全 101 件のコメント

[–]blackbeatsblueLittle Japan[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (1子コメント)

Due to this being a contentious topic, this thread has been designated as controversial. As a controversial thread:

  • All participating redditors must have significant /r/Toronto histories. Any violators will receive a ban without warning.

  • Any rule-breaking actions by /r/Toronto regulars will be punished with increased severity.

Please be careful to follow Rules 2 and 3 and engage in polite, respectful dialogue.

An explanation of this policy can be found here. If you wish to discuss it further, please keep this discussion on topic by messaging modmail.

modnote: please just be nice to each other?

[–]corzaftwThe Financial District 26ポイント27ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, as much as I love Pride, sucks that I won't be attending it again. At least until they sever ties with BLMTO.

[–]thisismeingradenineLeslieville 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wondered how long it would be before they bowed to BLM...

[–]PurplebuzzParkdale 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can't wait for next years parade. We are going to burn it down to build it up. I for one love a good bonfire.

[–]AstroTRBO 11ポイント12ポイント  (36子コメント)

Fuck Pride. This is them pandering to people who want to get their own way. They deserve zero respect, zero funding and zero publicity after this stunt.

[–]1of42 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's hard to say. I'm gay, and on its face strongly disagree with this statement.

But the LGBTQ+ community has a variety of agendas within it and a lot of dedicated activists (read: not a lot else going on in their lives) for all of them. Pride has to manage those personalities. I am unconvinced that this is not just a lot of social justice boilerplate. The result is what counts, and the only actual content here is that they are initiating the dispute resolution process, which we knew anyways. There's still much to be seen.

[–]calendarization 1ポイント2ポイント  (28子コメント)

Pride deserves zero funding? Simply because they've apologized to queer people who said the organization didn't listen to their concerns and pledged to do a better job of listening to queer people?

[–]thecoloneltomparkerStonegate-Queensway 3ポイント4ポイント  (7子コメント)

Why would we fund a group that claims 'a history of anti-blackness'. Public funding for admittedly racist organizations seems like a bad idea.

[–]calendarization 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

If we extend your logic, then, we shouldn't pay taxes to the Crown.

[–]thecoloneltomparkerStonegate-Queensway 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

I just think it's a shame that Pride has had to claim that they are (or have been) a racist organization. They don't appear to be particularly racist. Racist parades are usually not cool. In this case it seems that BLM have demanded some self-flagellation, and Pride have acquiesced. Basically, "admit you're a racist or suffer the consequences".

[–]calendarization 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

I re-read the press release. I think the BLMTO aspect of this story is misleading a lot of people to think this hasn't been an issue for Black queer people and queer people of colour with Pride for years. Pride Toronto acknowledges that these issues have been a source of contention, heartbreak, divisiveness, and conflict for years. Pride has been dealing with issues of race and the marginalization of racialized peoples for a long time. It has been a constant struggle for Black queer people and queer people of colour to get Pride's mostly European-derived folks to recognize, acknowledge, and participate in celebrating their lives. Heck, I remember when there were racist epithets tossed around by white gym queens when Pride floats dared to have a hip hop DJ spinning records.

Just because Pride is seriously progressive doesn't mean it is perfect. The list of demands BLMTO presented includes things like hiring more Black and indigenous employees at Pride, and additional funding for Black and south asian culture at the festival. BLMTO stopped the parade to make these demands, which made headlines and chyrons, but people have been demanding Pride do these things without that kind of publicity and no one has called for Pride to be defunded because they've negotiated the issue.

[–]thecoloneltomparkerStonegate-Queensway [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Thanks for the response and your insight. I think your point of view likely represents the majority of folks who are really invested in the issue.

[–]calendarization [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

you're welcome. i'm not really all that invested in it. heck, i haven't even gone to a damn parade in a couple of years. i just follow these news items relatively closely and have a somewhat decent memory for queer issues in toronto for the last 20 years or so.

[–]the_bartthe -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why would we fund a group that claims 'a history of anti-blackness'.

you are aware you live in a country with a long history of racism right?

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So... privatize the police?

[–]boxjohn 5ポイント6ポイント  (19子コメント)

No because they've given the specific group Black Lives Matter Toronto waaaaaaaay too much time after said group both disrupted Pride and proved to be totally wingnut racists.

[–]calendarization -2ポイント-1ポイント  (5子コメント)

again, just to be clear - because they've given BLMTO in your opinion too much time, Pride Toronto deserves no funding? there should be only a privately funded queer festival and parade next year, in your opinion?

[–]boxjohn 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

No, there should be a parade run by a group who doesn't associate or cow tow to the Black Lives Matter Toronto group.

[–]calendarization 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I wish you all the best in organizing such a group then.

[–]boxjohn 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't think the fact that I can't/won't personally spearhead an organization replacing Pride Toronto is a very good counter argument to the assertion that they're out of touch and supporting hate groups.

[–]calendarization 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think BLMTO is a hate group. I disagree with you on that point.

Pride Toronto made it clear in the press release that they feel they are out of touch, because despite their mandate to listen to the queer community, and despite their explicit history of being a political organization standing up to dangerous and violent opposition from the State and large groups of various oppressors, they did not listen to and act on pleas from various members of Black queer communities for inclusion in Pride. That's how their town hall worked; it's how, I gather, their DRP works. This, then, is them making it clear how Pride is getting in touch.

You must be aware of how Pride started. Every summer there's a rash of articles and short news features about it: the repression, the violence, the legislated discrimination, outright criminalisation; the bathhouse raids; the first march on Yonge; the demands by the queer community for acceptance and representation and inclusion. How, with this rich short history of change, can Pride Toronto ignore queer people telling it that they need to do a better job of listening to Black queer people, and making greater efforts to include Black queer people in the festival?

So, you won't do anything to start a different organization, but you want the present one to fall apart. If you got your way - if Pride Toronto was defunded - then should we simply hope that others, not you, will rise up to create a different organization to celebrate Pride in Toronto? Or are you expecting someone else to do work you are unwilling to do yourself?

[–]alphs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They've allowed BLM to hijack the pride movement. Shame on BLM, shame on Pride TO.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -20ポイント-19ポイント  (61子コメント)

Pride Toronto remains committed to all of the demands agreed to and presented by BLMTO, Blackness Yes, Black Queer Youth, and others. We remain committed to demonstrating progress on each and every item and, as agreed, working with these groups to hold a public town hall this Winter to demonstrate progress and plans to deliver on these commitments.

/r/toronto racist concern-troll meltdown in 5... 4...

[–]beef-supremeLeslieville[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (50子コメント)

So, It'll be a police-free the purge Pride'17 ?

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -3ポイント-2ポイント  (49子コメント)

I'm pretty sure all BLM demanded re: police was that Pride not have police parade-floats, or officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers.

"No police presence at all" is a strangely-common (on r/Toronto anyway) misreading of BLM's Pride-protest demands.

[–]beef-supremeLeslieville[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (14子コメント)

You're right. #8 is the removal of police floats/booths throughout Pride. I think this statement is prepping for BLMTO's request #9.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path 2ポイント3ポイント  (13子コメント)

For BLMTO to demand no police presence at all, they'd have to have never seen both "Police Academy" and "RoboCop," which we both know is a scientific impossibility.

[–]calendarization 2ポイント3ポイント  (12子コメント)

it would violate the schroedenberg principle.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path 1ポイント2ポイント  (11子コメント)

No, I factored in the 1.21 jigawatts.

[–]calendarization 1ポイント2ポイント  (10子コメント)

better not floor the gas unless you really liked oct 21 2015 i guess

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

My mission is to protect you. Thirty-five years from now, you reprogrammed me to be your protector here, in this time.

[–]calendarization 5ポイント6ポイント  (7子コメント)

Well then maybe we'll all get to watch you slam your head into a five ton slab of granite.

[–]rekjensenMoss Park 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers.

This wasn't in the published list of demands I saw, just the (pointless) no-floats part.

[–]1of42 6ポイント7ポイント  (10子コメント)

Which is even worse than any other form of the demand since it has zero effect except symbolic spite and division.

BLM complains that police routinely are racist to and oppress people of colour. Okay, so the natural response to that in the context of Pride would be to examine the policing at the festival. But no, instead they demand the floats and officers representing agencies in the parade - the only officers who are by definition not actively oppressing PoC - be removed.

It's fucking ludicrous.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -2ポイント-1ポイント  (9子コメント)

Police participation in Pride has always been contentious.

BLM are hardly the first to ask that it stop.

They just did an effective job of getting that issue into the news this year.

[–]1of42 7ポイント8ポイント  (8子コメント)

Of course the relationship between police and Pride has always been controversial, we all know the history. But what BLM is demanding isn't really about that specific controversial history except insofar as they are co-opting the narrative. Their stated issue with the police is due to oppression of PoC/other minorities, and they have picked the singular least effective, most spitefully symbolic demand to "address" it.

Need I remind you that BLM literally shut down a reconciliation event between police and victims of the bathhouse raids (that launched Pride) the week prior to the parade? It got overshadowed by the parade protest, but it really crystallized how little BLM truly cares about LGBT issues except insofar as they intersect with BLM's agenda.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

Symbolic, absolutely - but that doesn't mean more concrete things aren't happening too.

I'm not involved so I can't say, but:

If you have ideas for more effective ways to end systemic police mistreatment of LGBT black people, I'm sure BLM-TO would appreciate learning about them:

http://blacklivesmatter.ca/about/

[–]1of42 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Symbolic, absolutely - but that doesn't mean more concrete things aren't happening too.

Which has absolutely no bearing on the analysis of this particular demand.

If you have ideas for more effective ways to end systemic police mistreatment of LGBT black people, I'm sure BLM-TO would appreciate learning about them

I have plenty, but I suspect many of them have been considered already. Further, I'm white. BLM Toronto explicitly welcomes my opinion and presence only insofar as it meekly supports whatever BLM decides. Which I don't disagree with in their context; I'm sure it's exactly what they want and quite possibly an objectively reasonable choice. But I'm sure you can also see why I have little interest in wasting my time in a one-way dialogue.

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Please share those ideas here instead.

I'll email them in.

You never know!

It's hard to tell what race I am from an email.

I mean, probably.

[–]the_bartthe 0ポイント1ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm pretty sure all BLM demanded re: police was that Pride not have police parade-floats, or officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers. "No police presence at all" is a strangely-common (on r/Toronto anyway) misreading of BLM's Pride-protest demands.

so it won't do anything to diminish the police presence at Pride?

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path 0ポイント1ポイント  (8子コメント)

Just a slight diminishment.

Remember when I said:

I'm pretty sure all BLM demanded re: police was that Pride not have police parade-floats, or officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers.

[–]the_bartthe -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm pretty sure all BLM demanded re: police was that Pride not have police parade-floats, or officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers.

yeah, what i typed doesn't disagree with that statement. if there are police officers hired to due security/safety. how does not allowing floats/booth do anything to diminish their presence ?

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path -2ポイント-1ポイント  (6子コメント)

police officers hired to due security/safety

Nobody's trying to diminish their presence, remember?

[–]the_bartthe 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

then why did you say?

Just a slight diminishment.

you could at least attempt to keep your story/argument straight

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

In terms of overall police presence at Pride, that is a slight diminishment.

[–]the_bartthe [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

I'm pretty sure all BLM demanded re: police was that Pride not have police parade-floats, or officers marching in a way that represents themselves as officers.

so it's fine as long as they don't flaunt their flamboyant "lifestyle choice" in public as it may offend some people? hmm wonder where i've heard that before...

[–]ur_a_idietThe Bridle Path [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

Huh? "Police Officer" is a job, not a "lifestyle choice."

[–]ryaba 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thankfully there's good people in r/toronto to engage and bait them all!

[–]Antinephalist 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is that really contributing? Or are you attempting to shut down discussion?

[–]the_bartthe [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

or are they projecting their beliefs/actions onto the whole subreddit?

[–][削除されました]  (6子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]PurplebuzzParkdale[M] -5ポイント-4ポイント  (1子コメント)

    RULE 3 warning.

    [–]Hongxiquan -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    oh I see, I wasn't calling him a troll, I was trying to troll, but I didn't have anything to say, so I just said troll.

    [–]blackbeatsblueLittle Japan[M] -10ポイント-9ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Pardon, just to be clear, are you calling /u/ur_a_idiet a troll? I don't really get the point of your comment, but that would be against rule 3.

    [–]Hongxiquan 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    no, I'm not calling him a troll, I am concern trolling, by saying the word troll. Sorry yah that was low effort content.

    [–]blackbeatsblueLittle Japan 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    No worries ... it was just wasn't clear.

    [–]Hongxiquan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    yeah sorry about that, I was trying to keep the timing right but I couldn't figure how to do the south park "rabble, rabble, rabble" with the word "troll" quick enough