全 4 件のコメント

[–]ctcrnitv 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I like the literal definition. To me a person is a whore ONLY if they exchange sex for ulterior means (money, gifts, financial security, emotional control etc). Some might say that's most women, but that isn't the point. Being promiscuous isn't the same as being a whore, the element of exchanging sex for something else makes the difference.

A woman could have sex with only 1 guy for money, and to me she is automatically whore even if it's just one guy. A woman who has sex with 40 guys because she likes sex, is sexually promiscuous and I'd stay away for other reasons but not because she's a whore.

[–]FanofLemmy[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I like that answer. I never thought of it that way, either. I need to reevaluate my thoughts on this. I wish I worked with some MGTOW guys, unfortunately the gym is full of manginas and pussy worshipping betas. The thirst is real.

[–]oldredder [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No solid conditions - any number of conditions that branch in different directions are all qualified

[–]good_man_gone [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It doesent take a genius to figure it out. All women want is dicks and nice things which they dont like paying for. So either you provide or fuck or both.