Who will win the presidency?
Who’d Who would win the presidency today?
Hillary Clinton
63.3%
Donald Trump
36.7%
Electoral votes
Electoral votes
Hillary Clinton
Clinton
292.6
Donald Trump
Trump
245.1
Gary Johnson
Johnson
0.3
Popular vote
Hillary Clinton
Clinton
46.8%
Donald Trump
Trump
44.1%
Gary Johnson
Johnson
7.8%
# How the odds have changed
We'll be updating our forecasts every time new data is available, every day through Nov. 8.
# Who’s ahead in each state and by how much
Our win probabilities come from simulating the election 10,000 times, which produces a distribution of possible outcomes for each state. Here are the expected margins of victory. The closer the dot is to the center line, the tighter the race. And the wider the bar, the less certain the model is about the outcome.
Key
Average
80% chance outcome falls in this range
Our latest coverage
# It’s all about the 538 Electoral College votes
Here's a map of the country, with each state sized by its number of electoral votes and shaded by the leading candidate's chance of winning it.
Key
50%
60
70
80
90
Clinton's chances
Trump's chances
One electoral vote
# The winding path to 270 electoral votes
A candidate needs at least 270 electoral votes to clinch the White House. Here's where the race stands, with the states ordered by the projected margin between the candidates — Clinton’s strongest states are farthest left, Trump’s farthest right — and sized by the number of electoral votes they will award.
A candidate needs at least 270 electoral votes to clinch the White House. Here's where the race stands, with the states ordered by the projected margin between the candidates — Clinton’s strongest states are at the top, Trump’s at the bottom — and sized by the number of electoral votes they will award.
One electoral vote
# How much each state matters
Two measures help capture how important a state and its voters will be in determining the next president: “Tipping-point chance” is the probability that a state will provide the decisive vote in the Electoral College. “Voter power index” is the relative likelihood that an individual voter in a state will determine the Electoral College winner.
Tipping-point chance
Florida | 18.2% |
Pennsylvania | 11.1% |
Michigan | 10.0% |
North Carolina | 9.5% |
Ohio | 8.6% |
Colorado | 6.8% |
Virginia | 5.1% |
Wisconsin | 5.0% |
Minnesota | 5.0% |
Nevada | 2.9% |
New Hampshire | 2.7% |
Georgia | 2.1% |
Arizona | 1.7% |
Iowa | 1.5% |
New Mexico | 1.3% |
Illinois | 0.9% |
New Jersey | 0.8% |
Rhode Island | 0.8% |
Washington | 0.7% |
Oregon | 0.7% |
Maine - statewide | 0.7% |
Delaware | 0.5% |
Texas | 0.5% |
South Carolina | 0.4% |
Connecticut | 0.4% |
Montana | 0.3% |
Nebraska 2nd District | 0.3% |
Maine 2nd District | 0.2% |
Alaska | 0.2% |
Mississippi | 0.2% |
Missouri | 0.1% |
Indiana | <0.1% |
Kansas | <0.1% |
South Dakota | <0.1% |
Louisiana | <0.1% |
Maine 1st District | <0.1% |
Kentucky | <0.1% |
Nebraska 1st District | <0.1% |
Utah | <0.1% |
New York | <0.1% |
North Dakota | <0.1% |
Tennessee | <0.1% |
Arkansas | <0.1% |
Massachusetts | <0.1% |
Nebraska - statewide | <0.1% |
Alabama | <0.1% |
California | <0.1% |
West Virginia | <0.1% |
Vermont | <0.1% |
Oklahoma | <0.1% |
Idaho | <0.1% |
Maryland | <0.1% |
Hawaii | <0.1% |
Wyoming | <0.1% |
Nebraska 3rd District | <0.1% |
District of Columbia | <0.1% |
Voter power index
New Hampshire | 4.9 |
Nevada | 3.5 |
Colorado | 3.3 |
Michigan | 2.8 |
North Carolina | 2.7 |
Florida | 2.6 |
Pennsylvania | 2.6 |
Rhode Island | 2.4 |
New Mexico | 2.3 |
Minnesota | 2.2 |
Wisconsin | 2.2 |
Ohio | 2.0 |
Virginia | 1.7 |
Delaware | 1.7 |
Nebraska 2nd District | 1.4 |
Maine - statewide | 1.3 |
Iowa | 1.2 |
Alaska | 1.0 |
Maine 2nd District | 1.0 |
Arizona | 0.9 |
Montana | 0.8 |
Georgia | 0.7 |
Oregon | 0.5 |
Connecticut | 0.3 |
New Jersey | 0.3 |
Washington | 0.3 |
South Carolina | 0.3 |
Illinois | 0.2 |
Nebraska 1st District | 0.2 |
Mississippi | 0.2 |
South Dakota | 0.2 |
Vermont | 0.1 |
Maine 1st District | 0.1 |
Kansas | 0.1 |
Texas | <0.1 |
Missouri | <0.1 |
Hawaii | <0.1 |
Indiana | <0.1 |
Tennessee | <0.1 |
West Virginia | <0.1 |
Louisiana | <0.1 |
Nebraska 3rd District | <0.1 |
New York | <0.1 |
California | <0.1 |
Utah | <0.1 |
Kentucky | <0.1 |
North Dakota | <0.1 |
Arkansas | <0.1 |
Massachusetts | <0.1 |
Nebraska - statewide | <0.1 |
Alabama | <0.1 |
Oklahoma | <0.1 |
Idaho | <0.1 |
Maryland | <0.1 |
Wyoming | <0.1 |
District of Columbia | <0.1 |
# What to expect from the Electoral College
In each of our simulations, we forecast the states and note the number of electoral votes each candidate wins. That gives us a distribution for each candidate, where the tallest bar is the outcome that occurred most frequently.
Swipe for state forecasts →
# Who’s winning the popular vote
Our model produces a distribution of outcomes for the national popular vote. The curves will get narrower as the election gets closer and our forecasts become more confident.
Key
Average
80% chance outcome falls in this range
# Crazy and not-so-crazy scenarios
Here are the chances we’ll see these election outcomes.
| Electoral College deadlock no candidate gets 270 electoral votes | 0.7% |
| Recount at least one decisive state within 0.5 ppt | 7.6% |
| Clinton wins popular vote | 69.9% |
| Trump wins popular vote | 30.1% |
| Clinton wins popular vote but loses Electoral College | 7.6% |
| Trump wins popular vote but loses Electoral College | 1.0% |
| Johnson wins at least one electoral vote | 2.2% |
| Clinton majority wins at least 50 percent of the vote | 16.8% |
| Trump majority wins at least 50 percent of the vote | 4.0% |
| Clinton landslide double-digit popular vote margin | 8.4% |
| Trump landslide double-digit popular vote margin | 1.5% |
| Map exactly the same as in 2012 | 0.5% |
| Clinton wins at least one state Mitt Romney won in 2012 | 63.0% |
| Trump wins at least one state President Obama won in 2012 | 81.8% |
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Poll results aggregated from HuffPost Pollster, RealClearPolitics, polling firms and news reports.
Forecast models by Nate Silver. Research by Jennifer Kanjana and Dhrumil Mehta. Design and development by Jay Boice, Aaron Bycoffe, Matthew Conlen, Reuben Fischer-Baum, Ritchie King, Ella Koeze, Allison McCann, Andrei Scheinkman and Gus Wezerek. Candidate portraits by Kristina Micotti. Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
51.5%
Donald Trump
48.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
71.5%
Donald Trump
28.4%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
74.0%
Donald Trump
26.0%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
47.6%
Donald Trump
52.4%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
42.8%
Donald Trump
57.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
66.7%
Donald Trump
33.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
79.8%
Donald Trump
20.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
74.8%
Donald Trump
25.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
76.1%
Donald Trump
23.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
50.7%
Donald Trump
49.3%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
67.7%
Donald Trump
32.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
19.8%
Donald Trump
80.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
27.8%
Donald Trump
72.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
36.3%
Donald Trump
63.7%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
83.7%
Donald Trump
14.7%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
95.1%
Donald Trump
4.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
90.9%
Donald Trump
9.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
86.8%
Donald Trump
13.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
93.7%
Donald Trump
6.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
91.0%
Donald Trump
8.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
73.9%
Donald Trump
26.0%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
*Maine awards two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one to the winner of each congressional district. We’ve forecast each contest: StatewideDistrict 1District 2
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
84.7%
Donald Trump
15.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
7.0%
Donald Trump
92.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
7.5%
Donald Trump
92.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
92.5%
Donald Trump
7.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
11.6%
Donald Trump
88.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
15.1%
Donald Trump
84.4%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
2.9%
Donald Trump
97.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
10.1%
Donald Trump
89.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
5.5%
Donald Trump
94.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
6.7%
Donald Trump
93.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.1%
Donald Trump
98.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
99.7%
Donald Trump
0.3%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
9.6%
Donald Trump
90.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
99.0%
Donald Trump
1.0%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
2.2%
Donald Trump
97.7%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
96.1%
Donald Trump
3.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
99.4%
Donald Trump
0.6%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.1%
Donald Trump
98.9%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.6%
Donald Trump
98.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.9%
Donald Trump
98.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
5.7%
Donald Trump
94.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.4%
Donald Trump
98.6%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
99.7%
Donald Trump
0.2%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
0.8%
Donald Trump
99.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
98.5%
Donald Trump
1.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
1.4%
Donald Trump
98.5%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
2.4%
Donald Trump
97.6%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
*Nebraska awards two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one to the winner of each congressional district. We’ve forecast each contest: StatewideDistrict 1District 2District 3
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
0.4%
Donald Trump
99.6%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
>99.9%
Donald Trump
<0.1%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Hillary Clinton
0.4%
Donald Trump
99.6%
Projected vote share over time
Chances over time
← Swipe for more forecasts →
Our latest coverage
How this forecast works
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2016 general election forecast. Read more …
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
National polls
Our model is mostly based on state polls, but national polls inform various steps of its calculations, such as the trend line adjustment, house effects adjustment and demographic regression.
Our latest coverage
From polls to an adjusted average
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.
Updates
We update our forecast with new polls as they are released. Here are the polls we added in each update. So far we’ve collected 2,070 state and national polls.
Key
= New
A = ALL ADULTS
RV = REGISTERED VOTERS
LV = LIKELY VOTERS
V = VOTERS
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 3:47 p.m. EDT
| POLLSTER | GRADE | SAMPLE | Clinton | Trump | Johnson | LEADER | ADJUSTED LEADER | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | California | Sep. 27-28 | SurveyUSA | A | 723 | LV | 59% | 33% | 3% | Clinton +26 | Clinton +26 |
| • | New Hampshire | Sep. 25-27 | GBA Strategies | B | 600 | LV | 43% | 37% | 11% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +5 |
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 1:53 p.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 26-28 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,698 | LV | 42% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +3 | |
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 9:20 a.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 26-28 | Rasmussen/ | C+ | 1,500 | LV | 42% | 41% | 7% | Clinton +1 | Clinton +3 |
| • | South Carolina | Sep. 18-26 | Winthrop University | 475 | LV | 38% | 42% | Trump +4 | Trump +5 | ||
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 8:07 a.m. | |||||||||||
| • | Florida | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 826 | LV | 45% | 43% | 3% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
| • | North Carolina | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 861 | LV | 44% | 42% | 7% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
| • | Virginia | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 811 | LV | 46% | 40% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +6 |
| • | Colorado | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 694 | LV | 46% | 40% | 6% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +6 |
| • | National | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 933 | LV | 44% | 40% | 6% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +4 |
| • | Pennsylvania | Sep. 27-28 | Public Policy Polling | B+ | 886 | LV | 45% | 39% | 6% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +6 |
| • | National | Sep. 22-28 | USC Dornsife/ | 2,631 | LV | 43% | 47% | Trump +4 | Clinton +1 | ||
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 8:58 p.m. | |||||||||||
| • | Michigan | Sep. 27 | Mitchell Research & Communications | D | 1,956 | LV | 46% | 41% | 8% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +5 |
| • | National | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 19,273 | LV | 37% | 35% | 8% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 7:23 p.m. | |||||||||||
| • | Missouri | Sep. 26-27 | Remington | 1,279 | LV | 39% | 49% | 5% | Trump +10 | Trump +10 | |
| • | National | Sep. 25-27 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,449 | LV | 43% | 38% | 8% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | Washington | Sep. 25-27 | Emerson College | B | 700 | LV | 44% | 38% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +8 |
| • | Nebraska | Sep. 25-26 | Emerson College | B | 700 | LV | 29% | 56% | 7% | Trump +26 | Trump +25 |
| • | Nebraska’s 3rd District | Sep. 25-26 | Emerson College | B | 700 | LV | 20% | 65% | Trump +45 | Trump +43 | |
| • | Nebraska’s 1st District | Sep. 25-26 | Emerson College | B | 700 | LV | 29% | 53% | Trump +24 | Trump +22 | |
| • | Nebraska’s 2nd District | Sep. 25-26 | Emerson College | B | 700 | LV | 40% | 49% | Trump +9 | Trump +7 | |
| • | National | Sep. 24-26 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,489 | LV | 43% | 39% | 7% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | Utah | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 153 | LV | 22% | 32% | 17% | Trump +10 | Trump +11 |
| • | Nebraska | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 207 | LV | 29% | 38% | 5% | Trump +9 | Trump +9 |
| • | California | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 1,311 | LV | 45% | 30% | 6% | Clinton +15 | Clinton +15 |
| • | Idaho | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 144 | LV | 23% | 46% | 9% | Trump +24 | Trump +24 |
| • | Maine | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 75 | LV | 36% | 29% | 17% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +8 |
| • | Connecticut | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 291 | LV | 38% | 32% | 8% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +6 |
| • | Wisconsin | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 672 | LV | 41% | 28% | 7% | Clinton +13 | Clinton +13 |
| • | Kentucky | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 320 | LV | 33% | 35% | 7% | Trump +3 | Trump +3 |
| • | New York | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 931 | LV | 43% | 29% | 5% | Clinton +13 | Clinton +13 |
| • | Oregon | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 347 | LV | 44% | 29% | 6% | Clinton +15 | Clinton +15 |
| • | Louisiana | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 221 | LV | 31% | 46% | 5% | Trump +15 | Trump +15 |
| • | New Hampshire | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 39 | LV | 40% | 39% | 5% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
| • | Maryland | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 349 | LV | 41% | 29% | 7% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +12 |
| • | District of Columbia | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 52 | LV | 67% | 15% | 0% | Clinton +51 | Clinton +51 |
| • | Ohio | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 737 | LV | 32% | 35% | 9% | Trump +3 | Trump +3 |
| • | Massachusetts | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 399 | LV | 50% | 23% | 7% | Clinton +27 | Clinton +27 |
| • | Florida | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 956 | LV | 34% | 41% | 6% | Trump +7 | Trump +7 |
| • | Delaware | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 90 | LV | 26% | 23% | 12% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +3 |
| • | Hawaii | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 82 | LV | 42% | 22% | 12% | Clinton +21 | Clinton +21 |
| • | Minnesota | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 547 | LV | 37% | 28% | 9% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +9 |
| • | Tennessee | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 449 | LV | 25% | 48% | 7% | Trump +22 | Trump +22 |
| • | Iowa | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 362 | LV | 36% | 30% | 11% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +6 |
| • | Georgia | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 441 | LV | 32% | 39% | 8% | Trump +8 | Trump +8 |
| • | New Mexico | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 194 | LV | 38% | 26% | 17% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +12 |
| • | West Virginia | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 100 | LV | 31% | 40% | 7% | Trump +10 | Trump +10 |
| • | Pennsylvania | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 734 | LV | 35% | 36% | 9% | Trump +1 | Trump +1 |
| • | South Carolina | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 319 | LV | 28% | 46% | 5% | Trump +17 | Trump +18 |
| • | Montana | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 147 | LV | 32% | 36% | 6% | Trump +4 | Trump +4 |
| • | Washington | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 510 | LV | 43% | 25% | 10% | Clinton +18 | Clinton +18 |
| • | North Carolina | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 613 | LV | 33% | 41% | 6% | Trump +9 | Trump +9 |
| • | Vermont | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 56 | LV | 48% | 28% | 0% | Clinton +20 | Clinton +20 |
| • | Arkansas | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 131 | LV | 28% | 46% | 4% | Trump +17 | Trump +17 |
| • | Arizona | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 494 | LV | 38% | 34% | 11% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +4 |
| • | Mississippi | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 172 | LV | 25% | 52% | 4% | Trump +27 | Trump +27 |
| • | Nevada | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 173 | LV | 34% | 34% | 10% | Tie | Trump +1 |
| • | Illinois | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 933 | LV | 37% | 30% | 6% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +6 |
| • | Wyoming | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 55 | LV | 18% | 46% | 12% | Trump +28 | Trump +28 |
| • | Virginia | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 546 | LV | 40% | 32% | 8% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +8 |
| • | Oklahoma | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 163 | LV | 23% | 36% | 14% | Trump +13 | Trump +13 |
| • | Alaska | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 67 | LV | 28% | 38% | 10% | Trump +9 | Trump +9 |
| • | Rhode Island | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 57 | LV | 42% | 23% | 6% | Clinton +19 | Clinton +19 |
| • | Kansas | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 252 | LV | 43% | 31% | 9% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +12 |
| • | Indiana | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 568 | LV | 36% | 33% | 11% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +3 |
| • | Colorado | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 530 | LV | 37% | 31% | 10% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +5 |
| • | North Dakota | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 61 | LV | 27% | 49% | 15% | Trump +23 | Trump +23 |
| • | Michigan | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 516 | LV | 37% | 30% | 8% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +7 |
| • | Missouri | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 560 | LV | 34% | 32% | 9% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
| • | Alabama | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 361 | LV | 29% | 48% | 5% | Trump +19 | Trump +19 |
| • | South Dakota | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 86 | LV | 29% | 31% | 12% | Trump +2 | Trump +2 |
| • | New Jersey | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 605 | LV | 38% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +2 | Clinton +2 |
| • | Texas | Sep. 21-26 | Google Consumer Surveys | B | 1,003 | LV | 30% | 42% | 8% | Trump +12 | Trump +12 |
| • | National | Sep. 23-25 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,407 | LV | 42% | 39% | 7% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 22-24 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,251 | LV | 42% | 39% | 7% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 21-23 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,161 | LV | 42% | 38% | 9% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Sep. 20-22 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,182 | LV | 42% | 38% | 8% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Sep. 19-21 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,292 | LV | 41% | 40% | 8% | Clinton +1 | Trump +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 18-20 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,353 | LV | 42% | 41% | 7% | Clinton +1 | Trump +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 17-19 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,376 | LV | 42% | 40% | 7% | Clinton +2 | Tie | |
| • | National | Sep. 16-18 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,378 | LV | 42% | 39% | 8% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 15-17 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,468 | LV | 42% | 38% | 8% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Sep. 14-16 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,557 | LV | 42% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Sep. 13-15 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,704 | LV | 43% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +4 | |
| • | National | Sep. 12-14 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,627 | LV | 44% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Sep. 11-13 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,612 | LV | 44% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Sep. 10-12 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,797 | LV | 44% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Sep. 9-11 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,121 | LV | 43% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Sep. 8-10 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,317 | LV | 43% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Sep. 7-9 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,043 | LV | 43% | 38% | 8% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Sep. 6-8 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,780 | LV | 42% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Sep. 5-7 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,327 | LV | 42% | 35% | 9% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +4 | |
| • | National | Sep. 4-6 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,094 | LV | 43% | 34% | 9% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +6 | |
| • | National | Aug. 30-Sep. 1 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,097 | LV | 43% | 34% | 9% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Aug. 29-31 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,267 | LV | 42% | 35% | 10% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Aug. 28-30 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,429 | LV | 41% | 36% | 9% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 27-29 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,009 | LV | 42% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 26-28 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,024 | LV | 43% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Aug. 25-27 | The Times-Picayune/ | 3,231 | LV | 42% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 24-26 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,565 | LV | 42% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Aug. 23-25 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,903 | LV | 41% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +4 | Tie | |
| • | National | Aug. 22-24 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,703 | LV | 41% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +4 | Tie | |
| • | National | Aug. 21-23 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,178 | LV | 43% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Aug. 20-22 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,842 | LV | 42% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 19-21 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,836 | LV | 44% | 35% | 7% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +4 | |
| • | National | Aug. 18-20 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,362 | LV | 42% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 17-19 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,357 | LV | 44% | 35% | 8% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +4 | |
| • | National | Aug. 16-18 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,359 | LV | 44% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Aug. 15-17 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,690 | LV | 43% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 14-16 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,695 | LV | 45% | 35% | 8% | Clinton +10 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Aug. 13-15 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,702 | LV | 45% | 36% | 7% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +4 | |
| • | National | Aug. 12-14 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,390 | LV | 46% | 33% | 7% | Clinton +13 | Clinton +8 | |
| • | National | Aug. 11-13 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,386 | LV | 44% | 36% | 8% | Clinton +8 | Clinton +3 | |
| • | National | Aug. 10-12 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,395 | LV | 43% | 37% | 9% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Aug. 9-11 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,416 | LV | 44% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +7 | Clinton +2 | |
| • | National | Aug. 8-10 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,417 | LV | 47% | 35% | 6% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +7 | |
| • | National | Aug. 7-9 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,891 | LV | 49% | 33% | 7% | Clinton +16 | Clinton +11 | |
| • | National | Aug. 6-8 | The Times-Picayune/ | 3,443 | LV | 48% | 34% | 6% | Clinton +14 | Clinton +9 | |
| • | National | Aug. 5-7 | The Times-Picayune/ | 3,441 | LV | 48% | 35% | 7% | Clinton +13 | Clinton +8 | |
| • | National | Aug. 4-6 | The Times-Picayune/ | 2,947 | LV | 47% | 35% | 6% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +7 | |
| • | National | Aug. 3-5 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,359 | LV | 46% | 34% | 7% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +7 | |
| • | National | Aug. 2-4 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,321 | LV | 46% | 34% | 6% | Clinton +12 | Clinton +7 | |
| • | National | Aug. 1-3 | The Times-Picayune/ | 1,363 | LV | 45% | 35% | 6% | Clinton +10 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Aug. 1-2 | The Times-Picayune/ | 912 | LV | 45% | 35% | 6% | Clinton +10 | Clinton +5 | |
| • | National | Aug. 1 | The Times-Picayune/ | 490 | LV | 45% | 36% | 6% | Clinton +9 | Clinton +4 | |
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 2:06 p.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 26-27 | Echelon Insights | 1,529 | LV | 44% | 39% | 6% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +5 | |
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 10:49 a.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 21-27 | CVOTER International | C+ | 1,239 | LV | 48% | 48% | Tie | Clinton +1 | |
| • | National | Sep. 20-26 | CVOTER International | C+ | 1,174 | LV | 47% | 48% | Tie | Clinton +1 | |
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 9:08 a.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 26-27 | Morning Consult | 1,253 | LV | 41% | 38% | 8% | Clinton +3 | Clinton +3 | |
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 7:11 a.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 21-27 | USC Dornsife/ | 2,673 | LV | 43% | 47% | Trump +4 | Tie | ||
Tuesday, Sept. 27, at 6:49 p.m. | |||||||||||
| • | National | Sep. 22-26 | Ipsos | A- | 1,041 | LV | 43% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +5 | Clinton +5 |
| • | National | Sep. 21-25 | Ipsos | A- | 1,044 | LV | 44% | 38% | 6% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +5 |
| • | National | Sep. 20-24 | Ipsos | A- | 1,076 | LV | 43% | 37% | 7% | Clinton +6 | Clinton +5 |
| • | National | Sep. 19-23 | Ipsos | A- | 1,122 | LV | 40% | 37% | 8% | Clinton +4 | Clinton +3 |
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 3:47 p.m. EDT
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 1:53 p.m. EDT
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 9:20 a.m. EDT
Thursday, Sept. 29, at 8:07 a.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 8:58 p.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 7:23 p.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 2:06 p.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 10:49 a.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 9:08 a.m. EDT
Wednesday, Sept. 28, at 7:11 a.m. EDT
Tuesday, Sept. 27, at 6:49 p.m. EDT
Have thoughts on our forecast? Notice any bugs or missing polls? Send us an email.