上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 240

[–]xpants7751PA 524ポイント525ポイント  (8子コメント)

"Mr Trump. I hate you. You are a garbage human being. Why?" -You have 2 minutes.

[–]steeler1168NC 160ポイント161ポイント  (2子コメント)

Y-y-yu-your t-two minutes a-are up please don't hurt me

[–]dirtdiver7PD 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Mr. Trump, how many babies have you eaten? 10 or 12?"

[–]ColonelClusterPA 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

"First, let me say you're wro"

"I'm sorry, you're time's up. We have to move on."

[–]trainhasnobrakes 314ポイント315ポイント  (14子コメント)

MR. TRUMP, YOU BARBARIAN WARMONGER, WHY DID YOU BACK THE IRAQ WAR FULLY IN 2002 WHEN YOU WERE NOT INVOLVED WHATSOEVER WITH POLITICS?

You have 2 minutes.

[–]The_DonaldUser 226ポイント227ポイント  (12子コメント)

Mr. Trump, Hillary voted for the Iraq War, but it is you who is a bad person for supporting it. How do you respond? You have 5 seconds.

[–]blackjackjester 72ポイント73ポイント  (1子コメント)

Mr. Trump, at a time when 90% of the country supported the War in Iraq, why did you once mention that it's not the worst thing since the holocaust?

Mr. Trump, why do you only pay the taxes in which you owe, set forth by the congress that Hillary, Obama, and Biden were a part of?

[–]legayredditmodditors 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mr. Trump, why do you only pay the taxes in which you owe, set forth by the congress that Hillary, Obama, and Biden were a part of?

CONSPIRING UNCOVERED

[–]legayredditmodditors 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

Mr. Trump, Hillary should take NO responsibility for her actions, why are you such a TERRIBLE PERSON

[–]The_DonaldUser 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mrs. Hillary, Trump is clearly a racist person. How do you respond? Take as much time as needed.

[–]Cbird54TX 107ポイント108ポイント  (7子コメント)

This is the infuriating part. Hillary actually voted to go into Iraq and yet Trump is the one they're trying to paint as the warmonger.

[–]Lord_DraconiaNM 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Deflection. Literally every single thing they accuse on Trump is literally their sin. It sounds so simple but it explains every single leftist attack on Trump and us supporters.

[–]legayredditmodditors 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

WHY DID YOU MAKE A WISHY WASHY COMMENT TALKING WITH HOWARD STERN????

DON'T YOU KNOW HOWARD STERN INTERVIEWS ARE LAW NOW!!!!!

[–]flaco_74NY 80ポイント81ポイント  (2子コメント)

Lester Holt, "Republican" and "impartial."

This is why people overwhelmingly hate the media. And it can only go downhill from here.

[–]OHTHNAP 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it said more that Trump stood up to both of them without really even breaking a sweat.

That being said, he didn't seem polished at all. If he prepares for the second one and hits her on every single scandal she's had, instead of avoiding opportunities, he can knock her out of the race entirely.

And you know what? When she said, "I have the stamina to sit in front of congress for 11 hours", he SHOULD HAVE SAID IT WAS BECAUSE SHE WAS UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION.

When she talked about securing against cyber attacks, WHY IN THE WORLD DIDN'T HE SAY SHE COULDN'T EVEN SECURE HER OWN EMAILS?

I get it, he was more invested in travel and meeting people than preparing for a debate. But with tens of millions of people watching, this was his first opportunity to really knock her out. If he prepares, this race is over with the next debate.

[–]Z______FL 25ポイント26ポイント  (8子コメント)

Garrison really nailed the smug face that Hillary kept pulling during the debate. She kept pulling the "well this guy is an idiot" responses and it bugged the crap out of me.

[–]mikesernameNY 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's all she has, is to make him look worse than her. She knows she can't actually make herself look good

[–]Z______FL 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

We'll see if she still feels that way come the next debate and Trump brings out them big guns.

[–]melvinman27CA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I thought she looked like she was spacing out and delirious

[–]mivvanMAGA 158ポイント159ポイント  (15子コメント)

The debate was clearly two on one. There is a great amount of data supporting it. Lying Lester was the third debater, just as Crooked as his friend and protectee.

[–]crazyfingersculture 46ポイント47ポイント  (9子コメント)

Haha. I didn't know if others caught that or not. The moderator and Hillary are basically one in the same.

[–]retr0act1ve 57ポイント58ポイント  (8子コメント)

We were all watching. It is NEVER a moderators job in a debate to do rebuttals for a weak debater, it just isn't. When there's a debate if one debater doesn't have the facts to do a proper rebuttal that's their own fault, and they will lose. It's not the moderator's place to help one over the other. Then at one point the moderator goes full on debate mode with Donald, no sorry Lester asshat that is not being a moderator. I was absolutely annoyed with that a$$hole at the time. I tweeted at that moment to mention its not lesters job to do rebuttals for sick Hillary.

[–]Adramedes 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

We are all centipedes here, you can say asshole. Also you're completely correct. Lying Lester the molester is a despicable piece of shit.

[–]retr0act1ve 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm going to do a post later about this, and the ills of the information being submitted by social networks like Facebook. It's a sham these next 3 debates will be shams (I'm including the VP one).

[–]SOADLTME 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it was on purpose, rather than for censorship. he's in it for the $$.

[–]WashuchanAUS 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

In the end his partisan approach to moderating a debate cost Clinton the debate in the end of debate polls.

Trump won a 2v1 debate.

[–]retr0act1ve 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

According to politico story "Insiders" say Clinton won. hahaha. Okay so here we go. The media hypes up Trump's anger/temperament, then have Clinton play the smug asshole she is to see if they can bait him into letting loose on her. Of course he doesn't, but then they try to say he's a sexist bully anyway via politico. They figured if he remains reserved his fans wont like it, and if he lets loose they can call him a maniac. These so called "Insiders" just don't get it. What matters here is perception. She was perceived by the audience at home to be a unrepentant smug lying criminal. That is not a win for her, with all her nervous laughter and overall arrogance. She was perceived badly, and Trump was perceived to be playing nice with a criminal bully. It worked against them and that is what the polls reflect (save the CNN poll).

[–]tekende 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

It would have been nice if Trump had told him he's not supposed to be debating for Hillary.

[–]theffxAZ 32ポイント33ポイント  (3子コメント)

Lester interrupted Trump with "fact checks" more than Hillary. I'm sure she was told not to worry about what Trump says, Holt will take care of it.

[–]pepepupil 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Lapdog Lester.

[–]Adramedes 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

This needs to be trending on Twitter last night

[–]pepepupil 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Viewers intuitively notice that. It plays well for Trump as it makes him look like the underdog. He has to debate two people and he still did well!

[–]Cbird54TX 268ポイント269ポイント  (23子コメント)

Exactly. This wasn't a debate, it was a kangaroo court.

[–]eternalmars1 157ポイント158ポイント  (10子コメント)

I love how Hillary would bash Donald and Lester would be say "Moving on" and Donald would be like

"hey she just called me a racist, a birther, a tax cheat and a hater of women, you mind letting me respond to that?"

[–]BanemorthNJ 144ポイント145ポイント  (6子コメント)

"Absolutely. You have three seconds."

[–]AlthebartenderNJ 96ポイント97ポイント  (5子コメント)

He gave him a 10 second response time once, wtf.

[–]Main_man_mike 30ポイント31ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yeah and as soon as he went over the 10 seconds and he tried to cut trump off he just kept talking right over him. That was honestly one of my favourite parts of the debate is how trump realized the moderator was completely biased against him so he just blatantly disregarded anything he said and refused to be talked over or cut off.

[–]Ragnavoke 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

It really shows trumps power and that he's a true leader. The moderator was so scared and couldn't control trump. Trump was controlling the stage

[–]defenderrodham 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The really fun part about this is that the next bought-out-moderator will realize he needs to step it up, and become VERY overbearing or risk being shut down like Lester. This boost in overbearingness will be more obvious than ever about the HRC bias and no-one will be able to pretend there's no bias. Besides HuffPo readers.

[–]Ronin_oniTX 26ポイント27ポイント  (0子コメント)

Got to protect that narrative. Hopefully the undecided voters were aware of this while watching.

[–]Cbird54TX 22ポイント23ポイント  (2子コメント)

"But Donald according to our completely unbiased fact checkers you are those things. Speaking of which why do you hate women Donald?"

[–]Vague_Disclosure 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That gave me a chuckle, like 10 minutes in Hillbot starts plugging her website's fact checker as if that's the best place to go to get totally unbiased facts.

[–]BanemorthNJ 84ポイント85ポイント  (3子コメント)

I can't hear the phrase "kangaroo court" now without thinking of this. NSFW audio. When I first heard it I couldn't believe that this was an ACTUAL transcript. Here. It really was insane though. This cartoon is PERFECT.

[–]Beth_EsdaMO 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's pretty hilarious how Roiland's characters fit so well in this situation!

[–]blackjackjester 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

But did you expect anything less? I honestly don't know why anybody takes the debates seriously.

A) There is no actual debating, it's all soap boxing and personal attacks. Where is the opening statement, cross examination, and closing statement on specific policy differences?

B) It's run by a partisan moderator on a partisan network

C) What is there to possibly learn? That Hillary thinks she's presidential because she says she is presidential? That Trump is loud? That SJW's will say everything is sexist?

[–]rem14IA 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

The people of twitter agree "The Third Debater" and #TrumpWon are both trending this morning

[–]HoundDogs 34ポイント35ポイント  (0子コメント)

I said yesterday I was nervous about the debate because I felt like it would be more of a trial than an actual debate. I hate that I was right. However, I have hope that their side is essentially out of ammunition against him and that Trump will hone his 1 on 1 skills.

[–]nophantomlimbsTX 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

that is an insult to kangaroo courts this was a 4th grade play of a kangaroo court.

[–]yeahnonny 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

IT WAS A BANANA REPUBLIC!

[–]bennycabrilloCA 39ポイント40ポイント  (4子コメント)

"Mr trump you did support the war in iraq." Obvious bait to put trump on the defensive.

[–]koolmagicguy 27ポイント28ポイント  (3子コメント)

He never supported it. Even if he had, he couldn't have voted for it.When no one mentioned the FACT that Clinton VOTED for it. She has had real power and only made things worse.

[–]DannytheDCA 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wish he called her out on that during the debate. I know he has in the past but should have done it again last night.

[–]legayredditmodditors 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

So, Mrs Clinton, you voted for war after war while in office, let's talk about why TRUMP IS EVEN WORSE FOR TALKING ABOUT IT ON A RADIO SHOW

FUCKING HITLER

[–]AkamaruMN 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

The debate really did seem like a referendum on Donald Trump, not a debate about the issues.

The moderators need to stop the fact checking unless they can be 100% sure that their fact checks are accurate. The debate last night had some faulty fact checks.

Don't get me wrong, Hillary did well and it was clear that she practiced (her one liners). But it also helps when the moderator sets you up for the layup.

Trump needs more practice. He also needs to be more confident in his positions. He has the winning answers, he just needs to articulate them better.

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Donald, why are you a racist?

I CONCUR!!!! -Hillary

[–]patriottoNC 36ポイント37ポイント  (3子コメント)

Pundits said Hillary won because every second Trump spent defending himself was a second he lost to attack her. That's a spin. I see it as every second she attacked him was a second she lost to promote her policies. She squandered all her time without telling us how she will Make America Great Again. And to be clear, she attacked his character and not his policies. She just went on with the racist/sexist line, which is debunked over and over again.

He attacked her experience, not character. Clinton's email scandal is a crime that is currently being investigated by Congress and the FBI, not the National Enquirer. He also attacked her on her failed policies over 3 decades and direct responsibility for the rise of ISIS. These point primarily to her bad professional judgment (and secondarily to character) which threatens our national security, the first and foremost responsibility of a federal government.

[–]legayredditmodditors 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

did you like how she tried to turn his "doesn't look presidential" into sexism?

it was like a rofl in slow motion

[–]patriottoNC 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary doesn't have a presidential look

and he's right again!

[–]mj2323 96ポイント97ポイント  (15子コメント)

He did very well considering the deck was stacked entirely against him. There are two more debates to bring up the Clinton Foundation scandals as well as her emails.

[–]DragofireheartNH 84ポイント85ポイント  (9子コメント)

The only reason he looked "anxious" is because he likely wanted to crush the shit out of Hillary and wipe that smile off her face.

But he restrained himself. And it worked.

[–]SameCookiePseudonymUSA 47ポイント48ポイント  (1子コメント)

Every time he said "Secretary Clinton" he had an unnatural pause before it, as if he was stopping himself from saying "Crooked Hillary."

[–]AppleTheRed 42ポイント43ポイント  (0子コメント)

I almost guarantee you he had to physically hold back.

It's not quite his style to hold back, but he needed the moral high ground against her to sway neutrals.

People know what happened. This is one of the most biased debates i have ever seen.

[–]flaco_74NY 30ポイント31ポイント  (4子コメント)

I was really impressed at the end when he didn't go after Billary the rapist and enabler tag team.

[–]Opinionated_Ocelot 30ポイント31ポイント  (3子コメント)

I was so fucking afraid he would at that point. He brought it up as if to say "You know what, Hillary, FUCK IT!" ...but he didn't and I think we have to be proud of that. He held back in front of a world that thought he was unhinged.

I trust his judgement and I trust it even more now. He went as far as he needed to without going over the line, just like the author of the Art of the Deal would.

[–]shadowman3001BPA 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

He Trumped it. He did have to say it, but people will look into "what was he talking about..."

[–]legayredditmodditors 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

even when after the debate, the cnn fuck tried to bait him into it.

he resisted their petty bs

[–]Cuck-WTF 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wipe...like with a cloth?

[–]DragofireheartNH 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

YOU DARE QUESTION ME WHITE MALE!?

[–]-CANT_STUMP_TRUMP-OH 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

People don't seem to realize that Trump was planning this.

Trump wasn't wanting to go on the offensive this time around. He knew that the deck was stacked against him before he went in, he even tweeted about it.

Trump was just wanting to, dare I say, correct the record on all of Hillary's lies about him.

Now, Clinton is out of steam. All of the petty things she has attacked him on have been deflected, the only thing she still has on him is tax returns, but he has a clever answer for it.

Now, trump is in a perfect position to go on the offense on the next debates to really hammer home the numerous shady scandals that Hillary is involved in.

[–]slick3333CAN 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gotta leave some rounds in the gun, it's called leverage

-Paraphrased from the God Emperor

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It really WAS an expert answer on those. So now MSM CAN'T bring it up without mentioning- well he will if HILLARY releases her emails.

The media will NEVER mention her emails at length again.

[–]yvngtrvmp 18ポイント19ポイント  (1子コメント)

Trump is doing EXTREMELY well. I know us bloodthirsty centipedes are itching for Trump to give Hillary long overdue justice, but that isn't now 4D chess works. People have too short of attention spans for the first two debates to remain relevant until voting day; Trump is likely going to wait until the last one to bring up all that Clinton dirt.

[–]4dChessBot 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Let's play chess!

Donald Trump employs the vintage Herbstnebel Pin in the 282nd dimension!

We have the best words, don't we folks?

bot by /u/memeymckek

[–]GrakmarrWY 39ポイント40ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ben nails it as always. Disgusting to watch Lester and the failed media show their blatant bias on the global stage. But Trump knew he was walking into an ambush, and he came out on top anyway. And the whole world got to see him win handily, despite the deck being stacked against him.

[–]DragofireheartNH 130ポイント131ポイント  (21子コメント)

Derpacraps expected Trump to be "out of control".

We expected him to crush Hillary with every flaw of hers.

Trump did neither.

Trump knew it would be a hit job tonight. He knew they would try and make him look unhinged with all of the attacks.

He needed to prove he can handle himself under pressure. He did it in the GOP Florida primary and he did it again last night.

A job well done.

[–]-CANT_STUMP_TRUMP-OH 38ポイント39ポイント  (9子コメント)

Well yeah, I think this debate was testing the waters from both sides.

Trump wanted to show that he is more than just a brainless attacker. He can defend himself as well (he did a GREAT job at it, too).

Clinton wanted to show she can be aggressive and bite back. She tried, but I would say that all of her claims were deflected very well by Trump.

The only thing that was lacking on Trump's end is that he didn't point out the hypocrisy of the moderator, such as when he asked Trump about supporting the war in Iraq, when Clinton literally voted for it.

But we have to remember that one of the biggest things holding trump back from having even more support is that he's "too dangerous and volatile" to be president. By being presidential and not going full blown hulk smash and instead going on defense, he is making his own image look better.

So I really don't think this debate will change a damn thing. It's only both sides testing each other out and setting up an image that they want to carry forward. It will be the next and ultimately the 3rd debate that everyone will remember when they go out to vote in the 8th.

[–]whiteonrice69 34ポイント35ポイント  (3子コメント)

What gets me is this: why would we care what a private citizen (at the time) thought about a war? Whether he thought we should go to war or not had absolutely zero to do with the choice that was made by...politicians. MSM trying to use this as an excuse when he absolutely no bearing on the decision boogles my mind.

Hillary's opinion on the matter far outweighs that of a private citizen (at the time)

[–]Neuermann 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've been wondering this as well. A private citizen doesn't have all of the info on the situation. The only conclusion I can come up with is that Trump said something, therefore he must be proved a liar.

"You know, I really like pizza hut. I always have. It's a good pizza, as far as chains go, and its always consistant."

"Mr. Trump, in an interview with Jon Smith in 1992, you said pizza hut is no good. Do you his flip flop on every issue? Why would you lie and say you always loved pizza hut?"

Actual quote turns out to be, "Yeah, I usually like pizza hut, but this was a bit disappointing."

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's kind of like some of the neo-revolutionary thought about women.

Men have been holding all women down; therefore women shouldn't take responsibility for their actions; and every accuse is absolute truth.

Just that that mindset has been seeping into the media, for some time now.

[–]HillaryCIinton 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump keeps bringing up that he was against the war from the very start. If he hadn't been saying that, it wouldn't have been an issue that he would have to respond to

[–]BanemorthNJ 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

Just once or twice I wish he would have pulled out the old "I'm not even going to dignify that comment with a response. Let's discuss the actual issues here like..."

[–]AppleTheRed 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

You might wish for it, but if he did that the MSM would have a field day.

20000 articles titled "TRUMP REFUSES HARDBALL QUESTIONS" would pop up immediately. Reporters would heckle his ass constantly.

He did what needed to be done, not what i wanted to see done.

[–]-CANT_STUMP_TRUMP-OH 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yep, he wasn't perfect obviously. But his goal was to prove clinton's attacks wrong, and he did quite a good job. He is going to need to go after her scandals more in depth later, but for the first debate of 3 he did good.

I really don't think we can say that either candidate "won" but rather if the candidates got the points they wanted to across. And since both candidates knew it was one of 3 debates, it could very easily be planned that they didn't mention many things. And as it stands, I would say Trump did a lot of what he wanted to do. He wanted to show he isn't a barbarian like Clinton keeps explaining to people. Many people never see trump except in those negative hit ads on him where they misrepresent him. So I would say he did a good job.

But in the future, it's gonna be time to go on her hard. The most oppurtune time would be the 3rd debate, because that's the one everyone remembers.

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think she did better to the AVERAGE american who wasn't paying attention, tbh.

[–]ddiddy171KY 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Should of brought it up on his own though

[–]Cbird54TX 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

A wise man uses only what he needs.

[–]DragofireheartNH 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

He will in the 2nd or 3rd debate.

[–]thepalehunter 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I hope he does just as well in the next two debates.

[–]DragofireheartNH 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The reception he got for this debate is likely going to have him pace the intensity. 2nd debate won't be a blood bath. He'll save that for the 3rd.

[–]highideasNM 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

And he won. Every major poll calls it. Their narrative is "legitimate polls" hahahahaha

[–]AppleTheRed 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Dude he even won the ABC poll

[–]Four-Hundred_Babies 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

And you don't think that the fact that online groups such as this subreddit were spamming literally every poll they could find is a factor?

If anything, the online polls show how badly you guys had to go into damage control after that embarrassment of a debate last night.

[–]crookedhillary1234 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the plan was to make Hillary confident enough to not be "sick" for the following debates and to see if a more neutral moderator will be in the following debates.

[–]h35grga 53ポイント54ポイント  (3子コメント)

I love how they tried to use a split screen format to hide the fact that she's 4 feet tall and he's a 6'3 giant. Go look at any past presidential debate, they're usually fairly close together and often in the same frame.

I saw two or three seconds where they were in the same frame together. Why wouldn't they want people to see that?

[–]Opinionated_Ocelot 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

Height Privilege! Triggered!

[–]rlbigfishPA 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, it's okay on the left to emasculate people based on their height.

[–]TnargkillerUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love how they tried to use a split screen format to hide the fact that she's 4 feet tall and he's a 6'3 giant. Go look at any past presidential debate, they're usually fairly close together and often in the same frame.

They also gave her a much smaller, but proportioned podium to make them look the same size when given close-up shots. You can tell it's about 8" shorter than his and a big narrower when they do shots including both of them.

[–]SonofSaxon79NC 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

BASED BEN "ONE MAN MASSACRE" GARRISON DOES IT AGAIN

[–]jcdausch 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

Horribly biased, per usual

[–]Opinionated_Ocelot 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fucking Lester. Started off decent, but spun out of control real quick as if Trump was there to prove everyone wrong.

It's completely incomprehensible as to why Hillary doesn't also have to prove herself.

[–]TheWhiteTide 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lock her up, MAGA

[–]lauranja913 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

The debate was literally an attack on Trump. He handled it greatly despite what all the dumb crooked anchors say

[–]NimbleCanuckCAN 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

On point as usual.

If people are put off enough by the bias it helps Trump aka

NO BRAKES

[–]BlackPaintist 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sums it up.

Hilary, how do you feel about race in America?

Donald, isn't your stop and search policy an unconstitutional form of racism?

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary said superpredators a long time ago, I won't press her on it.

DONALD IS LITERAL KKKK

[–]ThePrimeOptimusUSMC 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even my wife, who hasn't gotten much into this election, was yelling at fuck boy Lester for the obvious race and gender baiting questions. Calling it a "debate" is a fucking stretch, more like a coordinated setup between fuck boy Lester and Hillary. And I think she knew it, too, she had that fucking smug smile on her face every time fuck boy Lester leaned into Trump.

[–]cw08CAN 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

ACCURATE

[–]NorthJersey908NJ 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jeez, you can't get more accurate than that. Ben does it again!

[–]calmroseviolentwind 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

The commission of presidential debates should stop hiring these media pundits to moderate these debates, its not even their job.

[–]stinky_meow 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump should've said "Lester, if you're gonna keep being a skankhunt, I'm gonna keep interrupting you"

[–]tjciv 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Mrs. Clinton, what flavor ice cream did your granddaughter have at her second birthday party? Take your time and look at your notes. You have 25 years to respond. The same amount of time you've had in government to implement the policies you speak of today. BTW, you look beautiful tonight." 😁

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

BTW, you look beautiful tonight.

Also, you wll be a better president than a literal sexist hitler clone.

DONALD YOU HAVE 2 SECONDS TO RESPOND

NO CLAPPING

[–]Feeble_to_faceCA 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary seemed to already know most of the questions...

[–]SalSevenSix 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty much sums it up.

[–]Butterysamosashell 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

the moderator was a better debater than shillary

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love how he doesn't bring up her 200+ day drought of talking to the press.

(3 people on her plane ISN'T a press conference, no matter how hard you try to spin it)

[–]2udaylatifIL 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lester Holt did debate Trump or seemed like he was doing an interview of his own instead of moderating a debate several times. It is not the moderator's job to fact check on the spot and counterpoint what the candidate is saying.

[–]melapot8MD 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Guys its only gonna get worse. Next debate moderator is Cooper and Raddatz. That one's probably gonna be ugly but I think Wallace will try to make up for it during the third debate.

[–]Markz1337PHL 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even at a disadvantage he won.

[–]MadPreacher1ADIA 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ben hit it out of the park on that one. Lester should now officially change his name to Hillary Jr. LOL

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

legally change it to Lust4 Hillary

[–]qa2PA 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Stick to the issues.

If not, and you want to bring up stuff like tax returns or "you were given money. You're racist" at least be fair and bring up emails, Clinton foundation, corruption, etc

[–]FiDollaMilkshake 14ポイント15ポイント  (6子コメント)

It appeared to me that Hillary had been given the questions in advance...

[–]TechnoplasmNJ 13ポイント14ポイント  (3子コメント)

Especially her answer to the first initial question. Everything from her tone, to her movement, word choice, and emphatic pauses suggested that she had known exactly what the question would be and had rehearsed a speech beforehand

[–]drunkrustbestrustUSAF 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I can't remember which question it was, but she went on a huge monologue on speaking out to foreign countries on how we'll "honor" our obligations. It looked SUPER fucking rehearsed, and I was disgusted listening to it.

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

well they DO rehearse LIKELY questions; however I do think the first one might have been staged.

[–]angrae 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Or... you know... she prepared herself for almost any question they were going to ask her.

[–]FiDollaMilkshake 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah... except that brain-damaged SeaHag can't remember anything - ask the FBI.

[–]FlorianPicassoMT 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

BASED MEME MERCHANT

[–]maga_landslide_win 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

For 90 minutes, a black man turned into a white woman.

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

DON'T YOU ASSUME HIS RACE SHITLORD

[–]DCH1013 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I would genuinely like to know the answers to these questions.

[–]thajugglaNV 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tax laws for his taxes, he's not racist or sexist, that answer is just looking at the fact that he runs a Fortune 500 company, and Hillary started the birther movement. Trump talking about the birth certificate, after Hillary started that line, got Obama to release his long form birth certificate, which put the birther movement to rest.

Let me know if you would like anything expanded in more detail.

[–]bisjac 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Debates should be like 3 hours long. All these fucking 2 minutes with 10 second replies.

This shit is more important than network commercial time.

[–]karagousis 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Time Warner (the owner of CNN) is playing a risky card this election. They have a lot to lose if Trump wins. He can - hypothetically - cause their shares do drop severely after his election. The idea that media is "free" in the US is a misconception, any government can at any given time favor one network over another, and that's one of the reasons reelections are going to be a historical invariable: the media will stay on the side of who's in charge.

[–]PMYourHateMailNY 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wasn't this debate supposed to be about foreign affairs and such?

[–]Nomonomz 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is it just me or did Clinton get way more speaking time?

[–]AppleTheRed 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's just you. Trump spoke 35% more than she did actually.

He kind of had to, because every time Lester let her get the last word and tried to "move on" before Trump could respond.

He also kept pestering Trump about answers and trying to CTR him, while he left Shillary alone.

[–]DrHenryPym 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No kidding. She was getting nasty, and I'm actually proud he didn't sink to her level.

[–]legayredditmodditors 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If it wasn't 2/3rds an ATTACK on trump instead of discussing her policies, that would be fine.

but she has NO policy.

[–]einjzmolfTX[🍰] 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Should have had her note pad with all the questions already written out

[–]ThePooGuy2 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

AN UPHILL BATTLE FROM DAY ONE

IT DOESNT MATTER HOW HARD THEY RIG THESE EVENTS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF BEING LOOKED AT AS STUPID

THE BLATANT LIES BY HILLARY CLINTON ARE A DIRECT INSULT TO ALL AMERICANS INTELLIGENCE

MAGA.

VOTE IN NOVEMBER

[–]trashpostsaretrash 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

All that jewelry and no lapel pin. Ffs is she even proud to be an American?

[–]ThugLifeNewShitUSA 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

this toon says it all

Mo-lester Holt served his masters well

[–]isdatrupit 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

That was the most biased bullshit I've ever seen. And Hillary's smug look made me want to punch myself.

[–]ChocktawRidge 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary can flat out tell more lies in thirty seconds than anyone I know. Then Trump is supposed to have two minutes to respond to that shit. I'm glad he kept his cool.

[–]lolaTJ 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lester Holt is Hillary's body double

[–]3goistPA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact checker neither confirmed nor denied Clinton's statements and facts only appeared to be checked at Clinton's request? What?

[–]microaggressive_spat 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes there is a little bias against Trump, but there is also a general bias against cancer guys, let's be real.

[–]00Spartacus 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

To all the Clinton shills, answer me this one question.

Give me Clintons defining line.

Here's Trumps. "26 years and you've achieved nothing. You've only started talking about this when I brought it up. All sound bites and zero action"

That was the central message of the night and perfectly personified why another establishment lapdog is not suited for the Presidency.

[–]globalism_suxTX 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can't find the all-seeing eye in this one. Little help?

[–]szd0817USA 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can someone screenshot it? Twitter is blocked at work.

[–]Herpaderp_KidUSA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

As always, Mr Garrison hits the heart of the matter dead center.

[–]BushidoBrowne 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

The thing is, he still didn't answer any of those questions.

I agree that the dude was asked too much but he could have easily answered those.

[–]thajugglaNV 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Do you really need him to personally answer a question about racism or sexism? You can just look at the Trump organization, you know a business that can't be racist or sexist due to the fact that the company can be sued into the ground, and see that these two questions are stupid to even bring up.

As far as the taxes, you can go talk to your local rep about why the tax laws allow rich people to get away with paying very little in taxes, they're the ones who pass the laws, not Trump.

[–]BushidoBrowne 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

He could have said what you just posted...but he didn't.

[–]thajugglaNV 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, I definitely agree, and I felt like he did not go far enough some times.

I think it was kind of what you said though, there was just so much being thrown around at once for a bit there.

[–]Adramedes 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Clinton and her shill lapdog moderator both hit him as hard as they could on every issue though. They're out of ammo. They went for the knockout and failed.

[–]goldensnakes 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty much spot-on. I also notice that whenever Clinton would get cheers, the moderator never told them to stop or turn it down but whenever Trump had any, he shut them down.

[–]Jimmy0517 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why is this subreddit not showing 3,000 plus upvoted posts on my feed? Also at times via the app I cannot even find this sub on my sub list. Wtf is going on?

[–]Four-Hundred_Babies 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lmao. You guys really are delusional. Just because Trump is incapable of answering literally any question with a shred of intelligence doesn't mean the deck was stacked against him.

I guess at this point you'll find any way to convince yourself Trump didn't get completely demolished last night. Now hurry up and ban me before I trigger too many of you softies :)

[–]smftw 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hillary was acting as if she's under the influence. There should be a drug test for candidates.

[–]GrandebaboFL 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

...and Trump still won.

[–]MrWoodson 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Lester Holt is a registered republican. This cartoon doesn't make any sense.