上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 226

[–]explohd 151ポイント152ポイント  (38子コメント)

Do skirts go between the cheeks like similar to that? Yes.
Is that butt too firmly contoured? Yes.
Should OP have used all of the butt related puns they could have? Yes.

[–]ActualCryptid 132ポイント133ポイント  (36子コメント)

Do skirts go between the cheeks like that? Yes.

Not unless it's intentional, that shit looks like she's using a butt plug to anchor it in there. If she bends over, you're gonna be able to check for hemorrhoids through the fabric. Shit's so tight I can read her tattoo.

Yes, sometimes skirts do get up in there, but this is clearly the result of the artist watching porn while sketching.

[–]SevenLightpm me your dicks pls 138ポイント139ポイント  (18子コメント)

The fact that it's hugging the underside of the butt curve, then falling loosely, is just...what? And even skin-tight skirts tend not to go between the cheeks like that. Tight clothes will stretch over things like buttcracks and cleavage, because that's how clothes work.

That picture in the comic looks fucking absurd to me lol.

[–]annarchy8mods are gods 45ポイント46ポイント  (15子コメント)

Like most clothing in comics, it defies gravity.

[–]legacylegacy [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Yeah I said this elsewhere but at this point people are just complaning that the comic isn't photorealistic.

Which is just weird. Calm down, it's Sunday.

[–]SuitableDragonfly [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I think expecting things to generally obey the laws of physics is different than expecting photorealism.

[–]LouistheXV [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's a fucking comic book. Have you seen capes? Who cares.

[–]SuitableDragonfly [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I've seen comics criticised for less. if it distracts from the story, people probably won't like it.

[–]lurkerthrowaway845 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Unfortunately a lot of comic book artists are not the most realistic artists since being able to draw out scenes fast is a major part of it. You have to be prepared to redraw things tons of times if the writers/management want you to so most rush there work while trying to be mostly consistent. It also does not help that the best tend to draw multiple comics making their time even more precious.

[–]SuitableDragonfly [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't think it's like a sin against art or anything, I just think that if I saw that in a comic I would probably make a thread making fun of it, too, because it's funny. I don't see how time constraints are really an issue here, though, because I don't think it would ever occur to me to even draw a skirt that way because skirts don't do that? It's probably faster to draw an actual skirt than to sketch out the shape of her ass like that.

[–]frondofafrond 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

But this is bad somehow, don't you understand?

[–]niroby [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Well it's fucking weird. What is the purpose of her but crack being so obsessively outlined. Does it add to the story? Is part of her character that she has a magical gravity defying arse?

[–]khanfusionJust a stupid diversionist tactic to diminish feminism [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

I'm not so sure about that. I've seen skirts hang somewhat like the picture, and to ease my suspicion that I'm going crazy, I did a quick search

So: exaggerated? Yeah. Completely off base? Not really.

[–]niroby [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

You can see the outline of her glutes, you can't see the skirt cling to the underside of her butt or the fabric stuck between her crack. That's a world apart from the drawing.

[–]khanfusionJust a stupid diversionist tactic to diminish feminism [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

"A world apart"

Think about what you just said.

[–]DangerAcademy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wait a sec, are you saying they're drawings and not photos? Hold up here, let me research this myself.

[–]explohd 37ポイント38ポイント  (3子コメント)

Haha, you make a great point. I was thinking the skirt was clenched similar to this[SFW] where you have the profile of each cheek, but no underbuns. I don't even think there is a skirt/dress that can give a butt profile like that of yoga pants.

[–]lunakitty_ 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Underbuns is my new favourite word

[–]thesilvertongue 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah even if you physically shoved it up there and clenched, youd get the cheek cleavage, but you stil wouldnt get the underbuns as well

[–]downvotesyndromekid 25ポイント26ポイント  (3子コメント)

I mean occasionally a loose summer dress will be momentarily blown by the wind to similar effect. These light dresses may also become partially transparent if pressed against skin. In any case this was an artistic choice ("artistic", perhaps not) by the illustrator however so I don't think it's relevant. Barely believable or not it's still very forced.

[–]Ebu-GogoWhan that drama with his popcorn soote 15ポイント16ポイント  (2子コメント)

Maybe forced, but I don't think I would have thought twice about it if it hadn't been explicitly pointed out.

Of all artistic errors in female anatomy and clothing, this is a pretty minor offense IMO.

[–]SuitableDragonfly [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Seemed pretty glaring to me. Maybe it's different if you've actually worn skirts and thought about how they'd look on you?

[–]FrostBittenSalsa [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If I can rock my spandex pt shorts with this ass of mine I can rock that skirt

[–]YossarionTinfoil Deerstalker [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'n pretty sure that's Wonder Woman. She's protected by ancient eros magic that makes it easier for her to kick ass in Man's World. There are certain clothing-related side-effects.

I just made that up, but it's my new head-canon.

[–]DarkLordJigglypuff 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

Usually when drawing a figure you start out with a naked body and add clothes. The artist just didn't understand the way fabric falls over an ass, or didn't care.

[–]PMmeabouturday [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Or was trying to make it sexy

[–]sockyjo [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Would it not have been sexy if the fabric folds had been drawn skillfully?

Are skirts in real life unable to look sexy because of the fact that they can't cleave to the underside of a butt

[–]thesilvertongue 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

You also have to be commando or wearing a thong, but even then that goes really way too far up the butt

[–]ActualCryptid 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Shit's so tight if Fido goes in for the old sitcom buttsniff, he's gonna find a colon polyp. The fabric is so far in there she's one good cough from choking on a hem.

[–]Norbits [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Really the only issue here is that it's a flowy dress that does that. Not sure what everyone else is on about in this thread.

[–]brown_cakeI love a good argument about ducks. 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

Everyone is just salty that Nightwing's butt has competition.

[–]arsitrouke 112ポイント113ポイント  (28子コメント)

That looks fucking ridiculous honestly.

[–]topicality 39ポイント40ポイント  (0子コメント)

And that's the true test! Is this distractingly dumb.

[–]unevolved_panda [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It does look ridiculous, but it's not even in the top five ridiculous things I've seen women wearing in comics, so I'm not sure all these folks are so bent out of shape.

[–]MyChemicalWedding [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm not sure all these folks are so bent out of shape.

Same reason they always are, I guess.

[–]Alexispinpgh 33ポイント34ポイント  (20子コメント)

Yeah, I'm a woman who has spent a fair amount if time around sex workers and in strip clubs and I don't think I've seen any of these butt-molding skirts. I'm REALY confused by where these dudes are seeing this magic apparel

[–]khanfusionJust a stupid diversionist tactic to diminish feminism [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

TBF how often do sex workers/strippers wear long skirts? Can't really be butt-hugging if ends at or before the bottom of the ass.

[–]Alexispinpgh [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Actually it's super weird, the strip club where I play poker every week has the strippers walk around in really revealing evening gowns when they aren't naked. There's s lot of cut-outs and plunging necklines but no magical ass skirts

[–]khanfusionJust a stupid diversionist tactic to diminish feminism [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There are literally no skirts that are long, but do not taper into the thighs. I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to call bullshit on that one.

[–]trumpetmuppet 11ポイント12ポイント  (14子コメント)

http://picture-cdn.wheretoget.it/8wcj6m-l-610x610-beige-romper-backless-big+ass-tight+dress-tight+butt-beige+dress.jpg

I've seen it a lot. Even a cotton maxi dress will try to settle on the ass like that.

[–]stickl 44ポイント45ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's not a dress that's a romper. That's why it goes in her butt like that, its two legs are super large and drape to make it appear like a skirt.

[–]transanxious3 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've never seen that happen and that picture looks ridiculous to the point of looking photoshopped.

Tight skirts across the backside will, at most, form a slight ripple between the cheeks, because there's nothing deeper in the crevasse holding the material in, so it'll naturally follow the path of least resistance and pull taut across the empty space between the buttcheeks.

[–]somethingsupwivchuck 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well in my experience the tighter they are the less likely you get a dip because the material stretches across and becomes flat. It's only loose skirts coupled with no underwear or a thong that leads to any definition.

[–]darth_tiffany 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even if we pretend that isn't Photoshopped, there's a difference between a billowy maxi skirt settling in your crack when you bend over (a common enough occurrence if you're not wearing underwear), and it being glued to every contour of your ass when you're standing straight up, as it is in the illustration.

Also, LOL at all the schoolboys in that thread who are suddenly female fashion experts. "All my pornstar girlfriends wear skintight vinyl miniskirts, so obviously every other type of skirt should behave exactly like that. SJWs amirite."

[–]ButtonsAndSoup 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm pretty sure that's a romper / jumpsuit. I have plenty of those skirts. They make my booty look damn good but they don't curve that deeply into the asscrack and they don't hug the butt cheeks that far under the butt.

[–]grungebot5000jesus man [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

that still doesn't hug under the butt though

[–]thesilvertongue 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think thats a romper, not a maxi, but its hard to tell.

[–]ceol_ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

URL says romper, so I'm inclined to agree.

[–]yip-yip-yhtapmysTHE LEFT AND RIGHT WING BELONG TO THE SAME BIRD. 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's the same image in the linked thread. If it was that common I'm guessing there'd be more than one picture of it. Dresses simple don't work that way.

Source: am woman. Have butt.

[–]where_i_go_now -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

You can downvote him guys, but you can't downvote reality.

[–]nononsenseresponse 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

You mean the fact that it's a romper and not a dress? Cos that's reality.

Edit: That, or Photoshop

[–]nightrideHermione x Sorting hat otp -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lol, this picture. But tbh I find it endlessly amusing that apparently some people believe there are dresses out there with what I can only assume is a bun shaped back for extra sexiness.

[–]ias6661unveiling a government conspiracy by emailing the government 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is it though? Doesn't look way out tbh, even if it's rare.

[–]Zero_point0 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're not offended enough, my friend.

[–]piddlystains [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It was almost enough to make me not order the comic. Because the fact of the matter is it might be tame fanservice, but it's still sexualizing a character for apparently no reason -- not because it suits Wonder Woman's character or because it suits the situation or anything like that.

I personally don't have much tolerance for fanservice. And I'm not some prude or anything. I just think that if artists feel the need to sexualize their female characters for my benefit, then they have a low opinion of me (will only invest in a character if she's not just attractive but sexualized) or their own work. For me, it's not just the image (which I do think is silly, even if it's not as revealing as most fanservice), but it's the idea that creators feel the need to do this that I find objectionable.

[–]Icantremembermyoldlo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They are not making fanservice for you. Some people like it, are you saying their taste are wrong? That the artist doing what they want means they have a low opinion of you or their work? It's interesting watching someone insult an artist because they don't like what they did.

[–]toclosetotheedge 82ポイント83ポイント  (53子コメント)

I like r/comicbooks but it gets really circle jerky a lot and can't discuss anything relating to fanservice all that well.

[–][削除されました]  (4子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]A_Donkey_Brained_Man 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm not a comic book guy, but reddit tends to have more than of these and they are set on trying to win that argument.

    [–]Zemylarabid anti-STEMite [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I get the feeling that story wouldn't be called "Attack on Titan".

    [–]Oxus007Recreationally Offended[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Don't flamebait/grandstand

    [–]BooleanKing 37ポイント38ポイント  (3子コメント)

    So basically all of reddit.

    There are very few subs where you can critique sexualized women without accusations of being "triggered" getting thrown around.

    [–]Stormsoul22 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Ironically they're apparently the ones triggered.

    [–]IgnisDominiEthnomasochist [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Except /r/anime surprisingly

    [–]StingAuerI sexually identify as a member of the bourgeoisie [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    My understanding is that almost the entire anime community is tired of tween spankbait being shoehorned into everything.

    [–]yesitsfrankenstein 17ポイント18ポイント  (42子コメント)

    Usually because it's just awkward. Superheros typically have very idealized bodies. Why this is a problem for people, I don't know, but I too would just sadly shake my head and walk away if someone started complaining about it.

    Or, at the least, get mad about all of it, and not just one gender. I might stick around for like 30 seconds in that case.

    [–]piddlystains [スコア非表示]  (41子コメント)

    The difference is this sort of fanservice is almost exclusively used for one gender. This is a surprisingly modest version of it (which makes it interesting) but the point is very clearly "look at Wonder Woman's ass."

    Running this by a friend of mine (which I mention in another post) her assessment was that she might as well draw her without a skirt and that this fanservice "makes the fans seem like real shitty people."

    [–]yesitsfrankenstein [スコア非表示]  (40子コメント)

    [–]manny_excuses [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Compare that design to something that women actually find attractive: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Btk2r7mCUAE0CNx.jpg

    Posing plays a huge role. Consider also how certain body types have been socialized to be attractive. I don't think it's too surprising that women are encouraged to sexualize the ideal man. Even if there is natural attraction to this body type (and I would guess there likely is), there are many other body types that women do or would find attractive but aren't generally encouraged to enjoy.

    [–]apekillape [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Yadda yadda male gaze and ideals.

    That's not for women to lust after, like the example we're discussing. It's for men to aspire to.

    If it's equal, put the man in daisy dukes and slap the S right on his dangle. That'll sell some books.

    [–]legionallofus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    If it's equal, put the man in daisy dukes and slap the S right on his dangle. That'll sell some books.

    Would it? Why do you think there's not as many male strip clubs as female?

    [–]apekillape [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Real answer is kind of complicated.

    We've been policing women's sexuality pretty much forever, so even though women are just as gross and pervy as we are they haven't been able to be open about it until recently. You ever see a teen girl's room? They don't have all those boy band posters up because they really like the melodies.

    Coupled with that, strip clubs are inherently built on a fantasy that doesn't generally cater to women in our (I'm American) culture. But that doesn't mean they don't want the same sort of thing we get out of it. There's a film on Japanese host clubs that goes into an aspect of this in detail, called The Great Happiness Space.

    To directly answer your question though, no. It would not, I was making a joke. Much like online FPS/MOBA gaming, mainstream comic fans are still dudes, and not enough of them see anything wrong with alienating the smaller number of them that don't like being objectified. But that number would get a lot bigger if the majority weren't so nonchalant about dismissing their viewpoints.

    [–]thesilvertongue [スコア非表示]  (31子コメント)

    That body isn't remotely sexualized. It's just muscular. This is what a fan service sexy comic man looks like

    [–]YearsandMonths [スコア非表示]  (26子コメント)

    If women were into the village people, yes. But typically women aren't into guys that dress like they work at a gay nightclub.

    So, in a word: no.

    [–]thesilvertongue [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

    According to what excatly? You honestly are going to tell me that a sexless looking muscular superman is the height of female sexual fantasy?

    Man Laura Croft at least is showing skin, has an ass, a bulge, and really low riding pants that show off those V muscles in addition to muscles. Plus, he's in purposefully sexy poses.

    [–]YearsandMonths [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Sexy poses? Yes for a gay bottom. If you're into pegging dudes, cool for you. Most women are not. Most of them, shockingly, like to get pegged. With a penis. Right in their vaginas.

    [–]thesilvertongue [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    There are plenty of gratuitous bulge pics in the mix as well.

    But dont pretend like straight ladies dont enjoy a nice man butt.

    Point is he's got way more sex appeal than superman who is just standing around with big muscles

    [–]YearsandMonths [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    There are plenty of gratuitous bulge pics in the mix as well.

    Yeah, that's comic books.

    But dont pretend like straight ladies dont enjoy a nice man butt.

    Yeah, that's comic books.

    [–]AlbertBelleBestEver [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    ...You honestly think women are into men that dress like they're gay?

    There's a reason why guys don't wear things on the beach, and they'll wear whatever gets them laid.

    [–]Paremo [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    they'll wear whatever gets them laid.

    I'm no expert on such matters, but that seems sexist.

    [–]thesilvertongue [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Um... yes. He's got a great ass.

    Do you think women are more sexually attracted to superman suits?

    Its also not about the clothes. Its about what features are emphasized and exaggerated and where the viewers eye is drawn.

    [–]ohmygodagiantrock [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

    Idk the show Spartacus had the male characters wear something similar and female viewership was huge. The women on the show wore revealing outfits as well but the show mostly gets a pass in feminist circles because the sexualization was equal.

    [–]YearsandMonths [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    He looks like a superhero.

    So why is this thread full of complaints about superheros looking like superheros?

    [–]ceol_ [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    What superheroes are you seeing that wear bottoms like that? Even He-Man lacks that distinct bulge.

    [–]FixinThePlanetSJWay is the only way [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Did you poll a lot of women to confirm that they didn't find that attractive?

    [–]YearsandMonths [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, I went out in a daisy dukes topless on Fridays for two years and hit on girls and then on Saturdays went out in suits.

    Girls hate guys in suits, and love those who dress like it's Halloween. Who knew?

    [–]niroby [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The large number of teen girls into yaoi suggests otherwise.

    [–]piddlystains [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Fanservice is not merely idealized bodies. It's sexualizing these bodies.

    I don't have an objection to the idealized body, it's part of the fantasy. I have an objection with drawing a panel that's needlessly trying to draw my eye to her ass.

    [–]thesilvertongue [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Now this would be the male equivalent, not just a muscular superman.

    It's even complete with an unnecessary butt angle and a wedgie that looks incredibly painful and defies physics.

    [–]piddlystains [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    That picture is brilliant.

    To add onto the point, just showing a muscular Superman misses the point for another reason. Superman is a male created ideal of the male body. Most superheroines are male created ideals of the female body. Even ideal is made with an end or purpose in mind. In the case of these idealized bodies, the end is fighting crime and supervillains. Their bodies are essential tools to this end and are drawn with this in mind: when you plan on punching out god-like bad guys, you need to be a powerhouse. Yet the ideals for the male body emphasize the muscles while the female bodies emphasizes tits and ass. The fact that Wonder Woman is not drawn with comparable musculature to Superman or Batman is telling.

    Unless we have Wonder Woman's primary mode of attack being the rear view, it's not like her ass is a vital part of accomplishing the end that her idealized body is presumably made for.

    [–]shneb [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The poster is talking about asses. Women are also attracted to asses. Male characters sexualized in that way would have their asses taking up a third of the panel and pants that defied gravity.

    Sometimes that does happen.

    [–]sandwichsparrowLGBT mafia hit-squad member 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

    They're called contour lines. It's a drawing. He's drawing the shadow that makes it clear that a woman in a skirt doesn't have one uni-cheek.

    Is that necessary? Are people really concerned about the state of the woman's butt under her skirt?

    [–]SnapshillBotShilling for Big Archive™ 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You're oversimplifying a complex situation to the point of adding nothing to the discussion.

    Snapshots:

    1. This Post - 1, 2, 3, 4

    2. "Yes, some do exist. They're specia... - 1, 2, Error, 3

    3. "OP, if this is offensive to you, t... - 1, 2, Error, 3

    4. "OP sounds like a tumblerina lookin... - 1, 2, Error, 3

    I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

    [–]Not_A_Doctor__ 41ポイント42ポイント  (5子コメント)

    I guess it's because of the history of cheesecake in comics, but I'm sick of this debate. I love the comics that I love and don't seek eroticization from them. In fact, a good analogy is conventional fiction. Quick, in the last fifty novels that you read, were female characters described in an eroticized way for the purpose of exciting the readers? I read a lot of books and the answer is no. Eroticizing a character is a very specific type of characterization that isn't used because it undermines your ability from write a bunch of other stuff. You can't write a Borges story if part of the aim is cheesecake sexualization. You can't have The Last of the Just if you also describe the tits and asses of concentration camp victims. Just can't happen. Similarly, the cheesecake sexualization in so many comics prevents them from putting across a lot of other tones, shades and stories.

    You can tell I'm really sick of this argument, can't you?

    [–]aescolanus 35ポイント36ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Quick, in the last fifty novels that you read, were female characters described in an eroticized way for the purpose of exciting the readers?

    Yes, in about half of them.

    (I read a lot of modern urban fantasy.)

    [–]Arkadii [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Same, also a lot of science fiction, and it really bugs the shit out of me in most of them.

    [–]Not_A_Doctor__ 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I am willing to admit might be out of touch.

    [–]ActualCryptid 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Nah, it's the kids who are wrong.

    [–]khanfusionJust a stupid diversionist tactic to diminish feminism [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I mean, that was kind of a ridiculous statement.

    [–]ziggaby [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    To me it looks like a shadow from the left cheek is making it look like it's crammed up there.

    [–]piddlystains [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I'm going to speak as a new comic reader. Aside from reading some trades in junior high and high school, I never really read comics. I've started reading them with the Rebirth line and, I got to say, seeing that image was almost enough to have me skip out on Trinity. I decided the otherwise great reviews meant it was silly not to buy it over one fan service shot. But, goddamn, is that silly.

    And I'm not a major feminist. I'm just generally not big on fan service, and that picture, while not as bad as other fan service (despite its silliness it's very tame), seems emblematic of some of the comic book nerd stereotypes.

    Also I just find the art baffling. I quickly ran it by a friend of mine to get her view.

    Might as well not make her wear a skirt

    Seems about right.

    But the proportions are just baffling all around.

    [–]SlabMcLargeHuge 5ポイント6ポイント  (9子コメント)

    [–]tinytwo 36ポイント37ポイント  (8子コメント)

    It is a dress but it's very photoshopped. I remember there was a thread of the original, but searching isn't turning much up.

    [–]transanxious3 16ポイント17ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I mean seriously, how can someone not immediately tell that is ridiculously photoshopped? It looks like someone took a photoshopped bare ass and pasted a cotton fabric texture over it.

    [–]redditors_are_awful [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    The alleged original isn't that much different in terms of visible butt cheeks:

    http://i.imgur.com/gXMhv1Q.jpg

    [–]transanxious3 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, that still looks shopped. It's a little weird how every high-definition smidge of buttcheek is visible with absolutely zero folding until it gets further down the thigh... yet the spine that is clearly visible above the dressline has totally vanished beneath the fabric that mysteriously magically hugs other parts of the body.

    [–]LeotheYordleOvershill! Shilltacular! Shilltrocity! Shillamanjaro! [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Some of us just want to live in hope.

    [–]transanxious3 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    For what? Clothing that defies the laws of physics? Magnetic sphincters?

    [–]StingAuerI sexually identify as a member of the bourgeoisie [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Magnetic sphincters?

    band name

    [–]transanxious3 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Run a Google image search for 'tight dresses', see how long it takes to find a picture where the dress is doing the thing it did in that comic panel.

    [–]praemittias -1ポイント0ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Reading comments in this thread, I have to ask: are you guys really arguing because a clothing in a comic book isn't hanging naturally? Like sitting around getting outraged about because it hugs a cartoon's ass too tight?

    Fucking Christ. This isn't circlebroke, guys. It's never going to be that type of sub.

    [–]mintzonWhat is this I don't even [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Who is outraged? Haven't seen any outrage. Offended, maybe. Downvotes for people not offended or offended at the offended, definitely.

    This isn't circlebroke, guys. It's never going to be that type of sub.

    Oh, I see, you're being sarcastic. Carry on.

    [–]Shooouryuken [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Downvotes for people not offended

    These are always the funniest. SRD wil get into a frenzy of calling out so-called "shitty behavior" and people who are like "...I don't think it's shitty, guys" get downvoted in the thrill of it all. KILL THE UNBELIEVERS!

    [–]IceCreamBalloonsEthics are forged in the fires of flamewar [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    get downvoted in the thrill of it all. KILL THE UNBELIEVERS!

    I didn't realize karma was life or death.

    [–]Tahmatoes [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Supes serious. Don't do this at home, kids.

    [–]LouistheXV [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Oh good days it's not circlebroke. Right now, it's smelling very, very brokey in here.