28
29

Spiffy!Convincing breakdown of Clinton using hand signals to communicate with Lester Holt during the debate. (youtube.com)

basedOp が 投稿

全 12 件のコメント
並べ替え:
新着 (提案されたアイデア)
ベストトップ論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Verum_DiceturLet robust discourse bring us full circle. 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Thanks for putting this together basedOp! Your efforts are commendable!

It is a crying shame that you, me, and so many others have had no choice but to turn reporters and investigators given the HIGH TREASON that is being committed by a good portion of the mass media. Lying is in season across the fourth estate that is no more.

In fact, even the FBI is fully compromised per their shameful Director. The rot, the misinformation, and thieving has reached unimaginable proportions.

Sadly, all too many that understand and know what has happened in their department, at their offices, at their institutions are afraid to speak up given real and immediate retaliation that will come their way. That notwithstanding, as free Americans, I urge you to gather with similarly minded citizens/patriots and come forward to expose this filthy house of cards. Reach out to members of Congress and other authorities that are NOT compromised, and defend your country.

Sadly, none of this is surprising to me. In fact, I would not be shocked if the questions to be asked were given to the former SoS long before the debate started. She seemed to be busily reading and hiding some notes all during the debate.

It is despicable, it is an attack on American society, and YES, it is high treason what has been happening this political season. No, this is not an overstatement or an exaggeration. The MSM has been fully complicit in the destruction of our democracy. The thievery, the deceit, the lying and all manner of manipulations is all too clear to see and has been on full display over the past year or so.

Under the premise that, "the buck stops here", all of this goes back to the sitting POTUS. Yes, Obama, the hope and change fraud needs to be held accountable. Yes, the same man that directly critized his predecessor for not having any presence when needed most relative to hurricane Katrina and the crisis in New Orleans.

Yet, only a scant number of weeks ago, this very same person failed to cut his vacation short and was not at all interested in supporting the families that were impacted with major floods in Louisiana. His T-time on the golf course was by far more important than doing his job. But all we hear from HRC and other Democrats is about protecting his ridiculous legacy.

Sit back and ask yourselves, what is Obama's legacy?

[–]NetWeaselSCContinuing the Struggle 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

treason bot activated.

the HIGH TREASON that is being committed by a good portion of the mass media.

Sorry, not treason. Treason is specifically defined in the Constitution, for good reason. There are plenty of other words that are more accurate in that context.

[–]Verum_DiceturLet robust discourse bring us full circle. 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

I understand your point fully. Thanks for your note. Allow me to expand and clarify.

What I also know is that this very same term start with a loss of TRUST.

Once that happens, then the outcome IMHO is a given. That said, how much TRUST is there in the fabulous mass media? How much TRUST is there is the institutions that are supposed to be working on behalf of the American people and on living up to the principles clearly defined in the Constitution.

The use of specific words only serve to denote the dangerous times that we all live in. I only hope that the American people are seriously paying attention.

[–]NetWeaselSCContinuing the Struggle 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

It has somehow fallen to me to protect that word from misuse. Also, "treason" seems to be only committable against the Government, not the People. And the offence of media is more against the People.

OTOH, Hillary seems to be wanting to redefine cyberattacks as "warfare," which could raise domestic hacking [of the government] to actual real "treason" levels. Add in a touch of "l'etat, c'est moi," and you've got a real problem.

[–]Verum_DiceturLet robust discourse bring us full circle. -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

While I fully compliment you and ALL the other moderators, given all of your hard work and dedicated support, I surely do not envy you.

What you do, and do so very well, is really a tough job. Many thanks! :) I know that I personally could not do it.

I understand and fully get the semantics involved. ;) Hummm, I can only wonder what Jefferson would say about all of this if he were alive to see all of offer commentary? And, I ask, which came first, THE PEOPLE, or the government? No response needed. ;) I may have to start my very own newspaper. LOL

When it comes to HRC, it starts and ends right there for obvious reason. SHE seems to represent and own all branches and institutions of government, etc, etc.

On a side note, in light of the drama right in front of us, who needs Game of Thrones. I have stopped watching the old episodes because the "Games" at hand are just as exciting.

As you know, long before darkness overcomes, very many will surely rise. Have a great day!

[–]BerningforchangeStay strong! We are winning. 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I see this. I thought the finger thing was weird at the time. Now, maybe it was a signal. Did she do this during the primary debates? I don't remember seeing that. I'll look for it during the next debate for sure.

[–]martini-meow(I remain stirred, unshaken.) 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I saw a still frame of end of debate, guy at her podium picking something up. Havent checked footage. Was he grabbing her cheat sheet to disappear it?

[–]crimelab_inc 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty convincing, IMO. The main thing that gets me is that each time she does the face rub it seems so purposeful and contrived. It doesn't seem like she is actually scratching an itch, but literally sending a signal. A couple of times she looks to somebody down to her left when she does it. I'd like to know who was sitting down there.

The thing that got me before seeing this video was how Holt would ask Trump personal/scandal questions trying to get a rise out of him, while asking Hillary straight policy questions allowing her to ramble on with pre-canned speeches.

[–]Rockerouter 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Given the amount of collusion Clinton and the media have proven to have during the primaries, this isn't out of the realm of possibility.

[–]jlalbrechtjailbreak 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is pretty convincing. However, the argument would much more convincing if:

  • These were the only times she scratched (actually rubbed) her face; and/or

  • She got a softball back to her and gave a zinger without rubbing her face.

Were either of these the case? If so especially if both, then it is extremely convincing.

[–]kybarnet 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Like it!

[–]TotesMessenger 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)