全 11 件のコメント

[–]FindTheTruth08 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I havent read any of it or plan to(Except the risotto recipe one). Anything the Kremlin wants me to know, i don't care to.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wanna take you to a ...

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Zeno84 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's an admirable quality that I do not possess.

[–]Empigee 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

Nope. They're public figures, and I have no problem scrutinizing them, anymore than I would have a problem looking at leaked Trump documents.

[–]njmaverick[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

They're public figures, and I have no problem scrutinizing them

Some may be, but others just work for public figures.

[–]Empigee 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Still a matter of public interest given who they're working for.

[–]njmaverick[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Still a matter of public interest given who they're working for.

that could be said of nearly 90% of emails at work and a considerable number of private.

I don't believe that the public's interest in what is said in private emails should be the determining factor

[–]Empigee 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Actually, it needs to be the determining factor. Otherwise, every Trump, crooked politicians, and corrupt CEO will just hide his dirty dealings in the e-mails of his subordinates.

[–]njmaverick[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You seem to be conflating public interest versus public curiosity. When someone is in power they have certain transparency requirements. However, in the case of wikileaks there is not power or authority. These are private citizens who violated in a very personal manner not unlike a donald trump pussy grab

[–]UnclenilesI picked one helluva year to quit drinking 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Haven't read much of it. Despite the hysteria of The_FirstAmendmentPeople so far none of it has been worth the time it takes to read it.