0
0

Quick reminder: chestlets are not women. (self.Incels)

DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit! が 投稿

I keep seeing posters here pretending to offer a "feminine" perspective on our problems as incels, but a quick review of said users' post histories quickly reveals talk about having a small chest, or wearing a small bra, etc. This is just a reminder that chestlets are not women, period. And that means that, because they are not a woman, they can't offer any woman's perspective on our or anyone else's issues.

Adult female humans are designed, by nature, to have large areas of adipose and glandular tissue over their pectoral chest muscles. This special tissue allows them to produce milk to feed infants, and thus continue the propagation of the species. They also function as a symbol of sexual maturity in females, and help to identify when a particular girl is starting to reach sexual maturity. "Women" who do not have breasts are thus unnatural, and a sign of a genetically inferior specimen. We should not acknowledge their existence, and if a girl has not developed a normal set of breasts after a set period of time we should banish them to live in isolated chestlet communities far away from civilization.

全 88 件のコメント
並べ替え:
新着 (提案されたアイデア)
ベストトップ論争中古い順Q&A

[–]VardaOiolosseoIAmNoMan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ok, sure. Whatever you say, troll.

Considering you've probably never seen a woman's tit in your life (besides your mum's), you're basically a 5-year-old pretending to be a connoisseur of single malt whiskey. Go back to your sippy cup, son.

[–]northace 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fucking hell you lads think deep into this shit. Always good for a luagh this sub!

[–]BananaBeem 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

What a great comment dude!

[–]StAliaHarkonnen 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

I prefer flat girls over cows.

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

You're depriving your future children the intimate comfort of grabbing onto a warm, soft breast when they nurse. Instead, they'll reach out and find nothing to grab onto, only a bony flat chest. When your baby is around other women who are actually women, he or she will instinctually reach out to them instead of your wife when they want to nurse, making your wife into a mommycuck. It's a sad future, trust me.

[–]breakfastCommodore 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

"Chestlets" jesus tapdancing christ they're people not some kind of sub species meant only for your consumption and pleasure

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

No one wants to consume them for their pleasure, just the opposite.

[–]breakfastCommodore 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

You have that much in common at least

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, exactly. There's an interesting parallel between chestlets and incels.

[–]somanyquestiones 9ポイント10ポイント  (5子コメント)

Just two facts here: 1. The size of the breasts has nothing to do with milk production. It's the mammary glands wich are responsible for that. The mammary glands are more or less the volume of a teespoon, all other breasttissue is fat. 2. Nobody forces you or any other man to be with a woman, who has a smaller breast.

So, there is really no problem here. Your life can go on! And before you even speculate, no I'm not small breasted.

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Dear, I quite simply do not believe you. No one would be this defensive if they weren't a chestlet.

[–]somanyquestiones 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh, is someone here violating rule 8?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I gave my reasons for my accusation (although lie is quite a harsh word). Statistically, most women who are this defensive over men not liking flat chests are flat chested themselves.

[–]somanyquestiones 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh, can you link that statistic for me? Also why should I lie about this? Whats in it for me?

[–]PEDANTlC 6ポイント7ポイント  (13子コメント)

Is this satire?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (12子コメント)

Nope, it's real. Chestlets like you have to accept reality. You share a lot of traits with us incels in a way.

[–]PEDANTlC 8ポイント9ポイント  (11子コメント)

Oh man, this place is so fun. It's like all the crazy ideas on the internet having an orgy. Wait. Hold up. What do I have in common with incels?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

You're genetically inferior.

[–]PEDANTlC 3ポイント4ポイント  (9子コメント)

How do you figure?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (8子コメント)

Umm, did you not read the OP?

[–]PEDANTlC 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

Yeah, but it doesn't really say anything meaningful. Who am I genetically inferior to? How does that make me anything like an incel? I really have trouble believing this isn't some kind of parody. You can't actually think this way. You're just trying to rustle the normies or something, right? Or maybe this is some way to feel like you have some power despite being incel, like you're too good for some women or something?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

If you have small breasts you are genetically inferior to women with large breasts.

This makes you like incels because most incels are genetically inferior in some way. We are usually born with ugly features and mental issues, all of which have a genetic component.

This post is not meant to portray me as being too good for chestlets. Most incels are desperate enough that they still would sleep with a chestlet if given the opportunity. Does that all answer your questions?

[–]PEDANTlC 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

But that's just nonsense, you literally say that they aren't women, like breast size precludes genitals. Aside from being completely subjective (there's no such thing as objectively genetically inferior), it also ignores all other forms of genetics (Is a chestlet genetically inferior to a large breasted woman who has autism/was born with no limbs/is hella ugly? Lots of guys actually love small breasts, what you've basically done is make up some pseudo scientific explanation for a preference you have and then felt the need to announce it to the world.

So are incels not men? Like, do all people who don't fit into some narrow idea of what makes up a perfect specimen for the human race not have a gender(and I'm still wondering who exactly decides the parameters for this idea. Is it what you find attractive? What I find attractive? What some evolutionary biologist things is perfect?) ? It's such a ridiculous thing to say that it sounds like it's gotta be a joke.

See, you still say it like someone would have to be making a sacrifice to sleep with a chestlet. It sounds like you're trying to create a distinction that makes a whole subgroup of women as undesirable as incels to make yourself feel better.

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

See, you still say it like someone would have to be making a sacrifice to sleep with a chestlet. It sounds like you're trying to create a distinction that makes a whole subgroup of women as undesirable as incels to make yourself feel better.

Wow, you're really getting bothered by the idea that you might somehow be on our level. Well, hate to be the bearer of bad news but you are chestlet. The vast majority of men don't prefer teeny tiny breasts, that's why female human's breasts are significantly larger than other mammals or primates. Because men sexually selected women with larger breasts, and they were the ones largely able to pass down their genes. Can't deny evolution or biology.

And just because people can be genetically inferior in other ways, does not mean chestlets aren't inferior - again, they are. That trait, having basically no breasts, is an inferior one in a "woman."

[–]hahehaho 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fatty tissue barely effects your ability to feed a baby. The only differences would be in the feeding schedules

[–]NeosAliusNon-transitioning ugly transgirl 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Holy shit who cares? Breasts come in all sizes. Women are still women regardless of breast size.

[–]i_like_my_lifem19, banged a 4/10 and chugged the whole jar of blue pills 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

No no no, you've got that all wrong. They might have a vagina, and feminine facial features, and feminine body features, but they definetely aren't women. Scientists have not yet found out what they are, but it's assumed that they are a whole new species.

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at this person sitting next to her friend and how uncomfortable she is. You can tell just by her expression that she knows how inferior she appears compared to the real woman right next to her.

Why would chestlets want to put themselves through this kind of emotional torture everyday? Removing them society would improve their lives most of all.

[–]Angryman41119M/ KHHV Incel -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

The more I read about women the more I begin to hate them I hope they suffer for rejecting us incels, depriving us of love, sex and intimacy and driving me to suicide.

[–]ManletofPiss -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

if you ever do end it, be sure to do something for our cause before you do ;)

[–]rosievox 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What, take a bunch of women out with him?

[–]Dougler900027, chugging blue pills is for the weak: mine were suppositories 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

Phew! For a second there you almost let women's feminine perspective be considered valid! Great save homie. The incel ideology lives to see another day.

Adult female humans are designed, by nature, to have large areas of adipose and glandular tissue over their pectoral chest muscles. This special tissue allows them to produce milk to feed infants, and thus continue the propagation of the species. They also function as a symbol of sexual maturity in females, and help to identify when a particular girl is starting to reach sexual maturity. "Women" who do not have breasts are thus unnatural, and a sign of a genetically inferior specimen.

Oooh I like this tactic! Here let me try:

Llamas appear to have originated from the central plains of North America about 40 million years ago. They migrated to South America about three million years ago. By the end of the last ice age (10,000–12,000 years ago), camelids were extinct in North America. As of 2007, there were over seven million llamas and alpacas in South America, and due to importation from South America in the late 20th century, there are now over 158,000 llamas and 100,000 alpacas in the United States and Canada. Llamas function as a symbol of wealth and power among men, and the responsibility of llama ownership helps to identify when a boy is starting to reach sexual maturity. "Men" who do not own llamas are thus unnatural, and a sign of a genetically inferior specimen. We should not acknowledge their existence, and if a man does not own at least one (1) llama after a set period of time we should banish them to live in isolated llamaless communities far away from civilization.

[–]endmylifeasap21 KV, 6'4 tallcel 9ポイント10ポイント  (41子コメント)

all the delicious flat chest is for me

rest of /r/incels must fight over the cowtitted leftovers

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -10ポイント-9ポイント  (40子コメント)

You have a sick, twisted fetish my friend. How would your chestlet wife even be able to feed your children? Why would you make your future children suffer like that?

[–]ChasingALightningBug 5ポイント6ポイント  (10子コメント)

From a large breasted woman, breast size has no impact on milk production. It actually can be more difficult for large breasts to supply enough milk, oddly enough.

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (9子コメント)

Eww, are you really a trollx poster?

[–]ChasingALightningBug 3ポイント4ポイント  (8子コメント)

No?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yes.

[–]ChasingALightningBug 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

You win forgot about that.

Does it matter, I'm confused how that relates though?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a horrible subreddit, even worse than this one.

[–]ChasingALightningBug 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Just gonna totally ignore my comment then?

[–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Frankly, and I genuinely mean no offense by this, your comment was a little boring. Mostly a repeat of what others had said to me before, and you can see my responses to them yourself. I wouldn't have responded to it at all, but then I discovered you're a trollx poster (a charge you originally denied), and I became interested in why a person who engages in a subreddit which regularly shames people for the size of their body parts would have something against my post!

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your comment has been removed for not using a no participation link.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]whenifeellikeit 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

    You should read that awkward book your parents should've given you when you hit puberty.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

    You should read the "what's happening to my body?" section for the girls and wonder why what a lot being described there never happened to you.

    [–]whenifeellikeit 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Oh, wait... are you calling me flat-chested?

    LOL

    [–]Jashinist 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Taunting women for their looks is totally legitimate, y'all.

    But don't dislike him because he's ugly, that means you're a heartless evil bitch deserving of torture and having your rights taken away, probably.

    [–]whenifeellikeit 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Poor kid would die if he knew what size my tits actually are.

    [–]Jashinist 3ポイント4ポイント  (23子コメント)

    The hormones during pregnancy make breasts swell. Size of the breasts doesn't correlate with milk production, as far as I'm aware.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -5ポイント-4ポイント  (22子コメント)

    Female humans were selected to have larger breasts compared to other mammals by evolution for a reason. You need to get over it /u/jashinist: the first step is acceptance.

    [–]Jashinist 4ポイント5ポイント  (21子コメント)

    Oh I have no skin in the game, I'm def not flat chested, just think it's unfair to correlate small breasts with malnourishing children.

    I did some googling and this is the general consensus:

    "Breast size is irrelevant. The size of a woman's breasts is mostly determined by how much fatty tissue they contain. But this tissue doesn't have anything to do with the quantity of her breast milk."

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -3ポイント-2ポイント  (20子コメント)

    I'm guessing whatever place you pulled that from after using Google isn't a legitimate academic source on women's anatomy, is it?

    Again, why would evolution heavily select for female humans to have larger breasts if they were not in someway important? It's not a common feature of mammals at all.

    [–]Dougler900027, chugging blue pills is for the weak: mine were suppositories 4ポイント5ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Again, why would evolution heavily select for female humans to have larger breasts if they were not in someway important?

    ...Dammit I've sitting here for five minutes deciding between telling you that's not really how evolution works, or whether I should mention that, like most physical characteristics, breast size is normally distributted --Heh, or should I say... Normieally distributed? Eh? eh? No, nothing? Fine. Be that way-- ... And now I've just lost my motivation to continue this argument.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (5子コメント)

    /u/Dougler9000, if you weren't so focused on being smug and actually read the words that other people wrote you might actually learn something. I'm going to quote the relevant part of my comments for you:

    Female humans were selected to have larger breasts compared to other mammals by evolution for a reason.

    I hope you see the key part of my argument now which you failed to read properly the first time. What you're doing is like arguing that because brain size is normally distributed among humans (it is) that it is therefore impossible to argue that evolution selected for larger brain sizes in humans (it did).

    I guarantee you that breast size among mammals is not normally distributed.

    [–]Dougler900027, chugging blue pills is for the weak: mine were suppositories 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Maybe if you understood how evolution works you'd understand the bit where, if we see a trait such as breast size is normally distributed in an intraspecies population, we can conclude that it was not specifically "selected for" when looking at an interspecies perspective of the data.

    Like, do you not get that there is some randomness involved in evolution? It's not as simple as "survival of the fittest. Full stop." Some traits enhance chance of survival, others do not, and some traits are sort of just along for the ride or their importance is not yet sufficiently understood like how kin selection behavior is a theory that is only recently beginning to gain traction.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    The human brain's size follows a normal distribution among the human population, but it is well known that brain size was a trait selected for among human beings' ancestors. Sorry, but you're just flat out wrong here.

    Furthermore, many evolutionary biologists have offered theories on why human female breasts are so comparatively large. Maybe you should go and read some work from actual scientists before you dismiss the idea?

    [–]Jashinist 0ポイント1ポイント  (12子コメント)

    Because it's attractive and indicative of health and fertility (since pre-pubescent women don't have them, and in older women they deflate a bit). Same with jawlines in men. Can indicate general health and good genetics - but when it comes to breast milk, the size of the breasts don't matter. Breast size more likely indicates a healthy amount of calorie-intake as it's fatty tissue.

    Lol @ guessing I must be bullshitting. It's easy to call shenanigans on everything, it's hard to actually research I guess. Also you're breaking rule #9, but whatever. And yes, I did find scientific sources.

    http://www.llli.org/nb/nbmarapr05p44.html

    Milk supply is more based on supply/demand - once a woman stops breast feeding, the supply dries up - if she keeps regular breastfeeding, many mothers keep up the supply for years and years.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Is this a tactic admission that you are /u/dougler9000? Why else would you respond to a post that didn't address you or your arguments?

    I don't even know why you're arguing with me, since we seem to agree that breasts are symbols of sexual maturity in women, and that therefore larger breasts sizes are a measure of fitness in human females.

    [–]Jashinist 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Hah, no, we're separate people. I've made it clear throughout my entire argument that I'm referring to these statements that make no sense: "How would your chestlet wife even be able to feed your children? Why would you make your future children suffer like that?"

    It's not a "tactic" admission (did you mean "tacit"?) that I'm him, to respond to a comment you directed specifically to a comment I made. And you pretty much begged me to respond, by saying that clearly my conclusions weren't scientific. If you're referring to the comment I deleted, it was because I didn't realise dougler was in the conversation and followed the thread, assuming your comment was now trying to shift the conversation to it being about mammalian differentiation to avoid the fact that I was correct about breast size =/= milk production.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Right, it was just a mistake that you responded to me as if you were actually dougler, despite the fact that only he would have received a notification of my response as it was in a completely different thread. Just a coincidence.

    Like I said though, your secret is safe with me.

    [–]Dougler900027, chugging blue pills is for the weak: mine were suppositories 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Everyone on reddit is a bot except you.

    [–]DefenseOfTheRestSupport efforts to remove toxic normies from our subreddit![S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Come on now, I saw the reply you posted then quickly deleted.