全 72 件のコメント

[–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Didn't we just have a thread over a study that said the docility of men was evolutionary because we are inherently less civilized?

I've got my problems with women too, but I don't think men are perfect. It's people that are the problem.

Also, if we had non selective women giving babies to whoever wanted them, there would be more incels and ugly people.

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Also, if we had non selective women giving babies to whoever wanted them, there would be more incels and ugly people.

They would have to at least have a job in order to buy a sexbot and an artificial womb, so I don't think complete losers would get to reproduce.

[–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

It could be worked around, but the bottom line is that we don't want romantic companionship from robots.

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

But have you watched the movie Stepford Wives? With so advances sexbots, the men would forget they're robots!

[–]GroovyEFSPurple Lamborghini [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You can't do acid with robots so how am I meant to have a relationship with em?

[–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Yeah, those were the bad guys though. And not like the romanticized psychopathic protagonist kind of thing. Everybody hates them and nobody wants to be like them.

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

They were the bad guys because they were killing their wives. Now no murder needs to happen, women will cease to exist on their own.

[–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Passive genocide doesn't really jive with me either.

[–]OfSpock [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Men only achieve things through competition. Take away the competition and watch men slack off because men are lazy by nature. Men will get fat and complacent while the robot wives do all the work. I would guess only half of men will have children without society pressuring them to do so. Either that or a lot of them will barely recognise the children they have because the bot will take care of them. Lets hope the mother part of the sex bot is well programmed.

[–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I have all or nothing motivation and I'm female. I'm either 0% into it or 100% into it. I'm tired of society expecting me to be a certain way because of my genitals. I need an extrinsic cause like danger or having a compulsion to get something done or an ideal or cause I'm internally representing. I'm extremely reactive.

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Men want to spread their genes, they just don't want to raise the kids. I bet most men would have kids if artificial wombs were available.

[–]OfSpock [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Why, though?

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Because men want to spread their genes, it feels like an accomplishment to them. Haven't you seen some RPillers who dream of leaving someone pregnant and having a beta guy raise their kid?

[–]ABCYZSpoiled Princess [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, a woman, not a fake womb.

[–]OfSpock [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

But since it will be the bot baking and rising the child, there's no sense of accomplishment.

[–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It would still be his genes.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModeratorPurple Pill Machine...literally[M] [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    Attention!

    • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

    • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

    • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

    • OP you can choose your own flair, just press Flair under your post!

    Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]future_space_boobs [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    REEEEEEEEEEEEE

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    What? This is discussing something different. Whether female nature is bad for civilization or not. The other thread was focusing on sexbots, this one is about female nature.

    [–]future_space_boobs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yes I know what it is, I also know you're way too far down an internet rabbit hole. You should close your computer and get some fresh air-- I mean that sincerely

    [–]GroovyEFSPurple Lamborghini [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Oops. I had forgotten that thread from one year ago.

    [–]GroovyEFSPurple Lamborghini [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I forget nothing.

    (Shit, maybe I'm a robot.)

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Who were you from one year ago? I don't remember you.

    [–]GroovyEFSPurple Lamborghini [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I had like a billion alts. Mostly Xanax references.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

    How far are sex bots from actual production?

    Still another decade or two before they will be good enough to actually compete with women.

    Women will get sex bots too... Think about that... (and cleaning, cooking bots too)

    VR porn and hands free masterbation aids is much closer than sex bots... And will be more disruptive than sex bots, in my opinion.

    Artificial wombs are pie in the sky and not even viable tech at the moment. It won't happen in our life times. Even though the research sounds promising.

    And it won't matter because the damage to society, the family unit and relationships will already be irreversible, by that time.

    The Stepford Wives type of sex bot come domestic servant is not needed nor even efficient.

    A dedicated sex bot and a separate dedicated cleaning bot and another seperate dedicated cooking bot will be a better option.

    And women will welcome the other types of bots with glee... they did for the washing machine, etc. But who will give women money to spend?

    The only thing bots won't be able to do is create new things, invent, innovate, code, etc. Something men are really good at.

    I really don't get why some feminist are upset by the idea of sex bots...

    More men using sex bots (and happy with it when they get good enough) mean less sexual harrassment, sexual assault and rape. And less fugly guys trying their luck.

    I thought feminsts want change. Strange, that they now oppose progress that will drastically reduce men wanting to sexually interact with women.

    [–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    In that society I'd be a hardcore career women just to prove people wrong. Currently, society hasn't regressed enough to the point I absolutely have to prove the world wrong but I know it will. Any questions?

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    You go girrrrl....

    Have fun working yourself to death for corporations, slave.

    [–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Double standard lol. When men do it it's empowering and status building and planning for the future to have more money for things for retirement... but when women do it it's working themselves to death as a slave. Explain the difference. I believe in working smart, not hard. Work with max efficiency and use the rest of the time to daydream while looking busy.

    Oh and I'd plan to start my own business after I gain enough. It's not about that for me. It's about proving a point, also about people who aren't "normal" or NT. Also about gaining so many resources I can solve almost anything in my path. Then become a role model for neurodiversity.......

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    It's no double standard. Male corporate slaves are corporate slaves too. I don't understand why feminists wanted to join in on that. Granted, I really hate capitalism.

    [–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I see it as a means to an end. I want to make enough money so that I can solve problems that come in my path that others can't. I also wanna isolate myself from the worst elements of society.

    If I didn't have multiple points to prove or the motivation where I have to have all these needs met, I wouldn't really care as much. It would also be a way of getting money faster.

    I also see it as a means to an ends of starting my own business or company. That way I don't have to conform to their standards. Sure I want things to be different like I want a guaranteed wage and more unions and also a less conformist workplace but they aren't going to be so I might as well do whatever it takes to insulate myself until society changes in the way I want it to.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    It is no double standard.

    Women, generally, are the perfect corporate slaves. And that is exactly what most women do... when they discribe themselves as "career" women... become corperate slaves.

    That you have a plan and are executing it makes you an exception, not the rule. Even amoung men. I did assume that you were just like 95% of the other corperate slaves... my bad.

    Women have other options available to them that men don't and use them often.

    Many men are corporate slaves too.

    I don't envy corporate slaves of either gender.

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    Some feminists believe artificial wombs will liberate women.

    I don't think women would survive for long on their own, they would likely cease to exist. However, I don't see it as that big of a deal. Women are not useful and only seem to cause problems since the beginning of time.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

    I agree with them. Artificial wombs will liberate women, pity the tech is so far away.

    It will liberate men even more. It will liberate women so much they won't be needed at all.

    Men need four things to become totally independent from women.

    1) Artificial wombs. (And human egg cells that can be artificially created)

    2) Great sex bots.

    3)100% Effective reversable Male contraceptives.

    4) Women to pay for their own shit. And not having mens taxes spent on women by the government.

    Male contraceptives are coming in 2018/2019.

    VR Porn with male masterbation aids in the next 5 years. (Not sex bots but close enough and good enough for now.)

    Artificial wombs and artificial egg cells are still way off unfortunately.

    Men not paying hidden bachelor taxes to support women through government hangouts, welfare, special womens organizations and no divorce payments, alimony or child support for children that men did not agree to have before hand.

    That is still a very long way off.

    [–]LittleWindowpane [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Interesting. Radical feminist Shulamith Firestone thought the same way. Horseshoe theory at its finest.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Sorry, I don't know of her.

    What was her conclusion? Was she for or against men getting these four things?

    [–]LittleWindowpane [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    She believed women were oppressed by their biology. She was for artificial wombs and male birth control.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Nevermind. I looked her up.

    She believes that the solutions are political in nature... with a lot of political theory.

    I don't. In politics, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

    Politics will not change any of this... Technology is far more likely to cause change. And has a proven track record of doing exactly that.

    All the politics, laws for the benifit of women, and women are still unhappy and want more. Politics has not improved anything for women (if feminist are to be believed).

    I don't see more politics and laws to benifit women making any difference now either. Technology is far more likely to cause change.

    [–]LittleWindowpane [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    There are matriarchal societies, like the Minangkabau, where rape is pretty much unknown. Rapists are executed there, which is a decent deterrent...Still, it seems at least decent.

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Okay. But how successful is this matriachal society?

    They are so sucessful that they are a superpower in... economics? Growth? Technology? Top 10 in education?

    Do you get my point? They are irrelevant to the global sceme of reality.

    What has this got to do with the topic at hand? Sex bots? Have they made any?

    [–]Atlas_B_ShrugginBitch, I'm in the 215 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Why will men continue to have a civilization that caters to women at all if they don't need them for sex love or babies anymore? Even if they don't just kill all the women outright, do you think there's still be a feminism forcing women into the world of work and caring about feeding and housing women if men don't need women anymore?

    [–]SunnyFoxesRed for life, love & sex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The female egg. Only women have them.

    Why would men expand the necessary energy to kill women when they would just die out on their own?

    Men would not even bother to harm a woman if these things occur. There is absolutely no motivation for it.

    Live and let live. As long as I am not paying for it.

    I don't get where you are coming from or even going to with this line of thinking.

    [–]arreayxn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Oh boy a being who never disagrees! I'm just gonna go play tennis with my chair. For real though I would love an artificial womb, who even wants to give birth? Imagine all the jars I'd never have to open if I just got an unthinking robot to do it for me. I mean I'll be dead by the time we even come close but the thought is just so exciting.

    [–]Princeso_BubblegumFem Pill [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Which is why we have been so successful now that we have masculized women, duh. Either sex's "inherent nature" is kind of fucked up. Go for full androgynous society.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The masculization of women is predominately in the USA which is a failing capitalist shithole full of famous murderers, false advertisements, and people living shitty lives under control of corporations.

    [–]Sunhappy_DCINTJ juju [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    ALL human nature unchecked is problematic for civilization.

    [–]despisedlove2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Traditional marriage kept the worst excesses of female and male natures under check.

    See this interesting video: https://youtu.be/UxpVwBzFAkw.

    [–]DebatePonyLet's ride! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    No, female nature is not bad for society. Also...

    Artificial womb or not, where is the other half of the DNA coming from? Or would it be like an exact copy of the males DNA?

    Exact copy: halting evolution and would lead to the downfall of the literal man kind.

    Those who continued to breed with women (or women who took sperm from a bank) would continue to evolve due to genetic diversity and would continue on humankind.

    [–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (23子コメント)

    I don't care about "averages", I don't want to be punished due to someone's conception of averages. In my experience, I've been a lot more innovative and creative than a lot of men. I know how to research things too. I don't care if most males prefer Stepford wives. I don't care if most males want me. I want to outright repel any man who would want a Stepford wife. People think I don't know this and one insulted me by saying most men wouldn't have me because of the way I acted. I completely know this. It's deliberate and it weeds people out.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

    You don't really think most men want a robot wife, do you?

    [–]despisedlove2 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I wouldn't mind one. At least, I would be able to relax around her without expecting a knife in my back at the first sign of weakness.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    If you don't think a robot will turn on you at the perfectly computer calculated moment then you're insane.

    [–]questioningwomanNo piller [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    I do think a lot of them want robot wives. That's why I see weeding out as so important. So if I do things that weed out those men, I'm doing something right. The same with friendship or your own personal allies if you know how to look. I like weeding people out from the start. People chalk it up to luck but for me it's deliberate planning and persistence. I'm obsessive until I get whatever I want or need and my plans always change according to circumstances. Unlike a lot of women, I'm not very socially motivated. I don't get intrinsic reward from being around someone if they want me to change too much. Sometimes things that look like incompetence on my end are because I want things to deliberately go one way or another.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    We don't want romance with robots and, food for thought, we tend to weed out women that think all men want robot companions rather than women.

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

    What's wrong with men wanting a robot companion? I personalyl don't see it as an insult to the men. I totally understand.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    So you would date/marry a robot man?

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    That is different. Women wouldn't be able to be attracted to a man/robot they can control, while the men would probably be happier with it.

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    Good point. I can see where you're coming from now.

    Do you think the ability to program a robot will be even .001% as satisfying as my hard earned leadership of my human wife? Even though I'll never have full control and I sometimes lose control, it's earned and that means something. Only Omegas, the types that essentially do marry created characters, will be happy with the meaningless companionship of a robot. And that's only because they've completely given up.

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Wouldn't you prefer someone who is completely docile and agreeable and loyal so you wouldn't have to worry at all?

    [–]Delete_December_23rdConsiderate Nihilist [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    You say "someone" as if a robot is someone. I wouldn't have anything to worry about at all in my relationship because I wouldn't have a relationship. I'd have a fucking robot.

    [–]ThatGreekLadyNon-Red Pill,anti-romantic[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Good, do you want to have a boyfriend or do you prefer to be single?

    I used to prefer being single, not for your reasons but because I can't enjoy sex, but now I'm thinking of starting to date again and try to see if I can make myself like sex. I have a date with a guy that seems interesting this week.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [deleted]

      [–]theiamsamurai [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Attraction is not a choice. Have you actually changed anything as far as diet/exercise? If you take testosterone supplements and work out a lot, then your experiment might be worthwhile, but otherwise, I'm not sure. Btw, your flair says you're anti-romantic, and you're anti-woman nature. Are you pro-romantic when it comes to gay relationships, because they have the highest rates of sex and lowest break-up rates?