1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
afpe

STOP!!! OVERSEXUALIZING!!! ORGANS!!! THAT EXIST!!! TO FEED INFANTS!!!! U !! LOOK!!! STUPID!!!

afpe:

afpe:

unapothecary:

mlpgodzalis9876:

unapothecary:

mlpgodzalis9876:

unapothecary:

mlpgodzalis9876:

afpe:

Too bad there are biological and psychological reasons as to why breasts evolved to be sexual, but lets all ignore that so you can complain that people think breasts are sexy (because that’s how they’re wired to be).

I would also like to point out that big breasts are a signifier for fertility. Just like wide hips.

there are no biological reasons to sexualize breasts. they serve no purpose than to feed babies. both genders have breasts, womens’ are enlarged TO FEED INFANTS. but whatever. y'all justify everything when it comes to oversexualization and believe everything women have/do is for sex appeal.

… You don’t get it, do you? We’re not the ones sexualising breasts. Biology is sexualising them. Breasts are not only an organ for feeding children, they also show men the amount of milk they can produce for the children. This is like saying “Stop sexualising vaginas! There’s nothing sexual about vaginas!” or “Stop sexualising penises!” I’m sorry, cupcake, but the facts are that the bigger the breasts, the better they are for producing the milk for children.

Adult human beings are sexual being by nature. There are exceptions, of course, like Asexual people, but humans want bigger breasts to show off fertility. That’s why there’s push-up bras, to give the illusion of bigger breasts.

this is the dumbest thing i have ever read. you honestly think men beat off to breasts and go “"omg her fertility 😩😩😩😩😩😩😩😩😩💦💦💦💦💦💦💦”“. but here’s a fun fact; not all women are fertile, yet they still have breasts 😦

Yes, but that’s a MEDICAL ISSUE. That’s something wrong with the INDIVIDUAL who is infertile. But AS A WHOLE bigger breasts shows fertility.

i really hope you’re a troll because someone this stupid needs help. why should i even argue with you? you’re a bigoted anti feminist blog. you’re obviously ignorant.

I like how you couldn’t actually reply to what they said so you just resorted to name calling. Very feminist of you.

Anyways, here’s some sources:

http://www.livescience.com/23500-why-men-love-breasts.html

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/breasts-natural-unnatural-history-explores-evolution-organ/story?id=16292226

http://brainmind.com/sexevolution.html

http://www.evolution-x.com/breasts.htm

http://www.evolution-x.com/breasts.htm

I COULD go on but I think I’ve proven my point.

Lmao it’s true though? Maybe the guy doesn’t consciously think about a woman’s fertility when he’s aroused, but biologically men are attracted to the features of the opposite sex that indicate fertility. So, larger breasts and a big bum (linked to child-bearing hips).

afpe Source: unapothecary

More you might like

thejournal.ie

16-year-old faces charge for having consensual sex with girl the same age as him

A judge has voiced “serious concerns” for the boy who is in State-care.
Louise McCarthy

theproudpatriarch:

If he’s facing statutory rape charges because he, 16, had sex with a girl, also 16, why isn’t she facing the same charges?

FUN FACT: The legal definition of rape is “attack by penetration”. Because of this, by law, only men can be charged with rape, and for the same offence, women will be charged with sexual assault: a lesser sentence.

In the example above, the sex was consensual, meaning that the girl cannot even be charged with sexual assault, but it is still considered statutory rape, allowing the boy to be charged.

This is blatant sexism in the legal system, the sort that cannot and will not be changed due to a lack of campaigning, and the government’s fear of complaints regarding sexism towards women.

It is also important to add that legal systems are not objective, and therefore the judge and the jury have the power to direct the verdict. Statistically, it has been shown that many take pity on women, leading to further reduced sentences for them.

It is issues such as this that are the real sources of gender inequality. It is not a case of feelings being hurt because of inconsequential stereotypes, but a real form of UNEQUAL RIGHTS.

If feminism is truly about equal rights, then I ask, why are you not campaigning for change in cases like this?

Source: theproudpatriarch anti feminist anti sjw feminist feminism egalitarianism egalitarian equality equal rights

Anonymous asked:

You dooooo realize that feminism is just about treating everyone with love and respect? Sure, there are bad apples in every bunch, but don't let them ruin it for you. I mean apparently they already have haha. But seriously, not sure why you'd be against it. Look up feminism in the dictionary. That definition is not the people who go overboard lol. Damn bitch

I’ve made these points before on my blog but here we go:

You cannot judge a movement by its definition. The definition of s Nazi is a member of the Nationalist Socialist German Workers’ Party; the dictionary will not tell you that they slaughtered 11m people.

I’m in no way saying feminism is as bad as Nazism, I’m simply saying that in the case of a movement, the definition is not indicative of its nature.

You can make the choice not to associate yourself with a movement while still agreeing with the premise: I believe in equal rights, but I don’t want to associate myself with feminism, because many things feminists have done have not been compatible with the notion of equal rights.

As long as I believe in equal rights, what does it matter what I label myself?

anti feminist anti feminism anti sjw anti blm anti black lives matter anti vegan sjw bullshit nazis feminazi feminist feminism sjw blm black lives matter white privilege male privilege equal rights

So what I’m gathering from the whole BLM UK thing is that they’re blocking a runway at London City Airport because they think that pollution/climate change/global warming is racist, and they think this because POCs have bigger nostrils?

Like what are they expecting anyone to do? Are they demanding government funded nostril reduction surgery in the name of equality???

anti black lives matter black lives matter blm anti blm uk anti feminist anti feminism anti sjw sjw feminist feminism
ace-pervert

You don’t have to include men in feminist spaces

ace-pervert:

smallblueangel:

unaffiliatedpangolin:

skeleton-lad:

smallblueangel:

sugardreamgxrl:

cisnowflake:

If you claim to be an equality movment you sure do.

What I mean is, while men are involved in feminism, not every feminist space needs to be open to accommodate them because women deserve some room for themselves.

First: that’s stupid bullshit.
Second: feminists are the first to whine when men want rooms for them!

No person in their right mind would want to be around a feminist.

All male groups are patriarchal “boy’s clubs” that are barring women from getting ahead. 

All female groups are a safe space needed for the protection of women and to help gender equality.

http://www.chronicle.com/article/At-Harvard-All-Female-Groups/236431/ 

I can’t stand the word “safe space” anymore.

same

When I hear the term, it makes me cringe, because why should special snowflakes be accommodated for? However, on my first day at college, we were told there are two safe spaces, and without hearing the whole sentence, I rolled my eyes and thought for fuck’s sake, really?

BUT, what the teacher went on to say was that these safe spaces were for those who are diagnosed with depression, anxiety and such, and it reminded me that this is what a safe space really is, and that’s not so bad. 

So, a big fuck you to all the fragile SJWs who demand safe spaces and make them so that they’re no longer for the people who actually need them.

And that goes to self-diagnosers too. Yes, by all means, you may have the condition that you think you have, but you cannot expect to be treated or accommodated for if you haven’t received a formal diagnosis.

ace-pervert Source: sugardreamgxrl

Can we please stop overusing the word “misogyny”? Misogyny is a deep-set hatred of women. Saying “make me a sandwich” is not misogynistic; it’s sexist, yes, but it doesn’t mean that the person saying it hates women for being women.

Saying that women only exist for the sexual pleasure of men, for example, is misogynistic. Saying that women are inferior to men is misogynistic. Saying that women are only here to provide children is misogynistic.

In reality, no one really says these things. Yes, there are definitely a few, but it took a few minutes to think of things that really are misogynistic to prove my point.

Again, telling a woman to “stay in the kitchen” is sexist, not misogynistic. 

By trivialising the word “misogyny”, all meaning is removed when something really is misogynistic. If you describe casually sexist remarks as misogyny, when something is actually misogynistic, no one will take you seriously when you call it out.

It’s literally The Boy Who Cried Wolf all over again.

or the feminist who cried misogyny amirite? anti feminism anti feminist anti sjw rape culture partiarchy male privilege white privilege sjw feminist feminism misogyny misandry mra
See this in the app Show more