•
•

Should Hillary bother with the 3rd debate? (self.EnoughTrumpSpam)

duckandcover が 投稿

What's in it for her? I think, given where Donald did from the last debate through today, we would see more Trump shitshow. Nothing of substance. Maybe it would be more advantage of her to take a long interview talking about policy and state that she's doing it because such won't happen at a debate with Trump (leave the rest implicit)

全 6 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]oblommer 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would be an unbelievably bad decision to skip the debate. Trump would have 90 minutes to say whatever he wants! People would think she's trying to hide something.

[–]wondergoinanon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's a long game that you're not fully acknowledging here. It starts with solid debate and Miss Universe, parade of Clinton 'accusers' and solid debate, and ends with solid debate and ?!?

There's more to be gained than you think.

[–]B0000000BS 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think that she has a lot to gain from participating in another debate, but she has a lot to lose from skipping it. The story right now is on Donald Trump and all of his failings as a person and politician; the last thing Hillary Clinton wants to do is change the topic to "Hillary Clinton skips debate" and let the talking heads from both sides speculate as to why.

[–]HollowUkuleleChords [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

She should do the debate. She should answer questions about policy

[–]ajswdf [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I agree that the 3rd debate is a waste of time, but there's no way Clinton can be the one to skip it. It would make her look really bad.

[–]gogojack [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Can win if you don't show up.

What I'm really disappointed about is that unlike in the past, there's not one debate that focuses on just foreign policy. Trump is so far out of his depth on that front, and Clinton - while you may disagree with her policy - has gobs of experience.