.org) has a lot of public-domain files available as torrents. Technically, these files from WikiLeaks may also be okay. Alternatively, some more detail about the letters you receive would probably indicate how exactly you ended up receiving it. Does the letter mention a specific copyrighted work, or a corporation that holds the sole rights to copy it? Does it list your I.P. address? Or does it only mention traffic, terms of use, and university regulations?

As /u/mastigia said, torrenting isn't illegal. It was invented to do one thing very well: to move around very large files to a lot of people via the internet. Regular downloading has the following disadvantages:

  • All of the traffic is placed on a single server, which gets expensive to run if many people are downloading a large file from it.

  • If that one server goes down, nobody else can download the file, even though many people have copies of it.

  • If your network connection is interrupted, you have to download the whole file all over again.

  • If part of the file is mangled while you download it, you won't find out until you open the file, and then you have to download the whole file again.

  • You can only download the file over one network connection, which is only as fast as its slowest component.

Torrenting addresses all of these:

  • Files are downloaded from "peers": other people who already have the file. If any one person deletes the file or disconnects from the network, you can still download from all of the other people who are "seeding" the file.

  • There is no centralized infrastructure (apart from the internet service providers) that is needed to make this happen. Anybody may make torrents available for free, and anybody may download them for free, and the only cost is their computer's electricity and their personal internet connection. Nobody needs to own a domain name, or an SSL certificate, or a server.

  • Torrents are subdivided into very small "chunks". If your internet is too spotty to download a 20 gigabyte file all at once, you are still probably able to download a 2 megabyte chunk. As long as you can download a complete chunk from a peer before you lose your connection, you will eventually download the complete torrent.

  • Each chunk is checked for correctness after it is downloaded. If it is bad, the chunk -- and only that chunk -- is redownloaded.

  • You can only download a chunk from one peer, but you can download many chunks at once. If there are many peers, you can download many parts of the torrent at once. The only limit is how fast your internet connection is.

Because torrents can run extremely quickly, many schools block them so as to relieve stress on their network infrastructure. Fortunately, most torrent clients allow you to throttle your download and upload speeds. If you keep your downloading to 1 megabyte per second and your uploading to 100 Kilobytes per second, you should get no complaints. This bandwidth is completely typical for normal web browsing, and should not interfere with other peoples' ability to use the same network as you.

Because torrenting is a useful protocol that has actual, legal use cases, most schools and internet service providers do not explicitly prohibit torrenting. Most of the ones that do block torrenting, only block it to keep the network from being overused. If you torrent non-copyrighted material at a reasonable speed, you should have no problems. If you do get into trouble, you can explain why you did it and why you shouldn't get in trouble for it.

[–]mastigia [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You should copy that response to the OP. Great write up.

[–]Vid-Master [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Find a place that offers free WiFi like a McDonalds

[–]JosephND 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Don't follow any advice telling you to TOR over torrent. It'll obfuscate data to your school but it could jeopardize your exit node

[–]_C0bb_ 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's usually against school policy to seed so just be mindful of that you should be good.

[–]none31415 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does the email say? No torrenting allowed? Or make sure you're not downloading copyright material?

[–]riptide747 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Haven't you heard? CNN says it's illegal to have it so it must be illegal.

[–]tigresuaz [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So isn't it illegal what they did, according to their asinine comment.

[–]mastigia [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oh, thanks for setting me straight, friendly internet man!

[–]6079_Smith_W_MiniTru 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

Private Internet Access VPN.

However, you won't get copyright notices on this one, so I doubt you'd see repercussions.

[–]digiorno 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

The school won't do anything. Torrents themselves are just a method of data transfer, is the content that people get upset about. For example, Microsoft uses a system similar to bit torrent to update its operating systems. No one will care if you use 10GB to download Windows 10, but someone might care if you download 10GB of paramount movies. And even then, they usually care more about people who upload content anyway (seeders).

[–]YendysWV 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

World of Warcraft uses torrents for their patches.... You should be fine.

[–]reagor 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Make sure you limit your connections, campus it gets kinda pissed when you open 1000 concurrent connections

[–]chipbod 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Just go to starbucks and download?

[–]Sl31gh3r86 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm in the most northern part of maine. closest walmart is an hour away the only open wifi is the college campus. our town only has a mcdonalds and a subway

[–]ruok4a69 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

McDonalds has free wifi in most locations. Enjoy your 100kbps!

[–]Lectricblues 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Has Assange confirmed these are legit? Hashes?

[–]Gimmie_2_Dollars [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

How to link is dead

[–]6079_Smith_W_MiniTru [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

[–]AutoModerator[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Gimmie_2_Dollars [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Thanks. Having a little trouble finding it on my pc after install but thank you.

[–]scooterdoop 24ポイント25ポイント  (5子コメント)

what's strange/annoying is there doesn't seem to be any information one way or the other, what's been going on over there all night.

[–]mph88delorean 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

Media blackout or bias?

[–]flytheflag 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

Most likely both, May doesn't give a fuck. There's no such thing as a free press over here with intelligence services and their assets being deeply embedded inside most media outlets and the catchall of the D-Notice advisory issued by secret courts.

[–]BitchesMan 34ポイント35ポイント  (18子コメント)

One Brit on Reddit claims military is on site with media blackout in effect, and then later said "It's all over now, they were done within 5 minutes."

The only remotely corroborating tweet I could find was from 4 hours ago claiming 8 police entered the embassy, but I'd take this DC based source with a grain of salt: https://twitter.com/SLindauer2011/status/787853902062301184

They pulled back the guards outside the embassy one week ago and I guess they couldn't wait till Ecuador's scheduled questioning of the guy in November.

EDIT: Added NP link

EDIT 2: Added possible corroboration.

EDIT 3: Found a LIVE Periscope being run by a guy trying to get into the embassy, he asked to see a Julian, was asked if he had appt, was turned away. No soldiers or anything out of the ordinary.

EDIT 4: Guy working for Wikileaks confirms Julian is fine - One pic and one tweet to the first Periscoper in the area.

[–]flytheflag 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

I highly doubt the validity of that first comment. It would be SO19 (armed police) and MI5 if anything were to happen.

[–]Amadeus_IOM 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't know. That brit sounds a bit out there. The embassy is right next to Harrods. Good luck doing anything unnoticed there or threatening people on a public road if they take pictures. Smells like BS.

[–]24Aids37 23ポイント24ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why do they say it was a state party? Why not just say it who it was?

[–]fckingmiracles 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why do they say it was a state party?

So far it looks like that is just in Assange's mind.

No evidence for any state actor so far. No evidence whatsoever.

[–]Moarbrains [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Since the story is that he is blocked, how would he go about proving such a thing?

Ignoring the fact that there really isn't anyone else interested in blocking him.

[–]spongebobzombiepants [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He is staying inside the Ecuadorian embassy. He released a key thing against Ecuador. The embassy is in London. He released a key thing against the UK. Seems pretty heavy on the implications to me.

[–]YankeeBravo -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because they don't want to piss off the DNC/Obama administration?

Assange done fucked up good when he started releasing the DNC emails.

[–]necro_clown 80ポイント81ポイント  (17子コメント)

So what's the contingency plan

[–]Baseball_Is_Okay 124ポイント125ポイント  (14子コメント)

Probably a dead man's switch. There's a program he "checks in" to every few hours, maybe days... If he misses a couple check ins, (i.e. in prison, dead, or otherwise incapacitated), the documents are released automatically.

[–]worktheshoot 61ポイント62ポイント  (7子コメント)

So in a weird way, did whoever severed his internet ensure that all the content will be released?

[–]TheCrimsonCorndog 88ポイント89ポイント  (6子コメント)

It seems highly unlikely that anybody with the power to sever his connection would do so without taking this problem into account.

[–]redditready1986 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

For them it might not be a problem. If it is the opposition than releasing these documents is exactly what they want.

[–]Dragofireheart 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Could be that.

Or maybe the elite that want to shut him up are stupid and/or are calling his bluff.

[–]rsnauth 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why bother risking getting caught if Assange was going to release them anyway?

[–]Phinigma 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Could be wanting to dump the information in a huge unstructured mess to limit it's effectiveness. (The Panama Papers for example.)

[–]cuteman 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is the theory that it's everything he has?

[–]know_comment 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

do we think the hashcode was a deadman switch? They were obviously going to drop some leaks between today and tomorrow, so I suspect some of this is a publicity game to get people checking the feeds.

[–]thorthon 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Most likely the files are already out there with trusted people but they are encrypted. The deadman switch will probably release the key that will decrypt those files to whoever has them.

The hashcodes are the checksum of those files. So when they are released a checksum can be done on the released files to verify they are the real deadman switch files instead of imposter files.

[–]Treebeezy 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

There already is a bunch of insurance files out there, the links are in this thread.

[–]SarahC 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Unless his dead mans switches are people he contacts in some way?

It would be more useful for situations like this one - though he'd have to trust them lots.

[–]Watsonathan 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What I'd like to know is, what could he have that isn't important enough to release immediately for the good of the masses but still explosive enough to make governments nervous about taking him out?

[–]mastigia 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Point to point wifi AP or since shit I imagine. Not sure what he was using before. There are plenty of options.

[–]bagateller 186ポイント187ポイント  (31子コメント)

A Gulfstream V took off from London Luton airport a while ago. Is it rendition aircraft N379P transferring Assange to we-know-where?

puts on tin foil hat

Edit: Aaaand it's disappeared from Flightradar24.

Edit 2: It's been reported elsewhere that the aircraft's registration number is N517DW. Probably an ordinary corporate jet.

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_HANDCUFFS 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was stationed in GTMO not to long ago. Could message some old buddies who are still there and find out if a detainee transport takes place.

[–]spongebobzombiepants [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You should. The real question is whether to tell us internet folks.

[–]PutMeInTheBinPls 31ポイント32ポイント  (9子コメント)

It's still on flightradar

Edit: Now can't even access the flightradar24.com site at all.

[–]bagateller 14ポイント15ポイント  (7子コメント)

Yep, that's the one.

[–]mankface 4ポイント5ポイント  (6子コメント)

about to fly over Nova Scotia

[–]LifeWin 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Intercept by Nova Scotia Liberation Front is a go.

[–]Jhad31 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Extraordinary rendition! Extraordinary rendition!

[–]ReReminiscence 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah archer even when things are going to shit you still make me laugh

[–]robbydb [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Except I would expect Ricky to say Extraordinary Rendering or something to that affect.

[–]Mizzay 7ポイント8ポイント  (11子コメント)

Where was it on route to when it disappeared? Sweden?

[–]bagateller 10ポイント11ポイント  (10子コメント)

Route information was not available, but it was tracked half-way over the Atlantic when it disappeared, most definitely en route to the US.

[–]RoganMound 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

The vast majority of flights in and out of Luton are short haul, you could be on to something

[–]HeraldricRaygun 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yup. I've always known it as european and domestic flights.. maybe as far as North Africa. Can anyone confirm this?

[–]HazyHotDog 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

I have made screenshots about the whole flight in case Flighradar24.com goes down, im tracking the plane, because of course I aint got shit to do on a monday. (I do)

[–]RDS 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

This should be higher up. Not liking the looks of this tho. Please stay on it.

[–]100_percent_diesel 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's a Glaxo Smith Kline executive jet

[–]Mae-Brussell-Hustler 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Appears to be landing in the Research Triangle Park area - Raleigh, Durham. Seems to check out.

[–]flyingburritoman 157ポイント158ポイント  (23子コメント)

If this doesn't prove they're on to something nothing does.

[–]SchlangeHatRecht 57ポイント58ポイント  (14子コメント)

totally. we best not read any CtR shills claiming wikileaks are fake ever again.

[–]PalermoJohn 48ポイント49ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's also illegal according to CNN...

[–]bisilfishil [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Except for them. They're special. It's ok, they'll tell us everything we need to know, save for the unsavory illegal bits.

[–]X90210 21ポイント22ポイント  (2子コメント)

Bro. The united States will go to any length to stop someone from lying on the internet.

[–]rsnauth 2ポイント3ポイント  (8子コメント)

The best thing about this, is it makes extremely easy to spot shill accounts.

Anybody dismissing this event or trying to deflect can only be either EXTREMELY ignorant/stupid or a paid shill.

[–]KingClam2 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

can only be either EXTREMELY ignorant/stupid or a paid shill.

So... no change?

[–]rsnauth 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nope, but its easier to spot them now.

[–]LBJSmellsNice 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's kind of a really arrogant view. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot or getting paid to say so, shit can be nuanced

[–]fckingmiracles 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Anybody dismissing this event or trying to deflect can only be either EXTREMELY ignorant/stupid or a paid shill.

What event though? Am I not allowed to question Assange's claim that it was 'a state actor' and not any other possible reason his Internet was out (construction, accident, failing hardware, user issues etc.)?

Why seem to act as if not believing Assange is not allowed anymore. Why do you say that?

[–]SarahC 6ポイント7ポイント  (5子コメント)

If he can't update his dead mans switch - won't that flush him out of the building to be captured?

If he can't get online I imagine his decryption password will be posted.... unless his dead mans switch are several people he trusts?

[–]OffOfCommission182 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

He has to have people working for him that are gonna throw the switch, let's just hope the government hasn't figured out who they are yet

[–]jld2k6 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

They could also go the old fashioned route and waterboard him until he tells them how to check in themselves before the switch is activated :|

[–]DankyTheChristmasPoo 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's the only leverage he has, if he doesn't want to spend his remaining days in a 5x5 concrete block he's not going to give it up.

[–]leafcruncher 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hear me out. We should always be skeptical and thinking critically. WikiLeaks has been a main source of true information for a lot of us. They have absolute say over a lot of people here. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" comes to mind. If WikiLeaks is our sole source of news there exists a chance for them to skew us in whatever direction they want. I'm not saying they are, but there exists a chance. There also exists a chance that since the recent leaks have not received much news coverage, maybe this event has been fabricated so WikiLeaks will get more airtime? Just a thought. Also can someone eli5 why Anderson came to the embassy and what that implies?

[–]noidentificationwith 109ポイント110ポイント  (6子コメント)

Earlier to this within hours: Reports Brits to storm the Ecuadorian Embassy, Kerry threatened Ecuadorian President, to seize Assange, file checksum released earlier by wikileaks naming Kerry:

https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/787863160149598208

https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/787858612844695552

edit: old pictures of assange being circulated with audio saying he is OK is disinfo

[–]HarryParatesties 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

Makes sense. Didn't one of those keys have a "Kerry" title? Run homie, it's the only way...

[–]KirkOA [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yep, John Kerry, who supposedly threatened Ecuador, Ecuador was also one of the keys titles who's president supposedly was being threatened, and UK FCO was the last one, which is the UK Foreign Office, who deal with foreign relations, UK's foreign secretary Boris Johnson last night talked with John Kerry at a multinational meeting regarding Syria, that ties all the titles together.

[–]flytheflag 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm really very surprised we haven't seen anyone giving onsite updates. If anyone has twitter or periscope links please drop them in the thread.

[–]igottashare 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

I thought something was up when Wikileaks lost its https protocol late Saturday.

[–]SeepingMoisture 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's https as of right now.

https://wikileaks.org

[–]igottashare [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well aware. Was down most of Saturday. If you were trying to access the site using a PC or Android, your browser probably gave you a warning to get you out of there. By early Sunday MDT things returned to normal.

[–]Raksso 26ポイント27ポイント  (4子コメント)

First Pamela Anderson then the sda-hash then the death rumour then his internet link is down.

Wtf is going on?

[–]rockyrainy 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Have not heard of pamala Anderson for ages

[–]ForgotMyFathersFace 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're not missing much, she's been hanging out with some rabbi and going on a rampage saying porn is evil.

[–]flimflam2020 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

They will do all they can to shut him up until the elections are over.

[–]dyingiseasy 24ポイント25ポイント  (3子コメント)

Two theories:
1) Perhaps chaos and riot is what they wanted.
But I say they cannot be that stupid to kill/arrest assange.

2) This might be a diversion to find out and map who wikileaks supporters are and assassinate those helping wikileaks. They know killing/arresting assange will create chaos and riot. Some supporters might do some rash things bc of this news. They just need to see who will react to this and cut off wikileaks 'hands'. You know what im saying?

[–]99percentbullshit 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

or, just a thought. Maybe try to incite a riot that would lead people to try and get in to the embassy to prove that he's alive... Which would allow the perfect opening to slip someone in (as a civilian) to assassinate him in the first place. Then you can blame the individual and the government that did it gets away with a clean slate. Worked out quite well for a long time with the JFK assassination.

[–]Kill_Frosty 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or, maybe at this point they have realized the people who care are a small minority and they can and have gotten away with so much shit at this point they no longer fear the people.

They know they can kill him or at the least stop his progress to nothing but critics from the "crazies", while most people won't care and will support them in getting a "traitor".

Why would anyone get off their couch or put down their computer? They could come out and literally say "we are going to sell nukes to terrorists to pay for a vacation for congress" and aside from some peaceful protests that would last a few weeks until the media moved on to cover what trump said 15 years ago or some celeb will die/get in a scandal nothing would happen.

They don't fear the people and are getting more and more in the open about it.

[–]deleted3d [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I doubt his staff are that stupid, he probably is using Tor and compartmentalization to keep the government dark to wikileaks structure.

[–]tinylilzikababyhead 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seems pretty desperate.

[–]Do_u_ev3n_lift 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I saw the keys he tweeted out last night. WHY would he tease Kerry and the UK back to back. You're in UK dude, wait a while on the UK leaks.

[–]robstah 18ポイント19ポイント  (1子コメント)

He's "technically" in Ecuador.

[–]SgtBrutalisk 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's nothing sweeter than being technically right.

[–]SixtyNineFactorial 11ポイント12ポイント  (9子コメント)

[–]scooterdoop 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

I really wonder why he'd allow any visitors prior to the Big Drop / election / etc. a huge window of opportunity for shady happenings.

[–]worktheshoot 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

It ain't no fun if the homies can't get none!

[–]atheist4thecause 4ポイント5ポイント  (5子コメント)

Maybe she sexed him up? I mean, it could get lonely in the embassy.

[–]scooterdoop 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

that's how he got fucked the last time! (re: "rape" charges in sweden)

[–]raisedbysheep 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

She bugged his room and/or poisoned his lunch. It's not like they could have sent an agent, after all.

This is like sending Dennis Rodman to North Korea. If you don't know that he had a mission, then you haven't been paying attention.

[–]DonkeyDome 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

She's just trying to get the PIN to his bank account.

[–]MusicMagi 16ポイント17ポイント  (6子コメント)

Just when it was released that Hillary sold weapons to ISIS. Rest assured, the ruling class will stop at nothing to silence this man.

[–]powercorruption 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

This is news? Haven't we known she's sold weapons to Saudis and Qatar for years?

[–]MusicMagi 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

AFAIK, this is the first time there's been solid proof.

[–]petedacook 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is some fucking Bullshit!

I smell the US Gvmnt. silencing Assange with this news. They don't want anymore leaks getting out that damage the chosen one.

[–]libretti 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I'm livid. Those fucks will stop at nothing to protect their power and influence over us peasants.

[–]flytheflag 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Link to another relevant thread. RT Bank accounts blocked in the UK Things are not looking good.

[–]activow 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

He Triggered someone. Good for you Assange. It's working.

[–]BLOCK_WATCH 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

When a search is performed about "new" this hour, it's all Pamela Anderson stuff, with the exception of reports with info we already have. However, it turned this up from the other day. Just putting here on this thread so there's some context to the last few days. I didn't put the link because I didn't want to, but you can verify I copied and pasted.


http://www (dot ) nytimes (dot) com/reuters/2016/10/12/world/europe/12reuters-ecuador-sweden-assange.html?_r=0


ECUADOR MOVES ASSANGE QUESTIONING TO NOVEMBER

BY REUTERS - October 12, 2016 11:27 p.m.

QUITO — Ecuador has delayed until Nov. 14 its questioning of Julian Assange in a Swedish rape investigation, at the Wikileaks founder's request, the prosecutor's office of the Andean country said on Wednesday.

The questioning, led by an Ecuadorian prosecutor and originally scheduled for Monday, could help end a four-year-long deadlock since Assange took refuge in Ecuador's London embassy.

"He made the request in a document, via the Ecuadorian ambassador in the United Kingdom, in which he sets out his reasons pertaining to protection guarantees and self-defense," the prosecutor's office said in a statement.

Swedish chief prosecutor Ingrid Isgren and a police investigator will be allowed to be present to ask questions through the Ecuadorian prosecutor, who will later report the findings to Sweden, the European country's prosecutors have previously said. Swedish authorities want to question Assange, 45, over allegations that he committed rape in 2010. Assange denies the allegations.

(Reporting by Alexandra Valencia; Writing by Alexandra Ulmer; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

EDIT: Added date of publication next to Reuters byline.

[–]nighthaven 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

Now that Obama has effectively turned over ICANN to the UN, who's to stop them from shutting down the WikiLeaks site altogether?

This just stinks of a conspiracy from the US to silence both Assange and WikiLeaks to bolster their next political puppet Hillary Clinton.

What astounds me is just how many people won't care about this and just how many blind Hillary supporters will cheer this move on like it's "the best thing for America ever!!!"

I can't believe how short-sighted Americans have become. 300 million people exposed to the worst of humanity and almost half of them, according to the polls, want this person to be their leader.

Save your pity. The people who lose their lives as a result of her being placed into power will need it.

EDIT: Edited for Hyperbole to make everyone happy.

[–]deleted3d [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He didnt turn it over to the UN, the US absolved its supervisory role of ICANN which is still a California company.

[–]rissasr 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

The joking about this in r/politics is making me sick. I hope WL drops a truth bomb that makes the Democrats collectively shart their pants

[–]jaykayel 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

ELI5?

[–]DELETEDREDDIT 76ポイント77ポイント  (3子コメント)

Big Daddy State said Assange is grounded from internet access since he says bad things about Daddy State's friends.

[–]Swansonbreakfast 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Paid off reporters, Sending Hillary Bernie Debate questions, Vetoing any negative articles, Taking out craiglist adds for fake victims.

And the clincher so far... Excepting millions of dollars in campaign money from the Saudi government after openly admitting they knew they were funding ISIS

Fuck them

[–]captaincarb [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There a vans parked outside the embassy with fake front companies names on the side. the vans are carrying electronic warfare packages to jam his signal.

inb4 source. can't find the periscope link. obviously it's speculation but I don't know why a smoked salmon and caviar company needs to be parked outside the embassy for 8 hours.

[–]mistydmist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I thought Democratic Terrorism was only n the US, But I see they have gone global.

[–]DoYouEvenBrewBro 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Does Trump own a GulfStream V? would be epic if he hurried up the leak process prior to the Wednesday debate. Its best to derail the questioning and give Hillary as little time as possible to prepare BS answers

[–]Jabbajaw 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So who would benefit from shutting down his link?

[–]Jabbajaw 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They probably have him in custody.

[–]archtme 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What does this mean? "State party" - did Ecuador cut his internet? Or did someone cut the internet to the entire embassy?

[–]wheelinganddealing [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Is he still alive? This is crazy, we live in fucking crazy times.

[–]KornymthaFR [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

[–]AutoModerator[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]attoj559 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I haven been keeping tabs on this as much as some of you have so I have a question. Does Assange have a yet to be released document that will put Hillary away? I think I remember reading that he does. The October emails have been pretty good but is he holding onto the bombshell until the election week or something?

[–]zeropoint357 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Lol at the Hillbots frothing on Twit. Trump fanboys may be a bunch toothless, inbred hillbilly fucks, but at least they ain't squealing pansies.

[–]PalermoJohn 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

I mean he logs into a VPN somewhere. Should be fairly easy to get a smartphone with internet into his hands.

[–]buildflygame 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Signal jammers are a thing

[–]fckingmiracles 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can anyone confirm those are being used?

[–]-o-o-o [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I can do sweep with a RTL-SDR and Spectrum Analyser after work.

[–]-o-o-o [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Or stand outside with a personal hotspot activated with no password required. Anyone in London can give him access.