Trump Won Putin’s Focus Group
Judging from Russia’s state-sponsored Twitter coverage of the presidential debate, the Kremlin is anything but a swing state.
- By Julia IoffeJulia Ioffe is a contributing writer at the New York Times Magazine. She was a senior editor at the New Republic and was the Moscow correspondent for Foreign Policy and the New Yorker from 2009 to 2012.
-
A record number of Americans tuned to watch the debate on Monday night, but someone else was watching, too: the Kremlin media machine. It was the middle of the night in Russia, but the tweets kept coming, making it clear, as always, whose side the Kremlin is on in this election. At the very least, it shows exactly how smoothly Donald Trump’s policy positions dovetail with Moscow’s. Read between the lines, and it also shows what the Kremlin thinks about Hillary Clinton.
Here is a small sampling from the accounts of Kremlin-owned media.
Трамп: США не должны быть мировым полицейскимhttps://t.co/gq39CUB8U9
— Известия (@izvestia_ru) September 27, 2016
“Trump: USA Shouldn’t Be World’s Policeman”
In the U.S., we call it being the “world’s policeman.” Putin calls it a “unipolar world,” and he’s been inveighing against America’s role — as policeman, as sole pole — for most of his rule. Now, one of the two people who will be president in January is saying it for him.
Трамп заявил, что ядерный потенциал России мощнее американскогоhttps://t.co/LV8a6PcQoM
© AP pic.twitter.com/pexWlGMwPu— РИА Новости (@rianru) September 27, 2016
Трамп заявил, что ядерный потенциал России мощнее американскогоhttps://t.co/u04daIvRwz pic.twitter.com/kcCfkDkioB
— Life | Новости (@lifenews_ru) September 27, 2016
Strangely, these two tweets from two different outlet — one a state-owned wire, the other a hyper-loyal, jingoistic outlet — ran with the same headline: “Trump Declares that Russia’s Nuclear Potential is Greater than America’s.” In fact, Trump – correctly — touted Russia’s recent modernization of its nuclear arsenal (though he didn’t mention that this was, in part, Putin’s burial of any new arms control deals with Obama). It’s not immediately obvious (to me) that the second part of his assertion — that America’s nuclear arsenal is in shambles — is true, but the Russians took it and ran with it.
Трамп не исключил вероятности превентивного ядерного удара Вашингтономhttps://t.co/MWIHzb9wS9 pic.twitter.com/pusUKxnHk7
— Life | Новости (@lifenews_ru) September 27, 2016
“Trump Doesn’t Exclude Preventive Nuclear Strike by Washington”
Something tells me they liked this one a little less.
Oh wait, but wait!
'I would certainly not do a first strike' – Trump on nuclear weapons #debatenight #debates https://t.co/8As3SyHlxJ pic.twitter.com/YLJRuHD7pH
— RT America (@RT_America) September 27, 2016
.@realDonaldTrump: #Daesh formed in a vacuum created by @HillaryClinton and @BarackObama https://t.co/sokx6og6FQ #debatenight pic.twitter.com/XP3A4DiOva
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) September 27, 2016
You know who else has been saying that the Americans essentially formed the Islamic State? That’s right, it’s Putin.
'Alumni' of US Bush administrations back @realDonaldTrump hours before #PresidentialDebate https://t.co/klnYTKB9a5 pic.twitter.com/VCvXURPsEq
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) September 27, 2016
Did you not get enough of Trump bragging about his endorsements by Republican luminaries during the debate? Because the Kremlin media has some more for you. With gifs, because they know you Americans like gifs.
.@realDonaldTrump's lack of interest in 'activities' likely to end #SyrianCivilWar – expert https://t.co/diwZrt7cpF pic.twitter.com/g0xLpn2CT0
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) September 27, 2016
This one is truly special, and typical of how these outlets operate. Sputnik, an English-language news service wholly owned and controlled by the Kremlin, cites an expert named Wayne Madsen who says that Trump becoming president “is the only way we are going to see the end to the Syrian civil war.” (Because a President Trump would put an end to all American operations there, and would allow Putin and Bashar al-Assad to scorch and flatten the country into submission?) Who is Wayne Madsen? According to Wikipedia, “he has been described as a conspiracy theorist.”
And this, of course, is perfect.
'You don't know who broke into #DNC' – Trump on cyber security and hacking #debatenight #debates https://t.co/D8ekHtjLgM pic.twitter.com/t8x15WaRvv
— RT (@RT_com) September 27, 2016
There is very little doubt left that the Russians were behind the hack, but Trump muddying the waters simply by saying we don’t know—and, sure, officially we don’t yet know—is wonderful on many levels: the candidate who has most benefited from the hack is now helping those responsible cover up their tracks by denying their role, and they tout his denial of their role as irrefutable proof of their involvement. (Guess who else agrees.)
But while the Kremlin media machine was very obviously putting for their man Trump, it had to concede: the instant polls after the debate showed that Clinton crushed him, and to be fair, some of them tweeted that, too.
By morning, they had moved on to other things — news from Syria, the doping scandal — but they were still holding out hope. Russia’s new, well-funded and Kremlin-loyal Christian TV station boomed that “Trump calmly and surely beat Clinton.” “This has never happened in American history, for there to be complete uncertainty about who won the first round of that national American sport of presidential debates,” said a hot take published by RIA News, a state-owned wire. “Moreover, it raises the question: what is victory anyway?”
Well, as much as the Kremlin and Trump would like to muddy the waters and talk about a rigged system, eventually — say, on or around November 9 — we will know who won. And though Americans haven’t yet decided on who should lead them for the next four years, the Russian government clearly has: the ranting bull who would smash up the American china shop for them. Funny thing about bulls like that, though, is they can suddenly get sick of the china smashing, and charge in your direction.
Photo credit: JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images