I think at this point we should probably face it, people. I'd say it's a 50/50 chance that Bernie was just a pawn: a man with a good track record who was hired by the DNC to collect money from millenials that could then be turned over to the Clinton campaign.

And if he didn't know he was doing it, then I can almost guarantee you that is why the government was allowing Bernie to do it and why the media was backing him so vehemently earlier this year. It was to galvanize the greatest number of young voters and polarize them to the left.

Bernie's submission and the abrupt media about-face are being blamed on reactionism to Donald Trump--and again, I'm sure this is an overt motive--but the ulteriors suggest that this was calculated from the start, just as they gave Trump a chance so that he could draw votes away from other anti-establiishment candidates to pave the way for Jeb Bush.

The thing is, I think in both cases the establishment underestimated that wilfulness and pent-up anger of the population. Bernie nearly spiraled out of control, but fortunately his main opponent was an establishment candidate, and the establishment has engineering a 1v1 win in the bag.

Trump was a different story. After he made Jeb and Marco look like fools, there were only anti-establishment candidates running. At this point, I think that they actually selected the most outrageous candidate to win the nomination, making the easiest path to victory for Clinton, their establishment candidate.

At this point, they're pulling out a lot of stuff on trump that they were supposed to use to help Jeb win months ago, especially the hot mic scandalous recording that was provided by a member of the Bush family.

This logic is the only reason I want to vote Trump. Clearly Hillary is just the custodian of a narrative that will continue to disenfranchise the American people and accelerate the globalist agenda. I don't base that off of what she says, but what she does, and who is helping her do it.