Bitcoin creates poverty.
Math proves this.
Bitcoin ownership is highly concentrated among those who got them early when their was no risk. Running a computer for 1 hour is not risk taking.
The only way for early adopters to cash into fiat is for bidders to have pooled large amounts of it together.
Why does an early adopter need to cash out?
Because all goods/services in the economy are denominated in FIAT money. If you want to buy a Lamborghini the producer demands 300,000 EUROs.
Bitcoin latecomers give their fiat money in exchange for ever decreasing amounts of bitcoin. As long as future bidders are incentivized to buy bitcoin, early adopters have massively expanding fiat bank accounts.
A rising price is the only incentive to constantly buy bitcoins in large enough volumes to matter. The ideologue buyers are microscopic in comparison.
Bitcoin is always a zero sum game. Bitcoin buyers are either financing mining costs + profits or financing the investments/consumption of early adopters. Regardless they themselves are getting poorer in-doing so.
It is mathematically impossible that all bitcoiners come out ahead, but absolutely mathematically provable that the majority go into poverty to swell the fortunes of a minority.
ここには何もないようです