@Nate_Cohn slay mamapic.twitter.com/2vwRtZeFcC
The RAND panel has Clinton+10 http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1758.html …
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn so add 10 to LAT for the right number? Just kidding. - その他の返信を表示
- さらに表示
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn You mean the one that every Trump supporter in the world is saying was the most accurate in 2012 because of LAT? -
@CabinetSpace@Nate_Cohn how is RAND. At HRC+10 but LAT shows tied? I thought they were the same thing? -
@em_div@Nate_Cohn LAT attempted to use the same methodology but they seem to weight differently and their panel is probably not good -
@CabinetSpace@Nate_Cohn ahhh. I thought LAT licensed and rebranded RAND. Not an attempt to replicate it. Thanks.
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn big deal or no? -
@aerospace5@Nate_Cohn they were real accurate last time. Last poll had it O +3.9 I believe. He won by around 4%
-
-
@Nate_Cohn even bigger news usc/la times has it tied! That's landslide time for Hillary -
@Nate_Cohn i will wait for Mr. Mitchell's statistical analysis. -
-
@Nate_Cohn so when people try to say LAT is the same as RAND and claim their results from 2012 vindicate the current LAT poll, they're lying - さらに表示
-
-
@Nate_Cohn LAT purports to benbased on the Rand model -
@Nate_Cohn in mid-September -
-
@Nate_Cohn Survey covered period before the first debate, when the race was, according to some pundits, tied. -
@SmiddyTime@Nate_Cohn That's the value of a panel survey (correctly done) -- filters out a lot of the noise.
-
-
@Nate_Cohn I think Sam already called this racehttps://twitter.com/plumazul/status/786209269767102464 … -
@Nate_Cohn The Who ? -
@Nate_Cohn surely you realize that this poll is old.... it started on Sept 12th and ended Sept 25th... ended 3 weeks ago!! Why post it!?!!?
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。