Unsurprisingly, after stalking me here, you proceeded to blatantly lie.

Pretty much everything here is wrong or misleading. You have a horribly twisted understanding of the history of the conflict.

Says the guy who is defending a clearly incorrect map.

Both Jews and Arabs lived as Palestine in Mandatory Palestine and before than in Ottoman provinces. They were all citizens of that legal instrument. That first map just shows the amount of land owned by arabs in that land. Arabs would be referred to as Palestinians afterwards when the Jews became Israelis and distinguished themselves from arab palestinians.

No, it doesn't. It shows land owned by Jews, Arabs, and the state, and it gives the Arabs all land owned by the state. It would be like me showing a map of the US with white-owned land, black-owned land, and then federal government owned land, but then put all federal government owned land under the color for white-owned land.

That would make no sense.

And while it shows land ownership in a private sense, this is horribly different from sovereign land. It would be like showing a map of white-owned land in the US 20 years ago, and then showing a map of the US and labeling it all "black-owned land". They are literally black and white in terms of how different each type of ownership is.

Jordan annexed Palestine and gave them citizenship.

No, it annexed Palestinians. It didn't annex "Palestine". "Palestine" didn't exist, and the Mandate of Palestine was split up.

The land was both Jordanian and Palestinian because the two concepts were one and the same

Not according to Palestinians, who claimed a separate national identity, despite Jordan claiming they were the rightful owners of the land.

With Gaza it was slightly different but by the end of Nasser's reign he had given Egyptian citizenship to the Palestinians as part of the United Arab Republic

You say "slightly different", despite them being very, very different. Jordan gave citizenship and full rights to Palestinians for the most part, while Egypt went the opposite route. Palestinians in Egypt were not allowed to own agricultural land until 1963 (15 years), and in 1964 were told that they had to get entry and exit visas, quite different from any actual citizen. They got some rights similar to Egyptian citizens, but never quite close to the level of Jordan's granting of rights to Palestinians.

Its completely fair to say that the land was Palestinian as well as Jordanian/Egyptian.

It was Jordanian and Egyptian, not Palestinian. It was never run by Palestinians, sovereignty-owned by Palestinians, etc. In fact, the above only shows that Egypt/Jordan controlled every aspect of the land and its people, meaning it was not Palestinian land at all.

This is completely false and the opposite of the truth. The Palestinians were deprived of citizenship in any state and denied the ability to be part of any state.

The first time they had any autonomy was granted by Israel. The first time. They had no such autonomy under the British, none under Egypt or Jordan, etc.

The first time they came anywhere close to self-determination was Israel giving it to them. The only country that has offered them self-determination and a state is Israel. Never did Egypt or Jordan do the same for them, despite controlling the West Bank and Gaza for nearly 20 years.

If anything this map overstates Palestinian land control because 100% of those Palestinians are deprived of any basic human rights and citizenship

Citizenship yes, basic human rights no.

being relegated to oppressive bantustans

Completely false. Ignoring how we got here, a treaty Palestinians signed and their rejection of every peace offer since, Israel has never attempted to make the situation permanent and has offered Palestinians a real, viable state multiple times; 2000, 2001, 2007, 2008, and so on. You know this, and you know how it contrasts with Bantustans, but you still push this horrible analogy, even as you ignore that Palestinians themselves say they support putting Jews into real Bantustans...or worse.

Israel deprived them of that and crushes any hope for them to be citizens of any state each and every year that settlements expand

Settlements "expand" at a rate of 8 square kilometers a year. That's...0.1% of the West Bank.

It'll take well over 500 years for Israel to cover the West Bank with settlements. And Israel has offered to evacuate plenty of settlements for peace, multiple times. Palestinians are the ones who refuse.

The real problem, the real reason Palestinians can't be citizens of any state, is because they say that even if they get their own state, they will continue trying to destroy Israel. You know this, you've seen the polls, but ignore them and say "But it's just one poll" despite it being more than one and done by Palestinian pollsters.

Rather than urge Palestinians to accept peace as a final answer, you claim the problem is Israel building houses over an imaginary line set in 1949 after Palestinians and Arab states started a war with Israel.

yeah right, this was a fact free comment.

Almost none of what you said addressed any part of the map, which was his actual point of criticism. You didn't even answer most of his post, but you claim it was "fact-free"...despite actually saying that parts of it were correct factually. Do you realize how stupid your comment is?

Go stalk around somewhere else.