Here is a post censored on DE. Draw your own conclusions as to why.
This is actually a very good article, because the author spends a good deal of time discussing a little known aspect of the war: Franco using Muslim Moroccans as soldiers against his fellow Spanish countrymen.
The Moroccans played a vita role in the initial phase of the war: the Nationalists would have been unable to continue their attack in Spain without Moroccans troops flown over from the protectorate. The motives of the volunteers were manifold: some were attracted by the soldier's pay, some hated Communism, some believed in the promises of independence, and more skeptical ones thought that they would receive some combat experience for a future war of independence. Others wanted only a chance to kill Spaniards, no matter what political stance these represented.
Moroccan troops, "los moros," quickly got a bad reputation. It was said that they systematically raped Republican women and tortured prisoners of war. In battle they used to castrate their fallen enemies, and when pictures of mutilated corpses spread to foreign newspapers, the nationalist Colonel Juan Yagüe officially banned the habit among his Moroccan troops.
Propaganda art by Helios Gómez depicting rape of a Republican woman by Moroccan troops. Republican propaganda made the most of the real and imaginary atrocities of "the Moors." In propaganda posters Moroccans were depicted as grinning, thick-lipped turbanheads, who harassed white women and pierced children with their bayonets. Republican journalists and authors wrote of "brutal Africans with knives in their teeth," and accused Franco of bringing "African savages to a European civil war." The Left of the 1930's clearly didn't embrace the current type of political correctness.
If one thinks about it for awhile, it certainly looks like the roles commonly attributed to fascists and communists could be reversed. Here we have fascists using non-European Muslims to slaughter their fellow Europeans, while the communists were supporting Europeans against a darky Muslim horde. This also could work for the Nazis; they were trying to make the rest of Europe their slaves, and the only non-Europeans they attacked was during the North African Campaign. Here though, there is still a question of whether or not Middle Easterners and North Africans are part of the Caucasoid race. The "American" government certainly considers them part of the white race for census purposes, and has for a very long time considered them as such. It is this ideological question that forms the backbone of asking whether or not ancient Egyptians were white or black, a question that 19th century "American" anthropology took up with zest, even before the Civil War.
That this question is actually ideologically very important to the powers that be in "America" is left unstated. It is up to 'normies' to figure it out on their own, and then to deduce how the "America" government actually thinks about Europeans and "white" people. The "American" government actually wants a certain segment of their Left-thinking inclined population to believe it represents the interests of the masses of the White Nation, but this is becoming clearer and clearer not to be the case. It also has no problem letting the rest of the world be ambiguous on the question, because they are signaling to the rest of the world North Africa and the Middle East belong to them. Why? They're hoping to convince other governments they are representing the interests of the Caucasoid race with their interference in the Muslim world, which is of course, a stupid lie.
And their greatest weapon in this fight is the Salafi ideology. Make no mistake, all these Islamo-fanatics are on the payroll of "America," much like the Moroccans were on the payroll of Franco. One could say, the struggle between the Russians and "Americans" in Afghanistan made the Russians lose the war over who is going to represent the Caucasoid race. The Sand-Whites chose, and they chose "America," because "America" would go along with their religious ideology and their Bacha bazi boy raping ways. Instead, Gorbachev made a play to the Europeans with the line of the Common European Home the Russians came up with in the 80s, which like most things in communism, was a spectacular failure.
What we are seeing now is the final push for Arab integration into the "American" Empire. "America" wants to turn Arabs into "white" people. And "America" will use the 'Sand-Whites' as an ideological battering ram against Europe. The moment for a political awakening is now, because Europeans have no future, unless they decisively turn against that abomination known as "America," and turn toward support of Arab Nationalism against the Islamo-puppets of "America" and Zionism.
[–]robertocommendez0202National-Militarism 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]user987398[S] 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]omnialcatrazNihilistic National Socialist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]robertocommendez0202National-Militarism 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]UyhAEqbnp"in the platonist tradition" 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]robertocommendez0202National-Militarism 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SmallSubBot 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]zalseonTrinitarian Fascist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheHunnicWhaleHungarian Clerical Fascist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]kurt292BArgentinean Nationalist 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thezerechСлава Україна! (Integral-Bonapartist) 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]omnialcatrazNihilistic National Socialist 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]user987398[S] 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]omnialcatrazNihilistic National Socialist 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)