全 21 件のコメント

[–]Endorsed ContributorMattyAnon 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

They'll try to make it legally mandatory for women to know if a man has Vasalgel (some sort of online register), and possibly illegal for a husband to get it without his wife's consent.

They'll hamster that unlike the pill it's semi permanent and that she has a right to know. They might even give up the right to "pill privacy" in exchange, although this is not a fair deal because there is no proof she's actually "remembering" to swallow it. Swallow it, hehe.

Despite 6 decades of women hiding whether they are on the pill (or whether they're lying about it), they'll demand the right to know if a man is on it "to avoid him wasting my time" or some other such convenient lie to cover up their real need to know: "before I fuck him, will I get my child support?".

[–]Battle-Scars 7ポイント8ポイント  (3子コメント)

Once they outlaw Vasalgel only outlaws will use Vasagel, sounds like a great black market opportunity to make some 1% money.

[–]Endorsed Contributorstonepimpletilists 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

How would they even enforce that?

It would at worst, be like how guys get steroids today

[–]Endorsed ContributorMattyAnon 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

It requires a medical operation to start or end it. Steroids don't require use of medical professionals, Vasalgel does.

[–]Endorsed Contributorstonepimpletilists 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mexico will become popular then.

[–]TrumpRules2016 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Interesting article from a feminist: http://archive.is/YZJt7

[–]2popthatpill 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Interesting article indeed - women are already nervously pretending to be pro-Vasalgel (although I doubt that'll stop them from pushing to have it banned).

[–]TrumpRules2016 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I find the "Safe Sex is Empowered Sex" funny. Yes vaselgel protects you from knocking some chick up, but safe sex also has to do with STDs and the author lightly mentioned that.

Unfortunately, we haven't found some pill or procedure that protects you from getting STDs yet.

[–]xx69bootyhunter69xx 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Please use archive.is for such posts. TRP absolutely shouldn't be giving an ounce of internet traffic to feminist sites.

[–]TrumpRules2016 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just changed it. It's only showing the text and not those annoying photos.

[–]DisgruntledWolverine 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Women are too short sighted. They almost never thing long term, it is always about the here and now. How does this make me feel "here and now"

They probably can't even comprehend what this will mean for their precious feminist ideology in the long run

Hopefully we see it in FDA trials in the US within a year or 2... A lot of people think it is a pipedream... but I can hope for the best.

[–]aanarchist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

about time take responsibility for birth control is like i could not have found a better way to frame the advent of vasagel myself. they think it's for their benefit, though in a sense it is in the long run.

[–]dbtlsdn999 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're going to be fucked when they "forget" their birth control and force marry some rich guy.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have actually seen it written by some feminists (who are overt opponents of Vasalgel) that "developments in male birth control would take control over pregnancy away from women".

That is a pretty blatant admission that women purposefully weaponize pregnancies (that is, the "whoopsie" pregnancy) in order to secure financial leverage over men that they don't know how to attract.

Just one more indication that women have no clue (or inclination) to harness femininity to persuade men to be faithful. It's all stick and no carrot.

[–]maxrp 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hopefully it also stops male sex drives, stop guys giving women so much attention in the street / bar etc, stop all the beta cringe behaviour for sex, and change the whole dynamic of chasing women to zero.

[–]Endorsed ContributorG_Petronius 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

You say throughout the article that women have had primary control of reproductive outcomes for the past five generations, thanks to hormonal birth control and abortion, and I tend to agree: abortion allows for the ultimate panic-button escape from parenthood, while hormonal birth control (provided it's taken regularly) is very effective.

But I have to ask: since men could equally as effectively control their own reproductive outcomes via proper use of condoms, why is it that we assume that's not the same thing? what comes to my mind is that most men prefer not to wear a rubber, especially in a LTR, and at any rate the pill and abortion don't require that anybody stop in the heat of the moment, so there's less room for people to just say "fuck it". What are you thoughts on this? has it really been just a matter of men not liking condoms and being prone to ignoring them in the moment?

[–]Endorsed ContributorMattyAnon 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

is very effective

The pill is perfect because it is not 100% effective. This means she can trap a man by "forgetting" to take it, while claiming that she took it every day, it just didn't work properly this time.

Complete control with zero responsibility. Just how women like things.

[–]Endorsed Contributorstonepimpletilists 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rare cases, spermicides jacking.

Uncommon cases, breakage

Common cases, didn't use, drunk to notice, or slipped off

People are stupid, BC protects us from ourselves. Condoms aren't as good at it.

[–]H42 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

"In the heat of the moment" sexually is a far different mental state than when in the doc's office getting reversibly sterile for 8-10 years.

[–]Endorsed ContributorG_Petronius 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's what I'm getting at.