1. How many government agencies need to independently confirm that something is a suicide before it sticks? Clinton was in charge when the "Government Agencies" made that finding. FBI Director Comey just stated to a Congressional Committee, under oath, that while Hillary Clinton broke the law, nothing she did is actionable or meets the test of legal action being necessary. So I guess I do not have a lot of faith in "Government Agencies".
2. Do you really want to vote for Hillary because "technically" the charges were false. Just proves the lengths you will go to support the Clinton's and you did not address my comment about trying to get your wife to buy off on that argument. By the way, how many interns does the "First Man" get?
3. I was talking about the desecration and total lack of respect Bill Clinton has for the office of the Presidency. He treated the Oval Office like a fraternity dorm room. People are complaining about Trump walking into a wardrobe room at the Miss Universe pageant like it is the most horrible thing in the world but you seem more than willing to give a pass on scented cigars and stained dresses. I am glad my daughter was not an intern at that time. I guess you have to have daughters to be able to make that statement.

The experts you so highly speak of are the establishment we are trying to get rid of. Of course they are not going to agree with Trump. They are trying to save their own skin. And if you are trying to make the argument that Trump can't stand on a principal, then explain to me the "Line in the Sand" quote from Obama. Why don't we have soldiers on the ground in Syria. The reason is Obama does not have the courage or inclination to fight terror in the world and has no end game for it. Hell, he can't even say who the enemy is. Foreign Policy is a fluid situation and the deals you make today may be different from what was said years ago. The constant I am looking for is this, Does the nominee have America's interest first in their thinking? I don't think giving Iran 170 billion dollars is in our best interest, their money or not. It is plainly obvious that Trump has our best interest at heart and Clinton does not. But go ahead and keep fooling yourself she is the best candidate.

Obama had no "substantive" policy unless it has to do with bringing about the end of the United States of America as it existed in 2008. He wanted to reallocate wealth in this country. If he had all this "substantive" policy, why is Michelle Obama saying that Hillary is the candidate we need to heal our wounds. Shouldn't the wounds be healed after 8 years. I thought Obama's substantive policy's would have fixed all of that by now, especially since in his first two years he had a majority in the house and a filibuster proof Senate.

Questions, do you still have your own doctor? How is your medical insurance going? How do you feel about the military being at 80% or less readiness. How do you feel about the debt growing almost 100% on his watch. Oh I know it is all Bush's fault. As far as human decency is concerned, Trump is the only one that wants to create a safe zone in Syria for the refugees. Hillary Clinton wants a 550% increase in Syrian refugees. No way can we vet those people. Trump is correct, without borders we do not have a country. Sorry, I am not a globalist.