Transcript Gs

L. Blankfein Thank you(.) please close the doors and ensure you have no electronic recording devices of

1

any kind. Let me remind you that this discussion is under NDA. Today we are entering some

2

uncharted waters with global political instability and a barely-contained shadow-recession

3

domestically. We have always relied on partners in government and that is as true today as

4

it ever has been. Both our own internal research and Mrs. Clinton’s strategic intelligence

5

have identified emergent threats on the near-horizon.

6

Today Mrs. Clinton will discuss the possibility of domestic chaos in the coming national

7

election. I am exceptionally pleased to present former first lady and Secretary of State

8

Hillary CLINTON.

9

[ ((Applause)) ]

10

H. Clinton THANK YOU Lloyd (0.5) Friends



, distinguished members of Goldman Sachs, it is a great

11

pleasure to address you here today. (0.5) As you know we are in preparation for the 2016

12

presidential campaign and I am here both to ask for your support and to apprise you of

13

what we see on the horizon.

14

Gentlemen, ladies, I’m also going to be blunt and >to the point<: Our time is valuable.

15

Historically the Republican party has been the party most aligned with Wall Street and the

16

Financial Services industry. Today, however, that is no longer the case.

17

Our analysis indicates that the Republican establishment firewall barely held in 2012 and

18

this cycle you will be immensely lucky to see a candidate like Mitt Romney. Because of the

19

collapse of the control systems that gave us the 2012 field, derisively called the ‘clown car,’

20

we think that 2016 will be far, far worse.

21

You are more likely to see a nominee who is a general-election non-starter. You will be

22

lucky to get a Herman Cain. You might well see Scott Walker as the GOP nominee.

23

Gentlemen, Scott Walker?

24

(0.5)

25

What we see on the left is in its way more disconcerting. The early data suggests that while

26

the minority base is probably still dominated by the Democratic messaging, a coalition of

27

sub altern interests is forming that could, with an extremely weak Republican nominee,

28

create an aperture for either a 3

rd

Party Victory or, in essence, an election inflection point

29

where an insurgent candidate could actually co-opt (.) Take over (.) a major party.

30

This coalition, a collection of generally under-represented, low social capital individuals has

31

become increasingly networked and increasingly motivated. This group that our analysts

32

are calling the ((Makes air quotes)) bucket of losers could not only be a significant force in

33

the next election but (.) could, on an outside percentile, even win.

34

(Chaos)

35

I’m here today to speak with you about what we see as a narrow but existential threat to

36

the political-economic complex as we know it.

37

S. Smith A third-party? Really? We’re supposed to believe—

38

H. Clinton Hear me out. This isn’t politics as usual. Our attempts to create a better society, what our

39

detractors call ‘social engineering,’ have necessarily created several sub-groups as losers.

40

After all, prosperity for all (0.5) is prosperity for none



.

41

((Nods to agreeing MDs))

42

These groups are ((Raises fingers with each point)) NEETS, who are more numerous and

43

active in politics than ever, millennial-narcissists, and white-male-feminines.

44

C. Broderick =Feminists?=

45

H. Clinton =Feminines=. White males who exhibit traditionally feminine markers.

46

E. Cooper =Such as?=

47

H. Clinton ((Irritable look)) Such as the sub-culture self-described as ((Makes air-quotes)) bronies. Male

48

Millennials who are fans of the young girl’s cartoon My Little Pony, Friendship is Magic,

49

devoting social energy and capital to viewing, discussing, and dressing up as the non-

50

human characters.

51

E. Cooper >DRESSING UP



<

52

H. Clinton We understand there are (.) special outfits. Suits.

53

E. Cooper >And this is widespread?<

54

H. Clinton How many is too many?

55

E. Cooper Fair.

56

(Quiet Discussion All Around)

57

H. Clinton If these forces continue to grow and if they are allowed to continue networking and

58

communicating there is a possibility for the election of a completely ungoverned candidate.

59

M. Sherwood Ungoverned?

60

H. Clinton Yes. Potentially.

61

M. Sherwood Such as? Who are we talking about?

62

H. Clinton There could be a number of emergents from any quadrant. Right now our worst-case is Jill

63

Stein.

64

G Palm =Who?=

65

D. Solomon =Stein?=

66

R. Gnodde =No!=

67

H. Clinton ((Holding up hands for order)) =This is currently very unlikely.= Please(.)

68

L. Blankfein EVERYBODY

69

H. Clinton While it is incredibly unlikely that a democratic insurgent could overcome our selection

70

system, it is not impossible. A strong far-left candidate could gain purchase with many of

71

these losers creating a window of viability. It’s also possible that, in the general election, we

72

could see strong 3

rd

party candidates splitting votes, winning states, and so on. It’s even

73

possible that one of these could arise from the right (.) although our loyal opposition has

74

been rather efficient in destroying their Tea Party Insurgents.

75

D. Solomon What groups are in this-these-buckets of losers



Who are we dealing with?

76

H. Clinton There are three groups in the bucket. Firstly, the NEETs. These are people without social,

77

economic, or intellectual capital. They are often possessed with both a very poor self-image

78

and, paradoxically, a high degree of entitlement. They have nurtured a victim-mentality=

79

S. Smith =Well they have been victimized



=

80

H. Clinton =No. >Not in a traditional manner<. NEETs are societies’ drop-outs and they are largely

81

responsible for their own conditions. We should not be especially sympathetic to their

82

plight. They are usually angry, often involuntarily celibate, and yet believe themselves to be

83

the future of our nation.

84

(laughter)

85

H. Clinton The NEETs are represented with a Swarm Information-Pattern. They are active and

86

anonymous online and can self-coordinate in a way that could be problematic if there is a

87

potential ungoverned for them to align themselves with. Furthermore, they are, by being

88

extremely low-caste, un-shamed. This makes social control methods less useful against

89

them.

90

(General agreement)

91

H. Clinton Next are the Millennial-Narcissists. These are children of privilege such as Occupy Wall Street.

92

Almost entirely white save for some highly-valued token minorities, they are insulated from

93

the impact of a 3

rd

party vote due to their Caucasian-Male privilege. In other words, they can

94

afford to vote for disruption because their parents paid for the iPhones.

95

S. Smith

〫

Shit

〫

96

H. Clinton What?

97

S. Smith My daughter attends Brown. I just bought her a new iPhone. She’s pretty much a communist

98

politically.

99

H. Clinton ((Nods))

100

The MNs are dangerously hard to reach and influence. They don’t consume traditional

101

media. They have incredibly high expectations in terms of employment but they are the

102

next available labor pool.

103

R. Gnodde What about imports? We are bringing in the next generation.

104

Interests

Browse by

Transcript Gs

Documents similar to Transcript With Hillary Clinton and Senior Goldman Sachs Executives in 2014.pdf

Books similar to Transcript With Hillary Clinton and Senior Goldman Sachs Executives in 2014.pdf

Documents about Politics

Books about Republican Party (United States)

Audiobooks about Republican Party (United States)

Documents about Republican Party (United States)

Books about Political Party

Audiobooks about Political Party

Documents about Political Party

Books about Hillary Clinton