全 161 件のコメント

[–]TheabsolutemadladUSA 245ポイント246ポイント  (11子コメント)

Wasn't it confirmed that the Tampa Bay Times, who owns Politifact, fully endorsed Hillary?

[–]ArsenalITMAGA[S] 118ポイント119ポイント  (3子コメント)

[–]TheabsolutemadladUSA 45ポイント46ポイント  (2子コメント)

Pathetic! Shills are in every facet of the media.

[–]BillySearsOK 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

And yet people claim Politifact is unbiased!

[–]Bernie_wears_DependsCA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not even most shills will cite Politifact anymore. They have wholly discredited themselves this election cycle.

[–]TempAlt0AUS 54ポイント55ポイント  (3子コメント)

Whenever I mention this in /r/politics, the shills go silent. Then they post more Politi"""Fact""" articles anyway.

[–]flapsmcgeeNJ 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Fact is in the name. It has to be true.

[–]Obelisp 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

Always use FactTM Brand information for all your propaganda needs!

[–]coastdweller69CA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for subscribing to TrumpFacts!

[–]a_stale_pancake 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tampa Bay Times has endorsed every Democratic candidate for the last 20 years

[–]ePants 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The have literally never endorsed a Republican candidate (for a state governor or presidential election).

One of their current members of the board of editors (who choose the paper's stance and endorsements) is also a politifact "fact checker".

[–]cbdexpertMI 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

At this point what difference does it make?

[–]dudehatUSAF 64ポイント65ポイント  (2子コメント)

We all know about the media bias, your dumb fucking friends on Facebook don't. Share this shit.

[–]waalchastazoor 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

They're too retarded to even process reality at this stage.

[–]KangInTheNarthNY 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The second I say something about the corrupted Clintons, I'm immediately labelled a bigoted racist.

[–]ArsenalITMAGA[S] 276ポイント277ポイント  (26子コメント)

Seems like they need their "RECORD CORRECTED" considering they >>ENDORSED CLINTON<<. - Also read my recent posts, I have some real doozies regarding the Clinton's going after Bill's rape victims that most people have no idea actually verifiably happened.

[–]ForgototherpasswordMAGA 115ポイント116ポイント  (7子コメント)

[–]TheabsolutemadladUSA 41ポイント42ポイント  (1子コメント)

HOLY SHIT JUST TENDIES EVERYWHERE

[–]ScotchbroomWA 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

let the tendies hit the floor

[–]egotisticalnoob 10ポイント11ポイント  (2子コメント)

No support troops

Fair share

All people can't be do loopholes

How is fair?

IT'S. SO. POETIC.

[–]peachypootsMAGA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Parsley, sage, rosemary and whine.

[–]RabidRango 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't think it be like it is, but it do.

[–]Good_Behavior_DayMN 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

In light of this new information, Politifact updated their fact check to "Mostly False"

[–]Lets-MAGA-now 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

Politico is owned by a far leftist group and always lie and cover up for donkycrats

[–]ArsenalITMAGA[S] 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

*Politifact - Tampa Bay Times.

[–]kebabrossLTU 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who officially endorsed Hillary many moons ago

[–]canadianguy1234CAN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

did politifact endorse, or just their parent company?

[–]Pop_PsychologyUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (12子コメント)

Is this from a legit leak or the fake one?

[–]ArsenalITMAGA[S] 24ポイント25ポイント  (10子コメント)

The Legit Leak. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 <-- Don't click if you work for Govt.

*Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open Trade And Open Markets. *“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28]

[–]Pop_PsychologyUSA 7ポイント8ポイント  (9子コメント)

😨

If she wins we are so fucked.

[–]tom_turbine 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

Unlikely thankfully. The Republicans in the house are powerful enough to stymie her and the US (and the West) are likely to continue its shift towards anti-globalism and anti-leftism.

Likely scenario if she somehow """wins""" is two years of little action followed by Democrats getting demolished in the midterms like 2010 again, continued drift to the right, Democrats get obliterated to comical degree in 2020.

The serious damage she can do is on the Supreme Court but hopefully if she's foolish enough to try and appoint judges who don't believe in the constitution the Republicans will slap them down. That's something she has to be careful of, if she tries to overplay her hand and stack the court with justices who will try to destroy the first, second, and fourth amendments and the Republicans put their foot down and stop her that's a huge blow to her power and prestige. A strong Republican presence will likely moderate who she selects, even if she would like to appoint entirely screeching retarded anti-gunner transblack womyn judges she can't just put up someone who is entirely unfit for the job which anyone who doesn't believe in the second amendment automatically is.

[–]TrumpOP 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

The Executive has immense power. She will flood the country with illegals. It will be over. A Republican will never win again.

[–]John_Milller 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Won't get that far. We will have a civil war by then

[–]CrazyGrape 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's unlikely that there will be a civil war as long as nobody starves and entertainment is available to all.

[–]John_Milller -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

You just don't realize how close we are I guess.

[–]Danksgiving01 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF THE PURSE

[–]javrous 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think you need to look at the statistics coming out. The troubling numbers are for this election for Trump to win he needs all of the swing states and to take one from Hillary. Currently from a combination of polls Hillary is winning the swing states AND has Arizona that usually votes Republican. Along with Republican organisations in Arizona endorsing Hillary.

Another concerning factor is that 26% of people identify as Republican while 29% identify as Independent. Those numbers sound close but when you factor in that 42% Identify as Independent who mostly swing democrat.

Both Democrats and Republicans showed distrust within their established members while many republicans are still divided.

It's scary but it's a huge advantage to them right now.

[–]rollmefurther-bitchUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The only thing protecting her from jail right now is the incumbent Executive Branch.

She would be impeached in all likelihood. Huge huge congressional investigations, legislation to reverse crooked deals, etc. Looks like wheels are already churning for this, which is why they (DNC, incumbent dems, MSM) are so desperate.

[–]Serruptitious1 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Haha, not really. She will always be viewed as illegitimate anathema, she can't operate in a bi-partisan manner, which is irrelevant anyway because Republicans are set to own every god damned thing come January.

If anything, she is so fucked if she wins because the Republicans can sabotage the living shit out of her every initiative while saddling the blame for everything squarely on her shoulders. You know the game "congress did this"... bitch, nobody cares, you're the president.

You wanted to be president, now you're blaming men for everything? Typical woman. Everything is a man's fault.

She will be the most memed president ever and she will be paralyzed, ineffectual, tragic.

Or she can lose. I'm good with that, too.

[–]YronnoGA 49ポイント50ポイント  (0子コメント)

I rate Politifact as mostly false.

[–]kaduceus 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

My favorite politiFACT is the one where Bernie Sanders cites a statistic about black male youth unemployment and they rate it as "mostly true" and Trump cites the same statistic and they rate it as "mostly false"

[–]kicktripleUSA 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I loved it when they rated Sanders comment about white people don't know what it's like to be poor.

Oh wait, they never did

[–]peachypootsMAGA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If a statement is totally illogical and inherently nonsensical then it's impossible to test with preexisting citations.

[–]Darkred28TX 133ポイント134ポイント  (19子コメント)

DO YOU WANT A HETEROSEXUAL MALE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?!

[–]truthforchangeUSA 35ポイント36ポイント  (8子コメント)

Ewww. I'm triggered, bro.

[–]jacob253WA 11ポイント12ポイント  (7子コメント)

Sith male scum!

[–]Tuggy_TugboatUSA 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm fine with you attacking that hetero filth. But do not bring my religion into this!

[–]jacob253WA 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

My bad, thought sith was a race, not a religion.

[–]Imakepeoplecringe1 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you're being serious there technically was a species on star wars called sith

[–]jacob253WA 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's like jews, is it a race or a religion?!

[–]alittlecocoa 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sithophobic.

[–]jacob253WA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You haven't called me anything Hillary Clinton hasn't already called me.

[–]kebabrossLTU 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

LESBIAN WHITE FEMALE OR BUST AMIRITE

[–]FilthyPepperoniIN 17ポイント18ポイント  (4子コメント)

Agreed. I'll be damned if we have a WHITE MALE in the whites house. Deplorable.

[–]VierDeeOR 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, it was built by slaves so let's have a Saudi slave in there.

[–]egotisticalnoob 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Once we've had a black, there's just no going back!

[–]Tuggy_TugboatUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Back to black? Or back in general?

[–]egotisticalnoob 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I guess it could work either way, depending on which side you're on.

[–]Hiei1987 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump 2016: First heterosexual president of the US

[–]coralsnake 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

TBH, I don't care about sex or sexual orientation half so much as having somebody competent who will tell the truth.

I was an "against Hillary" type, until I saw the video and article about the press conference for the Miss Universe who gained so much weight.

Donald Trump saved his company and beauty queen from huge embarrassment by working out a win-win-win situation. He saved her job, he defended her, and he got a plan worked out to make her shine. Alicia Machado met her goals, and was in a position to prosper, after that.

What she did with her life after that was not so positive, and the Hillary Clinton Campaign laid an elaborate scheme to get her back into the public eye.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/30/fact-check-five-things-to-know-alicia-machado/

The Clinton Campaign's attempt to punish DJT for a good deed made me recognize that he has always had the kind of leadership capability that has been missing from the White House for so long.

Thanks, Hillary!

[–]FatalTypingAccident 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

and to think this could happen in the current year

[–]chipotlemcnuggies 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

haha this reminds me of Butter's (South Park) theory of Game of Thrones: they always show a flaccid penis or a gay erect penis, but never an erect penis of a straight man on the show because that would be too threatening

[–]TrueBlue41IN 122ポイント123ポイント  (19子コメント)

I trust politifact, they are a credible source with accurate info - every liberal cuck

[–]AnonPaul_DeviantartCA 49ポイント50ポイント  (13子コメント)

Always funny, considering Rachel Maddow did like 5 anti-PolitiFact segments before this election cycle.

[–]TrueBlue41IN 40ポイント41ポイント  (10子コメント)

my liberal friends say im crazy conspiracy theorist for saying i dont trust MSM

[–]drzealousUSA 17ポイント18ポイント  (2子コメント)

No, no. Why would they lie? They're experts!

[–]kebabrossLTU 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

They don't have teams of writers behind the scenes that are given paychecks by elite and foreign billionaires with a global agenda!

[–]Thanks-For_The-GoldCAN 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

The media is supported by citizens who care about the truth and pay* for unbiased** journalism!

*don't pay

**biased

[–]BangVamCA 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

You should kick your friends in the nuts.

[–]VierDeeOR 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Did you just gender them? What is your name?

[–]nekoexmachinaEU 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

according to modern progressives any gender can have balls, so he did not.

[–]mfdj2 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

My name is Hugh, Hugh Mungus.

[–]VierDeeOR 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

DID YOU JUST SEXUALLY HARASS ME?!?!?!

[–]ziegletCAN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have always called myself a liberal and same with the people I grew up with. I guess I missed the memo on sucking establishment dick though. So now I'm stuck in this basket with the likes of you fine folk (deplorables).

[–]sordfysh 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know many of you don't like Maddow's demeanor, but I think this is a great clip to watch and show your liberal friends.

https://youtu.be/6NRbCjzfPwo

Maddow is arguing that Politifact is run by the establishment Republicans. This explains why they would be so anti-Trump.

[–]renweard 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hit them in the face, listen to No Agenda podcast.

[–]notagayguy69 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

"But they have the word fact in the name, how could they be lying?" - a liberal genuinely said this to me before.

[–]DJT_MAGA_69ITL 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've been sneered at by performative conversational literalists for implying that there might be something slightly off kilter about "fact checking".

[–]VA_ALL_DAYVA 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've literally seen a comment on /policucks that went something like

If they don't even trust Politifact, you know there's a problem!

[–]TrueBlue41IN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

if you dont trust MSM lies then you know theres a problem

[–]ziegletCAN 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Snopes also confirms this to be entirely correct.

[–]zroxx2 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well, now we know why she didn't want and never intended to release these speech transcripts.

Her private policy positions are atrocious. And she's a serial liar when it comes to her policy goals.

[–]4thWay 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honestly, her PUBLIC positions are atrocious too.

[–]Gyorgy_Schwartz 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

Godammit, stop talking about this. Don't you care about what Trump said ten years ago?

[–]getinthechopper 26ポイント27ポイント  (4子コメント)

Well, call me a bigoted, Russian Nazi frog sympathizer, or whatever it is I'm supposed to be, but I'm beginning to think that Politifact might have an agenda.

[–]ArsenalITMAGA[S] 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, their owner endorsed Clinton. Literally.

[–]Main_man_mike 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Beginning? We found out months ago that they are owned by the Tampa bay times which endorsed Hilary Clinton.

[–]getinthechopper 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm being facetious.

[–]Main_man_mike 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sorry I'm a little hungover, now that I look at it it's painfully obvious.

[–]mtbwaltUSA 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Politifact is essentially a twin of CtR.

[–]HillarysCatheter 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

but but but but PoliFACT has fact in its name? Is being owned by Soros making some true facts more facty than others?

[–]CharlieDavyKWGA 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

And the Wikileaks are FAKE because the Clinton Administration says so.

[–]amsterdam_proUKR 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wikileaks are a Communist plot to steer the election by showing we were steering it.

[–]qa2PA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

BUT IT HAS FACT IN ITS NAME. ITS IMPOSSIBLE THEY WOULDNT BE TRUTHFUL BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE LYING. AND FACTS CANT LIE ABD THEY HAVE FACT IN THEIR NAME

[–]alphacentipedeUSA 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

she is such a fucking corrupt cunt.

[–]Huckleberry_Finnegan 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

AND YOU HAVE TO PAY HER 250K TO KNOW HER "PRIVATE" POLICY POSITIONS

[–]kicktripleUSA 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would be hilarious if in the next debate Trump opened his checkbook and said, "here is 250k. Now tell the world your private policy positions."

[–]ProtectTheWest 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why does anyone bother with politifact

[–]SuzookusSC 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

She never said TOTALLY open borders. I've seen her border control blue prints. There's a small speed hump near the border to slow traffic down near a cross walk and a short 4 foot Pickett fence to provide a nice stylish look. That's not TOTALLY open.

So yeah Trump is a total liar!

/s

[–]kicktripleUSA 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

And that speed bump is for pedestrians. She even has those bumpy sidewalk marker at the intersection for blind people. She is the best grandma

[–]VA_ALL_DAYVA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary would build a hand rail along the border.

[–]sky5walk 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Trump must mention this in the debate. But, we know he has private opinions now too. Difference is he apologized for the grab comment. If Hillary attempts to apologize for her "private" comments, he must ask her when she will return the speech money? hahaha

[–]qa2PA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

He needs to hammer on open borders and her globalist ideas which are now proven.

If the whole grope comments come up talk about Hillarys treatment towards bills victims

This debate will be tough especially with Anderson Cooper moderating. It shocks me that it's totally normal for a hardcore lefty to moderate a debate but if someone mentions bill o Reilly moderating its "OMG HES RIGHT WING GUYS!"

[–]LongLiveEuropeARMY 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

POLITIMOSTLYFALSE

[–]SacredMopheadSwegUK 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

What more do you expect from Politicucked?

[–]AHideyo23MAGA 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah sure that statement is false based on what she says in public, but we all know Hillary has private positions don't we??

[–]cheeeeeesePA 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

but their name is poltifact. what they say must be true

[–]Megabran 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Politifact should really check with Shillary's private positions before making fools of themselves.

[–]VA_ALL_DAYVA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tbf they just assumed her public positions we're her only positions, since they found the claim that Hillary lies to be

Absolutely Haram

[–]coralsnake 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It means they know where their pay comes from.

[–]Serruptitious1 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

You mean the shadow operative masquerading as an unbiased fact-checking organization?

At this point, I don't believe anybody who uses the phrases "debunk", "myth" or "fact" because I feel that it's all focus--group-tested manipulation tactics playing with perception.

I wonder how many "myths" need to be "RE-bunked" in order to set things right.

[–]TheManWhoPandersCAN 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well clearly Wikileaks is wrong here. Politifact is 100% pure accuracy, 100% of the time, as we know.

[–]bloodfoxtrueCHN 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This reminds me of the game 'charades' or 'password', where you do a hand motion to signify "opposite". At this point, I should take anything said by PolitiFact on Trump/Clinton to be reversed.

[–]United_States_Eagle 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

News Flash, polictfact, snopes, and any other 'fact' checking website don't do extensive research and claim anything false if they can't google search for it.

[–]OrganicVandal 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Her public position is no open borders. Her private position is open fucking borders.

[–]maga_nrg_man 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifuck.

'Fact' is the greatest misnomer ever.

[–]asiantrumpfanNY 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

How can bernie sanders supporters still support her?

[–]MadrassaLA 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

PolitiFact.. what an absolute complete joke of a "service". One of t he most dishonest liars out there - masquerading as truth.

Gotta love their stance of judge and jury spreading feel good validations out there.

[–]chckiFL 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's from her speech!

[–]AProgressiveNowNY 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

B R U T A L
R
U
T
A
L

[–]OldReaganDude 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifact is PolitiFALSE

[–]persistent_derp 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifacts = Politispins

[–]ThePooGuy2 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

MY TENDIES ARE ALL OVER THE FLOOR

I JUST CANT BELIEVE IT (I can)

HILLARY CLINTON LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

SAVE US GOD EMPEROR TRUMP

MAG A G A

[–]REEBUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Upupupup

[–]daddy8ballFL 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifact is just another election arm of the DNC.

[–]goonsackMAGA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

But who fact-checks the fact-checkers?

:)

[–]QuatrokingNLD 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifact doesn't check for truths, they just check if it fits the Clinton Narrative.

[–]MythArcana 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary changes her stances on issues like I change my pants. That goes for her Kreepy Kaine pick, as well.

[–]qa2PA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

What I absolutely can't stand is when liberals and even people in the media say "politifact rates Trump as 99% lies!!!"

[–]Profitigation 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politifact should have been called Politifiction Simple as that

[–]RedSocks157 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, they're totally gonna go back and fix this :P

[–]truthforchangeUSA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

When the meter goes all the way to the LEFT a dozen chickens cry out CUCK-A-DOODLE-DOOOOO! (and then they are sacrificed)

[–]ThanksInnAdvanceUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

They are bought and paid for. No more reasons to look to them for the truth.

[–]bigworldsmallbrainsPA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honestly... I'm confused.

[–]Ssjpower88MAGA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

another fake biased site that sold out just like nate plastic.

[–]SoFunnyLookinUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politico-crap..

[–]Djw245167VA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Poltifacts is complete garbage. I'm not into government regulations but there should be some type of measure to prevent organizations like this from hiding under the guise of being apart of the media. I know this could never happen because we have a department of justice that is completely politicized

[–]OhYesDaddyTX 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So if this gets posted on /r/politics what happens to it? Do mods just delete it or what?

[–]WorldlineAlpha 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You need to have a private and public position on policy, just like she needs a private and public server for her emails.

[–]PrincessRuri 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair, the fact check is dated to June 22nd, and the leak only happened yesterday.

[–]IamabioticgodVA -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

In theory is sounds viable. But right now its dangerous for the United States and we have much more to worry about before we can consider such a drastic global change